|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Multiple issues|technical = April 2011|expert = Physics|original research = March 2010|date = October 2011}}
| | Are we always having difficulties with the PC? Are you constantly trying to find ways to strengthen PC performance? Next this is the article you're interested in. Here we will discuss a few of the many asked concerns with regards to having we PC serve we well; how could I create my computer faster for free? How to create my computer run quicker?<br><br>If it is very not because big of a issue because you think it is very, it can possibly be resolved easily by running a Startup Repair or by System Restore Utility. Again it may be as easy as running an anti-virus check or cleaning the registry.<br><br>Perfect Optimizer also offers to remove junk files and is fully Windows Vista compatible. Many registry product just don't have the time and money to analysis Windows Vista errors. Because best optimizer has a big customer base, they do have the time, income and reasons to support totally support Windows Vista.<br><br>There are tips to create a slow computer work effective and fast. In this article, I will tell you only 3 most effective tricks or methods to prevent a computer of being slow and instead of which make it faster plus work even much better than before.<br><br>So to fix this, you merely have to be capable to create all the registry files non-corrupted again. This will dramatically speed up the loading time of the computer plus allows we to a large amount of details on it again. And fixing these files couldn't be simpler - you merely want to employ a tool called a [http://bestregistrycleanerfix.com/system-mechanic system mechanic professional].<br><br>The most probable cause of the trouble is the program problem - Registry Errors! That is the reason why individuals whom already have over 2 G RAM on their computers are still consistently bothered by the issue.<br><br>Most probably should you are experiencing a slow computer it may be a couple years old. We furthermore can not have been told that whilst we utilize a computer everyday; there are certain items that it requires to continue running inside its right performance. We also could not even own any diagnostic tools which will receive your PC running like hot again. Well do not let which stop you from getting the system cleaned. With access to the web you are able to find the tools that will assist we get a system running like hot again.<br><br>Often the best method is to read critiques on them and if various consumers remark regarding its efficiency, it's likely to be function. The ideal piece is that there are numerous top registry cleaners that work; you only have to take your pick. |
| | |
| {{Quantum mechanics|cTopic=Fundamental concepts}}
| |
| | |
| '''Quantum superposition''' is a fundamental principle of [[quantum mechanics]] that holds that a physical system—such as an [[electron]]—exists partly in all its particular theoretically possible [[quantum state|states]] (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but when measured or observed, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in [[interpretation of quantum mechanics]]).
| |
| | |
| Mathematically, it refers to a property of solutions to the [[Schrödinger equation]]; since the [[Schrödinger equation]] is [[linear]], any linear combination of solutions to a particular equation will also be a solution of it. Such solutions are often made to be [[orthogonal]] (i.e. the vectors are at right-angles to each other), such as the [[energy levels]] of an [[electron]]. In other words, the overlap of the states is nullified, and the [[expectation value]] of an [[Operator (physics)|operator]] is the expectation value of the operator in the individual states, multiplied by the fraction of the superposition state that is "in" that state (see also [[eigenstates]]).
| |
| | |
| An example of a directly observable effect of superposition is [[Interference (wave propagation)|interference]] peaks from an [[electron]] [[wave]] in a [[double-slit experiment]]. Another example is a quantum logical [[Qubit#Qubit_states|qubit state]], as used in [[quantum information processing]], which is a linear superposition of the "basis states" <math>|0 \rangle </math> and <math>|1 \rangle </math>.
| |
| Here <math>|0 \rangle </math> is the [[Dirac notation]] for the quantum state that will always give the result 0 when converted to classical logic by a measurement. Likewise <math>|1 \rangle </math> is the state that will always convert to 1.
| |
| | |
| ==Concept==
| |
| The principle of quantum superposition states that if a physical system may be in one of many configurations—arrangements of particles or fields—then the most general state is a combination of all of these possibilities, where the amount in each configuration is specified by a [[complex number]].
