Quaternion group: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
en>Rgdboer
m →‎Properties: lk Order (group theory)
Line 1: Line 1:
Weight problem is only bad for wellness it could have a damaging impact on earning force. Just 10% increase in body mass index , a measure of fat relative to height, could cut a man's real earnings by 3.3% along with a woman's by 1.8%, Economists said on wednesday.<br><br>My point is I recognize I'm not overweight plus I learn I am a healthy person on my cholesterol and blood pressure, thus there are details which give to my fat a calculator can't account for.<br><br>As of 2010 the percentage of Americans with obesity is over 35% and steadily growing. In 1985 lower than 15% of Americans were obese. Obesity is defined has having a BMI (Body Mass Index) of 30 or high. For somebody that is 5'9" that is 203 pounds or higher. For somebody which is 5'5" which is regarding 180 pounds or high.<br><br>A [http://safedietplansforwomen.com/bmi-calculator bmi calculator females] is important tool to have specifically for ladies since they are more prone to receive fat deposits than guys. Hormonal changes are the most significant reason. Women are additionally proven to emotionally devour food than man. Whenever ladies are depressed, happy or tired  they tend to look for comfort foods. Women are structurally different than man to accommodate the growing baby inside the abdominal region. Plus a healthy woman (21-36%) would have twice more fat compared to a healthy man (8-25%). Since women begin off with a greater fat percentage than men, then it's not surprising that they are more liable to be overweight.<br><br>Your child's BMI will then be compared to different kids utilizing a children's BMI percentile graph which may be found online also. If the child's BMI is greater than 95% of the youngsters of the same age and gender, he is considered to be obese. Because youngsters are still growing, this factor should be considered when creating an overall weight assessment.<br><br>Then you recognize how to calculate BMI for women plus guys. Calculating BMI utilizing this formula is quite simple nevertheless what does the number mean which you receive following calculation. Don't worry, a BMI chart for women which is equally used by guys comes for your rescue at this point.<br><br>In terms of its dodgy mathematics, the BMI is borderline junk science. However inside this regard, BMI is less egregious than Global Warming 'studies', inside that nearly all of the big-name 'researchers' cherry-pick, hide, or even fabricate data. Click found on the link for my extended hub on the topic.
{{for|jet engines that cool but do not liquify the air|Precooled jet engine}}
A '''Liquid Air Cycle Engine (LACE)''' is a type of [[spacecraft propulsion]] engine that attempts to increase its efficiency by gathering part of its oxidizer from the [[Earth's atmosphere|atmosphere]]. A liquid air cycle engine uses cryogenic hydrogen fuel to liquify the air.
 
In a [[LOX]]/[[LH2]] [[bipropellant rocket]] the [[liquid oxygen]] needed for combustion is the majority of the weight of the spacecraft on lift-off, so if some of this can be collected from the air on the way, it might dramatically lower the take-off weight of the spacecraft.  
 
LACE was studied to some extent in the [[United States|USA]] during the late 1950s and early 1960s, and by late 1960 [[Marquardt Corporation|Marquardt]] had a testbed system running. However, as [[NASA]] moved to ballistic capsules during [[Project Mercury]], funding for research into winged vehicles slowly disappeared, and LACE work along with it.
 
==Principle of operation==
 
Conceptually LACE works by compressing and then quickly liquefying the air. Compression is achieved through the ram-air effect in an intake similar to that found on a high-speed aircraft like [[Concorde]], where [[intake ramp]]s create [[shock wave]]s that compress the air. The LACE design then blows the compressed air over a [[heat exchanger]], in which the [[liquid hydrogen]] fuel is flowing. This rapidly cools the air, and the various constituents quickly liquefy. By careful mechanical arrangement the liquid oxygen can be removed from the other parts of the air, notably [[water]], [[nitrogen]] and [[carbon dioxide]], at which point it can be fed into the engine as usual. The hydrogen is so much lighter than oxygen that the now-warm hydrogen is often dumped overboard instead of being re-used as fuel, at a net gain.
 
==Advantages and Disadvantages==
 
The use of a winged launch vehicle allows using [[lift (force)|lift]] rather than [[thrust]] to overcome gravity, which greatly reduces [[gravity drag|gravity losses.]] On the other hand, the reduced gravity losses come at the price of much higher [[aerodynamic drag]] and [[aerodynamic heating]] due to the need to stay much deeper within the atmosphere than a pure rocket would during the [[boost phase]].
 
