|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Citations missing|date=July 2008}}
| | Choosing the right web hosting service is essential. The last thing you wish to do is get a website released with a hosting service (after learning to make use of that hosting service), then be dissatisfied with the service and need to mess around with moving your website to another hosting service.<br><br><br><br>[http://www.google.de/url?url=https://www.facebook.com/HostgatorCoupons2015&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&sa=U&ei=8LQZVdqUFMb1UMTjgYAM&ved=0CFUQFjAI&usg=AFQjCNEp3nZTl78rfepX64z4_aPFVnbyPg google.de]I'm a pleased HostGator client. I utilize both HostGator and Bluehost. I suggest both. This article is an extensive HostGator testimonial.<br><br>I'll begin with one of the most essential considerations: Cost<br><br>HostGator has numerous prices plans. They are as follows (since the date this short article was released):.<br><br>Hatchling Strategy: as low as $4.95 per month with a 3 year dedication. On this strategy you can host one website.<br>Infant Strategy: as reduced as $7.95 per month with a 3 year commitment. On this strategy you can host an unlimited variety of websites.<br>Business Strategy: as low as $12.95 per month with 3 year commitment.<br><br>You don't need to dedicate for 3 years. With shorter term commitments, you'll pay slightly more per month.<br><br>You can likewise get your own dedicated server if this is something you such as to have.<br><br>Limitless number of websites.<br><br>I would not think about a hosting service that didn't let me host an endless variety of sites for one regular monthly price under $10. I have several sites and I such as the versatility of being able to build more websites at no additional cost (except for signing up the domain name).<br><br>If you opt for the Child Strategy (this is the plan I have) or Business Plan, you can host as lots of websites on as many domain as you such as. This is where making use of a hosting service like HostGator can conserve you a large amount of cash in the long run vs. using a website home builder or having a website designer host your websites. When you make use of a website home builder or have a website designer host your website, you'll normally pay extra for each added internet site (or each extra batch of internet sites).<br><br>The disadvantage obviously, is you should manage your own hosting. Nevertheless, luckily, this isn't really hard with the user friendly CPanel and technical support.<br><br>Domain registration.<br><br>You can quickly sign up domain names with HostGator. Absolutely nothing can be even worse than developing an excellent site and then to lose it all because you forgot to renew your domain name. It's possible then that somebody else registers your domain name and you can't get it again.<br><br>All HostGator prepares offer unlimited bandwidth.<br><br>This is good and you need to need this with any website hosting service. I would rule out making use of a hosting service that didn't provide unrestricted bandwidth.<br><br>User friendly CPanel Dash panel.<br><br>You manage your websites with HostGator in a control panel described as a CPanel. The CPanel is an easy-to-use user interface to handle your internet sites and domains.<br><br>In the event you loved this short article and you would love to receive more information relating to [http://webhogwarts.altervista.org/groups/hostgator-mvc/ hostgator1centcoupon.info] kindly visit our own web-site. Easy website setup.<br><br>I particularly need with any hosting service that I make use of can install WordPress with virtually a single click or a series of simple clicks. HostGator provides Fantastico De Luxe and QuickInstall choices for quickly setting up WordPress and numerous other scripts to construct your website (i.e. Joomla and others).<br><br>Access to 4,500 website design templates.<br><br>For any internet designer, this is big. The templates are excellent. They are mainly HTML and Flash feature templates. You can select from over 115 categories. This is a fantastic method to build internet sites cheaply for customers. You can examine out these templates for yourself on the HostGator internet site without needing to register.<br><br>Free website contractors.<br><br>With an account, you can easily build a site with one of two website contractors you get access to. The 2 site builders are:.<br><br>Trendy Website Builder, and.<br>Website Studio website builder.<br><br>Note, you can only use the website home builders for one internet site on your account. What this suggests is if you get an account where you can host unlimited domains, you can just construct one website with a website builder.<br><br>E-mail accounts.<br><br>You get endless POP3 e-mail accounts with SMTP. Having email accounts on your custom-made domain names is more expert than a gmail or hotmail email account.<br><br>45 day money back guarantee.<br><br>You can get your refund if you cancel your account within 45 days if HostGator isn't really for you.<br><br>Video tutorials.<br><br>HostGator offers you access to many video tutorials that step you with many processes.<br><br>Client support.<br><br>You can access live client support through the telephone and live talk. The operators for technical support understand a lot about working in HostGator. Note, however, you won't get much support with certain scripts such as WordPress. For instance, if you have a concern about personalizing a WordPress style, HostGator won't aid you (I discovered this to be the case with Bluehost too. What I do in these scenarios is inquire on my premium WordPress style support online forum and/or do basic Google searches).<br><br>1 Objection of HostGator.<br><br>I needed to call HostGator to confirm my account upon opening it. This didn't take long, but it was an additional action. I would have chosen merely to sign up and get going without needing to call them for confirmation. |
| In [[relativistic physics]], the '''Rindler coordinate chart''' is an important and useful [[coordinate chart]] representing part of flat [[spacetime]], also called the [[Minkowski spacetime|Minkowski vacuum]]. The Rindler chart was introduced by [[Wolfgang Rindler]]. The Rindler coordinate system or frame describes a uniformly [[accelerating]] [[frame of reference]] in [[Minkowski space]]. In [[special relativity]], a uniformly accelerating particle undergoes [[hyperbolic motion (relativity)|hyperbolic motion]]. For each such particle a Rindler frame can be chosen in which it is at rest.