| |
| | |
| For example, if there are two configurations labelled by 0 and 1, the most general state would be
| |
| | |
| :<math>c_0 \mid 0 \rangle + c_1 \mid 1 \rangle</math>
| |
| | |
| where the coefficients are complex numbers describing how much goes into each configuration.
| |
| | |
| The principle was described by [[Paul Dirac]] as follows:
| |
| | |
| <blockquote>The general principle of superposition of quantum mechanics applies to the states [that are theoretically possible without mutual interference or contradiction] ... of any one dynamical system. It requires us to assume that between these states there exist peculiar relationships such that whenever the system is definitely in one state we can consider it as being partly in each of two or more other states. The original state must be regarded as the result of a kind of superposition of the two or more new states, in a way that cannot be conceived on classical ideas. Any state may be considered as the result of a superposition of two or more other states, and indeed in an infinite number of ways. Conversely any two or more states may be superposed to give a new state...</blockquote>
| |
| | |
| <blockquote>The non-classical nature of the superposition process is brought out clearly if we consider the superposition of two states, ''A'' and ''B'', such that there exists an observation which, when made on the system in state ''A'', is certain to lead to one particular result, ''a'' say, and when made on the system in state ''B'' is certain to lead to some different result, ''b'' say. What will be the result of the observation when made on the system in the superposed state? The answer is that the result will be sometimes ''a'' and sometimes ''b'', according to a probability law depending on the relative weights of ''A'' and ''B'' in the superposition process. It will never be different from both ''a'' and ''b'' [i.e, either ''a'' or ''b'']. ''The intermediate character of the state formed by superposition thus expresses itself through the probability of a particular result for an observation being intermediate between the corresponding probabilities for the original states, not through the result itself being intermediate between the corresponding results for the original states.''<ref name="Dirac1947">{{cite book|author=P.A.M. Dirac|title=The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (2nd edition)|year=1947|publisher=Clarendon Press|page=12}}</ref></blockquote>
| |
| | |
| [[Anton Zeilinger]], referring to the prototypical example of the [[double-slit experiment]], has elaborated regarding the creation and destruction of quantum superposition:
| |
| | |
| <blockquote>"[T]he superposition of amplitudes ... is only valid if there is no way to know, even in principle, which path the particle took. It is important to realize that this does not imply that an observer actually takes note of what happens. It is sufficient to destroy the interference pattern, if the path information is accessible in principle from the experiment or even if it is dispersed in the environment and beyond any technical possibility to be recovered, but in principle still ‘‘out there.’’ The absence of any such information is ''the essential criterion'' for quantum interference to appear.<ref name=Zeilinger>{{cite journal | author = Zeilinger A | year = 1999 | title = Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics | journal = Rev. Mod. Phys. | volume = 71 | pages = S288-S297 }}</ref></blockquote>
| |
| | |
| ==Theory==
| |
| | |
| ===Examples===
| |
| For an equation describing a physical phenomenon, the superposition principle states that a combination of solutions to a linear equation is also a solution of it. When this is true the equation is said to obey the superposition principle. Thus if [[quantum state|state vectors]] {{math|''f''<sub>1</sub>}}, {{math|''f''<sub>2</sub>}} and {{math|''f''<sub>3</sub>}} each solve the [[linear equation]] on ψ, then {{math|1= ψ = ''c''<sub>1</sub> ''f''<sub>1</sub> + ''c''<sub>2</sub> ''f''<sub>2</sub> + ''c''<sub>3</sub> ''f''<sub>3</sub>}} would also be a solution, in which each {{mvar|c}} is a coefficient. The [[Schroedinger equation]] is linear, so quantum mechanics follows this.
| |
| | |
| For example, consider an [[electron]] with two possible configurations, up and down. This describes the physical system of a [[qubit]].
| |
| | |
| :<math>c_1 \mid \uparrow \rangle + c_2 \mid \downarrow \rangle</math>
| |
| | |
| is the most general state. But these coefficients dictate probabilities for the system to be in either configuration. The probability for a specified configuration is given by the square of the absolute value of the coefficient. So the probabilities should add up to 1. The electron is in one of those two states for sure.
