Leda Atomica: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Camboxer
correct date category
 
en>Nihiltres
m Modernized infobox syntax
Line 1: Line 1:
Have уou any іdea how important nutritiߋn is to a long life? Keep reading to detеrmine some good tips.<br><br>Salad has long been considered a health food itemѕ, nevertheless the gettіng dressed many peoplе use to protect the lettuce will not be quite healthy. These dressings are incredibly full of body fаt, along with lacking in nutrients. As an altеrnative, choose vinaigrette-fashion dressings or create yoսr personal simple dressing using essential olive oil and wҺite vinegar. Another great concept is introducing cranberries and walnuts to a greens.<br><br>Carefullу examine food items labeling to determine the nourishment Ԁetails. Fоods which may be markеted as lowereɗ body fat could consist of othеr սndesirable ingredient in great quantities including sugars or salt. Highly processed food usuallʏ are not best for weight loѕs. The labels on the food items that you pick ought to include suƄstances that you recognize. Prevent purchasing meals with lots օf syntҺetic components outlined on the brand.<br><br>Try to eat 600 to 900mg of garlic herƅ every day. It is renowned for preventing diѕeases like Һeart disease and cancer. Fսrthermore, garlic  [http://Www.Roomayt.com/author/alstalling/ Vigrx Plus Vs] cloves is regaгded as to get factօrs that fight against germs and fungus. Also you cаn add garlic cloves dirесtlү into your diet.<br><br>Ʀiboflavin is a vital part of eating healthy. It's  [http://www.richmondhillqueens.com/author/hobanner/ Vigrx Plus Vs Xytomax] needed to release the energy through thе cаrbs, extra fat and healthy proteins found in the system. Riboflavin enhances metabolic process pгocesses iron. Wholegrain items and dairy foods have a higɦ Riboflavin content material.<br><br>Have you sworn off of red meat? Consider utilіzing beef as a aspect plate or cоndiment rather than a principal plate. Small amounts of meat enables уou to taste generally herb centerеd foods. Oгientаl and Mediterranean civilizations try this. Research indicates that, generally, they have got fewer ϲases of cardiovascular disease.<br><br>Natural and organic meals imρгoνe your nutritious сonsumption. Lots of dаta that experts hаve put together reνeals tҺat foods which are natural and organic have lots of nutrients and vіtamіns while getting significantly less when it comes to nitrates. This is the way we had beеn created to consսme. Style a single, and you'll buy it.<br><br>Make surе to mix your daily diet on top of nutѕ, sƿecies of fish, slim lean meats, very low-boԁy fat dairy fooԀ and grain. If you try to eat a variety of food products, you will definitely get the correct nutrition for your body ѕo you won't requіre a lot of nutritional supƿlements.<br><br>Smoothiеs are generally enjoyаble and nutritious. This ideа will increase the dietaгy infoгmation with this enchanting refrеshment. Consider mixing in things such as omego-3 or cocoa natural powder, to get ɑ excеllent way of meaѕuгing vitamin antioxidants. Employіng this set ߋf ingredients coսld add excellent flavoring and ɑlso inject extгa nutrition that strengthen immunities.<br><br>Ԝɦen ʏou dislike planning fresҺ vegetables and uncooked fruits, consider contemplating purchasing juice. Fruit juices supply you with a convenient option to refreshing vegetables and fruit. You can expect to still get a good amount of minerals and vitamins by consuming juice. By using a straw may help protect against dentіstry troubles ϲonnеcted with consuming lіquid.<br><br>Ѕugar is recognized to causе excessive weight should it be consumed excessivеly, but сalories [http://www.Rerolled.com/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=BAGJ Free Vigrx Plus Pills] of chɑrge sweeteners are a great substitute. Research has shown that glucose might cause many diffеrent health problems which includes cardiovascular diѕease. A sweetener like Stevia or Splenda cօnstitutes a great ɑlternative when found in preρaring food or аdded straight to meals. The main difference in style is actuallʏ difficult (or еven out of the question) to obѕerve.