Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome}} | |||
{{ | {{pp-move-indef}} | ||
{{ArticleHistory | |||
|action1=PR | |||
|action1date=March 12,2006 | |||
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/AIDS/archive1 | |||
|action1oldid=43520162 | |||
: | |action2=FAC | ||
|action2date=April 8,2006 | |||
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/AIDS/archive1 | |||
|action2result=promoted | |||
|action2oldid=47663579 | |||
|action3=FAR | |||
|action3date=20:43, 18 May 2008 | |||
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/AIDS/archive1 | |||
|action3result=removed | |||
|action3oldid=212487613 | |||
: | |action4=GAN | ||
|action4date=04:12, 6 August 2012 | |||
|action4link=Talk:HIV/AIDS/GA1 | |||
|action4result=listed | |||
|action4oldid=505904299 | |||
|maindate=June 15,2006 | |||
|currentstatus=FFA/GA | |||
|topic=biology | |||
}} | |||
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} | |||
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Science|class=GA}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|coresup=yes|class=GA|category=Natsci|VA=yes|WPCD=yes}} | |||
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=GA|importance=Top|reproductive=yes|selected=yes|MCOTW=prev |translation=yes |translation-imp=Top }} | |||
{{WikiProject Africa|class=GA|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject International development|class=GA|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Microbiology|class=GA|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Viruses|class=GA|importance=top}} | |||
}} | |||
{{On this day|date1=2012-06-05|oldid1=496145338}} | |||
{{Backwardscopy|title=Understanding and Management of Special Child in Pediatric Dentistry|url= http://books.google.ca/books?id=VAqP7xd4r74C&pg=PA264 |author= Gupta Priya| year=2012|org= JP Medical Ltd |comments=Extensive copy and pastes of large sections of Wikipedia without appropriate attribution or release under the appropriate license.}} | |||
{{Maintained|[[User talk:Jmh649|James Heilman, MD]]}} | |||
<!-- Settings for archive box and bot archiving. --> | |||
{{Archives |auto= short |index= /Archive index |search= yes |bot= ClueBot III |age= 90}} | |||
<!-- MiszaBot currently, 2013-11-29, does not run and is effectively abandoned. | |||
The solution appears to be to switch to User:ClueBot_III for archiving. --> | |||
<!-- For ClueBot III the numberstart argument is set to 22 because there are | |||
earlier archives which were manually performed which are not even close to 100K in length. | |||
The first archives moved by ClueBot III were Archive 21, but they were placed into Archive 20 making Archive 20 190k in length. Archive 22 should be the first completely started by CluBot III. | |||
Age is in hours, not days. | |||
index=yes results in the index contained on page User:ClueBot III/Indices/Talk:HIV/AIDS showing up ON THIS PAGE in place of the User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis template. | |||
--> | |||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
|archiveprefix=Talk:HIV/AIDS/Archive | |||
|format= %%i | |||
|age=2160 | |||
|index=no | |||
|minkeepthreads=2 | |||
|maxarchsize=100000 | |||
|numberstart=22 | |||
|header={{aan}} | |||
}} | |||
<!-- 2013-11-29 The most recent run that this actually made was at 5:04 pm, 22 March 2013. | |||
I have checked a few different pages, all have similar, or older, last run times. --> | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
|target=Talk:HIV/AIDS/Archive index | |||
|mask=Talk:HIV/AIDS/Archive <#> | |||
|leading_zeros=0 | |||
|indexhere=yes | |||
}} | |||
[[ | ==Lipodystrophy== | ||
Do not see what part of the paper supports this "Those who have not been treated with HAART have a higher rates of these metabolic problems suggesting that HIV itself may have an negative impact on cardiovascular system.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Troll JG|title=Approach to dyslipidemia, lipodystrophy, and cardiovascular risk in patients with HIV infection|journal=Curr Atheroscler Rep |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=51-6 |year=2011 |pmid=21181310 |pmc=3018260|doi=10.1007/s11883-010-0152-1}}</ref>" | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
[[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Emailed you the specifics and let you know via email/talk page. [[User:TylerDurden8823|TylerDurden8823]] ([[User talk:TylerDurden8823|talk]]) 20:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2013 == | |||
{{edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}} | |||
<!-- Begin request --> | |||
I'd like to make an edit request: | |||
under the section of "Discovery", I believe that Francoise Barre-Sinoussi should receive equal credit as Luc Montagnier in discovering HIV, as they received the Nobel Prize for it jointly. | |||
Thank you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/147.26.87.13|147.26.87.13]] ([[User talk:147.26.87.13|talk]]) 02:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Hello, | |||
In light of the new developments in our understanding of how HIV kills CD4 T cells | |||
1. I would like to add these relevant references: | |||
To the sentence: "It directly and indirectly destroys CD4+ T cells.[57]" please add <ref>http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674(10)01245-6</ref><ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vnfv/ncurrent/full/nature12940.html</ref> | |||
2. To the section Pathophysiology I would request to add: | |||
After the sentence: During the chronic phase, the consequences of generalized immune activation coupled with the gradual loss of the ability of the immune system to generate new T cells appear to account for the slow decline in CD4+ T cell numbers.[69]: | |||