| |
| | |
| :<math> p_\text{up} = \mid c_1 \mid^2 </math>
| |
| :<math> p_\text{down} = \mid c_2 \mid^2 </math>
| |
| :<math> p_\text{up or down} = p_\text{up} + p_\text{down} = 1 </math>
| |
| | |
| Continuing with this example: If a particle can be in state up and down, it can also be in a state where it is an amount {{math|3''i''/5}} in up and an amount {{math|4/5}} in down.
| |
| | |
| :<math>|\psi\rangle = {3\over 5} i |\uparrow\rangle + {4\over 5} |\downarrow\rangle.</math>
| |
| | |
| In this the probability for up is <math>\left|\;\frac{3i}{5}\;\right|^2=\frac{9}{25}</math>. The probability for down is <math>\left|\;\frac{4}{5}\;\right|^2=\frac{16}{25}</math>. Note that <math>\frac{9}{25}+\frac{16}{25}=1</math>. | |
| | |
| In the description, only the relative size of the different components matter, and their angle to each other on the complex plane. This is usually stated by declaring that two states which are a multiple of one another are the same as far as the description of the situation is concerned. Either of these describe the same state for any nonzero <math>\alpha</math>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| |\psi \rangle \approx \alpha |\psi \rangle
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The fundamental law of quantum mechanics is that the evolution is [[linear]], meaning that if state A turns into A′ and B turns into B′ after 10 seconds, then after 10 seconds the superposition <math>\psi</math> turns into a mixture of A′ and B′ with the same [[coefficients]] as A and B.
| |
| | |
| For example, if we have the following
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mid \uparrow \rangle \to \mid \downarrow \rangle</math>
| |
| :<math>\mid \downarrow \rangle \to \frac{3i}{5} \mid \uparrow \rangle + \frac{4}{5} \mid \downarrow \rangle</math>
| |
| | |
| Then after those 10 seconds our state will change to
| |
| | |
| :<math>c_1 \mid \uparrow \rangle + c_2 \mid \downarrow \rangle \to c_1 \left( \mid \downarrow \rangle\right) + c_2 \left(\frac{3i}{5} \mid \uparrow \rangle + \frac{4}{5} \mid \downarrow \rangle \right) </math>
| |
| | |
| So far there have just been 2 configurations, but there can be infinitely many.
| |
| | |
| In illustration, a particle can have any position, so that there are different configurations which have any value of the position {{mvar|x}}. These are written:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| |x\rangle
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The principle of superposition guarantees that there are states which are arbitrary superpositions of all the positions with complex coefficients:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_x \psi(x) |x\rangle
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| This sum is defined only if the index {{mvar|x}} is discrete. If the index is over <math>\reals</math>, then the sum replaced by an integral. The quantity <math>\psi(x)</math> is called the [[wavefunction]] of the particle.
| |
| | |
| If we consider a qubit with both position and spin, the state is a superposition of all possibilities for both:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_x \psi_+(x)|x,\uparrow\rangle + \psi_-(x)|x,\downarrow\rangle
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| The configuration space of a quantum mechanical system cannot be worked out without some physical knowledge. The input is usually the allowed different classical configurations, but without the duplication of including both position and momentum.
| |
| | |
| A pair of particles can be in any combination of pairs of positions. A state where one particle is at position x and the other is at position y is written <math>|x,y\rangle</math>. The most general state is a superposition of the possibilities:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_{xy} A(x,y) |x,y\rangle
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| The description of the two particles is much larger than the description of one particle—it is a function in twice the number of dimensions. This is also true in probability, when the statistics of two random variables are [[correlated]]. If two particles are uncorrelated, the probability distribution for their joint position {{math|P(''x'', ''y'')}} is a product of the probability of finding one at one position and the other at the other position:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| P(x,y) = P_x (x) P_y(y)
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| In quantum mechanics, two particles can be in special states where the amplitudes of their position are uncorrelated. For quantum amplitudes, the word [[quantum entanglement|entanglement]] replaces{{citation needed|reason=it's a crap. these are uncorrelated states which are necessarily entangled. correlated states can be either entangled or unentangled. --Incnis Mrsi|date=July 2012}} the word correlation, but the analogy{{which|date=July 2012}} is exact. A disentangled wave function has the form:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A(x,y) = \psi_x(x)\psi_y(y)
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| while an entangled wavefunction does not have this form.
