Main Page: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=December 2009}}
The '''Wigner–Eckart theorem''' is a [[theorem]] of [[representation theory]] and [[quantum mechanics]]. It states that [[Matrix (mathematics)|matrix]] elements of [[spherical tensor]] [[Operator (physics)|operator]]s on the basis of [[angular momentum]] [[eigenstate]]s can be expressed as the product of two factors, one of which is independent of angular momentum orientation, and the other a [[Clebsch-Gordan coefficient]]. The name derives from physicists [[Eugene Wigner]] and [[Carl Eckart]] who developed the formalism as a link between the symmetry transformation groups of space (applied to the Schrödinger equations) and the laws of conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum.<ref name="Eckart Biography">[http://orsted.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=571&page=194 Eckart Biography]– The National Academies Press</ref>
The '''Bell states''' are a concept in [[quantum information science]] and represent the simplest possible examples of [[Quantum entanglement|entanglement]]. They are named after [[John S. Bell]], as they are the subject of his famous [[Bell's theorem|Bell inequality]].  An '''EPR pair''' is a pair of [[qubits]] which jointly are in a Bell state, that is, entangled with each other. Unlike classical phenomena such as the nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravitational fields, entanglement is invariant under distance of separation and is not subject to relativistic limitations such as [[speed of light]].


==The Bell states==
The Wigner–Eckart theorem reads:
A Bell state is defined as a [[Maximally entangled state|maximally entangled]] [[quantum state]] of two [[qubit]]s. The qubits are usually thought to be spatially separated. Nevertheless they exhibit perfect [[correlation]]s which cannot be explained without [[quantum mechanics]].


To explain, let us first look at the Bell state <math>|\Phi^+\rangle</math>:
:<math>\langle jm|T^k_q|j'm'\rangle =\langle j||T^k||j'\rangle C^{jm}_{kqj'm'}</math>


:<math>|\Phi^+\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|0\rangle_A \otimes |0\rangle_B + |1\rangle_A \otimes |1\rangle_B).</math>
where ''T<sub>q</sub><sup>k</sup>'' is a rank ''k'' spherical tensor, <math>|jm\rangle</math> and <math>|j'm'\rangle</math> are eigenkets of total angular momentum ''J''<sup>2</sup> and its z-component ''J<sub>z</sub>'', <math>\langle j||T^k||j'\rangle</math> has a value which is independent of ''m'' and ''q'', and <math>C^{jm}_{kqj'm'}=\langle j'm';kq|jm \rangle</math> is the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for adding ''j''&prime; and ''k'' to get ''j''.


This expression means the following: The qubit held by Alice (subscript "A") can be 0 as well as 1. If Alice measured her qubit the outcome would be perfectly random, either possibility having probability 1/2. But if Bob then measured his qubit, the outcome would be the same as the one Alice got. So, if Bob measured, he would also get a random outcome on first sight, but if Alice and Bob communicated they would find out that, although the outcomes seemed random, they are correlated.
In effect, the Wigner–Eckart theorem says that operating with a spherical tensor operator of rank ''k'' on an angular momentum eigenstate is like adding a state with angular momentum ''k'' to the state. The matrix element one finds for the spherical tensor operator is proportional to a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient, which arises when considering adding two angular momenta. When stated another way, one can say that the Wigner-Eckart theorem is a theorem that tells you how vector operators behave in a subspace. Within a given subspace, a component of a vector operator will behave in a way proportional to the same component of the angular momentum operator. This definition is given in the book "Quantum Mechanics" by Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu and Laloe.


