Tikhonov regularization: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
added category 'inverse problems'
en>Richarddonkin
m →‎Determination of the Tikhonov factor: Typo since Bayesian interpretation section is below, not above.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[mathematics]], the '''Dini''' and '''Dini-Lipschitz tests''' are highly precise tests that can be used to prove that the [[Fourier series]] of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] converges at a given point. These tests are named after [[Ulisse Dini]] and [[Rudolf Lipschitz]].<ref>{{citation|title=Introduction to Partial Differential Equations and Hilbert Space Methods|author= Karl E. Gustafson|year=1999|publisher=Courier Dover Publications|pages=121 |url=http://books.google.com/?id=uu059Rj4x8oC&pg=PA121&dq=%22Dini+test%22|isbn=978-0-486-61271-3}}</ref>
Andrew Simcox is the title his mothers and fathers gave him and he completely enjoys this name. What I love doing is soccer but I don't have the time lately. For a while I've been in Mississippi but now I'm contemplating other options. Since he was 18 he's been operating as an info officer but he plans on changing it.<br><br>Also visit my webpage; best psychic ([http://cooking-recipes-videos.com/users/AMacadam cooking-recipes-videos.com])
 
== Definition ==
 
Let ''f'' be a function on [0,2π], let ''t'' be some point and let δ be a positive number. We define the '''local modulus of continuity''' at the point ''t'' by
 
:<math>\left.\right.\omega_f(\delta;t)=\max_{|\varepsilon| \le \delta} |f(t)-f(t+\varepsilon)|</math>
 
Notice that we consider here ''f'' to be a periodic function, e.g. if ''t'' = 0 and ε is negative then we ''define'' ''f''(ε) = ''f''(2π + ε).  
 
The '''global modulus of continuity''' (or simply the [[modulus of continuity]]) is defined by
 
:<math>\left.\right.\omega_f(\delta) = \max_t \omega_f(\delta;t)</math>
 
With these definitions we may state the main results
 
''Theorem (Dini's test): Assume a function f satisfies at a point t that''
 
:<math>\int_0^\pi \frac{1}{\delta}\omega_f(\delta;t)\,d\delta < \infty.</math>
 
''Then the Fourier series of f converges at t to f(t).''
 
For example, the theorem holds with <math>\omega_f=\log^{-2}(\delta^{-1})</math> but does not hold with <math>\log^{-1}(\delta^{-1})</math>.
 
''Theorem (the Dini-Lipschitz test): Assume a function f satisfies''
 
:<math>\omega_f(\delta)=o\left(\log\frac{1}{\delta}\right)^{-1}.</math>
 
''Then the Fourier series of f converges uniformly to f.''
 
In particular, any function of a [[Hölder class]]{{clarify|date=July 2010|reason=Target of redirect does not define the term as used here}} satisfies the Dini-Lipschitz test.
 
==Precision==
 
Both tests are best of their kind. For the Dini-Lipschitz test, it is possible to construct a function ''f'' with its modulus of continuity satisfying the test with ''O'' instead of ''o'', i.e.
 
:<math>\omega_f(\delta)=O\left(\log\frac{1}{\delta}\right)^{-1}.</math>
 
and the Fourier series of ''f'' diverges. For the Dini test, the statement of precision is slightly longer: it says that for any function Ω such that
 
:<math>\int_0^\pi \frac{1}{\delta}\Omega(\delta)\,d\delta = \infty</math>
 
there exists a function ''f'' such that
 
:<math>\left.\right.\omega_f(\delta;0) < \Omega(\delta)</math>
 
and the Fourier series of ''f'' diverges at 0.
 
==See also==
 
* [[Convergence of Fourier series]]
* [[Dini continuity]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Fourier series]]
[[Category:Convergence tests]]

Latest revision as of 15:38, 7 January 2015

Andrew Simcox is the title his mothers and fathers gave him and he completely enjoys this name. What I love doing is soccer but I don't have the time lately. For a while I've been in Mississippi but now I'm contemplating other options. Since he was 18 he's been operating as an info officer but he plans on changing it.

Also visit my webpage; best psychic (cooking-recipes-videos.com)