| |
| {{expand section|date=July 2012}}
| |
| | |
| ===Analogy with probability===
| |
| In [[probability theory]] there is a similar principle. If a system has a probabilistic description, this description gives the probability of any configuration, and given any two different configurations, there is a state which is partly this and partly that, with positive real number coefficients, the probabilities, which say how much of each there is.
| |
| | |
| For example, if we have a probability distribution for where a particle is, it is described by the "state"
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_x \rho(x) |x\rangle
| |
| </math>
| |
| Where <math>\rho</math> is the [[probability density function|probability density]] function, a positive number that measures the probability that the particle will be found at a certain location.
| |
| | |
| The evolution equation is also linear in probability, for fundamental reasons. If the particle has some probability for going from position x to y, and from z to y, the probability of going to y starting from a state which is half-x and half-z is a half-and-half mixture of the probability of going to y from each of the options. This is the principle of linear superposition in probability.
| |
| | |
| Quantum mechanics is different, because the numbers can be positive or negative. While the complex nature of the numbers is just a doubling, if you consider the real and imaginary parts separately, the sign of the coefficients is important. In probability, two different possible outcomes always add together, so that if there are more options to get to a point z, the probability always goes up. In quantum mechanics, different possibilities can cancel.
| |
| | |
| In probability theory with a finite number of states, the probabilities can always be multiplied by a positive number to make their sum equal to one. For example, if there is a three state probability system:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| x |1\rangle + y |2\rangle + z |3\rangle
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| where the probabilities <math>x,y,z</math> are positive numbers. Rescaling x,y,z so that
| |
| :<math>
| |
| x+y+z=1
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| The geometry of the state space is a revealed to be a triangle. In general it is a [[simplex]]. There are special points in a triangle or simplex corresponding to the corners, and these points are those where one of the probabilities is equal to 1 and the others are zero. These are the unique locations where the position is known with certainty.
| |
| | |
| In a quantum mechanical system with three states, the quantum mechanical wavefunction is a superposition of states again, but this time twice as many quantities with no restriction on the sign:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A|1\rangle + B|2\rangle + C|3\rangle = (A_r + iA_i) |1\rangle + (B_r + i B_i) |2\rangle + (C_r + iC_i) |3\rangle
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| rescaling the variables so that the sum of the squares is 1, the geometry of the space is revealed to be a high dimensional sphere
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A_r^2 + A_i^2 + B_r^2 + B_i^2 + C_r^2 + C_i^2 = 1
| |
| \,</math>.
| |
| | |
| A sphere has a large amount of symmetry, it can be viewed in different coordinate systems or [[linear algebra|bases]]. So unlike a probability theory, a quantum theory has a large number of different bases in which it can be equally well described. The geometry of the phase space can be viewed as a hint that the quantity in quantum mechanics which corresponds to the probability is the ''absolute square'' of the coefficient of the superposition.