I would request to add the following sentences: | |||
Recent studies<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vnfv/ncurrent/full/nature12940.html</ref><ref>http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2013/12/18/science.1243640</ref> demonstrate that lymphoid CD4 T cells, abortively infected by HIV-1, die by caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death. The DNA sensor IFI16 was shown to detect HIV DNA and triggers such cell death. Depletion of CD4 T-cell depletion and inflammation are signature events that propel HIV disease progression to AIDS. Cell death by pyroptosis appears to create a pathogenic vicious cycle in which dying CD4 T cells release inflammatory signals that attract more cells into the infected lymphoid tissues to die and to produce chronic inflammation and tissue injury. | |||
Thank you, and Happy Holidays. | |||
<!-- End request --> | |||
[[Special:Contributions/71.135.167.64|71.135.167.64]] ([[User talk:71.135.167.64|talk]]) 21:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
::We typically use [[review articles]] rather than primary sources per [[WP:MEDRS]]. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 21:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> per above. --[[User:Mdann52|<span style="color:Green">'''Mdann'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdann52|<span style="color:Red">'''52'''</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Mdann52|<span style="color:Maroon">''talk to me!''</span>]]</small> 14:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Probable cure for AIDS == | |||
There's probably an experimental ''cure'' for AIDS, which is the [[stem cell]]. | |||
There is a news article saying that two men were functionally ''cured'' of AIDS while they were undergoing a [[stem cell therapy]] to treat their lymphomas. In July 2012, Henrich had reported that the two men had no HIVs at their blood. | |||
Source: {{cite web|title=Two men "cured" of HIV no longer taking treatments|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/two-men-cured-of-hiv-no-longer-taking-treatments|first=Michelle|last=Castillo|website=CBS News|date=3 July 2013|accessdate=12 January 2014}} | |||
[[Special:Contributions/112.198.90.25|112.198.90.25]] ([[User talk:112.198.90.25|talk]]) 09:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::We use secondary sources. Yes interested but no not a general "cure" [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== AIDS Came from Eating Monkeys == | |||
== | Scientists from the University of Nottingham found that two strains of an HIV-like disease, SIV, has been discovered dormant in chimpanzees. Humans later caught the disease after hunting and eating the infected chimps. In humans, the disease morphed into HIV-AIDS, which reportedly has killed over 20 million people, mostly in Africa where eating monkey flesh often practiced <ref>http://www.thenazareneway.com/aids_came_from_monkeys.htm</ref> <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.5.27.63|195.5.27.63]] ([[User talk:195.5.27.63|talk]]) 14:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
[[ | |||
== Lead == | |||
The lead says "AIDS is considered a pandemic", this should be rephrased as "HIV/AIDS is considered a pandemic", which is the expression that's also used in the given source. The point is that not all HIV-positive people will progress to AIDS. We should really be careful not to mix up the two terms in this article. Can someone change this please, as I am unable to edit the article. [[User:Chakalacka|Chakalacka]] ([[User talk:Chakalacka|talk]]) 18:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{done}} -- [[User:Scray|Scray]] ([[User talk:Scray|talk]]) 18:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Since we are already at it, this sentence in the Virology section should also be fixed: "HIV is the cause of the spectrum of disease known as HIV/AIDS.". It just doesn't make sense. Maybe "HIV is the cause of the disease known as AIDS." or perhaps "HIV is the cause of a spectrum of diseases known as AIDS." [[User:Chakalacka|Chakalacka]] ([[User talk:Chakalacka|talk]]) 18:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::There is also "acute HIV" which is a disease caused by the HIV virus. So I think it is okay the way it is. The spectrum is HIV/AIDS. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::Has "acute HIV" actually been characterized/defined as a disease? I'm not a doc but I am wondering. Either way, I feel that the current sentence in a nutshell says "HIV is the cause of HIV" and somehow that seems more confusing than clarifying. [[User:Chakalacka|Chakalacka]] ([[User talk:Chakalacka|talk]]) 13:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yes it is a disease. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2014 == | |||
= | {{Edit semi-protected|<!-- Page to be edited -->|answered=yes}} | ||
<!-- Begin request --> | |||
<!-- End request --> | |||
[[Special:Contributions/27.124.18.34|27.124.18.34]] ([[User talk:27.124.18.34|talk]]) 13:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
:What actually? [[User:Noteswork|Noteswork]] ([[User talk:Noteswork|talk]]) 13:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== "These" versus "The vast majority of these" == | |||
Disagreement with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HIV/AIDS&curid=5069516&diff=594374423&oldid=593841565 this edit] that I wanted to discuss rather than just revert. | |||