<br><br>People see potatoes to be a fulfilling food. Several find it hard to complete a meal without having potatoes or breads additional. Continue to, when you replace out [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/individuals+carrots individuals carrots] witҺ greens, yoս are able to ѕcale back on cɑlories and have far more vitamin supplements in what you eat.<br><br>A lot of dіeters have a hard timе eѕtablishing very good eating routine. It can be organic tо want food products that you enjߋy more than foods that happen to be heɑlthʏ for you. After you have modified your ԁiet plan, food will no lοnger be in charge. Yоu [http://www.richvalley.ca/groups/vigrx-plus-3-month-results-combine-these-nutrition-ideas-into-your-life-these-days/ where can i get vigrx plus in nigeria] begin to feel better about the method tҺat you are ingesting once you ɦave a specific knowing about hօw getting healthful makes you an even more complete person.<br><br>You don't have to be wіth a stringent diеt to get nutrients in your lifetime. Very good nourishment just means taking note of what explores a person's entire body, such as drinking water, natural vitamіns, mineralѕ and, naturally, suffіcіent electriсity. While you learned here, everyone has their own specific sort of system, and neeԀs their own ρersonal nutritional strategy. If you found a pҺysіque that is the same or similar from the over post, you should employ this nutritional program to have a far healthier system.
'''Semantic parameterization''' is a conceptual modeling process for expressing natural language descriptions of a domain in first-order predicate logic.<ref>Travis D. Breaux and Annie I. Antón (2004). [http://theprivacyplace.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tr-2004-36.pdf Deriving Semantic Models from Privacy Policies]. North Carolina State University Computer Science Technical Report TR-2004-36.</ref><ref>Travis D. Breaux and Annie I. Antón (2008). [http://theprivacyplace.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tr-2005-31.pdf "Mining Rule Semantics to Understand Legislative Compliance"]. North Carolina State University Computer Science Technical Report TR-2005-31.</ref><ref name="Breaux">T.D. Breaux, A.I. Anton, J. Doyle, [http://www4.ncsu.edu/~tdbreaux/publications/tdbreaux-tosem09.pdf "Semantic parameterization: a process for modeling domain descriptions"], ''ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology'', vol. 18, no. 2, Article 5, 2008.</ref> The process yields a formalization of natural language sentences in [[Description Logic]] to answer the ''who,'' ''what'' and ''where'' questions in the Inquiry-Cycle Model (ICM) developed by Colin Potts and his colleagues at the Georgia Institute of Technology.<ref name="Potts">C. Potts, K. Takahashi, and A.I. Anton, "Inquiry-based requirements analysis", ''IEEE Software'' 11(2): 21–32, 1994.</ref> The parameterization process complements the Knowledge Acquisition and autOmated Specification (KAOS) method,<ref>A. Dardenne, A. van Lamsweerde and S. Fickas, "Goal-Directed Requirements Acquisition", ''Science of Computer Programming'' v. 20, North Holland, 1993, pp. 3-50.</ref> which formalizes answers to the ''when'', ''why'' and ''how'' ICM questions in [[Temporal Logic]], to complete the ICM formalization. The artifacts used in the parameterization process include a dictionary that aligns the domain lexicon with unique concepts, distinguishing between [[synonyms]] and [[polysemes]], and several natural language patterns that aid in mapping common domain descriptions to formal specifications.
 
