Conditional random field: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
en>Qwertyus →References: reflist |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Noref|date=July 2010}} | |||
In [[decision theory]], a decision rule is said to '''dominate''' another if the performance of the former is sometimes better, and never worse, than that of the latter. | |||
Formally, let <math>\delta_1</math> and <math>\delta_2</math> be two [[decision theory|decision rules]], and let <math>R(\theta, \delta)</math> be the [[risk function|risk]] of rule <math>\delta</math> for parameter <math>\theta</math>. The decision rule <math>\delta_1</math> is said to dominate the rule <math>\delta_2</math> if <math>R(\theta,\delta_1)\le R(\theta,\delta_2)</math> for all <math>\theta</math>, and the inequality is strict for some <math>\theta</math>. | |||
This defines a [[partial order]] on decision rules; the [[maximal element]]s with respect to this order are called ''[[admissible decision rule]]s.'' | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Admissible decision rule]] | |||
{{statistics-stub}} | |||
[[Category:Decision theory]] |
Revision as of 15:26, 24 December 2013
Template:Noref In decision theory, a decision rule is said to dominate another if the performance of the former is sometimes better, and never worse, than that of the latter.
Formally, let and be two decision rules, and let be the risk of rule for parameter . The decision rule is said to dominate the rule if for all , and the inequality is strict for some .
This defines a partial order on decision rules; the maximal elements with respect to this order are called admissible decision rules.
See also
I am Chester from Den Haag. I am learning to play the Cello. Other hobbies are Running.
Also visit my website: Hostgator Coupons - dawonls.dothome.co.kr -