Associative ionization: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Bibcode Bot
m Adding 0 arxiv eprint(s), 2 bibcode(s) and 0 doi(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode Bot
 
en>Monkbot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A serious injury incident can leave you not only physically injured, but can also leave you financially injured. Many of us believe we&quot;ve insurance to cover such events, and the insurance companies are primarily worried about spending as little as possible while transferring the problem of the costs to you, while this really is partly correct. <br><br>A lot of people do not fully understand the in&quot;s and out&quot;s of how insurance companies really work. Insurance companies are usually seeking to improve their bottom line and ergo their stockholders shares. Let us take a look at how insurance companies work with hospitals to save lots of money and transfer prices for you, the insured. <br><br>If you are in a significant injury incident and break your leg, the insurance carrier will pay the hospital a portion of the cost to deal with your broken leg. Hypothetically, if you break your leg and choose to pay the hospital in full from the own pocket, the price would be $5,000. Today many of us suppose that our insurance company pays the whole $5,000 to the hospital, but that&quot;s not the case. The insurance company will only pay a percentage. For example they could pay $4,000 for the process. This happens because complex contracts are created by insurance companies with the hospitals at a reduced price. The insurance carrier won&quot;t enable the hospital to be in their protected network of suppliers, If the hospital doesn&quot;t agree to offer a substantial discount. If you have an opinion about data, you will probably require to discover about [http://www.iamsport.org/pg/bookmarks/closewindowpxn/read/26945612/prepaid-legal-are-you-really-planning-to-use-it this month]. Which means the hospital will generally perhaps not manage to address any of the people included in the insurance provider. This might potentially be tens of thousands of people for that hospital. <br><br>Due to the insurance providers getting the upper hand in contract negotiations with the hospitals, the hospital always negotiates and agrees to some form of a discount. In either case, the insurance carrier can always pay significantly less than total price for the process. <br><br>Based on your insurance policy and coverage exemptions, you&quot;ll most likely be required to purchase a percentage of one&quot;s health care. This could include the deductible and another special circumstances. Your plan might indicate that you&quot;re responsible for the first $1,000 of an inpatient stay (along with your deductible) and that the insurance carrier will pay the rest. These quantities vary dependent upon your specific policy. <br><br>They will move as much of the expenses for you as possible in a serious injury accident, if your insurance company can. This can result in you suffering massive economic problems. This is even truer if your insurance provider wants to only pay a share of the cost of one&quot;s treatment. As an example, they could accept pay 85% of cost. Now if you&quot;ve a significant injury incident and the bill comes to $225,000 (which is not unheard of) then you&quot;d result in $33,750 of the whole bill. <br><br>If someone else reaches fault in your serious harm incident then you definitely face fighting that person&quot;s insurance carrier. These firms will look for quick inexpensive negotiations (or no settlement) and will try to make the most of your lack of knowledge of that which you are in fact entitled to receive. Still another example could be if both you and the person who are at fault have the exact same insurance company. This creates an entire new, and perhaps not unusual, situation where your insurance carrier will try to save money on both sides of the problem. <br><br>If you suffer with a critical injury, you desire a competent and experienced lawyer to view out for your desires. Discover more on a related essay - Visit this hyperlink: [http://www.sunk9.com/an-introduction-to-florida-dui-attorneys/ official site]. No matter whether or not somebody else are at fault for your injury you require a lawyer to help you through the process. Every day a large number of Americans are becoming a deal from their insurance carrier and most never even know it; they only simply take it because the way things work. A lawyer will help sift through the complicated insurance coverage policies and will help you to obtain the elements of the policy that provide you with the most comprehensive coverage. <br><br>When faced with a serious personal injury the final thing you should have to be worried about is how you are going to pay your medical expenses. Learn new resources on [http://www.zhongyumold.com/6-activities-to-do-if-involved-with-a-motorcycle-accident-3/ 6 Activities to do if involved with a Motorcycle Accident | Zhong Yum Old] by visiting our original use with. Unfortunately, it is possible that you must take measures to be sure that you will maybe not be stuck with the outrageous bill that your insurance company must cover. An attorney is the only one who&quot;s undoubtedly on your side when you are confronted with a significant accidental injury, because she or he is working for you and no one else..Zvulun and Associates<br>16000 Ventura Blvd. Ste 1208<br>Encino, CA 91436<br>888-333-2636<br><br>Should you loved this informative article and you want to receive more information regarding [http://capablepup604.livejournal.com electronic health record] generously visit our website.
This article relates the [[Schrödinger equation]] with the [[path integral formulation of quantum mechanics]] using a simple nonrelativistic one-dimensional single-particle [[Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)|Hamiltonian]] composed of kinetic and potential energy.
 
==Background==
 
===Schrödinger's equation===
Schrödinger's equation, in [[bra–ket notation]], is
 
:<math>
i\hbar {d\over dt} |\psi\rangle  = \hat H |\psi\rangle
</math>
 
where <math>\hat H </math> is the [[Hamiltonian operator]].  We have assumed for simplicity that there is only one spatial dimension.
 