So far, this is nothing special: Maybe the two particles "agreed" in advance, when the pair was created (before the qubits were separated), which outcome they would show in case of a measurement.
==Proof==


Hence, followed [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]], [[Boris Podolsky|Podolsky]], and [[Nathan Rosen|Rosen]] in 1935 in their famous "[[EPR paradox|EPR]] paper", there is something missing in the description of the qubit pair given above &mdash; namely this "agreement", called more formally a [[hidden variable theory|hidden variable]].
Starting with the definition of a [[spherical tensor]], we have that


But quantum mechanics allows qubits to be in [[quantum superposition]] &mdash; i.e. in 0 and 1 simultaneously, e.g. in either of the states <math>|+\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)</math> or <math>|-\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle - |1\rangle)</math>. If Alice and Bob chose to measure in this [[basis (linear algebra)|basis]], i.e. check whether their qubit were <math>|+\rangle</math> or <math>|-\rangle</math>, they will find the same correlations as above. That is because the Bell state can be formally rewritten as follows:
<math>[J_{\pm}, T_q^{(k)}]=\hbar \sqrt{(k\mp q)(k\pm q+1)}T_{q\pm 1}^{(k)}</math>


:<math>|\Phi^+\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|+\rangle_A \otimes |+\rangle_B + |-\rangle_A \otimes |-\rangle_B).</math>
which we use to then calculate


Note that this is still the ''same'' state.
<math>\langle \alpha',j'm'|[J_{\pm}, T_q^{(k)}]|\alpha,jm\rangle=\hbar \sqrt{(k\mp q)(k\pm q+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm'|T_{q\pm 1}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\rangle </math>.


[[John S. Bell]] showed in his famous paper of 1964 by using simple [[probability theory]] arguments that these correlations cannot be perfect in case of "pre-agreement" stored in some hidden variables &mdash; but that quantum mechanics predict perfect correlations. In a more formal and refined formulation known as the [[CHSH Bell test|Bell-CHSH inequality]], this would be stated such that a certain correlation measure cannot exceed the value 2 according to reasoning assuming [[local hidden variable theory|local "hidden variable" theory]] (sort of common-sense) physics, but quantum mechanics predicts <math>2\sqrt{2}</math>.
If we expand the commutator on the LHS by calculating the action of the ''J''<sub>±</sub> on the bra and ket, then we get


There are three other states of two qubits which lead to this maximal value of <math>2\sqrt{2}</math> and the four are known as the four ''maximally entangled two-qubit states'' or ''Bell states'':
<math> \begin{align}  
\langle \alpha',j'm'|[J_{\pm}, T_q^{(k)}]|\alpha,jm\rangle
& = \sqrt{(j'\pm m')(j'\mp m'+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm'\mp1 |T_{q}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\rangle\\
& \qquad -\sqrt{(j\mp m)(j\pm m+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm' |T_{q}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\pm 1\rangle 
\end{align} </math>.


:<math>|\Phi^+\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|0\rangle_A \otimes |0\rangle_B + |1\rangle_A \otimes |1\rangle_B)</math>
We may combine these two results to get


:<math>|\Phi^-\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|0\rangle_A \otimes |0\rangle_B - |1\rangle_A \otimes |1\rangle_B)</math>
<math> \begin{align}
\sqrt{(j'\pm m')(j'\mp m'+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm'\mp1 |T_{q}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\rangle
& = \sqrt{(j\mp m)(j\pm m+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm' |T_{q}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\pm 1\rangle\\
& \qquad +\sqrt{(k\mp q)(k\pm q+1)}\langle \alpha',j'm'|T_{q\pm 1}^{(k)}|\alpha,jm\rangle
\end{align} </math>.


:<math>|\Psi^+\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|0\rangle_A \otimes |1\rangle_B + |1\rangle_A \otimes |0\rangle_B)</math>
This recursion relation for the matrix elements closely resembles that of the [[Clebsch-Gordan coefficient]]. In fact, both are of the form <math>\sum_j a_{ij}x_j=0</math>. We therefore have two sets of linear homogeneous equations


:<math>|\Psi^-\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|0\rangle_A \otimes |1\rangle_B - |1\rangle_A \otimes |0\rangle_B).</math>
:<math>\sum_j a_{ij}x_j=0,\qquad \sum_j a_{ij}y_j=0</math>  


==Bell state measurement==
one for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (''x<sub>j</sub>'') and one for the matrix elements (''y<sub>j</sub>''). It is not possible to exactly solve for the ''x<sub>j</sub>''. We can only say that the ratios are equal, that is
The '''Bell measurement''' is an important concept in [[quantum information science]]: It is a joint quantum-mechanical measurement of two [[qubit]]s that determines in which of the four Bell states the two qubits are in.


