<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Complete_topological_space</id>
	<title>Complete topological space - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Complete_topological_space"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Complete_topological_space&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-03T03:24:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Complete_topological_space&amp;diff=16607&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Jaan Vajakas at 21:23, 22 May 2013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Complete_topological_space&amp;diff=16607&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T21:23:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[mathematics]], the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a significant non-linear [[Operation (mathematics)|operator]] used in [[real analysis]] and [[harmonic analysis]]. It takes a [[locally integrable]] function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; : &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and returns another function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that, at each point &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ∈ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, gives the maximum [[average|average value]] that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; can have on balls centered at that point. More precisely,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Mf(x)=\sup_{r&amp;gt;0} \frac{1}{|B(x, r)|}\int_{B(x, r)} |f(y)|\, dy &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)  is the ball of radius &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039; centred at &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;E&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| denotes the [[Lebesgue measure|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-dimensional Lebesgue measure]] of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;E&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ⊂ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The averages are jointly [[Continuous function|continuous]] in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, therefore the maximal function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, being the supremum over &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;0, is [[Measurable function|measurable]]. It is not obvious that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is finite almost everywhere. This is a corollary of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality==&lt;br /&gt;
This theorem of [[G. H. Hardy]] and [[J. E. Littlewood]] states that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;M&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is [[bounded operator|bounded]] as a [[sublinear operator]] from the [[Lp space|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)]] to itself for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;gt; 1. That is, if &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ∈ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) then the maximal function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is weak &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-bounded and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ∈ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;). Before stating the theorem more precisely, for simplicity, let {&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;} denote the set {&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; | &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) &amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}. Now we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Theorem (Weak Type Estimate).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;≥&amp;amp;nbsp;1 and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;∈&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), there is a constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;0 such that for all λ&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;0, we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left |\{Mf &amp;gt; \lambda\} \right |&amp;lt; \frac{C_d}{\lambda} \Vert f\Vert_{L^1 (\mathbf{R}^d)}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality in hand, the following &amp;#039;&amp;#039;strong-type&amp;#039;&amp;#039; estimate is an immediate consequence of the [[Marcinkiewicz theorem|Marcinkiewicz interpolation theorem]]: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Theorem (Strong Type Estimate).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;≥&amp;amp;nbsp;1, 1&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;≤&amp;amp;nbsp;∞, and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;∈&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;),&lt;br /&gt;
there is a constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;0 such that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Vert Mf\Vert_{L^p (\mathbf{R}^d)}\leq C_{p,d}\Vert f\Vert_{L^p(\mathbf{R}^d)}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the strong type estimate the best bounds for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are unknown.&amp;lt;ref name=Tao/&amp;gt; However subsequently [[Elias M. Stein]] used the Calderón-Zygmund method of rotations to prove the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Theorem (Dimension Independence).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For 1&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;≤&amp;amp;nbsp;∞ one can pick &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; independent of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&amp;lt;ref name=Tao&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Tao|first=Terence|title=Stein’s spherical maximal theorem|url=http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/steins-spherical-maximal-theorem/|work=What&amp;#039;s New|accessdate=22 May 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Stein82&amp;gt;{{cite journal|last=Stein|first=E. M.|title=The development of square functions in the work of A. Zygmund.|journal=Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society  New Series|date=S 1982|volume=7|issue=2|pages=359–376}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proof==&lt;br /&gt;
While there are several proofs of this theorem, a common one is given below: For &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;∞, the inequality is trivial (since the average of a function is no larger than its [[essential supremum]]). For 1&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;∞, first we shall use the following version of the [[Vitali covering lemma]] to prove the weak-type estimate. (See the article for the proof of the lemma.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Lemma.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Let &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; be a separable metric space and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; family of open balls with bounded diameter. Then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{F}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a countable subfamily &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{F}&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; consisting of disjoint balls such that&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bigcup_{B \in \mathcal{F}} B \subset \bigcup_{B \in \mathcal{F&amp;#039;}} 5B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where 5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with 5 times radius.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) &amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, then, by definition, we can find a ball &amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; centered at &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; such that&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\int_{B_x} |f|dy &amp;gt; t|B_x|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By the lemma, we can find, among such balls, a sequence of disjoint balls &amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;j&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; such that the union of 5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;j&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; covers {&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mf&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;}.&lt;br /&gt;