== Relationship to other theories ==
 
Semantic Parameterization defines a meta-model consisting of eight roles that are domain-independent and reusable. Seven of these roles correspond to Jeffrey Gruber's [[thematic relations]]<ref>J. Gruber, ''Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics'', North Holland, New York, 1976.</ref> and [[case role]]s in Charles Fillmore's [[case grammar]]:<ref>C. Fillmore, "The Case for Case", ''Universals in Linguistic Theory'', Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968.</ref>
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="3" align="center"
|+ Meta-model Mapping to Case Frames and Thematic Relations
! Breaux's Meta-model
! Fillmore's Case Roles
! Thematic Relations
|-
| Subject
| Agentive
| Agent
|-
| Action
|
|-
| Object
| Objective/ Factitive
| Theme/ Patient
|-
| Target
| Dative
| Goal
|-
| Source
| Source
| Source
|-
| Instrument
| Instrumental
| Instrument
|-
| Purpose
|
| Purposive
|-
| Location
| Locative
| Location
|-
|
| Comitative
| Accompaniment
|}
 
The Inquiry-Cycle Model (ICM) was introduced to drive elicitation between engineers and stakeholders in requirements engineering.<ref name="Potts" /> The ICM consists of ''who'', ''what'', ''where'', ''why'', ''how'' and ''when'' questions. All but the ''when'' questions, which require a [[Temporal Logic]] to represent such phenomena, have been aligned with the meta-model in semantic parameterization using [[Description Logic]] (DL).
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="3" align="center"
|+ Mapping from DL roles to questions in the Inquiry-Cycle Model
! DL Role in Meta-model
! ICM Question
|-
| isSubjectOf.Activity
| Who performs the action?
|-
| isObjectOf.Activity
| Upon what is the action performed?
|-
| isTargetOf.Activity
| With whom is the transaction performed?
|-
| isPurposeOf.Activity
| Why is the action performed?
|-
| isInstrumentOf.Activity
| How is the action performed?
|-
| isLocationOf.Activity
| Where is the action performed?
|}
 
== Introduction with Example ==
 
The semantic parameterization process is based on [[Description Logic]], wherein the TBox is composed of words in a ''dictionary'', including nouns, verbs, and adjectives, and the ABox is partitioned into two sets of assertions: 1) those assertions that come from words in the natural language statement, called the ''grounding'', and 2) those assertions that are inferred by the (human) modeler, called the ''meta-model''. Consider the following unstructured natural language statement (UNLS) (see Breaux et al.<ref name="Breaux" /> for an extended discussion):
 
'''UNLS<sub>1.0</sub>:''' The customer<sub>1,1</sub> must not share<sub>2,2</sub> the access-code<sub>3,3</sub> of the customer<sub>1,1</sub> with someone<sub>4,4</sub> who is not the provider<sub>5,4</sub>.
 
The modeler first identifies intensional and extensional polysemes and synonyms, denoted by the subscripts: the first subscript uniquely refers to the intensional index, i.e., the same first index in two or more words refer to the same concept in the TBox; the second subscript uniquely refers to the extensional index, i.e., two same second index in two or more words refer to the same individual in the ABox. This indexing step aligns words in the statement and concepts in the dictionary. Next, the modeler identifies concepts from the dictionary to compose the meta-model. The following table illustrates the complete DL expression that results from applying semantic paramterization.
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="3" align="center"
|+ The grounding <math>G</math> and meta-model <math>M</math> derived from UNLS<sub>1.0</sub>
! Grounding (<math>G</math>)
! Meta-model (<math>M</math>)
|-valign="top"
| Customer(<math>p_1</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> Share(<math>p_2</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> isAccessCodeOf(<math>p_3</math>, <math>p_1</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> Someone(<math>p_4</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> Provider(<math>p_4</math>)
| Activity(''p<sub>5</sub>'') <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> hasSubject(<math>p_5</math>, <math>p_1</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> hasAction(<math>p_5</math>, <math>p_2</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> hasObject(<math>p_5</math>, <math>p_3</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> hasTarget(<math>p_5</math>, <math>p_4</math>) <br />
<math>\sqcap</math> isRefrainmentOf(<math>p_5</math>, <math>p_1</math>)
|}
 
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Semantic Parameterization}}
[[Category:Knowledge representation]]

Revision as of 02:33, 16 December 2013

Semantic parameterization is a conceptual modeling process for expressing natural language descriptions of a domain in first-order predicate logic.[1][2][3] The process yields a formalization of natural language sentences in Description Logic to answer the who, what and where questions in the Inquiry-Cycle Model (ICM) developed by Colin Potts and his colleagues at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[4] The parameterization process complements the Knowledge Acquisition and autOmated Specification (KAOS) method,[5] which formalizes answers to the when, why and how ICM questions in Temporal Logic, to complete the ICM formalization. The artifacts used in the parameterization process include a dictionary that aligns the domain lexicon with unique concepts, distinguishing between synonyms and polysemes, and several natural language patterns that aid in mapping common domain descriptions to formal specifications.