If the qubits were not in a Bell state before, they get projected into a Bell state (according to the projection rule of [[quantum measurement]]s), and as Bell states are [[Quantum entanglement|entangled]], a Bell measurement is an entangling operation.
:<math>\frac{x_j}{x_k}=\frac{y_j}{y_k}</math>


Bell-state measurement is the crucial step in [[quantum teleportation]]. The result of a Bell-state measurement is used by one's co-conspirator to reconstruct the original state of a teleported particle from half of an entangled pair (the "quantum channel") that was previously shared between the two ends.
or that ''x<sub>j</sub>'' = ''cy<sub>j</sub>'', where ''c'' is a coefficient of proportionality independent of the indices. Hence, by comparing recursion relations, we can identify the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient <math>\langle j_1 j_2; m_1,m_2\pm 1|j_1 j_2; jm \rangle</math> with the matrix element <math>\langle \alpha', j'm'|T_{q\pm 1}^{(k)}|\alpha, jm\rangle</math>, then we may write


Experiments which utilize so-called "linear evolution, local measurement" techniques cannot realize a complete Bell state measurement. Linear evolution means that the detection apparatus acts on each particle independently from the state or evolution of the other, and local measurement means that each particle is localized at a particular detector registering a "click" to indicate that a particle has been detected. Such devices can be constructed, for example, from mirrors, beam splitters, and wave plates, and are attractive from an experimental perspective because they are easy to use and have a high measurement cross-section.  
:<math>\langle \alpha', j'm'|T_{q\pm 1}^{(k)}|\alpha, jm\rangle=\text{(proportionality constant)}\langle jk; mq\pm 1|jk;j'm'\rangle</math>.


For entanglement in a single qubit variable, only three distinct classes out of four Bell states are distinguishable using such linear optical techniques. This means two Bell states cannot be distinguished from each other, limiting the efficiency of quantum communication protocols such as [[quantum teleportation|teleportation]]. If a Bell state is measured from this ambiguous class, the teleportation event fails.
By convention the proportionality constant is written as <math>\langle \alpha'j'||T^{(k)}||\alpha j\rangle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2j+1}}</math>, where the denominator is a normalizing factor.


Entangling particles in multiple qubit variables, such as (for photonic systems) [[polarization (waves)|polarization]] and a two-element subset of [[azimuthal quantum number|orbital angular momentum]] states, allows the experimenter to trace over one variable and achieve a complete Bell state measurement in the other.<ref>Kwiat, Weinfurter. [http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v58/i4/pR2623_1 "Embedded Bell State Analysis"]</ref> Leveraging so-called hyper-entangled systems thus has an advantage for teleportation. It also has advantages for other protocols such as [[superdense coding]], in which hyper-entanglement increases the channel capacity.
==Example==


In general, for hyper-entanglement in <math>n</math> variables, one can distinguish between at most <math>2^{n+1} - 1</math> classes out of <math>4^n</math> Bell states using linear optical techniques.<ref>Pisenti, Gaebler, Lynn. [http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ICQI-2011-QMI25 "Distinguishability of Hyper-Entangled Bell States by Linear Evolution and Local Measurement"]</ref>
Consider the position expectation value <math>\langle njm|x|njm\rangle</math>. This matrix element is the expectation value of a Cartesian operator in a spherically-symmetric hydrogen-atom-eigenstate [[Basis (linear algebra)|basis]], which is a nontrivial problem. However, using the Wigner–Eckart theorem simplifies the problem. (In fact, we could obtain the solution quickly using [[Parity (physics)|parity]], although a slightly longer route will be taken.)


