130.199.3.165: /* Synthesis */ Corrected improper use of "reacting"; corrected spelling of "oxime"

2013-12-12T01:54:36Z

Synthesis: Corrected improper use of "reacting"; corrected spelling of "oxime"

New page

The '''Vaught conjecture''' is a [[conjecture]] in the mathematical field of [[model theory]] originally proposed by [[Robert Lawson Vaught]] in 1961. It states that the number of countable models of a first-order complete theory in a countable language is finite or ℵ0 or 2ℵ0. Morley showed that number of countable models is finite or ℵ0 or ℵ1 or 2ℵ0, which solves the conjecture except for the case of ℵ1 models when the continuum hypothesis fails. For this remaining case, {{harvs|txt|first=Robin |last=Knight|year1=2002|year2=2007}} has announced a counterexample to the Vaught conjecture and the topological Vaught conjecture.

==Statement of the conjecture==
Let <math>T</math> be a first-order, countable, complete theory with infinite models. Let <math>I(T, \alpha)</math> denote the number of models of T of cardinality <math>\alpha</math> up to isomorphism, the [[spectrum of a theory|spectrum]] of the theory <math>T</math>. Morley proved that if I(T,ℵ0) is infinite then it must be ℵ0 or ℵ1 or the cardinality of the continuum. The Vaught conjecture is the statement that it is not possible for <math>\aleph_{0} < I(T,\aleph_{0}) < 2^{\aleph_{0}}</math>. The conjecture is a trivial consequence of the [[continuum hypothesis]]; so this axiom is often excluded in work on the conjecture. Alternatively there is a sharper form of the conjecture which states that any countable complete T with uncountably many countable models will have a perfect set of uncountable models (as pointed out by John Steel, in On Vaught's conjecture. Cabal Seminar 76—77 (Proc. Caltech-UCLA Logic Sem., 1976—77), pp. 193–208, Lecture Notes in Math., 689, Springer, Berlin, 1978, this form of the Vaught conjecture is equiprovable with the original).

==Vaught's theorem==

Vaught proved that the number of countable models of a complete theory cannot be 2. It can be any finite number other than 2, for example:
*Any complete theory with a finite model has no countable models.
*The theories with just one countable model are the [[Omega-categorical theory|ω-categorical theories]]. There are many examples of these, such as the theory of an infinite set.
*[[Andrzej Ehrenfeucht|Ehrenfeucht]] gave the following example of a theory with 3 countable models: the language has a relation ≥ and a countable number of constants ''c''0, ''c''1, ...with axioms stating that ≥ is a dense unbounded total order, and ''c''0< ''c''1<''c''2... The three models differ according to whether this sequence is unbounded, or converges, or is bounded but does not converge.
*Ehrenfeucht's example can be modified to give a theory with any finite number ''n''≥3 of model by adding ''n''−2 unary relations ''P''''i'' to the language, with axioms stating that for every ''x'' exactly one of the ''P''''i'' is true, the values of ''y'' for which ''P''''i''(''y'') is true are dense, and ''P''1 is true for all ''c''''i''. Then the models for which the sequence of elements ''c''''i'' converge to a limit ''c'' split into ''n''−2 cases depending on for which ''i'' the relation ''P''''i''(''c'') is true.

The idea of the proof of Vaught's theorem is as follows. If there are at most countably many countable models, then there is a smallest one: the [[atomic model (mathematical logic)|atomic model]], and a largest one, the [[saturated model]], which are different if there is more than one model. If they are different, the saturated model must realize some ''n''-type omitted by the atomic model. Then one can show that an atomic model of the theory of structures realizing this ''n''-type (in a language expanded by finitely many constants) is a third model, not isomorphic to either the atomic or the saturated model. In the example above with 3 models, the atomic model is the one where the sequence is unbounded, the saturated model is the one where the sequence does not converge, and an example of a type not realized by the atomic model is an element greater than all elements of the sequence.

==Topological Vaught conjecture==

The topological Vaught conjecture is the statement that whenever a Polish group acts continuously on a Polish space, there are either countably many orbits or continuum many orbits. The topological Vaught conjecture is more general than the original Vaught conjecture: Given a countable language we can form the space of all structures on the natural numbers for that language. If we equip this with the topology generated by first order formulas, then it is known from [[Andrzej Grzegorczyk|A. Gregorczyk]], A. Mostowski, C. Ryll-Nardzewski, "Definability of sets of models of axiomatic theories", Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences (series Mathematics, Astronomy, Physics), vol. 9(1961), pp. 163–7 that the resulting space is Polish. There is a continuous action of the infinite symmetric group (the collection of all permutations of the natural numbers with the topology of point wise convergence) which gives rise to the equivalence relation of isomorphism. Given a complete first order theory T, the set of structures satisfying T is a minimal, closed invariant set, and hence Polish in its own right.

==References==
*{{citation|last=Knight|first=R. W.|title=The Vaught Conjecture: A Counterexample|publisher= manuscript|year= 2002 |url=http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/~knight/stuff/example.ps}}
*{{Citation | last1=Knight | first1=R. W. | title=Categories of topological spaces and scattered theories | doi=10.1305/ndjfl/1172787545 | mr=2289897 | year=2007 | journal=Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic | issn=0029-4527 | volume=48 | issue=1 | pages=53–77}}
* R. Vaught, "Denumerable models of complete theories", Infinitistic Methods (Proc. Symp. Foundations Math., Warsaw, 1959) Warsaw/Pergamon Press (1961) pp. 303–321
* [[Leo Harrington|L. Harrington]], [[Michael Makkai|M. Makkai]], [[Saharon Shelah|S. Shelah]]: A proof of Vaught's conjecture for ω-stable theories, ''Israel J. Math.'', '''49'''(1984), 259–280.
* {{citation | last=Marker | first=David | title=Model theory: An introduction | series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics | volume=217 | location=New York, NY | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=2002 | isbn=0-387-98760-6 | zbl=1003.03034 }}

==See also==
* [[Spectrum of a theory]]
* [[Morley's categoricity theorem]]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Vaught Conjecture}}
[[Category:Conjectures]]
[[Category:Model theory]]

Methomyl - Revision history

130.199.3.165: /* Synthesis */ Corrected improper use of "reacting"; corrected spelling of "oxime"