Stochastic oscillator: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m fix % bug in <math> use \% to avoid parse errors
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Frontogenesis''' is a meteorological process of tightening of horizontal temperature gradients to produce [[weather front|fronts]]. In the end, two types of fronts form: [[cold front]]s and [[warm front]]s. A cold front is a narrow line where temperature decreases rapidly. A warm front is a narrow line of warmer temperatures and essentially where much of the precipitation occurs. Frontogenesis occurs as a result of a developing [[baroclinic]] wave. According to Hoskins & Bretherton (1972, p.&nbsp;11), there are eight mechanisms that influence temperature gradients: horizontal [[Deformation (meteorology)|deformation]], horizontal [[Wind shear|shearing]], vertical deformation, differential vertical motion, latent heat release, surface friction, turbulence and mixing, and radiation. Semigeostrophic frontogenesis theory focuses on the role of horizontal deformation and shear.
I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Andrew and my spouse doesn't like it at all. Mississippi is the only location I've been residing in but I will have to move in a year or two. To climb is some thing she would by no means give up. Distributing manufacturing has been his occupation for some time.<br><br>Check out my blog post; online psychic, [http://www.skullrocker.com/blogs/post/10991 www.skullrocker.com],
 
==Kinematics==
 
Horizontal deformation in [[Extratropical cyclone|mid-latitude cyclones]] concentrates temperature gradients—cold air from the north and warm air from the south. Horizontal shear has two effects on an air parcel; it tends to rotate the parcel (think of placing a wheel at a point in space and as the wind blows, the wheel rotates) and deform the parcel through stretching and shrinking. In the end, this can also tighten temperature gradient, but most importantly, this rotates a concentrated temperature gradient for example, from the x-axis to the y direction. Within a mid-latitude cyclone, these two key features play an essential role in frontogenesis. On the west side of a typical mid-latitude cyclone, there are northerly winds (associated with cold air) and east of the cyclone, southerly winds (associated with warm air); resulting in horizontal shear deformation. In the end, this results to concentrate a cyclonic shear along a line of maximum shear (which in this case is the birth of a cold front). On the eastern side of a cyclone, horizontal deformation is seen which turns into confluence (a result of translation + deformation). Horizontal deformation at low levels is an important mechanism for the development of both cold and warm fronts (Holton, 2004).
 
==Elements of Frontogenesis==
 
The horizontal shear and horizontal deformation direct to concentrate the pole-equator temperature gradient over a large synoptic scale (1000&nbsp;km). The quasi-geostrophic equations fail in the dynamics of frontogenesis because this weather phenomenon is of smaller scale compared to the [[Rossby radius of deformation|Rossby radius]]; so semigeostrophic theory is used. Generally, [[Rossby number]]—ratio of inertial to coriolis terms—is used to formulate a condition of geostrophic flow. Across the front,  the Rossby number is on the order of udu/dx/fv = (10&nbsp;m/s)^2/(1000&nbsp;km)/(1e-4 s-1)/(1&nbsp;m/s) = 1; this shows we cannot ignore the inertial term (one must take into account the ageostrophic wind). Along the front, the Rossby number is on the order of udv/dx/fu = (10&nbsp;m/s)/(1000&nbsp;km)*(1e-4 s-1)*(10&nbsp;m/s) = 0.01, which means it is in geostrophic and thermal wind balance. Finally, looking at a cross section (y-z) through the confluent flow, using Q-vectors (Q pointing toward upward motion), on the warm side (bottom of confluent schematic), there is upward motion and on the other hand, the cold side (top of confluent schematic), there is downward motion.The cross-section points out convergence (arrows pointing towards each other) associated with tightening of horizontal temperature gradient. Conversely, divergence is noticed (arrows point away from each other), associated with stretching horizontal temperature gradient. Since the strength of the ageostrophic flow is proportional to temperature gradient, the ageostrophic tightening tendencies grow rapidly after the initial geostrophic intensification.
 