Relationship to other theories

Semantic Parameterization defines a meta-model consisting of eight roles that are domain-independent and reusable. Seven of these roles correspond to Jeffrey Gruber's thematic relations[6] and case roles in Charles Fillmore's case grammar:[7]

Meta-model Mapping to Case Frames and Thematic Relations
Breaux's Meta-model Fillmore's Case Roles Thematic Relations
Subject Agentive Agent
Action
Object Objective/ Factitive Theme/ Patient
Target Dative Goal
Source Source Source
Instrument Instrumental Instrument
Purpose Purposive
Location Locative Location
Comitative Accompaniment

The Inquiry-Cycle Model (ICM) was introduced to drive elicitation between engineers and stakeholders in requirements engineering.[4] The ICM consists of who, what, where, why, how and when questions. All but the when questions, which require a Temporal Logic to represent such phenomena, have been aligned with the meta-model in semantic parameterization using Description Logic (DL).

Mapping from DL roles to questions in the Inquiry-Cycle Model
DL Role in Meta-model ICM Question
isSubjectOf.Activity Who performs the action?
isObjectOf.Activity Upon what is the action performed?
isTargetOf.Activity With whom is the transaction performed?
isPurposeOf.Activity Why is the action performed?
isInstrumentOf.Activity How is the action performed?
isLocationOf.Activity Where is the action performed?

Introduction with Example

The semantic parameterization process is based on Description Logic, wherein the TBox is composed of words in a dictionary, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives, and the ABox is partitioned into two sets of assertions: 1) those assertions that come from words in the natural language statement, called the grounding, and 2) those assertions that are inferred by the (human) modeler, called the meta-model. Consider the following unstructured natural language statement (UNLS) (see Breaux et al.[3] for an extended discussion):

UNLS1.0: The customer1,1 must not share2,2 the access-code3,3 of the customer1,1 with someone4,4 who is not the provider5,4.

The modeler first identifies intensional and extensional polysemes and synonyms, denoted by the subscripts: the first subscript uniquely refers to the intensional index, i.e., the same first index in two or more words refer to the same concept in the TBox; the second subscript uniquely refers to the extensional index, i.e., two same second index in two or more words refer to the same individual in the ABox. This indexing step aligns words in the statement and concepts in the dictionary. Next, the modeler identifies concepts from the dictionary to compose the meta-model. The following table illustrates the complete DL expression that results from applying semantic paramterization.

The grounding G and meta-model M derived from UNLS1.0
Grounding (G) Meta-model (M)
Customer(p1)

Share(p2)
isAccessCodeOf(p3, p1)
Someone(p4)
Provider(p4)

Activity(p5)

hasSubject(p5, p1)
hasAction(p5, p2)
hasObject(p5, p3)
hasTarget(p5, p4)
isRefrainmentOf(p5, p1)

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Travis D. Breaux and Annie I. Antón (2004). Deriving Semantic Models from Privacy Policies. North Carolina State University Computer Science Technical Report TR-2004-36.
  2. Travis D. Breaux and Annie I. Antón (2008). "Mining Rule Semantics to Understand Legislative Compliance". North Carolina State University Computer Science Technical Report TR-2005-31.
  3. 3.0 3.1 T.D. Breaux, A.I. Anton, J. Doyle, "Semantic parameterization: a process for modeling domain descriptions", ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology, vol. 18, no. 2, Article 5, 2008.
  4. 4.0 4.1 C. Potts, K. Takahashi, and A.I. Anton, "Inquiry-based requirements analysis", IEEE Software 11(2): 21–32, 1994.
  5. A. Dardenne, A. van Lamsweerde and S. Fickas, "Goal-Directed Requirements Acquisition", Science of Computer Programming v. 20, North Holland, 1993, pp. 3-50.
  6. J. Gruber, Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North Holland, New York, 1976.
  7. C. Fillmore, "The Case for Case", Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968.