== | The full phrase in question, with the disputed part bolded, is:<blockquote>A small group of individuals continue to dispute the connection between HIV and AIDS,[228] the existence of HIV itself, or the validity of HIV testing and treatment methods.[229][230] '''The vast majority of these claims''', known as AIDS denialism, have been examined and rejected by the scientific community.</blockquote> | ||
As it looks now, it is implied that there exist some disputes about HIV and its relationship with AIDS that have been examined and accepted. This is most certainly not the case: EVERY such denialist claim that has been investigated has been rejected, quite firmly. While "These claims" is technically imprecise, it does not give a false impression and is significantly more correct. Thoughts? [[User:TechBear|<font color="green">'''TechBear'''</font>]] | [[User talk:TechBear|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TechBear|Contributions]] 15:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:I reverted it to say that all denialist claims are answered. There are not any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] presenting unanswered denialist claims. There is no controversy in the scientific or medical community. Anyone who wishes to state otherwise should present a source making a claim which has not been answered. So far as I know, by the late 1990s the debates had resolved in the scientific and medical communities, and no claims have been made since then. See [[WP:MEDRS|Wikipedia's guide to reliable sources for medicine]] for information about how to present medical claims. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="cursor:help"><span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span></span>]] 15:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
::What we had before which was "These claims" was perfectly clear. Thus restored to that. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== | == Removing very odd opinion from lead. == | ||
People are free to their opinions but I don't think they are needed in this Wikipedia article. I will be removing the line "The disease has also become subject to many controversies involving religion." Considering most people on the planet are religious, and most have different views of all subject matter, anything could be "subject to many controversies involving religion".[[User:Mantion|Mantion]] ([[User talk:Mantion|talk]]) 06:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:It's not an opinion or odd, and it's in the lead because it summarizes significant aspects of the article...per [[WP:Lead]]. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 06:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Yes there have been some controversies revolving around organized religion. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
== | == Congenital HIV/AIDS infection == | ||
No article on it. Surprised. Anyone smart? | |||
:How, exactly, does a newborn with HIV differ substantially from someone who contracts the virus later in life? Can you refer editors to [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:3PARTY|third-party]] sources that detail the differences? [[User:TechBear|<font color="green">'''TechBear'''</font>]] | [[User talk:TechBear|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TechBear|Contributions]] 22:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Red ribbon== | |||
[[ | Consider it a better image for the lead. Thus restored. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
[[ |
Revision as of 17:24, 19 August 2014
Template:Pp-move-indef Template:ArticleHistory Template:Reliable sources for medical articles Template:Vital article Template:WikiProjectBannerShell Template:On this day
Template:Backwardscopy Template:Maintained
Template:Archives User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
Lipodystrophy
Do not see what part of the paper supports this "Those who have not been treated with HAART have a higher rates of these metabolic problems suggesting that HIV itself may have an negative impact on cardiovascular system.[1]" 43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Emailed you the specifics and let you know via email/talk page. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2013
Template:Edit semi-protected I'd like to make an edit request:
under the section of "Discovery", I believe that Francoise Barre-Sinoussi should receive equal credit as Luc Montagnier in discovering HIV, as they received the Nobel Prize for it jointly.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.26.87.13 (talk) 02:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
In light of the new developments in our understanding of how HIV kills CD4 T cells
1. I would like to add these relevant references:
To the sentence: "It directly and indirectly destroys CD4+ T cells.[57]" please add [2][3]
2. To the section Pathophysiology I would request to add:
After the sentence: During the chronic phase, the consequences of generalized immune activation coupled with the gradual loss of the ability of the immune system to generate new T cells appear to account for the slow decline in CD4+ T cell numbers.[69]: I would request to add the following sentences:
Recent studies[4][5] demonstrate that lymphoid CD4 T cells, abortively infected by HIV-1, die by caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death. The DNA sensor IFI16 was shown to detect HIV DNA and triggers such cell death. Depletion of CD4 T-cell depletion and inflammation are signature events that propel HIV disease progression to AIDS. Cell death by pyroptosis appears to create a pathogenic vicious cycle in which dying CD4 T cells release inflammatory signals that attract more cells into the infected lymphoid tissues to die and to produce chronic inflammation and tissue injury.
