Reassignment method: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Mcld
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
Nice to satisfy you, my title is Ling and I completely dig that title. Some time in the past he selected to live in Idaho. The thing she adores most is to perform handball but she can't make it her profession. The job he's been occupying for years is a messenger.<br><br>Visit my web blog :: extended car warranty ([http://Sticker-Shocked.com/UserProfile/tabid/43/userId/404/Default.aspx linked web page])
{{distinguish|Fatou's lemma}}
 
In [[complex analysis]], '''Fatou's theorem''', named after [[Pierre Fatou]], is a statement concerning [[holomorphic functions]] on the unit disk and their pointwise extension to the boundary of the disk.
 
==Motivation and statement of theorem==
 
If we have a holomorphic function <math>f</math> defined on the open unit disk <math>D^{2}=\{z:|z|<1\}</math>, it is reasonable to ask under what conditions we can extend this function to the boundary of the unit disk. To do this, we can look at what the function looks like on each circle inside the disk centered at 0, each with some radius <math>r</math>. This defines a new function on the circle <math>f_{r}:S^{1}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}</math>, defined by <math>f_{r}(e^{i\theta})=f(re^{i\theta})</math>, where <math>S^{1}:=\{e^{i\theta}:\theta\in[0,2\pi]\}=\{z\in \mathbb{C}:|z|=1\}</math>. Then it would be expected that the values of the extension of <math>f</math> onto the circle should be the limit of these functions, and so the question reduces to determining when <math>f_{r}</math> converges, and in what sense, as <math>r\rightarrow 1</math>, and how well defined is this limit. In particular, if the [[L-p-space|<math>L^p</math> norms]] of these <math>f_{r}</math> are well behaved, we have an answer:
 
:'''Theorem:''' Let <math>f:D^{2}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}</math> be a holomorphic function such that
 
:: <math>\sup_{0<r<1}\lVert f_{r}\rVert_{L^{p}(S^{1})}<\infty.</math>
 
Then <math>f_{r}</math> converges to some function <math>f_{1}\in L^{p}(S^{1})</math> [[pointwise]] [[almost everywhere]] and in <math>L^{p}</math>. That is,
 
:: <math> \lVert f_{r}-f_{1}\rVert_{L^{p}(S^{1})}\rightarrow 0</math>
 
:and
 
:: <math> |f_{r}(e^{i\theta})-f_{1}(e^{i\theta})|\rightarrow 0</math>
:for almost every <math>\theta\in [0,2\pi]</math>.
 
Now, notice that this pointwise limit is a radial limit. That is, the limit being taken is along a straight line from the center of the disk to the boundary of the circle, and the statement above hence says that
:<math> f(re^{i\theta})\rightarrow f_{1}(e^{i\theta})</math>
for almost every <math>\theta</math>. The natural question is, now with this boundary function defined, will we converge pointwise to this function by taking a limit in any other way? That is, suppose instead of following a straight line to the boundary, we follow an arbitrary curve <math>\gamma:[0,1)\rightarrow D^{2}</math> converging to some point <math>e^{i\theta}</math> on the boundary. Will <math>f</math>  converge to <math>f_{1}(e^{i\theta})</math>? (Note that the above theorem is just the special case of <math>\gamma(t)=te^{i\theta}</math>).
It turns out that the curve <math>\gamma</math> needs to be ''nontangential'', meaning that the curve does not approach its target on the boundary in a way that makes it tangent to the boundary of the circle. In other words, the range of <math>\gamma</math> must be contained in a wedge emanating from the limit point. We summarize as follows:
 
:'''Definition:''' Let <math>\gamma:[0,1)\rightarrow D^{2}</math> be a continuous path such that <math>\lim_{t\rightarrow 1}\gamma(t)=e^{i\theta}\in S^{1}</math>. Define
 
:: <math>\Gamma_{\alpha}=\{z:\arg z\in [\pi-\alpha,\pi+\alpha]\}</math>
 
:and
 
:: <math>\Gamma_{\alpha}(\theta)=D^{2}\cap e^{i\theta}(\Gamma_{\alpha}+1).</math>
 
: That is, <math>\Gamma_{\alpha}(\theta)</math> is the wedge inside the disk with angle <math>2\alpha</math> : whose axis passes between <math>e^{i\theta}</math> and zero. We say that <math>\gamma</math>
: converges ''nontangentially'' to <math>e^{i\theta}</math>, or that it is a ''nontangential limit'', : if there exists <math>\alpha\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2})</math> such that <math>\gamma</math> is contained in <math>\Gamma_{\alpha}</math> and <math>\lim_{t\rightarrow 1}\gamma(t)=e^{i\theta}</math>.
 