| |
| | |
| ==Relation to Cartesian chart== | |
| [[File:Rindler chart.svg|thumb|Rindler chart, for ''g''=1, plotted on a Minkowski diagram. The dotted lines are the Rindler horizons]]
| |
| To obtain the Rindler chart, start with the [[Cartesian coordinate system|Cartesian chart]] (an [[Inertial frame of reference#Special relativity|inertial frame]]) with the [[Metric tensor (general relativity)#Flat spacetime|metric]]
| |
| :<math> ds^2 = -dT^2 + dX^2 + dY^2 + dZ^2,\; \forall T, X, Y, Z</math> | |
| | |
| In the region <math>\scriptstyle 0 \,<\, X \,<\, \infty,\; -X \,<\, T \,<\, X</math>, which is often called the ''Rindler wedge'', if g represents the proper acceleration (along the hyperbola ''x''=1) of the Rindler observer whose proper time is defined to be equal to Rindler coordinate time (see below), the new chart is defined using the coordinate transformation
| |
| :<math> t = \frac{1}{g} \operatorname{arctanh}\left(\frac{T}{X}\right),\; x= \sqrt{X^2-T^2},\; y = Y,\; z = Z</math> | |
| | |
| The inverse transformation is
| |
| :<math> T = x \, \sinh(gt), \; X = x \, \cosh(gt), \; Y = y, \; Z = z</math>
| |
| | |
| In the Rindler chart, the Minkowski [[line element]] becomes
| |
| :<math> ds^2 = -g^2 x^2 dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2, \; \forall x>0, \forall t, y, z</math>
| |
| | |
| Any observer at rest in Rindler coordinates has constant [[proper acceleration]], with Rindler observers closer to the [[Rindler coordinates#The Rindler horizon|Rindler horizon]] having greater proper acceleration. All the Rindler observers are instantaneously at rest at time T=0 in the inertial frame, and at this time a Rindler observer with proper acceleration g<sub>i</sub> will be at position X = 1/g<sub>i</sub> (really X = c<sup>2</sup>/g<sub>i</sub>, but we assume units where c=1), which is also that observer's constant distance from the Rindler horizon in Rindler coordinates. If all Rindler observers set their clocks to zero at T=0, then when defining a Rindler coordinate system we have a choice of which Rindler observer's [[proper time]] will be equal to the coordinate time t in Rindler coordinates, and this observer's proper acceleration defines the value of g above (for other Rindler observers at different distances from the Rindler horizon, the coordinate time will equal some constant multiple of their own proper time).<ref>Koks, Don: ''Explorations in Mathematical Physics'' (2006), [http://books.google.com/books?id=ytTFazXPy6oC&lpg=PR2&pg=PA240#v=onepage&q&f=false pp. 240-252]</ref> It is a common convention to define the Rindler coordinate system so that the Rindler observer whose proper time matches coordinate time is the one who has proper acceleration g=1, so that g can be eliminated from the equations
| |
| | |
| The above equation,
| |
| :<math> t = \frac{1}{g} \operatorname{arctanh}\left(\frac{T}{X}\right),\; x= \sqrt{X^2-T^2},\; y = Y,\; z = Z</math>
| |
| | |
| has been simplified for c=1. The unsimplified equation is more convenient for finding the Rindler Horizon distance, given an acceleration g.