It follows:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\{Mf &amp;gt; t\}| \le 5^d \sum_j |B_j| \le {5^d \over t} \int |f|dy.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This completes the proof of the weak-type estimate. We next deduce from this the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; bounds. Define &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) if |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)| &amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/2 and 0 otherwise. By the weak-type estimate applied to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, we have:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|\{Mf &amp;gt; t\}| \le {2C \over t} \int_{|f| &amp;gt; \frac{t}{2}} |f|dx, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = 5&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Then&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|Mf\|_p^p = \int \int_0^{Mf(x)} pt^{p-1} dt dx = p \int_0^\infty t^{p-1} |\{ Mf &amp;gt; t \}|  dt&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By the estimate above we have:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|Mf\|_p^p \leq  p \int_0^\infty t^{p-1} \left ({2C \over t} \int_{|f| &amp;gt; \frac{t}{2}} |f|dx \right ) dt = 2C p \int_0^\infty \int_{|f| &amp;gt; \frac{t}{2}} t^{p-2} |f| dx dt = C_p \|f\|_p^p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where the constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; depends only on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. This completes the proof of the theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
Some applications of the Hardy–Littlewood Maximal Inequality include proving the following results:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lebesgue differentiation theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rademacher&amp;#039;s theorem|Rademacher differentiation theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fatou&amp;#039;s theorem]] on nontangential convergence.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fractional integration theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we use a standard trick involving the maximal function to give a quick proof of Lebesgue differentiation theorem. (But remember that in the proof of the maximal theorem, we used the Vitali covering lemma.) Let &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ∈ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega f (x) = \limsup_{r \to 0} f_r(x) - \liminf_{r \to 0} f_r(x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f_r(x) = \frac{1}{|B(x, r)|} \int_{B(x, r)} f(y) dy.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We write &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039; where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is continuous and has compact support and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ∈ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) with norm that can be made arbitrary small. Then&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega f \le \Omega g + \Omega h = \Omega g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
by continuity. Now, Ω&amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ 2&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mg&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and so, by the theorem, we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left | \{ \Omega g &amp;gt; \varepsilon \} \right | \le \frac{2A}{\varepsilon} \|g\|_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we can let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|g\|_1 \to 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and conclude Ω&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = 0 almost everywhere; that is, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lim_{r \to 0} f_r(x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; exists for almost all &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. It remains to show the limit actually equals &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;). But this is easy: it is known that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|f_r - f\|_1 \to 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ([[approximation of the identity]]) and thus there is a subsequence &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f_{r_k} \to f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; almost everywhere. By the uniqueness of limit, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; almost everywhere then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
It is still unknown what the smallest constants &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are in the above inequalities. However, a result of [[Elias Stein]] about spherical maximal functions can be used to show that, for 1&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;∞, we can remove the dependence of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on the dimension, that is, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p,d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for some constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;0 only depending on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.  It is unknown whether there is a weak bound that is independent of dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several common variants of the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator which replace the averages over centered balls with averages over different families of sets. For instance, one can define the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;uncentered&amp;#039;&amp;#039; HL maximal operator (using the notation of Stein-Shakarchi)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f^*(x) = \sup_{x \in B_x} \frac{1}{|B_x|} \int_{B_x} |f(y)| dy&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the balls &amp;#039;&amp;#039;B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are required to merely contain x, rather than be centered at x. There is also the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;dyadic&amp;#039;&amp;#039; HL maximal operator&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_\Delta f(x) = \sup_{x \in Q_x} \frac{1}{|Q_x|} \int_{Q_x} |f(y)| dy&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ranges over all [[dyadic cubes]] containing the point &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Both of these operators satisfy the HL maximal inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John B. Garnett]], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bounded Analytic Functions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Springer-Verlag, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*Antonios D. Melas, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The best constant for the centered Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Annals of Mathematics, 157 (2003), 647–688&lt;br /&gt;
*Rami Shakarchi &amp;amp; [[Elias M. Stein]], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Princeton Lectures in Analysis III: Real Analysis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Princeton University Press, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
*Elias M. Stein, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Maximal functions: spherical means&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;73&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1976), 2174–2175&lt;br /&gt;
*Elias M. Stein, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Princeton University Press, 1971&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Teschl]], [http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-fa/index.html Topics in Real and Functional Analysis] (lecture notes)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hardy-Littlewood Maximal Function}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Real analysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Harmonic analysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Types of functions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Jaan Vajakas</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>