| |
| | |
| ===Hamiltonian evolution===
| |
| The numbers that describe the amplitudes for different possibilities define the kinematics, the space of different states. The dynamics describes how these numbers change with time. For a particle that can be in any one of infinitely many discrete positions, a particle on a lattice, the superposition principle tells you how to make a state:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_n \psi_n |n\rangle
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| So that the infinite list of amplitudes <math>\scriptstyle (... \psi_{-2},\psi_{-1},\psi_0,\psi_1,\psi_2 ...) </math> completely describes the quantum state of the particle. This list is called the '''state vector''', and formally it is an element of a [[Hilbert space]], an infinite dimensional complex [[vector space]]. It is usual to represent the state so that the sum of the [[absolute square]]s of the amplitudes add up to one:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum \psi_n^*\psi_n = 1
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| For a particle described by probability theory random walking on a line, the analogous thing is the list of probabilities <math>(...P_{-2},P_{-1},P_0,P_1,P_2,...)</math>, which give the probability of any position. The quantities that describe how they change in time are the transition probabilities <math>\scriptstyle K_{x\rightarrow y}(t)</math>, which gives the probability that, starting at x, the particle ends up at y after time t. The total probability of ending up at y is given by the sum over all the possibilities
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| P_y(t_0+t) = \sum_x P_x(t_0) K_{x\rightarrow y}(t)
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| The condition of conservation of probability states that starting at any x, the total probability to end up ''somewhere'' must add up to 1:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_y K_{x\rightarrow y} = 1
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| So that the total probability will be preserved, K is what is called a [[stochastic matrix]].
| |
| | |
| When no time passes, nothing changes: for zero elapsed time <math>\scriptstyle K{x\rightarrow y}(0) = \delta_{xy} </math>, the K matrix is zero except from a state to itself. So in the case that the time is short, it is better to talk about the rate of change of the probability instead of the absolute change in the probability.
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| P_y(t+dt) = P_y(t) + dt \sum_x P_x R_{x\rightarrow y}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| where <math>\scriptstyle R_{x\rightarrow y}</math> is the time derivative of the K matrix:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| R_{x\rightarrow y} = { K_{x\rightarrow y}(dt) - \delta_{xy} \over dt}
| |
| \,</math>.
| |
| | |
| The equation for the probabilities is a differential equation which is sometimes called the '''master equation''':
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| {dP_y \over dt} = \sum_x P_x R_{x\rightarrow y}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| The R matrix is the probability per unit time for the particle to make a transition from x to y. The condition that the K matrix elements add up to one becomes the condition that the R matrix elements add up to zero:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_y R_{x\rightarrow y} = 0
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| One simple case to study is when the R matrix has an equal probability to go one unit to the left or to the right, describing a particle which has a constant rate of random walking. In this case <math>\scriptstyle R_{x\rightarrow y}</math> is zero unless y is either x+1,x, or x−1, when y is x+1 or x−1, the R matrix has value c, and in order for the sum of the R matrix coefficients to equal zero, the value of <math>R_{x\rightarrow x}</math> must be −2c. So the probabilities obey the '''discretized diffusion equation''':
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| {dP_x \over dt } = c(P_{x+1} - 2P_{x} + P_{x-1})
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| which, when c is scaled appropriately and the P distribution is smooth enough to think of the system in a continuum limit becomes:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| {\partial P(x,t) \over \partial t} = c {\partial^2 P \over \partial x^2 }
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| Which is the '''[[diffusion equation]]'''.
| |
| | |
| Quantum amplitudes give the rate at which amplitudes change in time, and they are mathematically exactly the same except that they are complex numbers. The analog of the finite time K matrix is called the U matrix:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \psi_n(t) = \sum_m U_{nm}(t) \psi_m
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| Since the sum of the absolute squares of the amplitudes must be constant, <math>U</math> must be [[Unitary matrix|unitary]]:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sum_n U^*_{nm} U_{np} = \delta_{mp}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| or, in matrix notation,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| U^\dagger U = I
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| The rate of change of U is called the [[Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)|Hamiltonian]] H, up to a traditional factor of i: | |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| H_{mn} = i{d \over dt} U_{mn}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The Hamiltonian gives the rate at which the particle has an amplitude to go from m to n. The reason it is multiplied by i is that the condition that U is unitary translates to the condition:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| (I + i H^\dagger dt )(I - i H dt ) = I
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| H^\dagger - H = 0
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| which says that H is [[Hermitian]]. The eigenvalues of the Hermitian matrix H are real quantities which have a physical interpretation as energy levels. If the factor i were absent, the H matrix would be antihermitian and would have purely imaginary eigenvalues, which is not the traditional way quantum mechanics represents observable quantities like the energy.