| |
| | |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| t &= \frac{c}{g} \operatorname{arctanh}\left (\frac{c T}{X}\right) \;\overset {X \,\gg\, cT}\approx\; \frac{c^2 T}{g X}\\
| |
| X &\approx \frac{c^2 T}{g t} \;\overset{T \,\approx\, t}\approx\; \frac{c^2 }{g}
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| | |
| | |
| The remainder of the article will follow the convention of setting both g=1 and c=1, so units for X and x will be 1 unit = c^2/g = 1. Be mindful that setting g=1 light-second/second<sup>2</sup> is very different from setting g=1 light-year/year^2. Even if we pick units where c=1, the magnitude of the proper acceleration g will depend on our choice of units: for example, if we use units of light-years for distance, (''X'' or ''x'') and years for time, (''T'' or ''t''), this would mean g = 1 light year/year<sup>2</sup>, equal to about 9.5 meters/second<sup>2</sup>, while if we use units of light-seconds for distance, (''X'' or ''x''), and seconds for time, (''T'' or ''t''), this would mean g = 1 light-second/second<sup>2</sup>, or 299792458 meters/second<sup>2</sup>). | |
| | |
| ==The Rindler observers==
| |
| | |
| In the new chart, it is natural to take the coframe field
| |
| :<math> d\sigma^0 = -x \, dt,\;\; d\sigma^1 = dx,\;\; d\sigma^2 = dy,\;\; d\sigma^3 = dz</math> | |
| | |
| which has the dual [[Frame fields in general relativity|frame field]]
| |
| :<math> \vec{e}_0 = \frac{1}{x}\partial_t,\;\; \vec{e}_1 = \partial_x,\;\; \vec{e}_2 = \partial_y,\;\; \vec{e}_3 = \partial_z</math>
| |
| | |
| This defines a ''local Lorentz frame'' in the [[tangent space]] at each [[spacetime#Basic concepts|event]] (in the region covered by our Rindler chart, namely the Rindler wedge). The [[integral curve]]s of the [[timelike]] unit vector field <math>\scriptstyle\vec{e}_0</math> give a [[congruence (general relativity)|timelike congruence]], consisting of the world lines of a family of observers called the ''Rindler observers''. In the Rindler chart, these world lines appear as the vertical coordinate lines <math>\scriptstyle x \;=\; x_0,\; y \;=\; y_0,\; z \;=\; z_0</math>. Using the coordinate transformation above, we find that these correspond to hyperbolic arcs in the original Cartesian chart.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:RindlerObserversCartesian.png|frame|right|Some representative Rindler observers (navy blue hyperbolic arcs) depicted using the Cartesian chart. The red lines at 45 degrees from the vertical represent the Rindler horizon; the Rindler coordinate system is only defined to the right of this boundary.]]
| |
| As with any timelike congruence in any Lorentzian manifold, this congruence has a ''kinematic decomposition'' (see [[Raychaudhuri equation]]). In this case, the ''expansion'' and ''vorticity'' of the congruence of Rindler observers ''vanish''. The vanishing of the expansion tensor implies that ''each of our observers maintains constant distance to his neighbors''. The vanishing of the vorticity tensor implies that the world lines of our observers are not twisting about each other; this is a kind of local absence of "swirling".
| |
| | |
| The [[Four-acceleration|acceleration vector]] of each observer is given by the [[covariant derivative]]
| |
| :<math>\nabla_{\vec{e}_0} \vec{e}_0 = \frac{1}{x}\vec{e}_1</math>
| |
| | |
| That is, each Rindler observer is accelerating in the <math>\scriptstyle\partial_x</math> direction. Individually speaking, each observer is in fact accelerating with ''constant magnitude'' in this direction, so their world lines are the Lorentzian analogs of circles, which are the curves of constant path curvature in the Euclidean geometry.
| |
| | |
| Because the Rindler observers are ''vorticity-free'', they are also ''hypersurface orthogonal''. The orthogonal spatial hyperslices are <math>\scriptstyle t \;=\; t_0</math>; these appear as horizontal half-planes in the Rindler chart and as half-planes through <math>\scriptstyle T \;=\; X \;=\; 0</math> in the Cartesian chart (see the figure above). Setting <math>\scriptstyle dt \;=\; 0</math> in the line element, we see that these have the ordinary Euclidean geometry, <math>\scriptstyle d\sigma^2 \;=\; dx^2 \,+\, dy^2 \,+\, dz^2,\; \forall x\,>\,0,\; \forall y,\, z</math>. Thus, the spatial coordinates in the Rindler chart have a very simple interpretation consistent with the claim that the Rindler observers are mutually stationary. We will return to this rigidity property of the Rindler observers a bit later in this article.
