Higman group: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Deleted garbage
 
en>Mark viking
Added wl
Line 1: Line 1:
Bud is his name and his wife doesn't like it at all. After being out of his job for years he became a medical workers. To do magic is something he by no means give all the way up. Some time ago I chose to live in Missouri. You can find my website here: https://www.5goal.com/สมัครsbobet.html<br><br>my page; [https://www.5goal.com/สมัครsbobet.html สมัคร sbobet]
{{Transformation rules}}
 
'''Absorption''' is a [[validity|valid]] [[argument form]] and [[rules of inference|rule of inference]] of [[propositional logic]].<ref>{{cite book |ref=harv |last=Copi |first=Irving M. |last2=Cohen |first2=Carl |title=Introduction to Logic |publisher=Prentice Hall |year=2005 |page=362 |isbn=}}</ref><ref>http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e11a.htm</ref> The rule states that if <math>P</math> implies <math>Q</math>, then <math>P</math> implies <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math>. The rule makes it possible to introduce [[Logical conjunction|conjunctions]] to [[formal proof|proofs]]. It is called the law of absorption because the term <math>Q</math> is "absorbed" by the term <math>P</math> in the [[consequent]].<ref>Russell and Whitehead, ''[[Principia Mathematica]]''</ref> The rule can be stated:
 
:<math>\frac{P \to Q}{\therefore P \to (P \and Q)}</math>
 
where the rule is that wherever an instance of "<math>P \to Q</math>" appears on a line of a proof, "<math>P \to (P \and Q)</math>" can be placed on a subsequent line.
 
== Formal notation ==
The ''absorption'' rule may be expressed as a [[sequent]]:
 
: <math>P \to Q \vdash P \to (P \and Q)</math>
 
where <math>\vdash</math> is a [[metalogic]]al symbol meaning that <math>P \to (P \and Q)</math> is a [[logical consequence|syntactic consequences]] of <math>(P \leftrightarrow Q)</math> in some [[formal system|logical system]];
 
and expressed as a truth-functional [[tautology (logic)|tautology]] or [[theorem]] of [[propositional calculus|propositional logic]]. The principle was stated as a theorem of propositional logic by [[Bertrand Russell|Russell]] and [[Alfred Whitehead|Whitehead]] in  ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' as:
 
:<math>(P \to Q) \leftrightarrow (P \to (P \and Q))</math>
 
where <math>P</math>, and <math>Q</math> are propositions expressed in some formal system.
 
==Examples==
If it will rain, then I will wear my coat.<br>
Therefore, if it will rain then it will rain and I will wear my coat.
 
==Proof by truth table==
{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:center; width:45%"
|+ ''' '''
|- style="background:paleturquoise"
! style="width:15%" | ''<math>P\,\!</math>''
! style="width:15%" | ''<math>Q\,\!</math>''
! style="width:15%" | ''<math>P\rightarrow Q</math>''
! style="width:15%" | ''<math>P\rightarrow P\and Q</math>''
|-
| T || T || T || T
|-
| T || F || F || F
|-
| F || T || T || T
|-
| F || F || T || T
|}
<br>
 
==Formal proof==
{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:center; width:45%"
|+ ''' '''
|- style="background:paleturquoise"
! style="width:15%" | ''Proposition''
! style="width:15%" | ''Derivation''
|-
| <math>P\rightarrow Q</math>|| Given
|-
| <math>\neg P\or Q</math>|| [[Material implication (rule of inference)|Material implication]]
|-
| <math>\neg P\or P</math> || [[Law of Excluded Middle]]
|-
| <math>(\neg P\or P)\and (\neg P\or Q) </math> || [[Conjunction introduction|Conjunction]]
|-
| <math>\neg P\or(P\and Q)</math> || [[Distribution (logic)|Reverse Distribution]]
|-
| <math>P\rightarrow (P\and Q)</math> || Material implication
|}
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Rules of inference]]
[[Category:Theorems in propositional logic]]

Revision as of 05:41, 9 November 2013

Template:Transformation rules

Absorption is a valid argument form and rule of inference of propositional logic.[1][2] The rule states that if P implies Q, then P implies P and Q. The rule makes it possible to introduce conjunctions to proofs. It is called the law of absorption because the term Q is "absorbed" by the term P in the consequent.[3] The rule can be stated:

PQP(PQ)

where the rule is that wherever an instance of "PQ" appears on a line of a proof, "P(PQ)" can be placed on a subsequent line.

Formal notation

The absorption rule may be expressed as a sequent:

PQP(PQ)

where is a metalogical symbol meaning that P(PQ) is a syntactic consequences of (PQ) in some logical system;

and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic. The principle was stated as a theorem of propositional logic by Russell and Whitehead in Principia Mathematica as:

(PQ)(P(PQ))

where P, and Q are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Examples

If it will rain, then I will wear my coat.
Therefore, if it will rain then it will rain and I will wear my coat.

Proof by truth table

P Q PQ PPQ
T T T T
T F F F
F T T T
F F T T


Formal proof

Proposition Derivation
PQ Given
¬PQ Material implication
¬PP Law of Excluded Middle
(¬PP)(¬PQ) Conjunction
¬P(PQ) Reverse Distribution
P(PQ) Material implication

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e11a.htm
  3. Russell and Whitehead, Principia Mathematica