| |
| | |
| For a particle which has equal amplitude to move left and right, the Hermitian matrix H is zero except for nearest neighbors, where it has the value c. If the coefficient is everywhere constant, the condition that H is Hermitian demands that the amplitude to move to the left is the complex conjugate of the amplitude to move to the right. The equation of motion for <math>\psi</math> is the time differential equation:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| i{d \psi_n \over dt} = c^* \psi_{n+1} + c \psi_{n-1}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| In the case that left and right are symmetric, c is real. By redefining the phase of the wavefunction in time, <math> \psi\rightarrow \psi e^{i2ct}</math>, the amplitudes for being at different locations are only rescaled, so that the physical situation is unchanged. But this phase rotation introduces a linear term.
| |
| :<math>
| |
| i{d \psi_n \over dt} = c \psi_{n+1} - 2c\psi_n + c\psi_{n-1}
| |
| </math>
| |
| which is the right choice of phase to take the continuum limit. When c is very large and psi is slowly varying so that the lattice can be thought of as a line, this becomes the free [[Schrödinger equation]]:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| i{ \partial \psi \over \partial t } = - {\partial^2 \psi \over \partial x^2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| If there is an additional term in the H matrix which is an extra phase rotation which varies from point to point, the continuum limit is the Schrödinger equation with a potential energy:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| i{ \partial \psi \over \partial t} = - {\partial^2 \psi \over \partial x^2} + V(x) \psi
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| These equations describe the motion of a single particle in non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
| |
| | |
| ===Quantum mechanics in imaginary time===
| |
| The analogy between quantum mechanics and probability is very strong, so that there are many mathematical links between them. In a statistical system in discrete time, t=1,2,3, described by a transition matrix for one time step <math>\scriptstyle K_{m\rightarrow n}</math>, the probability to go between two points after a finite number of time steps can be represented as a sum over all paths of the probability of taking each path:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| K_{x\rightarrow y}(T) = \sum_{x(t)} \prod_t K_{x(t)x(t+1)}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| where the sum extends over all paths <math>x(t)</math> with the property that <math>x(0)=0</math> and <math>x(T)=y</math>. The analogous expression in quantum mechanics is the [[Path integral formulation|path integral]].
| |
| | |
| A generic transition matrix in probability has a stationary distribution, which is the eventual probability to be found at any point no matter what the starting point. If there is a nonzero probability for any two paths to reach the same point at the same time, this stationary distribution does not depend on the initial conditions. In probability theory, the probability m for the stochastic matrix obeys [[detailed balance]] when the stationary distribution <math>\rho_n</math> has the property:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \rho_n K_{n\rightarrow m} = \rho_m K_{m\rightarrow n}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| Detailed balance says that the total probability of going from m to n in the stationary distribution, which is the probability of starting at m <math>\rho_m</math> times the probability of hopping from m to n, is equal to the probability of going from n to m, so that the total back-and-forth flow of probability in equilibrium is zero along any hop. The condition is automatically satisfied when n=m, so it has the same form when written as a condition for the transition-probability R matrix.
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \rho_n R_{n\rightarrow m} = \rho_m R_{m\rightarrow n}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| When the R matrix obeys detailed balance, the scale of the probabilities can be redefined using the stationary distribution so that they no longer sum to 1:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| p'_n = \sqrt{\rho_n}\;p_n
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| In the new coordinates, the R matrix is rescaled as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \sqrt{\rho_n} R_{n\rightarrow m} {1\over \sqrt{\rho_m}} = H_{nm}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| and H is symmetric
| |
| :<math>
| |
| H_{nm} = H_{mn}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| This matrix H defines a quantum mechanical system:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| i{d \over dt} \psi_n = \sum H_{nm} \psi_m
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| whose Hamiltonian has the same eigenvalues as those of the R matrix of the statistical system. The [[eigenvectors]] are the same too, except expressed in the rescaled basis. The stationary distribution of the statistical system is the ''ground state'' of the Hamiltonian and it has energy exactly zero, while all the other energies are positive. If H is exponentiated to find the U matrix:
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| U(t) = e^{-iHt}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| and t is allowed to take on complex values, the K' matrix is found by taking [[imaginary time|time imaginary]].