| |
| | |
| ==A "paradoxical" property==
| |
| | |
| Note that Rindler observers with smaller constant x coordinate are accelerating ''harder'' to keep up! This may seem surprising because in Newtonian physics, observers who maintain constant relative distance must share the ''same'' acceleration. But in relativistic physics, we see that the trailing endpoint of a rod which is accelerated by some external force (parallel to its symmetry axis) must accelerate a bit harder than the leading endpoint, or else it must ultimately break. This is a manifestation of [[Lorentz contraction]]. As the rod accelerates its velocity increases and its length decreases. Since it is getting shorter, the back end must accelerate harder than the front. Another way to look at it is: the backend must achieve the same change in velocity in a shorter period of time. This leads to a differential equation showing, that at some distance, the acceleration of the trailing end diverges, resulting in the [[Rindler coordinates#The Rindler horizon|Rindler horizon]].
| |
| | |
| This phenomenon is the basis of a well known "paradox", [[Bell's spaceship paradox]]. However, it is a simple consequence of relativistic kinematics. One way to see this is to observe that the magnitude of the acceleration vector is just the [[Geodesic curvature|path curvature]] of the corresponding world line. But ''the world lines of our Rindler observers are the analogs of a family of concentric circles'' in the Euclidean plane, so we are simply dealing with the Lorentzian analog of a fact familiar to speed skaters: in a family of concentric circles, ''inner circles must bend faster (per unit arc length) than the outer ones''.
| |
| | |
| ==Minkowski observers==
| |
| | |
| [[Image:MinkowskiObserverRindler.png|frame|left|A representative Minkowski observer (navy blue hyperbolic secant curve) depicted using the Rindler chart. The Rindler horizon is shown in red.]]
| |
| It is worthwhile to also introduce an alternative frame, given in the Minkowski chart by the natural choice
| |
| :<math>\vec{f}_0 = \partial_T, \; \vec{f}_1 = \partial_X, \; \vec{f}_2 = \partial_Y, \; \vec{f}_3 = \partial_Z </math>
| |
| | |
| Transforming these vector fields using the coordinate transformation given above, we find that in the Rindler chart (in the Rinder wedge) this frame becomes
| |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| \vec{f}_0 &= \frac{1}{x}\cosh(t) \, \partial_t - \sinh(t) \, \partial_x\\
| |
| \vec{f}_1 &= -\frac{1}{x}\sinh(t) \, \partial_t + \cosh(t) \, \partial_x\\
| |
| \vec{f}_2 &= \partial_y, \; \vec{f}_3 = \partial_z
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| | |
| Computing the kinematic decomposition of the timelike congruence defined by the timelike unit vector field <math>\scriptstyle\vec{f}_0</math>, we find that the expansion and vorticity again vanishes, and in addition the acceleration vector vanishes, <math>\scriptstyle\nabla_{\vec{f}_0} \vec{f}_0 \;=\; 0</math>. In other words, this is a ''geodesic congruence''; the corresponding observers are in a state of ''inertial motion''. In the original Cartesian chart, these observers, whom we will call ''Minkowski observers'', are at rest.
| |
| | |
| In the Rindler chart, the world lines of the Minkowski observers appear as hyperbolic secant curves asymptotic to the coordinate plane <math>\scriptstyle x \;=\; 0</math>. Specifically, in Rindler coordinates, the world line of the Minkowski observer passing through the event <math>\scriptstyle t \;=\; t_0,\; x \;=\; x_0,\; y \;=\; y_0,\; z \;=\; z_0</math> is
| |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| t &= \operatorname{arctanh}\left(\frac{s}{x_0}\right),\; -x_0 < s < x_0\\
| |
| x &= \sqrt{x_0^2-s^2},\; -x_0 < s < x_0\\
| |
| y &= y_0\\
| |
| z &= z_0
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| | |
| where <math>\scriptstyle s</math> is the proper time of this Minkowski observer. Note that only a small portion of his history is covered by the Rindler chart! This shows explicitly why the Rindler chart is ''not'' [[Hopf-Rinow theorem|geodesically complete]]; timelike geodesics run outside the region covered by the chart in finite proper time. Of course, we already knew that the Rindler chart cannot be geodesically complete, because it covers only a portion of the original Cartesian chart, which ''is'' a geodesically complete chart.
| |
| | |
| In the case depicted in the figure, <math>\scriptstyle x_0 \;=\; 1</math> and we have drawn (correctly scaled and boosted) the light cones at <math>\scriptstyle s \,\in\, \left\{-\frac{1}{2},\; 0,\; \frac{1}{2}\right\}</math>.