Thank you, and Happy Holidays.
71.135.167.64 (talk) 21:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: per above. --Mdann52talk to me! 14:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Probable cure for AIDS
There's probably an experimental cure for AIDS, which is the stem cell.
There is a news article saying that two men were functionally cured of AIDS while they were undergoing a stem cell therapy to treat their lymphomas. In July 2012, Henrich had reported that the two men had no HIVs at their blood.
Source: Template:Cite web
112.198.90.25 (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
AIDS Came from Eating Monkeys
Scientists from the University of Nottingham found that two strains of an HIV-like disease, SIV, has been discovered dormant in chimpanzees. Humans later caught the disease after hunting and eating the infected chimps. In humans, the disease morphed into HIV-AIDS, which reportedly has killed over 20 million people, mostly in Africa where eating monkey flesh often practiced [6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.5.27.63 (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Lead
The lead says "AIDS is considered a pandemic", this should be rephrased as "HIV/AIDS is considered a pandemic", which is the expression that's also used in the given source. The point is that not all HIV-positive people will progress to AIDS. We should really be careful not to mix up the two terms in this article. Can someone change this please, as I am unable to edit the article. Chakalacka (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Done -- Scray (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Since we are already at it, this sentence in the Virology section should also be fixed: "HIV is the cause of the spectrum of disease known as HIV/AIDS.". It just doesn't make sense. Maybe "HIV is the cause of the disease known as AIDS." or perhaps "HIV is the cause of a spectrum of diseases known as AIDS." Chakalacka (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- There is also "acute HIV" which is a disease caused by the HIV virus. So I think it is okay the way it is. The spectrum is HIV/AIDS. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Has "acute HIV" actually been characterized/defined as a disease? I'm not a doc but I am wondering. Either way, I feel that the current sentence in a nutshell says "HIV is the cause of HIV" and somehow that seems more confusing than clarifying. Chakalacka (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- There is also "acute HIV" which is a disease caused by the HIV virus. So I think it is okay the way it is. The spectrum is HIV/AIDS. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Since we are already at it, this sentence in the Virology section should also be fixed: "HIV is the cause of the spectrum of disease known as HIV/AIDS.". It just doesn't make sense. Maybe "HIV is the cause of the disease known as AIDS." or perhaps "HIV is the cause of a spectrum of diseases known as AIDS." Chakalacka (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2014
27.124.18.34 (talk) 13:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
"These" versus "The vast majority of these"
Disagreement with this edit that I wanted to discuss rather than just revert.
The full phrase in question, with the disputed part bolded, is:
A small group of individuals continue to dispute the connection between HIV and AIDS,[228] the existence of HIV itself, or the validity of HIV testing and treatment methods.[229][230] The vast majority of these claims, known as AIDS denialism, have been examined and rejected by the scientific community.
As it looks now, it is implied that there exist some disputes about HIV and its relationship with AIDS that have been examined and accepted. This is most certainly not the case: EVERY such denialist claim that has been investigated has been rejected, quite firmly. While "These claims" is technically imprecise, it does not give a false impression and is significantly more correct. Thoughts? TechBear | Talk | Contributions 15:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I reverted it to say that all denialist claims are answered. There are not any reliable sources presenting unanswered denialist claims. There is no controversy in the scientific or medical community. Anyone who wishes to state otherwise should present a source making a claim which has not been answered. So far as I know, by the late 1990s the debates had resolved in the scientific and medical communities, and no claims have been made since then. See Wikipedia's guide to reliable sources for medicine for information about how to present medical claims. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Removing very odd opinion from lead.
People are free to their opinions but I don't think they are needed in this Wikipedia article. I will be removing the line "The disease has also become subject to many controversies involving religion." Considering most people on the planet are religious, and most have different views of all subject matter, anything could be "subject to many controversies involving religion".Mantion (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's not an opinion or odd, and it's in the lead because it summarizes significant aspects of the article...per WP:Lead. Flyer22 (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Congenital HIV/AIDS infection
No article on it. Surprised. Anyone smart?
- How, exactly, does a newborn with HIV differ substantially from someone who contracts the virus later in life? Can you refer editors to reliable, third-party sources that detail the differences? TechBear | Talk | Contributions 22:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Red ribbon
Consider it a better image for the lead. Thus restored. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- ↑ One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting
In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang
Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules
Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.
A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running
The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more
There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang - ↑ http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674(10)01245-6
- ↑ http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vnfv/ncurrent/full/nature12940.html
- ↑ http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vnfv/ncurrent/full/nature12940.html
- ↑ http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2013/12/18/science.1243640
- ↑ http://www.thenazareneway.com/aids_came_from_monkeys.htm