:'''Fatou's theorem:''' Let <math>f\in H^{p}(D^{2})</math>. Then for almost all <math>\theta\in[0,2\pi]</math>, <math>\lim_{t\rightarrow1}f(\gamma(t))=f_{1}(e^{i\theta})</math> 
: for every nontangential limit <math>\gamma</math> converging to <math>e^{i\theta}</math>, where <math>f_{1}</math> is defined as above.
 
==Discussion==
* The proof utilizes the symmetry of the [[Poisson kernel]] using the [[Hardy–Littlewood maximal function]] for the circle.
* The analogous theorem is frequently defined for the Hardy space over the upper-half plane and is proved in much the same way.
 
==See also==
*[[Hardy space]]
 
==References==
* John B. Garnett, ''Bounded Analytic Functions'', (2006) Springer-Verlag, New York
* Walter Rudin. ''Real and Complex Analysis'' (1987), 3rd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
* [[Elias Stein]], ''Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions'' (1970), Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 
[[Category:Theorems in complex analysis]]

Revision as of 06:14, 29 January 2014

Template:Distinguish

In complex analysis, Fatou's theorem, named after Pierre Fatou, is a statement concerning holomorphic functions on the unit disk and their pointwise extension to the boundary of the disk.

Motivation and statement of theorem

If we have a holomorphic function f defined on the open unit disk D2={z:|z|<1}, it is reasonable to ask under what conditions we can extend this function to the boundary of the unit disk. To do this, we can look at what the function looks like on each circle inside the disk centered at 0, each with some radius r. This defines a new function on the circle fr:S1, defined by fr(eiθ)=f(reiθ), where S1:={eiθ:θ[0,2π]}={z:|z|=1}. Then it would be expected that the values of the extension of f onto the circle should be the limit of these functions, and so the question reduces to determining when fr converges, and in what sense, as r1, and how well defined is this limit. In particular, if the Lp norms of these fr are well behaved, we have an answer:

Theorem: Let f:D2 be a holomorphic function such that
sup0<r<1frLp(S1)<.

Then fr converges to some function f1Lp(S1) pointwise almost everywhere and in Lp. That is,

frf1Lp(S1)0
and
|fr(eiθ)f1(eiθ)|0
for almost every θ[0,2π].

Now, notice that this pointwise limit is a radial limit. That is, the limit being taken is along a straight line from the center of the disk to the boundary of the circle, and the statement above hence says that

f(reiθ)f1(eiθ)

for almost every θ. The natural question is, now with this boundary function defined, will we converge pointwise to this function by taking a limit in any other way? That is, suppose instead of following a straight line to the boundary, we follow an arbitrary curve γ:[0,1)D2 converging to some point eiθ on the boundary. Will f converge to f1(eiθ)? (Note that the above theorem is just the special case of γ(t)=teiθ). It turns out that the curve γ needs to be nontangential, meaning that the curve does not approach its target on the boundary in a way that makes it tangent to the boundary of the circle. In other words, the range of γ must be contained in a wedge emanating from the limit point. We summarize as follows:

Definition: Let γ:[0,1)D2 be a continuous path such that limt1γ(t)=eiθS1. Define
Γα={z:argz[πα,π+α]}
and
Γα(θ)=D2eiθ(Γα+1).
That is, Γα(θ) is the wedge inside the disk with angle 2α : whose axis passes between eiθ and zero. We say that γ
converges nontangentially to eiθ, or that it is a nontangential limit, : if there exists α(0,π2) such that γ is contained in Γα and limt1γ(t)=eiθ.
Fatou's theorem: Let fHp(D2). Then for almost all θ[0,2π], limt1f(γ(t))=f1(eiθ)
for every nontangential limit γ converging to eiθ, where f1 is defined as above.

Discussion

See also

References

  • John B. Garnett, Bounded Analytic Functions, (2006) Springer-Verlag, New York
  • Walter Rudin. Real and Complex Analysis (1987), 3rd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
  • Elias Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions (1970), Princeton University Press, Princeton.