| |
| | |
| ==The Rindler horizon==
| |
| | |
| The Rindler coordinate chart has a ''coordinate singularity'' at ''x'' = 0, where the metric tensor (expressed in the Rindler coordinates) has vanishing [[determinant]]. This happens because as ''x'' → 0 the acceleration of the Rindler observers diverges. As we can see from the figure illustrating the Rindler wedge, the locus ''x'' = 0 in the Rindler chart corresponds to the locus ''T''<sup>2</sup> = ''X''<sup>2</sup>, ''X'' > 0 in the Cartesian chart, which consists of two null half-planes, each ruled by a null geodesic congruence.
| |
| | |
| For the moment, we simply consider the Rindler horizon as the boundary of the Rindler coordinates. If we consider the set of accelerating observers who have a constant position in Rindler coordinates, none of them can ever receive light signals from events with ''T'' ≥ ''X'' (on the diagram, these would be events on or to the left of the line ''T'' = ''X'' which the upper red horizon lies along; these observers could however receive signals from events with ''T'' ≥ ''X'' if they stopped their acceleration and crossed this line themselves) nor could they have ever sent signals to events with ''T'' ≤ −''X'' (events on or to the left of the line ''T'' = −''X'' which the lower red horizon lies along; those events lie outside all future [[light cones]] of their past world line). Also, if we consider members of this set of accelerating observers closer and closer to the horizon, in the limit as the distance to the horizon approaches zero, the constant proper acceleration experienced by an observer at this distance (which would also be the G-force experienced by such an observer) would approach infinity. Both of these facts would also be true if we were considering a set of observers hovering outside the [[event horizon]] of a [[black hole]], each observer hovering at a constant radius in [[Schwarzschild coordinates]]. In fact, in the close neighborhood of a black hole, the geometry close to the event horizon can be described in Rindler coordinates. Hawking radiation in the case of an accelerating frame is referred to as [[Unruh effect|Unruh radiation]]. The connection is the equivalence of acceleration with gravitation.<ref>[http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/black-hole-horizons-and-how-they-begin Dieter Brill, “Black Hole Horizons and How They Begin”, Astronomical Review (2012); Online Article, cited Sept.2012.]</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Geodesics==
| |
| | |
| The geodesic equations in the Rindler chart are easily obtained from the geodesic [[Lagrangian]]; they are
| |
| :<math> \ddot{t} + \frac{2}{x} \, \dot{x} \, \dot{t} = 0, \; \ddot{x} + x \, \dot{t}^2 = 0, \; \ddot{y} = 0, \; \ddot{z} = 0</math>
| |
| | |
| Of course, in the original Cartesian chart, the geodesics appear as straight lines, so we could easily obtain them in the Rindler chart using our coordinate transformation. However, it is instructive to obtain and study them independently of the original chart, and we shall do so in this section.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:UHS geodesics.png|frame|left|Some representative null geodesics (black hyperbolic semicircular arcs) projected into the spatial hyperslice t=0 of the Rindler observers. The Rindler horizon is shown as a magenta plane.]]
| |
| From the first, third, and fourth we immediately obtain the ''first integrals''
| |
| :<math> \dot{t} = \frac{E}{x^2}, \; \; \dot{y} = P, \; \; \dot{z} = Q </math>
| |
| | |
| But from the line element we have <math>\scriptstyle \epsilon \;=\; -x^2 \, \dot{t}^2 \,+\, \dot{x}^2 \,+\, \dot{y}^2 \,+\, \dot{z}^2</math> where <math>\scriptstyle\epsilon \;\in\; \left\{-1,\, 0,\, 1\right\}</math> for timelike, null, and spacelike geodesics, respectively. This gives the fourth first integral, namely
| |
| :<math> \dot{x}^2 = \left(\epsilon + \frac{E^2}{x^2} \right) - P^2 - Q^2</math>.
| |
| | |
| This suffices to give the complete solution of the geodesic equations.
| |
| | |
| In the case of [[null geodesic]]s, from <math>\scriptstyle\frac{E^2}{x^2} \,-\, P^2 \,-\, Q^2</math> with nonzero <math>\scriptstyle E</math>, we see that the x coordinate ranges over the interval <math>\scriptstyle 0 \,<\, x \,<\, \frac{E}{\sqrt{P^2 \,+\, Q^2}}</math>.
