|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Continuum mechanics|cTopic=[[Solid mechanics]]}}
| | High tech from tip to manage, Worldwide knives from Japan made a sensation when they burst onto the world's culinary stage as an alternative to classic European-style cutlery. This will certainly assistance you to make an informed selection in the end when it comes to deciding upon most effective kitchen knife set for your cooking wants ahead of you acquire. The secret of rapid and perfect cutting is practice and much more practice, nonetheless, practice wouldn't be adequate without the need of a correct set of tools, in this case, the greatest kitchen knife set. Also a high quality knife ought to be a full forged higher carbon stainless.<br><br><br><br>Should you have virtually any queries relating to exactly where as well as tips on how to use [http://www.thebestkitchenknivesreviews.com/best-knife-set-reviews-top-kitchen-sets/ best Knife set made in usa], you are able to e mail us from our own website. The peeling or paring knife is an important knife for slicing little items, this guide will aid you realize which is the most effective to get at the moment. Having said that, you could actually use a bread knife for other purposes and is truly a safe knife to have around dangerous persons! You can arguably use this for cutting steak and other meats, nevertheless be positive to pick up a trustworthy set. Be certain to pick up a powerful set that will not dull right after a handful of cuts.<br><br>As currently described keep away from a block of knives, and believe about one particular fantastic knife about 120-150 dollars. A new knife will get started losing it's edge pretty swiftly so I would obtain one particular fantastic knife and 1 great Steel or even far better a ceramic hone. For the me, since of my limited time as a stay-at-property Dad, the remedy has been to send my knives out to a higher-excellent knife sharpening service (such as yourself), and then hone religiously in involving sharpenings.<br><br>Your travel knife could prove the distinction involving life and death in these extreme circumstances. I purchased my swiss army knife from THE home of swiss army knives, Switzerland and I have by no means regretted it! My existing everyday carry knife is a Wenger Evolution S17: it's the similar width as the Victorinox Mountaineer, but it has a wood saw and a locking key blade, and its scissors spring is much less prone to breaking.<br><br>Buy a set and you'll get a significant discount, but you'll have to make do with the blade kinds integrated in the set. A very good knife block set will come with anywhere from 8 - 30 various pieces along with a nice block to shop them in. Some sets even come with kitchen shears and a sharpener. Even a high-high quality set can be ruined if left dirty and wet for an extended period of time.<br><br>You get a knife that will not discolor or rust, and maintains its edge with out becoming incredibly challenging to sharpen. In some cases as significantly as two or 3 instances the price tag of even a higher high quality steel knife. Experienced chefs in New York (and elsewhere) would get a violation and fine from the board of overall health for working with a knife with a manage, or cutting board, created of wood. Or, they use the [http://data.gov.uk/data/search?q=incorrect+knife incorrect knife] for the job at hand.<br><br>When it comes to quality, this set is made of the hardest steel which shall hardly ever rust as extended as 1 hand washes it. These who want a professional grade knife set should really opt for this knife set that provides every little thing. The Chicago Cutlery Insignia 2 set of knives is a fantastic beginning point for these who want to purchase a new knife set for the first time or to add to their current collection of knives. While, this knife set is dishwasher secure, it is greatest to clean by hand.<br><br>Lately, there have been a quantity of warnings published on this subject and now some auction dealers split these knife collections to sell them as person items. Get the typical eight" French-style Chef's or a 7" [http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/Santoku Santoku] knife, a utility/paring knife, and - if you can afford a tiny just about every day luxury, - the serrated bread knife. I have a international eight" chef knife and I Adore it compared to my old heavy german knife. Right here are some excellent throwing knife sets you can get.<br><br>Pick a chef's knife that has a wide adequate blade to give you maximum leverage when chopping. Ceramic knives can't be sharpened and never give you the similar razor sharp reduce as a genuine steel knife. Locate out if the knife is forged, which means handmade, or pressed and reduce out of a mold. Opt for a knife that has a bolster (bulge) amongst the knife blade and the handle to defend your hand from slipping when chopping up your food. Pick a chef's knife that isn't too heavy to manage. What a wonderful set. |
| [[Image:ESPIvibration.jpg|thumb | 250px | right| Vibration mode of a clamped square plate]]
| |
| In [[continuum mechanics]], ''' plate theories''' are mathematical descriptions of the mechanics of flat plates that draws on the [[bending|theory of beams]]. Plates are defined as plane [[List of structural elements|structural elements]] with a small thickness compared to the planar dimensions.<ref name=timo>Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S. "Theory of plates and shells". McGraw–Hill New York, 1959.</ref> The typical thickness to width ratio of a plate structure is less than 0.1. A plate theory takes advantage of this disparity in length scale to reduce the full three-dimensional [[continuum mechanics|solid mechanics]] problem to a two-dimensional problem. The aim of plate theory is to calculate the [[Deformation (mechanics)|deformation]] and [[stress (mechanics)|stress]]es in a plate subjected to loads.
