Eulerian poset: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Arcfrk
refined cat
 
en>Steelpillow
see also
Line 1: Line 1:
Nice meet up with you, I'm Dewitt. To play rock and roll is his wife doesn't absolutely love but he is doing. Her day job is often a manager but she's always wanted her own business. Ohio is our birth area. Go to his website to see more: http://www.evenor-tech.com/moncler-outlet.html<br><br>Feel free to surf to my homepage - [http://www.evenor-tech.com/moncler-outlet.html Moncler Outlet]
{{Multiple issues|orphan =April 2010|unreferenced =March 2010|technical =March 2010|
{{underlinked|date=October 2012}}
}}
 
In the early 1990s, a new type of [[sliding mode control]], named '''terminal sliding modes''' (TSM) was invented at the [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] (JPL) by Venkataraman and Gulati.
 
The main idea of terminal sliding mode control evolved out of seminal work on terminal attractors done by Zak in the JPL, and is evoked by the concept of terminal attractors which guarantee finite time convergence of the states. While, in normal sliding mode, asymptotic stability is promised which leads to the convergence of the states to the origin.
But this convergence may only be guaranteed within infinite time. In TSM, a [[nonlinear]] term is introduced in the sliding surface design so that the manifold is formulated as an attractor. After the sliding surface is intercepted, the trajectory is attracted within the manifold and converges to the origin following a power rule.
 
Terminal sliding mode also has been widely applied to nonlinear process control, for example, rigid robot control etc.. Several open questions still remain on the mathematical treatment of the system's behavior at the origin since it is non-Lipschitz.
 
==Control Scheme==
Consider a continuous nonlinear system in canonical form
 
<math>\overset{\cdot}{x}_{1}(t) =x_{2}(t) </math> ......
 
<math>\overset{\cdot}{x}_{n-1}(t) =x_{n}(t)</math>
 
<math>\overset{\cdot}{x}_{n}(t)=a(x)+b(x)u(t)</math>
 
where <math>x(t)\in  R^{n}</math> is the state vector, <math>u\in R</math> is the control
input, <math>a(x)</math> and <math>b(x)</math> are nonlinear functions in <math>x(t)</math>.
Then a sequence of terminal sliding surfaces can be designed as follows:
 
<math>s_{1}(t) =\overset{\cdot }{s}_{0}(t)+\alpha _{1}(t)s_{0}^{\gamma _{1}}(t)</math>
 
<math>s_{2}(t) =\overset{\cdot }{s}_{1}(t)+\alpha _{2}(t)s_{1}^{\gamma _{2}}(t)</math> ......
 
<math>s_{n-1}(t) =\overset{\cdot }{s}_{n-2}(t)+\alpha _{n-1}(t)s_{n-2}^{\gamma
_{n-1}}(t)</math> where <math>s_{0}(t)=x_{1}(t)</math> and <math>\gamma _{i}=\frac{p_{i}}{q_{i}}, i=1,2,...,n-1</math> . <math>p_{i}, q_{i}</math> are positive odd numbers and <math>p_{i}\leq q_{i}</math>.
 
==References==
Venkataraman, S., Gulati, S., Control of Nonlinear Systems Using Terminal Sliding Modes
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, Sept 1993, Volume 115,  Issue 3.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Terminal Sliding Mode}}
[[Category:Control theory]]

Revision as of 11:04, 5 December 2013

Template:Multiple issues

In the early 1990s, a new type of sliding mode control, named terminal sliding modes (TSM) was invented at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) by Venkataraman and Gulati.

The main idea of terminal sliding mode control evolved out of seminal work on terminal attractors done by Zak in the JPL, and is evoked by the concept of terminal attractors which guarantee finite time convergence of the states. While, in normal sliding mode, asymptotic stability is promised which leads to the convergence of the states to the origin. But this convergence may only be guaranteed within infinite time. In TSM, a nonlinear term is introduced in the sliding surface design so that the manifold is formulated as an attractor. After the sliding surface is intercepted, the trajectory is attracted within the manifold and converges to the origin following a power rule.

Terminal sliding mode also has been widely applied to nonlinear process control, for example, rigid robot control etc.. Several open questions still remain on the mathematical treatment of the system's behavior at the origin since it is non-Lipschitz.

Control Scheme

Consider a continuous nonlinear system in canonical form

x1(t)=x2(t) ......

xn1(t)=xn(t)

xn(t)=a(x)+b(x)u(t)

where x(t)Rn is the state vector, uR is the control input, a(x) and b(x) are nonlinear functions in x(t). Then a sequence of terminal sliding surfaces can be designed as follows:

s1(t)=s0(t)+α1(t)s0γ1(t)

s2(t)=s1(t)+α2(t)s1γ2(t) ......

sn1(t)=sn2(t)+αn1(t)sn2γn1(t) where s0(t)=x1(t) and γi=piqi,i=1,2,...,n1 . pi,qi are positive odd numbers and piqi.

References

Venkataraman, S., Gulati, S., Control of Nonlinear Systems Using Terminal Sliding Modes J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, Sept 1993, Volume 115, Issue 3.