| |
| | |
| The complete seven parameter family giving any null geodesic through any event in the Rindler wedge, is
| |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| t - t_0 &= \operatorname{arctanh} \left(
| |
| \frac{1}{E}\left[s \left(P^2 + Q^2\right) - \sqrt{E^2 - \left(P^2 + Q^2\right) x_0^2}\right]
| |
| \right) +\\
| |
| & \quad\quad \operatorname{arctanh} \left(
| |
| \frac{1}{E}\sqrt{E^2 - (P^2+Q^2) x_0^2}
| |
| \right)\\
| |
| x &= \sqrt{ x_0^2 + 2s \sqrt{E^2 - (P^2+Q^2) x_0^2} - s^2 (P^2 + Q^2) }\\
| |
| y - y_0 &= Ps;\;\; z - z_0 = Qs
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| | |
| Plotting the ''tracks'' of some representative null geodesics through a given event (that is, projecting to the hyperslice <math>\scriptstyle t \,=\, 0</math>), we obtain a picture which looks suspiciously like the family of all semicircles through a point and orthogonal to the Rindler horizon! (See the figure.)
| |
| | |
| == The Fermat metric ==
| |
| | |
| The fact that in the Rindler chart, the projections of null geodesics into any spatial hyperslice for the Rindler observers are simply semicircular arcs can be verified directly from the general solution just given, but there is a very simple way to see this. A [[static spacetime]] is one in which a vorticity-free timelike [[Killing vector]] field can be found. In this case, we have a uniquely defined family of (identical) spatial hyperslices orthogonal to the corresponding static observers (who need not be inertial observers). This allows us to define a new metric on any of these hyperslices which is conformally related to the original metric inherited from the spacetime, but with the property that geodesics in the new metric (note this is a [[Riemannian metric]] on a Riemannian three-manifold) are precisely the projections of the null geodesics of spacetime. This new metric is called the ''Fermat metric'', and in a static spacetime endowed with a coordinate chart in which the line element has the form
| |
| :<math> ds^2 = g_{00} \, dt^2 + g_{jk} \, dx^j \, dx^k,\;\; j,\; k \in \{1, 2, 3\} </math>
| |
| | |
| the Fermat metric on <math>\scriptstyle t \;=\; 0</math> is simply
| |
| :<math> d\rho^2 = \frac{1}{-g_{00}}\left(g_{jk} \, dx^j \, dx^k\right)</math>
| |
| | |
| (where the metric coeffients are understood to be evaluated at <math>\scriptstyle t \;=\; 0</math>).
| |
| | |
| In the Rindler chart, the timelike translation <math>\scriptstyle \partial_t</math> is such a Killing vector field, so this is a static spacetime (not surprisingly, since Minkowski spacetime is of course trivially a static vacuum solution of the [[Einstein field equation]]). Therefore, we may immediately write down the Fermat metric for the Rindler observers:
| |
| :<math> d\rho^2 = \frac{1}{x^2}\left(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2\right),\;\; \forall x>0,\;\; \forall y, z</math>
| |
| | |
| But this is the well-known line element of ''hyperbolic three-space'' '''H'''<sup>3</sup> in the ''upper half space chart''! This is closely analogous to the well known ''upper half plane chart'' for the hyperbolic plane '''H'''<sup>2</sup>, which is familiar to generations of [[complex analysis]] students in connection with ''conformal mapping problems'' (and much more), and many mathematically minded readers already know that the geodesics of '''H'''<sup>2</sup> in the upper half plane model are simply semicircles (orthogonal to the circle at infinity represented by the real axis).
| |
| | |
| == Symmetries ==
| |
| | |
| Since the Rindler chart is a coordinate chart for Minkowski spacetime, we expect to find ten linearly independent Killing vector fields. Indeed, in the Cartesian chart we can readily find ten linearly independent Killing vector fields, generating respectively one parameter subgroups of time translation, three spatials, three rotations and three boosts. Together these generate the (proper isochronous) Poincaré group, the symmetry group of Minkowski spacetime.
| |
| | |
| However, it is instructive to write down and solve the Killing vector equations directly. We obtain four familiar looking Killing vector fields
| |
| :<math> \partial_t, \; \; \partial_y, \; \; \partial_z, \; \; -z \, \partial_y + y \, \partial_z </math>
| |
| | |
| (time translation, spatial translations orthogonal to the direction of acceleration, and spatial rotation orthogonal to the direction of acceleration) plus six more:
| |
| :<math>\begin{align}
| |
| &\exp(\pm t) \, \left( \frac{y}{x} \, \partial_t \pm \left[ y \, \partial_x - x \, \partial_y \right] \right)\\
| |
| &\exp(\pm t) \, \left( \frac{z}{x} \, \partial_t \pm \left[ z \, \partial_x - x \, \partial_z \right] \right)\\
| |
| &\exp(\pm t) \, \left( \frac{1}{x} \, \partial_t \pm \partial_x \right)
| |
| \end{align}</math>
| |
| | |
| (where the signs are chosen consistently + or −). We leave it as an exercise to figure out how these are related to the standard generators; here we wish to point out that we must be able to obtain generators equivalent to <math>\scriptstyle \partial_T</math> in the Cartesian chart, yet the Rindler wedge is obviously not invariant under this translation. How can this be? The answer is that like anything defined by a system of partial differential equations on a smooth manifold, the Killing equation will in general have locally defined solutions, but these might not exist globally. That is, with suitable restrictions on the group parameter, a Killing flow can always be defined in a suitable ''local neighborhood'', but the flow might not be well-defined [[global spacetime structure|globally]]. This has nothing to do with Lorentzian manifolds per se, since the same issue arises in the study of general [[smooth manifold]]s.