| |
| | |
| Of the numerous plate theories that have been developed since the late 19th century, two are widely accepted and used in engineering. These are
| |
| * the [[Gustav Kirchhoff|Kirchhoff]]–[[Augustus Edward Hough Love|Love]] theory of plates (classical plate theory)
| |
| * The [[Raymond Mindlin|Mindlin]]–[[Eric Reissner|Reissner]] theory of plates (first-order shear plate theory)
| |
| | |
| == Kirchhoff–Love theory for thin plates ==
| |
| {{main|Kirchhoff–Love plate theory}}
| |
| {{Einstein_summation_convention}}
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Plaque mince deplacement element matiere.svg|thumb | 250px | Deformation of a thin plate highlighting the displacement, the mid-surface (red) and the normal to the mid-surface (blue)]]
| |
| The [[Gustav Kirchhoff|Kirchhoff]]–[[Augustus Edward Hough Love|Love]] theory is an extension of [[beam theory|Euler–Bernoulli beam theory]] to thin plates. The theory was developed in 1888 by Love<ref>A. E. H. Love, ''On the small free vibrations and deformations of elastic shells'', Philosophical trans. of the Royal Society (London), 1888, Vol. série A, N° 17 p. 491–549.</ref> using assumptions proposed by Kirchhoff. It is assumed that a mid-surface plane can be used to represent the three-dimensional plate in two-dimensional form.
| |
| | |
| The following kinematic assumptions that are made in this theory:<ref name=Reddy>Reddy, J. N., 2007, '''Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells''', CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.</ref>
| |
| * straight lines normal to the mid-surface remain straight after deformation
| |
| * straight lines normal to the mid-surface remain normal to the mid-surface after deformation
| |
| * the thickness of the plate does not change during a deformation.
| |
| | |
| === Displacement field ===
| |
| The Kirchhoff hypothesis implies that the [[Displacement (vector)|displacement]] field has the form
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| u_\alpha(\mathbf{x}) & = u^0_\alpha(x_1,x_2) - x_3~\frac{\partial w^0}{\partial x_\alpha}
| |
| = u^0_\alpha - x_3~w^0_{,\alpha} ~;~~\alpha=1,2 \\
| |
| u_3(\mathbf{x}) & = w^0(x_1, x_2)
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where <math>x_1</math> and <math>x_2</math> are the Cartesian coordinates on the mid-surface of the undeformed plate, <math>x_3</math> is the coordinate for the thickness direction, <math>u^0_1, u^0_2</math> are the in-plane displacements of the mid-surface, and <math>w^0</math> is the displacement of the mid-surface in the <math>x_3</math> direction.
| |
| | |
| If <math>\varphi_\alpha</math> are the angles of rotation of the [[Surface normal|normal]] to the mid-surface, then in the Kirchhoff–Love theory
| |
| <math>
| |
| \varphi_\alpha = w^0_{,\alpha} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| {|
| |
| |[[Image:Plaque mince deplacement rotation fibre neutre new.svg|thumb|600px|Displacement of the mid-surface (left) and of a normal (right)]]
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| === Strain-displacement relations ===
| |
| For the situation where the strains in the plate are infinitesimal and the rotations of the mid-surface normals are less than 10<math>^\circ</math> the [[infinitesimal strain theory|strains-displacement]] relations are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha\beta} & = \tfrac{1}{2}(u^0_{\alpha,\beta}+u^0_{\beta,\alpha})
| |
| - x_3~w^0_{,\alpha\beta} \\
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha 3} & = - w^0_{,\alpha} + w^0_{,\alpha} = 0 \\
| |
| \varepsilon_{33} & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Therefore the only non-zero strains are in the in-plane directions.