The Hamiltonian operator can be written
 
::<math> \hat H = {\hat{p}^2 \over 2m} + V(\hat q ) </math>
 
where <math> V(\hat q ) </math> is the [[potential energy]], m is the mass and we have assumed for simplicity that there is only one spatial dimension q.
 
The formal solution of the equation is
 
:<math>
|\psi(t)\rangle = \exp\left({- {i \over \hbar } \hat H t}\right) |q_0\rangle \equiv \exp\left({- {i \over \hbar } \hat H t}\right) |0\rangle
</math>
 
where we have assumed the initial state is a free-particle spatial state <math> |q_0\rangle </math>.
 
The [[probability amplitude|transition probability amplitude]] for a transition from an initial state <math> |0\rangle </math> to a final free-particle spatial state <math>  | F \rangle </math> at time T is
 
:<math>
\langle F |\psi(t)\rangle = \langle F | \exp\left({- {i \over \hbar } \hat H T}\right) |0\rangle.
</math>
 
===Path integral formulation===
The path integral formulation states that the transition amplitude is simply the integral of the quantity
 
:<math>
\exp\left( {i\over \hbar} S \right)
</math>
 
over all possible paths from the initial state to the final state. Here S is the classical [[Action (physics)|action]].
The reformulation of this transition amplitude, originally due to Dirac<ref>{{cite book |author=Dirac, P. A. M. |title=The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Fourth Edition|publisher=Oxford|year=1958|isbn=0-19-851208-2}}</ref> and conceptualized by Feynman,<ref>{{cite book |author=Richard P. Feynman |title=Feynman's Thesis: A New Approach to Quantum Theory |publisher=World Scientific|year=1958|isbn=981-256-366-0}}</ref> forms the basis of the path integral formulation.<ref>{{cite book | author=A. Zee    | title=Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell| publisher= Princeton University| year=2003 | isbn=0-691-01019-6}}</ref>
 
==From Schrödinger's equation to the path integral formulation==
'''Note:''' the following derivation is heuristic (it is valid in cases in which the potential, <math>V(q)</math>, [[Commutativity|commutes]] with the momentum, <math>p</math>). Following Feynman, this derivation can be made rigorous by writing the momentum, <math>p</math>, as the product of mass, <math>m</math>, and a difference in position at two points, <math>x_a</math> and <math>x_b</math>, separated by a time difference, <math>\delta t</math>, thus [[Spatial quantization|quantizing distance]].
 
:<math>p = m \left(\frac{x_b - x_a}{\delta t}\right)</math>
 
'''Note 2:''' There are two errata on page 11 in [http://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/~zee/nuts.html Zee], both of which are corrected here.
 
We can divide the time interval from 0 to T into N segments of length
 
:<math> \delta t = {T \over N}.
</math>
 
The transition amplitude can then be written
 
:<math>
\langle F | \exp\left({- {i \over \hbar } \hat H T}\right) |0\rangle =
\langle F | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) \cdots
  \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |0\rangle
</math>.
 
We can insert the identity
 
:<math>
I = \int dq |q\rangle \langle q |
</math>
 
matrix N-1 times between the exponentials to yield
:<math>
\langle F | \exp\left({- {i \over \hbar } \hat H T}\right) |0\rangle =
\left( \prod_{j=1}^{N-1} \int dq_j \right)
\langle F | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right)
|q_{N-1}\rangle \langle q_{N-1} |
\exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |q_{N-2}\rangle
\cdots
  \langle q_{1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |0\rangle
</math>.
 
Each individual transition probability can be written
 
:<math>
  \langle q_{j+1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |q_j\rangle =
 
\langle q_{j+1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } { {\hat p}^2 \over 2m} \delta t} \right)
\exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } V \left( q_j \right) \delta t} \right)|q_j\rangle
</math>.
 
We can insert the identity
 
:<math>
I = \int { dp \over 2\pi } |p\rangle \langle p |
</math>
 
into the amplitude to yield
 
:<math>
  \langle q_{j+1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |q_j\rangle =
\exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } V \left( q_j \right) \delta t} \right)
\int { dp \over 2\pi } \langle q_{j+1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } { { p}^2 \over 2m} \delta t} \right)  |p\rangle \langle p |q_j\rangle
</math>
 
::::::::: <math>
=
\exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } V \left( q_j \right) \delta t} \right)
\int { dp \over 2\pi } \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } { { p}^2 \over 2m} \delta t} \right) \langle q_{j+1}  |p\rangle \langle p |q_j\rangle
</math>
 
::::::::: <math>
=
\exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } V \left( q_j \right) \delta t} \right)
\int { dp \over 2\pi } \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } { { p}^2 \over 2m} \delta t} -{i\over \hbar} p \left( q_{j+1} - q_{j} \right) \right)</math>
 
where we have used the fact that the free particle wave function is
 
: <math>
\langle p |q_j\rangle = \frac{\exp\left(  {i\over \hbar} p  q_{j}  \right)}{\sqrt{\hbar}}</math>.
 