| |
| | |
| == Notions of distance ==
| |
| | |
| One of the many valuable lessons to be learned from a study of the Rindler chart is that there are in fact several ''distinct'' (but reasonable) notions of [[distance]] which can be used by the Rindler observers.
| |
| [[Image:RadarDistanceRindler.png|frame|left|Operational meaning of the ''radar distance'' between two Rindler observers (navy blue vertical lines). The Rindler horizon is shown at left (red vertical line). The world line of the radar pulse is also depicted, together with the (properly scaled) light cones at events A, B, C.]]
| |
| | |
| The first is the one we have tacitly employed above: the induced Riemannian metric on the spatial hyperslices <math>\scriptstyle t \;=\; t_0</math>. We will call this the ''ruler distance'' since it corresponds to this induced Riemannian metric, but its operational meaning might not be immediately apparent.
| |
| | |
| From the standpoint of physical measurement, a more natural notion of distance between two world lines is the ''radar distance''. This is computed by sending a null geodesic from the world line of our observer (event A) to the world line of some small object, whereupon it is reflected (event B) and returns to the observer (event C). The radar distance is then obtained by dividing the round trip travel time, as measured by an ideal clock carried by our observer.
| |
| | |
| (In Minkowski spacetime, fortunately, we can ignore the possibility of multiple null geodesic paths between two world lines, but in cosmological models and other applications things are not so simple! We should also caution against assuming that this notion of distance between two observers gives a notion which is symmetric under interchanging the observers!)
| |
| | |
| In particular, let us consider a pair of Rindler observers with coordinates <math>\scriptstyle x \;=\; x_0, \; y \;=\; 0,\; z \;=\; 0</math> and <math>\scriptstyle x \;=\; x_0 \,+\, h, \; y \;=\; 0,\; \; z \;=\; 0</math> respectively. (Note that the first of these, the trailing observer, is accelerating a bit harder, in order to keep up with the leading observer). Setting <math>\scriptstyle dy \;=\; dz \;=\; 0</math> in the Rindler line element, we readily obtain the equation of null geodesics moving in the direction of acceleration:
| |
| :<math> t-t_0 = \log(x/x_0) </math>
| |
| | |
| Therefore, the radar distance between these two observers is given by
| |
| :<math> x_0 \, \log \left(1 + \frac{h}{x_0} \right) = h - \frac{h^2}{2 \, x_0} + O \left( h^3 \right) </math>
| |
| | |
| This is a bit smaller than the ruler distance, but for nearby observers the discrepancy is negligible.
| |
| | |
| A third possible notion of distance is this: our observer measures the ''angle'' subtended by a unit disk placed on some object (not a point object!), as it appears from his location. We call this the ''optical diameter distance''. Because of the simple character of null geodesics in Minkowski spacetime, we can readily determine the optical distance between our pair of Rindler observers (aligned with the direction of acceleration). From a sketch it should be plausible that the optical diameter distance scales like <math>\scriptstyle h \,+\, \frac{1}{x_0} \,+\, O \left( h^3 \right) </math>. Therefore, in the case of a trailing observer estimating distance to a leading observer (the case <math>\scriptstyle h \,>\, 0</math>), the optical distance is a bit larger than the ruler distance, which is a bit larger than the radar distance. The reader should now take a moment to consider the case of a leading observer estimating distance to a trailing observer!
