Hebbian theory: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Wnt
Rm ad ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hebbian_theory&action=historysubmit&diff=487215589&oldid=479457754 ). Not clear to me this is a proper example anyway.
en>Kri
m →‎Hebbian Learning Account of Mirror Neurons: These letters should not be upper case
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[axiomatic set theory]], a function ''f'' : [[ordinal number|Ord]] → Ord is called '''normal''' (or a '''normal function''') [[iff]] it is [[continuous function#Continuous functions between partially ordered sets|continuous]] (with respect to the [[order topology]]) and [[monotonic function|strictly monotonically increasing]]. This is equivalent to the following two conditions:
Individual who wrote the  is called Eusebio. South Carolina is the size of his birth place. The beloved hobby for him as well as the his kids is to assist you fish and he's really been doing it for several years. Filing has been his profession for some time. Go to his website to discover a out more: http://prometeu.net<br><br>Also visit my web site :: hack clash of clans - [http://prometeu.net continue reading this..],
 
# For every [[limit ordinal]] γ (i.e. γ is neither zero nor a successor), ''f''(γ) = [[supremum|sup]] {''f''(ν) : ν < γ}.
# For all ordinals α < β, ''f''(α) < ''f''(β).
 
== Examples ==
A simple normal function is given by ''f''(α) = 1 + α; note however that ''f''(α) = α + 1 is ''not'' normal. If β is a fixed ordinal, then the functions ''f''(α) = β + α, ''f''(α) = β × α and ''f''(α) = β<sup>α</sup> (for β > 1) are all normal.
 
More important examples of normal functions are given by the [[aleph number]]s <math>f(\alpha) = \aleph_\alpha</math> which connect ordinal and [[cardinal number]]s, and by the [[beth number]]s <math>f(\alpha) = \beth_\alpha</math>.
 
== Properties ==
If ''f'' is normal, then for any ordinal α,
:''f''(α) ≥ α.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnstone|1987|loc=Exercise 6.9, p. 77}}</ref>
'''Proof''': If not, choose γ minimal such that ''f''(γ) &lt; γ. Since ''f'' is strictly monotonically increasing, ''f''(''f''(γ)) &lt; ''f''(γ), contradicting minimality of γ.
 
Furthermore, for any non-empty set ''S'' of ordinals, we have
:''f''(sup ''S'') = sup ''f''(''S'').
'''Proof''': "≥" follows from the monotonicity of ''f'' and the definition of the [[supremum]]. For "≤", set δ = sup ''S'' and consider three cases:  
* if δ = 0, then ''S'' = {0} and sup ''f''(''S'') = ''f''(0);
* if δ = ν + 1 is a [[successor ordinal|successor]], then there exists ''s'' in ''S'' with ν < ''s'', so that δ ≤ ''s''. Therefore, ''f''(δ) ≤ ''f''(''s''), which implies ''f''(δ) ≤ sup ''f''(''S'');
* if δ is a nonzero limit, pick any ν < δ, and an ''s'' in ''S'' such that ν < ''s'' (possible since δ = sup ''S''). Therefore ''f''(ν) < ''f''(''s'') so that ''f''(ν) < sup ''f''(''S''), yielding ''f''(δ) = sup {''f''(ν) : ν < δ}  ≤ sup ''f''(''S''), as desired.
 
Every normal function ''f'' has arbitrarily large fixed points; see the [[fixed-point lemma for normal functions]] for a proof.
One can create a normal function ''g'' : Ord → Ord, called the derivative of ''f'', where ''g''(α) is the α-th fixed point of ''f''.<ref>{{harvnb|Johnstone|1987|loc=Exercise 6.9, p. 77}}</ref>
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
== References ==
 
*{{citation
|first=Peter
|last=Johnstone
|authorlink=Peter Johnstone (mathematician)
|year=1987
|title=Notes on Logic and Set Theory
|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]
|isbn=978-0-521-33692-5}}.
 
[[Category:Set theory]]
[[Category:Ordinal numbers]]

Revision as of 20:23, 12 February 2014

Individual who wrote the is called Eusebio. South Carolina is the size of his birth place. The beloved hobby for him as well as the his kids is to assist you fish and he's really been doing it for several years. Filing has been his profession for some time. Go to his website to discover a out more: http://prometeu.net

Also visit my web site :: hack clash of clans - continue reading this..,