In order to appreciably reduce the mass of the oxygen carried at launch, a LACE vehicle needs to spend more time in the lower atmosphere to collect enough oxygen to supply the engines during the remainder of the launch. This leads to greatly increased vehicle heating and drag losses, which therefore increases fuel consumption to offset the drag losses and the additional mass of the [[Atmospheric_reentry#Thermal_protection_systems|thermal protection system]]. This increased fuel consumption offsets somewhat the savings in oxidizer mass; these losses are in turn offset by the higher Isp ([[Specific impulse]]) of the air-breathing engine. Thus, the engineering trade-offs involved are quite complex, and highly sensitive to the design assumptions made.<ref>{{ cite book
| first = Benjamin
| last  = Orloff
| title = A Comparative Analysis of Singe-State-To-Orbit Rocket and Air-Breathing Vehicles
| url  = http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA453934&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
| id    = AFIT/GAE/ENY/06-J13
}}</ref>
 
Other issues are introduced by the relative material and logistical properties of [[LOX]] versus [[LH2]].
LOX is quite cheap; LH2 is nearly two orders of magnitude more expensive.<ref>{{ cite web
|url = http://www.astronautix.com/props/loxlh2.htm
|title = LOX/LH2: Properties and Prices
}}</ref>
LOX is dense (1.141&nbsp;kg/L), whereas LH2 has a very low density (0.0678&nbsp;kg/L) and is therefore very bulky. (The extreme bulkiness of the LH2 tankage tends to increase vehicle drag by increasing the vehicle's [[Drag equation|frontal area]].) Finally, LOX tanks are relatively lightweight and fairly cheap, while the deep cryogenic nature and extreme physical properties of LH2 mandate that LH2 tanks and plumbing must be large and use heavy, expensive, exotic materials and insulation. Hence, much as the costs of using LH2 rather than a [[Rocket_propellant#Propellant_density|hydrocarbon fuel]] may well outweigh the Isp benefit of using LH2 in a [[Single-stage-to-orbit#Dense_versus_hydrogen_fuels|Single-Stage-To-Orbit rocket]], the costs of using more LH2 as a propellant and air-liquefaction coolant in LACE may well outweigh the benefits gained by not needing to carry as much LOX on board.
 
Most significantly, the LACE system is far heavier than a pure rocket engine having the same thrust (air-breathing engines of [[Reaction Engines SABRE|almost all]] types have relatively poor [[Thrust-to-weight_ratio#Examples|thrust-to-weight ratios]] compared to rockets), and the performance of launch vehicles of all types is particularly affected by increases in vehicle dry mass (such as engines) that must be carried all the way to orbit, as opposed to oxidizer mass that would be burnt off over the course of the flight. Moreover, the lower thrust-to-weight ratio of an air-breathing engine as compared to a rocket significantly decreases the launch vehicle's maximum possible acceleration, and increases [[gravity drag|gravity losses]] since more time must be spent to accelerate to orbital velocity. Also, the higher [[Parasitic drag|inlet and airframe drag losses]] of a lifting, air-breathing vehicle launch trajectory as compared to a pure rocket on a [[Spacecraft_propulsion#Airbreathing_engines_for_orbital_launch|ballistic launch trajectory]] introduces an additional penalty term
<math>1/(1+ 1/((L/D)(a/g)))</math>
into the [[rocket equation]] known as the "Air-Breather's Burden."<ref>{{ Cite web
|url  = http://www.islandone.org/Propulsion/SCRAM-Spencer1.html
|title = Liquid Air Cycle Rocket Equation, Henry Spencer Comment
}}</ref>
The "air-breather's burden" term implies that unless the [[lift-to-drag ratio]] <math>(L/D)</math>
and the acceleration of the vehicle as compared to gravity <math>(a/g)</math>
are both implausibly large for a [[hypersonic]] air-breathing vehicle, the advantages of the higher Isp of the air-breathing engine and the savings in LOX mass are largely lost.
 
Thus, the advantages, or disadvantages, of the LACE design continue to be a matter of some debate.
 
==History==
 
LACE was studied to some extent in the [[United States|United States of America]] during the late 1950s and early 1960s, where it was seen as a "natural" fit for a winged spacecraft project known as the [[Aerospaceplane]]. At the time the concept was known as LACES, for ''Liquid Air Collection Engine System'', or ACES for ''Air Collection and Enrichment System''. Both [[Marquardt]] and [[General Dynamics]] were involved in the research, and by late 1960 Marquardt had a testbed system running that was capable of running a 275 [[lbf]] (1.2 [[kilonewton|kN]]) thrust engine for minutes at a time. However, as [[NASA]] moved to ballistic capsules during [[Project Mercury]], funding for research into winged vehicles slowly disappeared, and LACE along with it.
 
==See also==
*[[Air-augmented rocket]]
*[[RB545]]
*[[Reaction Engines SABRE]] - a [[precooled jet engine]] that cools but does not liquefy the air
*[[Scramjet]]
 
==References==
<references />
 
==External links==
*[http://www.sworld.com.au/steven/space/lace.txt Liquid Air Cycle Rocket Equation]
*[http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/6133/hotol.html&date=2009-10-25+06:41:23  HOTOL]
*[http://www.islandone.org/Propulsion/SCRAM-Spencer1.html Liquid Air Cycle Rocket Equation, Henry Spencer Comment]
*[http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/03/rockets-not-air-breathing-plan.html  Rockets, not air-breathing planes, will be tomorrow's spaceships]
 
[[Category:Spacecraft propulsion]]
[[Category:Single-stage-to-orbit]]
[[Category:Reusable space launch systems]]
[[Category:Hydrogen rocket engines]]

Revision as of 03:25, 8 December 2013

28 year-old Painting Investments Worker Truman from Regina, usually spends time with pastimes for instance interior design, property developers in new launch ec Singapore and writing. Last month just traveled to City of the Renaissance. A Liquid Air Cycle Engine (LACE) is a type of spacecraft propulsion engine that attempts to increase its efficiency by gathering part of its oxidizer from the atmosphere. A liquid air cycle engine uses cryogenic hydrogen fuel to liquify the air.