| |
| | |
| There are other notions of distance, but the main point is clear: while the values of these various notions will in general disagree for a given pair of Rindler observers, they all agree that ''every pair of Rindler observers maintains constant distance''. The fact that ''very nearby'' Rindler observers are mutually stationary follows from the fact, noted above, that the expansion tensor of the Rindler congruence vanishes identically. However, we have shown here that in various senses, this rigidity property holds at larger scales. This is truly a remarkable rigidity property, given the well-known fact that in relativistic physics, ''no rod can be accelerated rigidly'' (and ''no disk can be spun up rigidly'') — at least, not without sustaining inhomogeneous stresses. The easiest way to see this is to observe that in Newtonian physics, if we "kick" a rigid body, all elements of matter in the body will immediately change their state of motion. This is of course incompatible with the relativistic principle that no information having any physical effect can be transmitted faster than the speed of light.
| |
| | |
| It follows that if a rod is accelerated by some external force applied anywhere along its length, the elements of matter in various different places in the rod cannot all feel the same magnitude of acceleration if the rod is not to extend without bound and ultimately break. In other words, an accelerated rod which does not break must sustain stresses which vary along its length. Furthermore, in any thought experiment with time varying forces, whether we "kick" an object or try to accelerate it gradually, we cannot avoid the problem of avoiding mechanical models which are inconsistent with relativistic kinematics (because distant parts of the body respond too quickly to an applied force).
| |
| | |
| Returning to the question of the operational significance of the ruler distance, we see that this should be the distance which our observers will obtain should they very slowly pass from hand to hand a small ruler which is repeatedly set end to end. But justifying this interpretation in detail would require some kind of material model.
| |
| | |
| == Generalization to curved spacetimes ==
| |
| | |
| Rindler coordinates described above can be generalized to curved spacetime, and are called as Fermi normal coordinates. The generalization essential involves constructing an appropriate orthonormal tetrad and then transporting it along the given trajectory using the Fermi-Walker transport rule. For details, see the paper by Ni and Zimmermann in the references below. Such a generalization actually enables one to study inertial and gravitational effects in an Earth based laboratory, as well as the more interesting coupled inertial-gravitational effects.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[Bell's spaceship paradox]], for a sometimes controversial subject often studied using Rindler coordinates.
| |
| * [[Born coordinates]], for another important coordinate system adapted to the motion of certain accelerated observers in [[Minkowski spacetime]].
| |
| * [[Congruence (general relativity)]]
| |
| * [[Ehrenfest paradox]], for a sometimes controversial subject often studied using Born coordinates.
| |
| * [[Frame fields in general relativity]]
| |
| * [[General relativity resources]]
| |
| * [[Milne model]]
| |
| * [[Raychaudhuri equation]]
| |
| * [[Unruh effect]]
| |
| | |
| == Notes ==
| |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| | |
| Useful background:
| |
| | |
| *{{cite book | author=Boothby, William M. | title=An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry | publisher=New York: Academic Press | year=1986 | isbn=0-12-116052-1}} See ''Chapter 4'' for background concerning vector fields on smooth manifolds.
| |
| | |
| *{{cite book | author=Frankel, Theodore | title=Gravitational Curvature: an Introduction to Einstein's Theory | publisher=San Francisco : W. H. Freeman | year=1979 | isbn=0-7167-1062-5}} See ''Chapter 8'' for a derivation of the Fermat metric.
| |
| | |
| Rindler coordinates:
| |
| | |
| *{{cite book | author=Misner, Charles; Thorne, Kip S. & Wheeler, John Archibald | title=Gravitation | publisher=San Francisco: W. H. Freeman | year=1973 | isbn=0-7167-0344-0}} See ''Section 6.6''.
| |
| | |
| *{{cite book | author=Rindler, Wolfgang | title=Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological | publisher=Oxford: Oxford University Press| year=2001 | isbn=0-19-850836-0}}
| |
| | |
| *{{cite journal | author=Ni, Wei-Tou; Zimmermann, Mark | title=Inertial and gravitational effects in the proper reference frame of an accelerated, rotating observer | journal=Physical Review D | year=1978 | volume=17 | issue=6 | pages=1473–1476 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.17.1473|bibcode = 1978PhRvD..17.1473N }}
| |
| | |
| Rindler horizon:
| |
| | |
| *{{cite journal | author=Jacobson, Ted; and Parenti, Renaud | title=Horizon Entropy | journal=Found. Phys. | year=2003 | volume=33 | issue=2 | pages=323–348 | doi=10.1023/A:1023785123428}} [http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302099 eprint version]
| |
| | |
| *{{cite web | author=Barceló, Carlos; Liberati, Stefano; and Visser, Matt | title=Analogue Gravity | work=Living Reviews in Relativity | url=http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-12/index.html | accessdate=2006-05-06 }}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Theory of relativity]]
| |
| [[Category:Coordinate charts in general relativity]]
| |