Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | |||
'''Gossen's Second “Law”''', named for [[Hermann Heinrich Gossen]] (1810–1858), is the assertion that an [[Economics|economic]] agent will allocate his or her expenditures such that the ratio of the [[marginal utility]] of each [[Good (economics)|good]] or [[Service (economics)|service]] to its price (the marginal expenditure necessary for its acquisition) is equal to that for every other good or service. Formally, | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial U/\partial x_i}{p_i}=\frac{\partial U/\partial x_j}{p_j}~\forall\left(i,j\right)</math> | |||
where | |||
* <math>U</math> is [[utility]] | |||
* <math>x_i</math> is quantity of the <math>i</math>-th good or service | |||
* <math>p_i</math> is the price of the <math>i</math>-th good or service | |||
== | == Informal derivation == | ||
Imagine that an agent has spent money on various sorts of goods or services. If the last unit of currency spent on goods or services of one sort bought a quantity with <em>less</em> marginal utility than that which would have been associated with the quantity of another sort that could have been bought with the money, then the agent would have been ''better off'' instead buying more of that other good or service. Assuming that goods and services are continuously divisible, the only way that it is possible that the marginal expenditure on one good or service should not yield more utility than the marginal expenditure on the other (or ''vice versa'') is if the marginal expenditures yield ''equal'' utility. | |||
== | == Formal derivation == | ||
Assume that utility, goods, and services have the requisite properties so that <math>\partial U/\partial x_i</math> is [[Well-defined|well defined]] for each good or service. An agent then optimizes | |||
:<math>U\left(x_1 ,x_2 ,\dots,x_n\right)</math> | |||
subject to a [[budget constraint]] | |||
:<math>W\geq\sum_{i=1}^n \left(p_i\cdot x_i \right)</math> | |||
where | |||
* <math>W</math> is the total available sum of money | |||
Using the method of [[Lagrange multipliers]], one constructs the function | |||
:<math>\mathcal{L}\left(x_1 ,x_2 ,\dots,x_n ,\lambda\right)=U\left(x_1 ,x_2 ,\dots,x_n\right)+\lambda\cdot\left[W-\sum_{i=1}^n \left(p_i\cdot x_i \right)\right]</math> | |||
and finds the first-order conditions for optimization as | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\lambda}=0</math> | |||
(which simply implies that all of <math>W</math> will be spent) and | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial x_i}=0~~\forall i</math> | |||
so that | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial U}{\partial x_i}-\lambda\cdot p_i =0~~\forall i</math> | |||
which is algebraically equivalent to | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial U/\partial x_i}{p_i}=\lambda~~\forall i</math> | |||
Since every such ratio is equal to <math>\lambda</math>, the ratios are all equal one to another: | |||
:<math>\frac{\partial U/\partial x_i}{p_i}=\frac{\partial U/\partial x_j}{p_j}~\forall\left(i,j\right)</math> | |||
(Note that, as with any maximization using first-order conditions, the equations will hold only if the utility function satisfies specific concavity requirements and does not have maxima on the edges of the set over which one is maximizing.) | |||
== References == | |||
* Gossen, Hermann Heinrich; ''Die Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln'' (1854). Translated into English as ''The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom'' (1983) MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-07090-1. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Gossen's laws]] | |||
* [[Hermann Heinrich Gossen]] | |||
* [[Marginal utility]] | |||
* [[Marginalism]] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gossen's Second Law}} | |||
[[Category:Marginal concepts]] | |||
[[Category:Consumer theory]] | |||
[[Category:Utility]] | |||
[[nl:Tweede wet van Gossen]] | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 17 August 2014
Template:TOCright Gossen's Second “Law”, named for Hermann Heinrich Gossen (1810–1858), is the assertion that an economic agent will allocate his or her expenditures such that the ratio of the marginal utility of each good or service to its price (the marginal expenditure necessary for its acquisition) is equal to that for every other good or service. Formally,
where
- is utility
- is quantity of the -th good or service
- is the price of the -th good or service
Informal derivation
Imagine that an agent has spent money on various sorts of goods or services. If the last unit of currency spent on goods or services of one sort bought a quantity with less marginal utility than that which would have been associated with the quantity of another sort that could have been bought with the money, then the agent would have been better off instead buying more of that other good or service. Assuming that goods and services are continuously divisible, the only way that it is possible that the marginal expenditure on one good or service should not yield more utility than the marginal expenditure on the other (or vice versa) is if the marginal expenditures yield equal utility.
Formal derivation
Assume that utility, goods, and services have the requisite properties so that is well defined for each good or service. An agent then optimizes
subject to a budget constraint
where
Using the method of Lagrange multipliers, one constructs the function
and finds the first-order conditions for optimization as
(which simply implies that all of will be spent) and
so that
which is algebraically equivalent to
Since every such ratio is equal to , the ratios are all equal one to another:
(Note that, as with any maximization using first-order conditions, the equations will hold only if the utility function satisfies specific concavity requirements and does not have maxima on the edges of the set over which one is maximizing.)
References
- Gossen, Hermann Heinrich; Die Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln (1854). Translated into English as The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom (1983) MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-07090-1.