<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Financial_correlation</id>
	<title>Financial correlation - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Financial_correlation"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Financial_correlation&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-19T17:38:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Financial_correlation&amp;diff=27259&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Zfeinst: /* Copula correlations */</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Financial_correlation&amp;diff=27259&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-01-09T22:18:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Copula correlations&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Transformation rules}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[predicate logic]], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;existential generalization&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hurley&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Copi and Cohen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (also known as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;existential introduction&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;∃I&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) is a [[validity|valid]] [[rule of inference]] that allows one to move from a specific statement to a quantified generalized statement. In [[first-order logic]], it is often used as a rule for the [[existential quantifier]] (∃) in formal proofs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example: &amp;quot;Rover loves to wag his tail. Therefore, something loves to wag its tail.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Fitch-style calculus]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q(a) \to\ \exists{x}\, Q(x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; replaces all free instances of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; within &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;pg. 347. Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Language proof and logic&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Second Ed., CSLI Publications, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Universal instantiation]] and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Existential Generalization&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are two aspects of a single principle, for instead of saying that &amp;#039;(x)(x=x)&amp;#039; implies &amp;#039;Socrates is Socrates&amp;#039;, we could as well say that the denial &amp;#039;Socrates≠Socrates&amp;#039; implies &amp;#039;(∃x)(x≠x)&amp;#039;. The principle embodied in these two operations is the link between [[quantification]]s and the singular statements that are related to them as instances. Yet it is a principle only by courtesy. It holds only in the case where a term names and, furthermore, occurs [[Reference|referentially]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quine,W.V.O., Quintessence, Extensionalism, Reference and Modality, P366&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Existential quantification]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inference rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Existential Generalization}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rules of inference]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Predicate logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Logic-stub}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Zfeinst</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>