The integral over p can be performed (see [[Common integrals in quantum field theory]]) to obtain
 
:<math>
  \langle q_{j+1} | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H \delta t} \right) |q_j\rangle =
\left( {-i m \over 2\pi \delta t \hbar } \right)^{1\over 2}
\exp\left[ {i\over \hbar} \delta t \left( {1\over 2} m \left( {q_{j+1}-q_j \over \delta t } \right)^2 -  
V \left( q_j \right)  \right) \right]
</math>
 
The transition amplitude for the entire time period is
 
:<math>
  \langle F | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H T} \right) |0\rangle =
\left( {-i m \over 2\pi \delta t \hbar } \right)^{N\over 2}
\left( \prod_{j=1}^{N-1} \int dq_j \right)
\exp\left[ {i\over \hbar} \sum_{j=0}^{N-1} \delta t \left( {1\over 2} m \left( {q_{j+1}-q_j \over \delta t } \right)^2 -  
V \left( q_j \right)  \right) \right]
</math>.
 
If we take the limit of large N the transition amplitude reduces to
 
:<math>
  \langle F | \exp\left( {- {i \over \hbar } \hat H T} \right) |0\rangle =
\int Dq(t)
\exp\left[ {i\over \hbar} S \right]
</math>
 
where S is the classical [[Action (physics)|action]] given by
 
:<math>
S = \int_0^T dt L\left( q(t), \dot{q}(t) \right)
</math>
 
and L is the classical [[Lagrangian]] given by
 
:<math>
L\left( q, \dot{q} \right)
= {1\over 2} m {\dot{q}}^2 - V \left( q \right)
</math>.
 
Any possible path of the particle, going from the initial state to the final state, is approximated as a broken line and included in the measure of the integral
 
:<math>
\int Dq(t) =
\lim_{N\to\infty}\left( {-i m \over 2\pi \delta t \hbar } \right)^{N\over 2}
\left( \prod_{j=1}^{N-1} \int dq_j \right)
</math>
 
This expression actually defines the manner in which the path integrals are to be taken. The coefficient in front is needed to ensure that the expression has the correct dimensions, but it has no actual relevance in any physical application.
 
This recovers the path integral formulation from Schrödinger's equation.
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}<!--added under references heading by script-assisted edit-->
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Relation between Schrodinger's equation and the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics}}
[[Category:Concepts in physics]]
[[Category:Statistical mechanics]]
[[Category:Quantum mechanics]]
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]
[[Category:Schrödinger equation]]

Latest revision as of 15:03, 14 January 2014

This article relates the Schrödinger equation with the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics using a simple nonrelativistic one-dimensional single-particle Hamiltonian composed of kinetic and potential energy.

Background

Schrödinger's equation

Schrödinger's equation, in bra–ket notation, is

where is the Hamiltonian operator. We have assumed for simplicity that there is only one spatial dimension.

The Hamiltonian operator can be written

where is the potential energy, m is the mass and we have assumed for simplicity that there is only one spatial dimension q.

The formal solution of the equation is

where we have assumed the initial state is a free-particle spatial state .

The transition probability amplitude for a transition from an initial state to a final free-particle spatial state at time T is

Path integral formulation

The path integral formulation states that the transition amplitude is simply the integral of the quantity

over all possible paths from the initial state to the final state. Here S is the classical action.

The reformulation of this transition amplitude, originally due to Dirac[1] and conceptualized by Feynman,[2] forms the basis of the path integral formulation.[3]

From Schrödinger's equation to the path integral formulation

Note: the following derivation is heuristic (it is valid in cases in which the potential, , commutes with the momentum, ). Following Feynman, this derivation can be made rigorous by writing the momentum, , as the product of mass, , and a difference in position at two points, and , separated by a time difference, , thus quantizing distance.

Note 2: There are two errata on page 11 in Zee, both of which are corrected here.

We can divide the time interval from 0 to T into N segments of length

The transition amplitude can then be written

.

We can insert the identity

matrix N-1 times between the exponentials to yield

.

Each individual transition probability can be written

.

We can insert the identity

into the amplitude to yield

where we have used the fact that the free particle wave function is

.

The integral over p can be performed (see Common integrals in quantum field theory) to obtain

The transition amplitude for the entire time period is

.

If we take the limit of large N the transition amplitude reduces to

where S is the classical action given by

and L is the classical Lagrangian given by

.

Any possible path of the particle, going from the initial state to the final state, is approximated as a broken line and included in the measure of the integral

This expression actually defines the manner in which the path integrals are to be taken. The coefficient in front is needed to ensure that the expression has the correct dimensions, but it has no actual relevance in any physical application.

This recovers the path integral formulation from Schrödinger's equation.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  3. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534