Bell measurements of [[ion]] qubits in [[ion trap]] experiments, the distinction of all four states is possible.
We know that ''x'' is one component of {{vec|''r''}}, which is a vector. Vectors are rank-1 tensors, so ''x'' is some linear combination of ''T''<sup>1</sup><sub>q</sub> for ''q'' = -1, 0, 1. In fact, it can be shown that


==See also==
:<math>x=\frac{T_{-1}^{1}-T^1_1}{\sqrt{2}}\,,</math>
*[[Bell test experiments]]
 
where we defined the
[[spherical tensor]]s<ref name="J. Sakurai 1994">J. J. Sakurai: "Modern quantum mechanics" (Massachusetts, 1994, Addison-Wesley)</ref>
''T''<sup>1</sup><sub>0</sub> = ''z''
and
:<math>T^1_{\pm1}=\mp (x \pm i y)/{\sqrt{2}}</math>
(the pre-factors have to be chosen according to the definition<ref name="J. Sakurai 1994"/> of a [[spherical tensor]] of rank ''k''. Hence, the ''T''<sup>1</sup><sub>''q''</sub> are only proportional to the [[ladder operators]]).
Therefore
:<math>\langle njm|x|n'j'm'\rangle = \langle njm|\frac{T_{-1}^{1}-T^1_1}{\sqrt{2}}|n'j'm'\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\langle nj||T^1||n'j'\rangle (C^{jm}_{1(-1)j'm'}-C^{jm}_{11j'm'})</math>
The above expression gives us the matrix element for ''x'' in the <math>|njm\rangle</math> basis.  To find the expectation value, we set ''n''&prime; = ''n'', ''j''&prime; = ''j'', and ''m''&prime; = ''m''.  The selection rule for ''m''&prime; and ''m'' is <math>m\pm1=m'</math> for the <math>T_{\mp1}^{(1)}</math> spherical tensors.  As we have ''m''&prime; = ''m'', this makes the Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients zero, leading to the expectation value to be equal to zero.


==References==
==References==


* {{citation
<references/>
  | last1=Nielsen
 
  | first1=Michael A.
==See Also==
  | author1-link=Michael Nielsen
 
  | last2=Chuang
*[[Tensor operator]]
  | first2=Isaac L.
 
  | author2-link=Isaac Chuang
  | title=Quantum computation and quantum information
  | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]
  | year=2000
  | isbn=978-0-521-63503-5
}}, [http://books.google.ca/books?id=66TgFp2YqrAC&pg=PA25 pp. 25].
* {{citation
  | last1=Kaye
  | first1=Phillip
  | last2=Laflamme
  | first2=Raymond
  | author2-link=Raymond Laflamme
  | last3=Mosca
  | first3=Michele
  | author3-link=Michele Mosca
  | title=An introduction to quantum computing
  | publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]
  | year=2007
  | isbn=978-0-19-857049-3
}}, [http://books.google.ca/books?id=W0ud06mkPqoC&pg=PA75 pp. 75].


==Notes==
==External links==
{{reflist}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Bell State}}
*J. J. Sakurai, (1994). "Modern Quantum Mechanics", Addison Wesley, ISBN 0-201-53929-2.
[[Category:Quantum information science]]
*{{mathworld|urlname=Wigner-EckartTheorem|title= Wigner–Eckart theorem}}
*[http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/qm2/modules/m4/wigner.htm Wigner–Eckart theorem]
*[http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/752.mf1i.spring03/TensorOperators.htm Tensor Operators]


[[es:Analizador de Estado de Bell]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wigner-Eckart theorem}}
[[he:מצב בל]]
[[Category:Quantum mechanics]]
[[Category:Representation theory of Lie groups]]
[[Category:Theorems in quantum physics]]
[[Category:Theorems in representation theory]]

Revision as of 02:20, 13 August 2014

The Wigner–Eckart theorem is a theorem of representation theory and quantum mechanics. It states that matrix elements of spherical tensor operators on the basis of angular momentum eigenstates can be expressed as the product of two factors, one of which is independent of angular momentum orientation, and the other a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. The name derives from physicists Eugene Wigner and Carl Eckart who developed the formalism as a link between the symmetry transformation groups of space (applied to the Schrödinger equations) and the laws of conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum.[1]

The Wigner–Eckart theorem reads:

jm|Tqk|jm=j||Tk||jCkqjmjm

where Tqk is a rank k spherical tensor, |jm and |jm are eigenkets of total angular momentum J2 and its z-component Jz, j||Tk||j has a value which is independent of m and q, and Ckqjmjm=jm;kq|jm is the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for adding j′ and k to get j.