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| K'(t) = e^{-Ht}
| |
| \,</math>
| |
| | |
| For quantum systems which are invariant under [[T-symmetry|time reversal]] the Hamiltonian can be made real and symmetric, so that the action of time-reversal on the wave-function is just complex conjugation. If such a Hamiltonian has a unique lowest energy state with a positive real wave-function, as it often does for physical reasons, it is connected to a stochastic system in imaginary time. This relationship between stochastic systems and quantum systems sheds much light on [[supersymmetry]].
| |
| | |
| ==Experiments and applications==
| |
| Successful experiments involving superpositions of [[mesoscopic|relatively large]] (by the standards of quantum physics) objects have been performed.<ref>[http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/3309/what-is-the-worlds-biggest-schrodinger-cat What is the World's Biggest Schrodinger Cat?]</ref>
| |
| | |
| * A "cat state" has been achieved with [[photon]]s.<ref>[http://www.science20.com/news_articles/schr%C3%B6dingers_cat_now_made_light Schr%C%B6dingers Cat Now Made of Light]</ref>
| |
| * A [[beryllium]] [[ion]] has been trapped in a superposed state.<ref>[http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/seminar/seminar-topics/SchrodingerCatAtom.pdf C. Monroe, et. al. ''A "Schrodinger Cat" Superposition State of an Atom'']</ref>
| |
| * A [[double slit experiment]] has been performed with molecules as large as [[Buckminsterfullerene|buckyballs]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120331115055/http://www.quantum.at/research/molecule-interferometry-foundations/wave-particle-duality-of-c60.html Wave Particle Duality of C60]</ref> and <ref>[http://www.univie.ac.at/qfp/research/matterwave/stehwelle/standinglightwave.html Diffraction of the Fullerenes C60 and C70 by a standing light wave]</ref>
| |
| * An experiment involving a [[superconducting quantum interference device]] ("SQUID") has been linked to theme of the thought experiment: " The superposition state does not correspond to a billion electrons flowing one way and a billion others flowing the other way. Superconducting electrons move en masse. All the superconducting electrons in the SQUID flow both ways around the loop at once when they are in the Schrödinger’s cat state."<ref>[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2815 Physics World: ''Schrodinger's cat comes into view'']</ref>
| |
| * A [[piezoelectric]] "[[tuning fork]]" has been constructed, which can be placed into a superposition of vibrating and non vibrating states. The resonator comprises about 10 trillion atoms.<ref>[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=quantum-microphone Scientific American :'' Macro-Weirdness: "Quantum Microphone" Puts Naked-Eye Object in 2 Places at Once: A new device tests the limits of Schrödinger's cat'']</ref>
| |
| * An experiment involving a [[flu virus]] has been proposed.<ref>[http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24101/ How to Create Quantum Superpositions of Living Things]></ref>
| |
| * The Heisenberg [[uncertainty principle]] states that for any given instant of time, the position and velocity of an electron or other subatomic particle cannot both be exactly determined, because the measurement operation affects the quantity being measured.
| |
| | |
| In [[quantum computing]] the phrase "[[cat state]]" often refers to the special entanglement of [[qubit]]s wherein the qubits are in an equal superposition of all being 0 and all being 1; i.e.,
| |
| | |
| :<math> | \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \bigg( | 00...0 \rangle + |11...1 \rangle \bigg) </math>.
| |
| | |
| ==Formal interpretation==
| |
| Applying the [[superposition principle]] to a quantum mechanical particle, the configurations of the particle are all positions, so the superpositions make a complex wave in space. The coefficients of the linear superposition are a wave which describes the particle as best as is possible, and whose amplitude [[Interference (wave propagation)|interferes]] according to the [[Huygens principle]].