| |
| | |
| If the rotations of the normals to the mid-surface are in the range of 10<math>~^{\circ}</math> to 15<math>^\circ</math>, the strain-displacement relations can be approximated using the [[Theodore von Kármán|von Kármán]] strains. Then the kinematic assumptions of Kirchhoff-Love theory lead to the following strain-displacement relations
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha\beta} & = \frac{1}{2}(u^0_{\alpha,\beta}+u^0_{\beta,\alpha}+w^0_{,\alpha}~w^0_{,\beta})
| |
| - x_3~w^0_{,\alpha\beta} \\
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha 3} & = - w^0_{,\alpha} + w^0_{,\alpha} = 0 \\
| |
| \varepsilon_{33} & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| This theory is nonlinear because of the quadratic terms in the strain-displacement relations.
| |
| | |
| === Equilibrium equations ===
| |
| The equilibrium equations for the plate can be derived from the [[principle of virtual work]]. For the situation where the strains and rotations of the plate are small, the equilibrium equations for an unloaded plate are given by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| N_{\alpha\beta,\alpha} & = 0 \\
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta,\alpha\beta} & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where the stress resultants and stress moment resultants are defined as
| |
| :<math>
| |
| N_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h \sigma_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3 ~;~~
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h x_3~\sigma_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3
| |
| </math>
| |
| and the thickness of the plate is <math>2h</math>. The quantities <math>\sigma_{\alpha\beta}</math> are the stresses.
| |
| | |
| If the plate is loaded by an external distributed load <math>q(x)</math> that is normal to the mid-surface and directed in the positive <math>x_3</math> direction, the principle of virtual work then leads to the equilibrium equations
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:180px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| N_{\alpha\beta,\alpha} & = 0 \\
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta,\alpha\beta} - q & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| For moderate rotations, the strain-displacement relations take the von Karman form and the equilibrium equations can be expressed as
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| N_{\alpha\beta,\alpha} & = 0 \\
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta,\alpha\beta} + [N_{\alpha\beta}~w^0_{,\beta}]_{,\alpha} - q & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Boundary conditions ===
| |
| The boundary conditions that are needed to solve the equilibrium equations of plate theory can be obtained from the boundary terms in the principle of virtual work.
| |
| | |
| For small strains and small rotations, the boundary conditions are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| n_\alpha~N_{\alpha\beta} & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad u^0_\beta \\
| |
| n_\alpha~M_{\alpha\beta,\beta} & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad w^0 \\
| |
| n_\beta~M_{\alpha\beta} & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad w^0_{,\alpha}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Note that the quantity <math> n_\alpha~M_{\alpha\beta,\beta}</math> is an effective shear force.
| |
| | |
| === Stress-strain relations ===
| |
| The stress-strain relations for a linear elastic Kirchhoff plate are given by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{11} \\ \sigma_{22} \\ \sigma_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} \\
| |
| C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon_{11} \\ \varepsilon_{22} \\ \varepsilon_{12} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Since <math>\sigma_{\alpha 3}</math> and <math>\sigma_{33}</math> do not appear in the equilibrium equations it is implicitly assumed that these quantities do not have any effect on the momentum balance and are neglected.