In effect, the Wigner–Eckart theorem says that operating with a spherical tensor operator of rank k on an angular momentum eigenstate is like adding a state with angular momentum k to the state. The matrix element one finds for the spherical tensor operator is proportional to a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient, which arises when considering adding two angular momenta. When stated another way, one can say that the Wigner-Eckart theorem is a theorem that tells you how vector operators behave in a subspace. Within a given subspace, a component of a vector operator will behave in a way proportional to the same component of the angular momentum operator. This definition is given in the book "Quantum Mechanics" by Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu and Laloe.

Proof

Starting with the definition of a spherical tensor, we have that

[J±,Tq(k)]=(kq)(k±q+1)Tq±1(k)

which we use to then calculate

α,jm|[J±,Tq(k)]|α,jm=(kq)(k±q+1)α,jm|Tq±1(k)|α,jm.

If we expand the commutator on the LHS by calculating the action of the J± on the bra and ket, then we get

α,jm|[J±,Tq(k)]|α,jm=(j±m)(jm+1)α,jm1|Tq(k)|α,jm(jm)(j±m+1)α,jm|Tq(k)|α,jm±1.

We may combine these two results to get

(j±m)(jm+1)α,jm1|Tq(k)|α,jm=(jm)(j±m+1)α,jm|Tq(k)|α,jm±1+(kq)(k±q+1)α,jm|Tq±1(k)|α,jm.

This recursion relation for the matrix elements closely resembles that of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. In fact, both are of the form jaijxj=0. We therefore have two sets of linear homogeneous equations

jaijxj=0,jaijyj=0

one for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients (xj) and one for the matrix elements (yj). It is not possible to exactly solve for the xj. We can only say that the ratios are equal, that is

xjxk=yjyk

or that xj = cyj, where c is a coefficient of proportionality independent of the indices. Hence, by comparing recursion relations, we can identify the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient j1j2;m1,m2±1|j1j2;jm with the matrix element α,jm|Tq±1(k)|α,jm, then we may write

α,jm|Tq±1(k)|α,jm=(proportionality constant)jk;mq±1|jk;jm.

By convention the proportionality constant is written as αj||T(k)||αj12j+1, where the denominator is a normalizing factor.

Example

Consider the position expectation value njm|x|njm. This matrix element is the expectation value of a Cartesian operator in a spherically-symmetric hydrogen-atom-eigenstate basis, which is a nontrivial problem. However, using the Wigner–Eckart theorem simplifies the problem. (In fact, we could obtain the solution quickly using parity, although a slightly longer route will be taken.)

We know that x is one component of Template:Vec, which is a vector. Vectors are rank-1 tensors, so x is some linear combination of T1q for q = -1, 0, 1. In fact, it can be shown that

x=T11T112,

where we defined the spherical tensors[2] T10 = z and

T±11=(x±iy)/2

(the pre-factors have to be chosen according to the definition[2] of a spherical tensor of rank k. Hence, the T1q are only proportional to the ladder operators). Therefore

njm|x|njm=njm|T11T112|njm=12nj||T1||nj(C1(1)jmjmC11jmjm)

The above expression gives us the matrix element for x in the |njm basis. To find the expectation value, we set n′ = n, j′ = j, and m′ = m. The selection rule for m′ and m is m±1=m for the T1(1) spherical tensors. As we have m′ = m, this makes the Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients zero, leading to the expectation value to be equal to zero.

References

  1. Eckart Biography– The National Academies Press
  2. 2.0 2.1 J. J. Sakurai: "Modern quantum mechanics" (Massachusetts, 1994, Addison-Wesley)

See Also


External links

  • J. J. Sakurai, (1994). "Modern Quantum Mechanics", Addison Wesley, ISBN 0-201-53929-2.
  • 22 year-old Systems Analyst Rave from Merrickville-Wolford, has lots of hobbies and interests including quick cars, property developers in singapore and baking. Always loves visiting spots like Historic Monuments Zone of Querétaro.

    Here is my web site - cottagehillchurch.com
  • Wigner–Eckart theorem
  • Tensor Operators