In a LOX/LH2 bipropellant rocket the liquid oxygen needed for combustion is the majority of the weight of the spacecraft on lift-off, so if some of this can be collected from the air on the way, it might dramatically lower the take-off weight of the spacecraft.

LACE was studied to some extent in the USA during the late 1950s and early 1960s, and by late 1960 Marquardt had a testbed system running. However, as NASA moved to ballistic capsules during Project Mercury, funding for research into winged vehicles slowly disappeared, and LACE work along with it.

Principle of operation

Conceptually LACE works by compressing and then quickly liquefying the air. Compression is achieved through the ram-air effect in an intake similar to that found on a high-speed aircraft like Concorde, where intake ramps create shock waves that compress the air. The LACE design then blows the compressed air over a heat exchanger, in which the liquid hydrogen fuel is flowing. This rapidly cools the air, and the various constituents quickly liquefy. By careful mechanical arrangement the liquid oxygen can be removed from the other parts of the air, notably water, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, at which point it can be fed into the engine as usual. The hydrogen is so much lighter than oxygen that the now-warm hydrogen is often dumped overboard instead of being re-used as fuel, at a net gain.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The use of a winged launch vehicle allows using lift rather than thrust to overcome gravity, which greatly reduces gravity losses. On the other hand, the reduced gravity losses come at the price of much higher aerodynamic drag and aerodynamic heating due to the need to stay much deeper within the atmosphere than a pure rocket would during the boost phase.

In order to appreciably reduce the mass of the oxygen carried at launch, a LACE vehicle needs to spend more time in the lower atmosphere to collect enough oxygen to supply the engines during the remainder of the launch. This leads to greatly increased vehicle heating and drag losses, which therefore increases fuel consumption to offset the drag losses and the additional mass of the thermal protection system. This increased fuel consumption offsets somewhat the savings in oxidizer mass; these losses are in turn offset by the higher Isp (Specific impulse) of the air-breathing engine. Thus, the engineering trade-offs involved are quite complex, and highly sensitive to the design assumptions made.[1]

Other issues are introduced by the relative material and logistical properties of LOX versus LH2. LOX is quite cheap; LH2 is nearly two orders of magnitude more expensive.[2] LOX is dense (1.141 kg/L), whereas LH2 has a very low density (0.0678 kg/L) and is therefore very bulky. (The extreme bulkiness of the LH2 tankage tends to increase vehicle drag by increasing the vehicle's frontal area.) Finally, LOX tanks are relatively lightweight and fairly cheap, while the deep cryogenic nature and extreme physical properties of LH2 mandate that LH2 tanks and plumbing must be large and use heavy, expensive, exotic materials and insulation. Hence, much as the costs of using LH2 rather than a hydrocarbon fuel may well outweigh the Isp benefit of using LH2 in a Single-Stage-To-Orbit rocket, the costs of using more LH2 as a propellant and air-liquefaction coolant in LACE may well outweigh the benefits gained by not needing to carry as much LOX on board.

Most significantly, the LACE system is far heavier than a pure rocket engine having the same thrust (air-breathing engines of almost all types have relatively poor thrust-to-weight ratios compared to rockets), and the performance of launch vehicles of all types is particularly affected by increases in vehicle dry mass (such as engines) that must be carried all the way to orbit, as opposed to oxidizer mass that would be burnt off over the course of the flight. Moreover, the lower thrust-to-weight ratio of an air-breathing engine as compared to a rocket significantly decreases the launch vehicle's maximum possible acceleration, and increases gravity losses since more time must be spent to accelerate to orbital velocity. Also, the higher inlet and airframe drag losses of a lifting, air-breathing vehicle launch trajectory as compared to a pure rocket on a ballistic launch trajectory introduces an additional penalty term into the rocket equation known as the "Air-Breather's Burden."[3] The "air-breather's burden" term implies that unless the lift-to-drag ratio and the acceleration of the vehicle as compared to gravity are both implausibly large for a hypersonic air-breathing vehicle, the advantages of the higher Isp of the air-breathing engine and the savings in LOX mass are largely lost.

Thus, the advantages, or disadvantages, of the LACE design continue to be a matter of some debate.

History

LACE was studied to some extent in the United States of America during the late 1950s and early 1960s, where it was seen as a "natural" fit for a winged spacecraft project known as the Aerospaceplane. At the time the concept was known as LACES, for Liquid Air Collection Engine System, or ACES for Air Collection and Enrichment System. Both Marquardt and General Dynamics were involved in the research, and by late 1960 Marquardt had a testbed system running that was capable of running a 275 lbf (1.2 kN) thrust engine for minutes at a time. However, as NASA moved to ballistic capsules during Project Mercury, funding for research into winged vehicles slowly disappeared, and LACE along with it.

See also

References

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. Template:Cite web
  3. Template:Cite web

External links