| |
| | |
| For any physical property in [[quantum mechanics]], there is a list of all the states where that property has some value. These states are necessarily perpendicular to each other using the Euclidean notion of perpendicularity which comes from sums-of-squares length, except that they also must not be i multiples of each other. This list of perpendicular states has an associated value which is the value of the physical property. The superposition principle guarantees that any state can be written as a combination of states of this form with complex coefficients.
| |
| | |
| Write each state with the value q of the physical quantity as a vector in some basis <math>\psi^q_n</math>, a list of numbers at each value of n for the vector which has value q for the physical quantity. Now form the outer product of the vectors by multiplying all the vector components and add them with coefficients to make the matrix
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A_{nm} = \sum_q q \psi^{*q}_n \psi^q_m
| |
| </math>
| |
| where the sum extends over all possible values of q. This matrix is necessarily symmetric because it is formed from the orthogonal states, and has eigenvalues q. The matrix A is called the observable associated to the physical quantity. It has the property that the eigenvalues and eigenvectors determine the physical quantity and the states which have definite values for this quantity.
| |
| | |
| Every physical quantity has a [[Hermitian operator|Hermitian]] [[linear operator]] associated to it, and the states where the value of this physical quantity is definite are the [[eigenstate]]s of this linear operator. The linear combination of two or more eigenstates results in quantum superposition of two or more values of the quantity. If the quantity is measured, the value of the physical quantity will be random, with a probability equal to the square of the coefficient of the superposition in the linear combination. Immediately after the measurement, the state will be given by the eigenvector corresponding to the measured eigenvalue.
| |
| | |
| It is natural to ask why "real" (macroscopic, Newtonian) objects and events do not seem to display quantum mechanical features such as superposition. In 1935, [[Erwin Schrödinger]] devised a well-known thought experiment, now known as [[Schrödinger's cat]], which highlighted the dissonance between quantum mechanics and [[Newtonian physics]], where only one configuration occurs, although a configuration for a particle in Newtonian physics specifies both position and momentum.
| |
| | |
| In fact, quantum superposition results in many directly observable effects, such as [[Interference (wave propagation)|interference]] peaks from an [[electron]] [[wave]] in a [[double-slit experiment]]. The superpositions, however, persist at all scales, absent a mechanism for removing them. This mechanism can be philosophical as in the [[Copenhagen interpretation]], or physical.
| |
| | |
| Recent research indicates that [[chlorophyll]] within [[plants]] appears to exploit the feature of quantum superposition to achieve greater efficiency in transporting energy, allowing pigment proteins to be spaced further apart than would otherwise be possible.<ref name="doi:10.1038/nature08811">{{Cite journal|last=Scholes|first=Gregory|coauthors=Elisabetta Collini, Cathy Y. Wong, Krystyna E. Wilk, Paul M. G. Curmi, Paul Brumer & Gregory D. Scholes|date=4 February 2010|title=Coherently wired light-harvesting in photosynthetic marine algae at ambient temperature|journal=Nature|volume=463|issue= 7281|pages=644–647|url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7281/full/nature08811.html|doi=10.1038/nature08811|bibcode = 2010Natur.463..644C|pmid=20130647}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=quantum-entanglement-and-photo|title=Quantum Entanglement, Photosynthesis and Better Solar Cells|last=Moyer|first=Michael|date=September 2009|work=Scientific American|accessdate=12 May 2010}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| If the operators corresponding to two observables do not [[Commutative property|commute]], they have no simultaneous eigenstates and they obey an [[uncertainty principle]]. A state where one observable has a definite value corresponds to a superposition of many states for the other observable.
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| * [[Eigenstates]]
| |
| * [[Mach-Zehnder interferometer]]
| |
| * [[Penrose Interpretation]]
| |
| * [[Pure qubit state]]
| |
| * [[Quantum computation]]
| |
| * [[Schrödinger's cat]]
| |
| * [[Wave packet]]
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| <references/>
| |
| {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2010}}
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Quantum Superposition}}
| |
| [[Category:Quantum mechanics]]
| |
| | |
| [[ar:تراكب كمي]]
| |
| [[sk:Princíp superpozície#Princíp superpozície v kvantovej mechanike]]
| |