Einstein's unsuccessful investigations: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Cogiati
No edit summary
en>ClueBot NG
m Reverting possible vandalism by 139.193.113.32 to version by JaconaFrere. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (2036876) (Bot)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{For|specific applications of Kepler's equation|Kepler's laws of planetary motion}}
Not much to tell аbout myself at all.<br>I enjoy of finally being а ρart of wmflabs.oгg.<br>Ӏ just hoρe I'm useful in one way .<br><br>Feel free to viѕit my web blog: [http://theamazingspider-man2Movie.blogspot.com/ Watch The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Full Movie]
[[File:Kepler's equation solutions.PNG|thumb|right|Kepler's equation solutions for five different eccentricities between 0 and 1]]
In [[orbital mechanics]], '''Kepler's equation''' relates various geometric properties of the orbit of a body subject to a [[central force]].  
 
It was first derived by [[Johannes Kepler]] in 1609 in Chapter 60 of his ''[[Astronomia nova]]'',<ref>{{cite book |last=Kepler |first=Johannes |year=1609 |title=[[Astronomia Nova|Astronomia Nova Aitiologētos, Seu Physica Coelestis, tradita commentariis De Motibus Stellæ Martis, Ex observationibus G. V. Tychonis Brahe]] |chapter=LX. Methodus, ex hac Physica, hoc est genuina & verissima hypothesi, extruendi utramque partem æquationis, & distantias genuinas: quorum utrumque simul per vicariam fieri hactenus non potuit. argumentum falsæ hypotheseos|language=Latin|pages=299–300|url=http://www.e-rara.ch/zut/content/pageview/162861}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Aaboe |first=Asger |year=2001 |title=Episodes from the Early History of Astronomy |publisher=Springer|pages=146–147|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=yK8Tp0izorMC&pg=PA146|isbn=9780387951362}}</ref> and in book V of his ''Epitome of Copernican Astronomy'' (1621) Kepler proposed an iterative solution to the equation.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kepler |first=Johannes |title=Epitome astronomiæ Copernicanæ usitatâ formâ Quæstionum & Responsionum conscripta, inq; VII. Libros digesta, quorum tres hi priores sunt de Doctrina Sphæricâ |year=1621|chapter=Libri V. Pars altera. |language=Latin|pages=695–696|url=http://www.e-rara.ch/zut/content/pageview/956468}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2000JHA....31..339S |title=Kepler's Iterative Solution to Kepler's Equation |first=N. M. |last=Swerdlow|journal=[[Journal for the History of Astronomy]] |volume=31 |pages=339–341 |year=2000 |bibcode=2000JHA....31..339S}}</ref> The equation has played an important role in the history of both physics and mathematics, particularly classical [[celestial mechanics]].
 
==Equation==
 
'''Kepler's equation''' is
 
{{Equation box 1
|indent =:
|equation = <math> M = E -\varepsilon \sin E </math>
|border colour = #50C878
|background colour = #ECFCF4}}
 
where ''M'' is the [[mean anomaly]], ''E'' is the [[eccentric anomaly]], and ε is the [[Eccentricity (mathematics)|eccentricity]]. Kepler's equation is a [[transcendental equation]] because [[sine]] is a [[transcendental function]], meaning it cannot be solved for ''E'' [[algebraic function|algebraically]]. [[Numerical analysis]] and [[Series (mathematics)|series]] expansions are generally required to evaluate ''E''.
 
== Alternate forms ==
 
There are several forms of Kepler's equation. Each form is associated with a specific type of orbit. The standard Kepler equation is used for elliptic orbits (0 &le; ε < 1). The hyperbolic Kepler equation is used for hyperbolic orbits (ε ≫ 1). The radial Kepler equation is used for linear (radial) orbits (ε = 1). [[Parabolic trajectory#Barker's equation|Barker's equation]] is used for parabolic orbits (ε = 1). When ε = 1, Kepler's equation is not associated with an orbit.
 
When ε = 0, the orbit is circular. Increasing ε causes the circle to flatten into an ellipse. When ε = 1, the orbit is completely flat, and it appears to be a either a segment if the orbit is closed, or a ray if the orbit is open. An infinitesimal increase to ε results in a hyperbolic orbit with a turning angle of 180 degrees, and the orbit appears to be a ray. Further increases reduce the turning angle, and as ε goes to infinity, the orbit becomes a straight line of infinite length.
 
