<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Burst_suppression</id>
	<title>Burst suppression - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Burst_suppression"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-08T20:32:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;diff=303755&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>62.220.2.102: &quot;in during&quot; -&gt; during</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;diff=303755&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-07-16T15:02:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;in during&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; during&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;amp;diff=303755&amp;amp;oldid=30227&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>62.220.2.102</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;diff=30227&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Monkbot: Fix CS1 deprecated date parameter errors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Burst_suppression&amp;diff=30227&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-01-15T16:40:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Fix &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Help:CS1_errors&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Help:CS1 errors (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;CS1 deprecated date parameter errors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Callier effect&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the variation in [[Sharpness (visual)|sharpness]] and [[Contrast (vision)|contrast]] of images produced by a [[photographic film]] with different manners of [[Light|illumination]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The directed [[Bright-field microscopy|bright-field]] (see [[Callier Effect#Figure 1|Fig. 1]]) has extremely strong directional characteristics by means of a point source and an optical system ([[Condenser (optics)|condenser]]); in this case, each point of the photographic film receives light from only one direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Figure 1}}[[File:Condensed-bright-field-setup.pdf|thumb|Figure 1. Directed bright-field]]&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, in a diffused [[Bright-field microscopy|bright-field]] setup (see [[Callier Effect#Figure 2|Fig. 2]]) the illumination of the film is provided through a translucent slab ([[Diffuser (optics)|diffuser]]), and each point of the film receives light from all the directions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Figure 2}}[[File:Diffused-bright-field.pdf|thumb|Figure 2. Diffused-bright-field]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[collimation]] of the illumination plays a fundamental role in [[Sharpness (visual)|sharpness]] and [[Contrast (vision)|contrast]] of the image impressed on a [[photographic film|film]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;C. Tuttle. 1926. The relationship between diffuse and specular density. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 12, 6 (1926), 559–565.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The light [[Light scattering by particles|scattered]] by the image particles has specific directional characteristics, which are revealed by the directional characteristics of the illumination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case of high scattering fraction, the [[Absorbance|attenuance]] provided by the image particles changes considerably with the degree of [[collimation]] of the illumination. In [[Callier Effect#Figure 3|Figure 3]] the same silver-based film is reproduced in directed and diffused bright-field setups. The image on the left is much ‘crisper’ and the [[film grain]] is emphasized together with dust and scratches; the image on the right appears ‘softer’ and the details are smoothed. The global contrast also changes: the contrast on the left is much stronger than that on the right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Figure 3}}[[File:DiffVScond.pdf|thumb|Figure 3. Images of the same silver-based film acquired in directed and diffused bright-field setups]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the absence of [[Light scattering|scattering]], the [[Absorbance|attenuance]] provided by the [[Photographic emulsion|emulsion]] is independent of the [[collimation]] of the illumination; a dense point [[Absorption (electromagnetic radiation)|absorbs]] a big portion of light and a less dense point [[Absorption (electromagnetic radiation)|absorbs]] a smaller portion, irrespective of the directional characteristics of the incident light. In [[Callier Effect#Figure 4|Figure 4]] are reported the images of a dye-based film acquired in directed and diffused bright-field setups; with regard to dust and other imperfections that entail scattering, the image on the left is sharper, but the global contrast of the two images is about the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Figure 4}}[[File:DiffVScond-color-eps-converted-to.pdf|thumb|Figure 4. Images of the same dye-based film acquired in directed and diffused bright-field setups]]&lt;br /&gt;
The ratio between the attenuances provided by a specific point of a photographic film, which were measured in directed (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dir&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) and diffused (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dif&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) bright-fields, is termed the Callier &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;#039;&amp;#039; factor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=\frac{{D_{dir}}}{{D_{{dif}}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Callier &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;#039;&amp;#039; factor is always equal to or greater than unity; its trend versus the diffusely measured density &amp;#039;&amp;#039;D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;dif&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is depicted in [[Callier Effect#Figure 5|Figure 5]] for a typical silver-based film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. G. Streiffert. 1947. Callier Q of various motion picture emulsions. J. Soc. Mot. Pict. Engrs. 49, 6 (December 1947), 506–522.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Figure 5}}[[File:Qfactor-CC.jpg|thumb|Figure 5: Callier Q factorversus diffuse density for a silver-based film.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On the local scale of the small image details, the direct effect of the Q factor is the variation in sharpness of the images produced illuminating with different light collimation; on the global scale of the entire image, the equivalent effect is the variation in contrast. These variations (for example with a condenser or a diffuser [[enlarger]]) were observed over a long period of time,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Callier. 1909. Absorption and scatter of light by photographic negatives. J. Phot. 33 (1909).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and they became known as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;‘Callier effect’&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Photography]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Monkbot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>