| |
| | |
| It is more convenient to work with the stress and moment results that enter the equilibrium equations. These are related to the displacements by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}N_{11} \\ N_{22} \\ N_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| \left\{
| |
| \int_{-h}^h \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} \\
| |
| C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} \end{bmatrix}~dx_3 \right\}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} u^0_{1,1} \\ u^0_{2,2} \\ \frac{1}{2}~(u^0_{1,2}+u^0_{2,1}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}M_{11} \\ M_{22} \\ M_{12} \end{bmatrix} = -\left\{
| |
| \int_{-h}^h x_3^2~\begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} \\
| |
| C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} \end{bmatrix}~dx_3 \right\}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} w^0_{,11} \\ w^0_{,22} \\ w^0_{,12} \end{bmatrix} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The ''' extensional stiffnesses''' are the quantities
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h C_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3
| |
| </math>
| |
| The ''' bending stiffnesses''' (also called '''flexural rigidity''') are the quantities
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h x_3^2~C_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| == Isotropic and homogeneous Kirchhoff plate ==
| |
| {{main|Kirchhoff–Love plate theory}}
| |
| For an isotropic and homogeneous plate, the stress-strain relations are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{11} \\ \sigma_{22} \\ \sigma_{12} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| = \cfrac{E}{1-\nu^2}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} 1 & \nu & 0 \\
| |
| \nu & 1 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 1-\nu \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon_{11} \\ \varepsilon_{22} \\ \varepsilon_{12} \end{bmatrix} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The moments corresponding to these stresses are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}M_{11} \\ M_{22} \\ M_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| -\cfrac{2h^3E}{3(1-\nu^2)}~\begin{bmatrix} 1 & \nu & 0 \\
| |
| \nu & 1 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 1-\nu \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} w^0_{,11} \\ w^0_{,22} \\ w^0_{,12} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Pure bending ===
| |
| The displacements <math>u^0_1</math> and <math>u^0_2</math> are zero under [[pure bending]] conditions. For an isotropic, homogeneous plate under pure bending the governing equation is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_1^4} + 2 \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_1^2 \partial x_2^2} + \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_2^4} = 0 \quad \text{where} \quad w := w^0\,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| In index notation,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| w^0_{,1111} + 2~w^0_{,1212} + w^0_{,2222} = 0 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| In direct tensor notation, the governing equation is
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:180px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \nabla^2\nabla^2 w = 0 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| === Transverse loading ===
| |
| For a transversely loaded plate without axial deformations, the governing equation has the form
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_1^4} + 2 \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_1^2 \partial x_2^2} + \frac{\partial^4 w}{\partial x_2^4} = -\frac{q}{D}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D := \cfrac{2h^3E}{3(1-\nu^2)} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| In index notation,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| w^0_{,1111} + 2\,w^0_{,1212} + w^0_{,2222} = -\frac{q}{D}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and in direct notation
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:180px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \nabla^2\nabla^2 w = -\frac{q}{D} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| In cylindrical coordinates <math>(r, \theta, z)</math>, the governing equation is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \frac{1}{r}\cfrac{d }{d r}\left[r \cfrac{d }{d r}\left\{\frac{1}{r}\cfrac{d }{d r}\left(r \cfrac{d w}{d r}\right)\right\}\right] = - \frac{q}{D}\,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| == Orthotropic and homogeneous Kirchhoff plate ==
| |
| For an [[orthotropic material|orthotropic]] plate
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{13} \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & C_{23} \\
| |
| C_{13} & C_{23} & C_{33} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| = \cfrac{1}{1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21}}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} E_1 & \nu_{12}E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| \nu_{21}E_1 & E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 2G_{12}(1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| Therefore,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} \\
| |
| A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| = \cfrac{2h}{1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21}}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} E_1 & \nu_{12}E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| \nu_{21}E_1 & E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 2G_{12}(1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} D_{11} & D_{12} & D_{13} \\ D_{21} & D_{22} & D_{23} \\
| |
| D_{31} & D_{32} & D_{33} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| = \cfrac{2h^3}{3(1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21})}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} E_1 & \nu_{12}E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| \nu_{21}E_1 & E_2 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 2G_{12}(1-\nu_{12}\nu_{21}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Transverse loading ===
| |
| The governing equation of an orthotropic Kirchhoff plate loaded transversely by a distributed load <math>q</math> per unit area is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D_x w^0_{,1111} + 2 D_{xy} w^0_{,1122} + D_y w^0_{,2222} = -q
| |
| </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| D_x & = D_{11} = \frac{2h^3 E_1}{3(1 - \nu_{12}\nu_{21})} \\
| |
| D_y & = D_{22} = \frac{2h^3 E_2}{3(1 - \nu_{12}\nu_{21})} \\
| |
| D_{xy} & = D_{33} + \tfrac{1}{2}(\nu_{21} D_{11} + \nu_{12} D_{22}) = D_{33} + \nu_{21} D_{11} = \frac{4h^3 G_{12}}{3} + \frac{2h^3 \nu_{21} E_1}{3(1 - \nu_{12}\nu_{21})} \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| == Dynamics of thin Kirchhoff plates ==
| |
| {{main|Kirchhoff–Love plate theory}}
| |
| The dynamic theory of plates determines the propagation of waves in the plates, and the study of standing waves and vibration modes.