===Hyperbolic Kepler equation===
 
The Hyperbolic Kepler equation is:
{{Equation box 1
|indent =:
|equation = <math> M = \varepsilon \sinh H - H </math>
|border colour|background colour }}
 
where ''H'' is the hyperbolic eccentric anomaly.
This equation is derived by multiplying Kepler's equation by the [[Imaginary number|square root of −1]]; ''i'' = √(−1) for [[imaginary unit]], and replacing
 
:<math> E = i H </math>
 
to obtain
 
:<math> M = i \left( E - \varepsilon \sin E \right) </math>
 
===Radial Kepler equation===
The Radial Kepler equation is:
{{Equation box 1
|indent =:
|equation = <math> t(x) = \sin^{-1}( \sqrt{ x } ) - \sqrt{ x ( 1 - x ) }  </math>
|border colour|background colour}}
 
where ''t'' is time, and ''x'' is the distance along an ''x''-axis.
This equation is derived by multiplying Kepler's equation by 1/2 making the replacement
 
:<math> E = 2 \sin^{-1}(\sqrt{ x }) </math>
 
and setting ε = 1 gives
 
:<math> t(x) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ E - \sin( E )  \right]. </math>
 
== Inverse problem ==
 
Calculating ''M'' for a given value of ''E'' is straightforward. However, solving for ''E'' when ''M'' is given can be considerably more challenging.
 
Kepler's equation can be solved for ''E'' [[analytic function|analytically]] by [[Lagrange inversion theorem|Lagrange inversion]].  The solution of Kepler's equation given by two Taylor series below.
 
Confusion over the solvability of Kepler's equation has persisted in the literature for four centuries.<ref>It is often erroneously claimed that Kepler's equation "cannot be solved analytically". http://www.jgiesen.de/kepler/kepler.html</ref><ref>Many authors make the absurd claim that it cannot be solved at all. M. V. K. Chari, Sheppard Joel Salon 2000 Technology & Engineering</ref> Kepler himself expressed doubt at the possibility of finding a general solution.
 
{{cquote|I am sufficiently satisfied that it [Kepler's equation] cannot be solved a priori, on account of the different nature of the arc and the sine.  But if I am mistaken, and any one shall point out the way to me, he will be in my eyes the great [[Apollonius of Perga|Apollonius]].|20px|20px|Johannes Kepler <ref>Kepler's Problem, by Asaph Hall  1883 Annals of Mathematics</ref>}}
 
===Inverse Kepler equation===
The inverse Kepler equation is the solution of Kepler's equation for all real values of ε:
 
: <math>
E =
\begin{cases}
 
\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty
{\frac{M^{\frac{n}{3}}}{n!}} \lim_{\theta \to 0^+} \! \Bigg(
  \frac{\mathrm{d}^{\,n-1}}{\mathrm{d}\theta^{\,n-1}} \bigg( \bigg(
  \frac{\theta}{ \sqrt[3]{\theta - \sin(\theta)} } \bigg)^{\!\!\!n} \bigg)
\Bigg)
,  & \varepsilon = 1  \\
 
\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty
{ \frac{ M^n }{ n! } }
\lim_{\theta \to 0^+} \! \Bigg(
  \frac{\mathrm{d}^{\,n-1}}{\mathrm{d}\theta^{\,n-1}}  \bigg( \Big(
  \frac{ \theta }{ \theta - \varepsilon \sin(\theta)} \Big)^{\!n} \bigg)
\Bigg)
, &  \varepsilon \ne  1
 
\end{cases}
</math>
 
Evaluating this yields:
 
: <math>
E =
\begin{cases} \displaystyle
x + \frac{1}{60} x^3 + \frac{1}{1400}x^5 + \frac{1}{25200}x^7 + \frac{43}{17248000}x^9 + \frac{ 1213}{7207200000 }x^{11} +
\frac{151439}{12713500800000 }x^{13}+ \cdots \ | \ x = ( 6 M )^\frac{1}{3}
,  & \varepsilon = 1  \\
\\
\displaystyle
  \frac{1}{1-\varepsilon} M
- \frac{\varepsilon}{( 1-\varepsilon)^4 } \frac{M^3}{3!}
+ \frac{(9 \varepsilon^2 + \varepsilon)}{(1-\varepsilon)^7 } \frac{M^5}{5!}
- \frac{(225 \varepsilon^3 + 54 \varepsilon^2 + \varepsilon ) }{(1-\varepsilon)^{10} } \frac{M^7}{7!}
+ \frac{ (11025\varepsilon^4 + 4131 \varepsilon^3 + 243 \varepsilon^2 + \varepsilon ) }{(1-\varepsilon)^{13} } \frac{M^9}{9!}+ \cdots
, &  \varepsilon \ne  1
 