==Development of the Frontogenetical Circulation==
 
During frontogenesis, the temperature gradient tightens and as a result, the [[thermal wind]] becomes imbalanced. To maintain balance, the [[geostrophic wind]] aloft and below adjust, such that regions of divergence/convergence form. [[continuity equation|Mass continuity]] would require a vertical transport of air along the cold front where there is divergence (lowered [[pressure]]). Although this circulation is described by a series of processes, they are actually occurring at the same time, observable along the front as a thermally direct circulation. There are several factors that influence the final shape and tilt of the circulation around the front, ultimately determining the type and location of clouds and precipitation. <ref name="Holt">[http://books.google.com/books?id=fhW5oDv3EPsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA277#v=onepage&q&f=false Preview Text], Holton, James R., 2004: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. Academic Press, 277 pp.</ref><ref name="Carl">[http://books.google.com/books?id=2lIVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA435&dq=Carlson,+Toby+N.,+1991:+Mid-Latitude+Weather+Systems&hl=en&ei=j7LdS6OgMITKMajZiMsH&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CEAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false Preview Text], Carlson, Toby N., 1991: Mid-Latitude Weather Systems. HarperCollins, 435 pp.</ref>
 
==3-Dimensional Equation==
The three-dimensional form of the frontogenesis equation is
 
:<math>\begin{alignat}{3} F = \frac{1}{|\nabla \theta|}\cdot \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}\left \{ \frac{1}{C_p} \left ( \frac{p_\circ}{p} \right )^\kappa \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left (\frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ] - \left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right ) \right \} \\
+ \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}\left \{ \frac{1}{C_p} \left ( \frac{p_\circ}{p} \right )^\kappa \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left (\frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ] - \left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right ) \right \} \\
+ \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}\left \{ \frac{p_\circ^\kappa}{C_p} \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \left (p^{-\kappa} \frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ] - \left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right ) \right \}\end{alignat} </math>
 
where each dimension begins with a [[diabatic]] term; in the <math>x</math> direction
 
<math>\frac{1}{C_p} \left ( \frac{p_\circ}{p} \right )^\kappa \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left (\frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ]</math>
 
in the <math>y</math> direction
 
<math>\frac{1}{C_p} \left ( \frac{p_\circ}{p} \right )^\kappa \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left (\frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ]</math>
 
and in the <math>z</math> direction
 
<math>\frac{p_\circ^\kappa}{C_p} \left [ \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \left (p^{-\kappa} \frac{dQ}{dt} \right ) \right ]</math>.
 
The equation also includes horizontal and vertical [[Deformation (meteorology)|deformation]] terms; in the <math>x</math> direction
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right )</math>
 
and in the <math>y</math> direction
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right )</math>
 
and in the vertical <math>z</math> direction
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} \right ) - \left ( \frac{\partial v}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y} \right )</math>.
 
The final terms are the tilting term and the vertical [[divergence]] term; the tilting term is represented in the three-dimensional frontogenesis equation in the <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> directions
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right )</math>
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial y} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right )</math>
 
and the vertical [[divergence]] term is present as
 
<math>-\left ( \frac{\partial w}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z} \right ) </math>
 
==See also==
*[[Frontolysis]]
 
==References==
1. Holton, J. R. (2004). An introduction to dynamic meteorology. (4 ed., Vol. 88, pp.&nbsp;269–276). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
 
2. Hoskins, B. J., & Bretherton, F. P. (1972). Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11-13.
 
3. Martin, J. E. (2006). Mid-latitude atmospheric dynamics. (1 ed., pp.&nbsp;189–194). England: Wiley.
 
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Synoptic meteorology and weather]]

Latest revision as of 09:09, 28 October 2014

I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Andrew and my spouse doesn't like it at all. Mississippi is the only location I've been residing in but I will have to move in a year or two. To climb is some thing she would by no means give up. Distributing manufacturing has been his occupation for some time.

Check out my blog post; online psychic, www.skullrocker.com,