\end{cases} </math>
 
These series can be reproduced in [[Mathematica]] with the InverseSeries operation.
: <code>InverseSeries[Series[M - Sin[M], {M, 0, 10}]]</code>
: <code>InverseSeries[Series[M - e Sin[M], {M, 0, 10}]]</code>
 
These functions are simple Taylor series. Taylor series representations of transcendental functions are considered to be definitions of those functions. Therefore this solution is a formal definition of the inverse Kepler equation. While this solution is the simplest in a certain mathematical sense, for values of ε near 1 the convergence is very poor, other solutions are preferable for most applications. Alternatively, Kepler's equation can be solved numerically.
 
The solution for ε ≠ 1 was discovered by [[Karl Stumpff]] in 1968,<ref>Stumpff, Karl (1968b) On The application of Lie-series to the problems of celestial mechanics, NASA Technical Note D-4460</ref> but its significance wasn't recognized.<ref>Colwell, Peter (1993), Solving Kepler's Equation Over Three Centuries, Willmann–Bell. p. 43.</ref>
 
===Inverse radial Kepler equation===
The inverse radial Kepler equation is:
: <math>
x( t ) = \sum_{n=1}^{ \infty }
\left[
\lim_{ r \to 0^+ } \left(
{\frac{ t^{ \frac{ 2 }{ 3 } n }}{ n! }}
\frac{\mathrm{d}^{\,n-1}}{\mathrm{ d } r ^{\,n-1}} \! \left(
    r^n \left( \frac{ 3 }{ 2 } \Big( \sin^{-1}( \sqrt{ r } ) - \sqrt{ r - r^2 }  \Big)
    \right)^{ \! -\frac{2}{3} n }
  \right) \right)
\right] </math>
 
Evaluating this yields:
:<math>x(t) =  p - \frac{1}{5} p^2 - \frac{3}{175}p^3
- \frac{23}{7875}p^4 - \frac{1894}{3931875}p^5 - \frac{3293}{21896875}p^6 - \frac{2418092}{62077640625}p^7 - \ \cdots \
\bigg| { p = \left( \tfrac{3}{2} t  \right)^{2/3} }  </math>
<br>
To obtain this result using [[Mathematica]]:
:<code>InverseSeries[Series[ArcSin[Sqrt[t]] - Sqrt[(1 - t) t], {t, 0, 15}]]</code>
 
==Numerical approximation of inverse problem==
For most applications, the inverse problem can be computed numerically by finding the [[Zero of a function|root]] of the function:
 
: <math>
f(E) = E - \varepsilon \sin(E) - M(t)
</math>
 
This can be done iteratively via [[Newton's method]]:
 
: <math>
E_{n+1} = E_{n} - \frac{f(E_{n})}{f'(E_{n})} =
E_{n} - \frac{ E_{n} - \varepsilon \sin(E_{n}) - M(t) }{ 1 - \varepsilon \cos(E_{n})}
</math>
 
Note that ''E'' and ''M'' are in units of radians in this computation.  This iteration is repeated until desired accuracy is obtained (e.g. when ''f''(''E'') < desired accuracy). For most elliptical orbits an initial value of ''E''<sub>0</sub> = ''M''(''t'') is sufficient. For orbits with ''ε'' > 0.8, an initial value of ''E''<sub>0</sub> = ''π'' should be used.<ref>
{{cite book
| last1 = Montenbruck
| first1 = Oliver
| last2 = Pfleger
| first2 = Thomas
| title = Astronomy on the Personal Computer
| publisher = Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
| year = 2009
| ISBN = 978-3-540-67221-0}}, pp 64–65</ref>
A similar approach can be used for the hyperbolic form of Kepler's equation. In the case of a parabolic trajectory, Barker's equation is used.
 
== See also ==
*[[Kepler's laws of planetary motion]]
*[[Kepler problem]]
*[[Kepler problem in general relativity]]
*[[Radial trajectory]]
 
== References ==
 
{{Reflist}}
 
== External links ==
{{commons category|Kepler's equation}}
* [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KeplersEquation.html Kepler's Equation at Wolfram Mathworld]
 
<!--- Categories --->
 
[[Category:Johannes Kepler]]
[[Category:Orbits]]

Latest revision as of 06:30, 21 November 2014

Not much to tell аbout myself at all.
I enjoy of finally being а ρart of wmflabs.oгg.
Ӏ just hoρe I'm useful in one way .

Feel free to viѕit my web blog: Watch The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Full Movie