| |
| | |
| === Governing equations ===
| |
| The governing equations for the dynamics of a Kirchhoff–Love plate are
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:330px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| N_{\alpha\beta,\beta} & = J_1~\ddot{u}^0_\alpha \\
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta,\alpha\beta} - q(x,t) & = J_1~\ddot{w}^0 - J_3~\ddot{w}^0_{,\alpha\alpha}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| where, for a plate with density <math>\rho = \rho(x)</math>,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| J_1 := \int_{-h}^h \rho~dx_3 = 2~\rho~h ~;~~
| |
| J_3 := \int_{-h}^h x_3^2~\rho~dx_3 = \frac{2}{3}~\rho~h^3
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \dot{u}_i = \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial t} ~;~~ \ddot{u}_i = \frac{\partial^2 u_i}{\partial t^2} ~;~~
| |
| u_{i,\alpha} = \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_\alpha} ~;~~ u_{i,\alpha\beta} = \frac{\partial^2 u_i}{\partial x_\alpha \partial x_\beta}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The figures below show some vibrational modes of a circular plate.
| |
| <gallery widths="250px">
| |
| Image:Drum vibration mode01.gif|mode ''k'' = 0, ''p'' = 1
| |
| Image:Drum vibration mode12.gif|mode ''k'' = 1, ''p'' = 2
| |
| </gallery>
| |
| | |
| === Isotropic plates ===
| |
| The governing equations simplify considerably for isotropic and homogeneous plates for which the in-plane deformations can be neglected and have the form
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D\,\left(\frac{\partial^4 w^0}{\partial x_1^4} + 2\frac{\partial^4 w^0}{\partial x_1^2\partial x_2^2} + \frac{\partial^4 w^0}{\partial x_2^4}\right) = -q(x_1, x_2, t) - 2\rho h\, \frac{\partial^2 w^0}{\partial t^2} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| where <math>D</math> is the bending stiffness of the plate. For a uniform plate of thickness <math>2h</math>,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D := \cfrac{2h^3E}{3(1-\nu^2)} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| In direct notation
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:350px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D\,\nabla^2\nabla^2 w^0 = -q(x, y, t) - 2\rho h \, \ddot{w}^0 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| == Mindlin–Reissner theory for thick plates ==
| |
| {{main|Mindlin–Reissner plate theory}}
| |
| {{Einstein_summation_convention}}
| |
| In the theory of thick plates, or theory of [[Raymond Mindlin]]<ref>R. D. Mindlin, ''Influence of rotatory inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic, elastic plates'', Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1951, Vol. 18 p. 31–38.</ref> and [[Eric Reissner]], the normal to the mid-surface remains straight but not necessarily perpendicular to the mid-surface. If <math>\varphi_1</math> and <math>\varphi_2</math> designate the angles which the mid-surface makes with the <math>x_3</math> axis then
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \varphi_1 \ne w_{,1} ~;~~ \varphi_2 \ne w_{,2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| Then the Mindlin–Reissner hypothesis implies that
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:400px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| u_\alpha(\mathbf{x}) & = u^0_\alpha(x_1,x_2) - x_3~\varphi_\alpha ~;~~\alpha=1,2 \\
| |
| u_3(\mathbf{x}) & = w^0(x_1, x_2)
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| === Strain-displacement relations ===
| |
| Depending on the amount of rotation of the plate normals two different approximations for the strains can be derived from the basic kinematic assumptions.
| |
| | |
| For small strains and small rotations the strain-displacement relations for Mindlin–Reissner plates are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha\beta} & = \frac{1}{2}(u^0_{\alpha,\beta}+u^0_{\beta,\alpha})
| |
| - \frac{x_3}{2}~(\varphi_{\alpha,\beta} + \varphi_{\beta,\alpha})\\
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha 3} & = \cfrac{1}{2}\left(w^0_{,\alpha}- \varphi_\alpha\right) \\
| |
| \varepsilon_{33} & = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| The shear strain, and hence the shear stress, across the thickness of the plate is not neglected in this theory. However, the shear strain is constant across the thickness of the plate. This cannot be accurate since the shear stress is known to be parabolic even for simple plate geometries. To account for the inaccuracy in the shear strain, a '''shear correction factor''' (<math>\kappa</math>) is applied so that the correct amount of internal energy is predicted by the theory. Then
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \varepsilon_{\alpha 3} = \cfrac{1}{2}~\kappa~\left(w^0_{,\alpha}- \varphi_\alpha\right)
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Equilibrium equations ===
| |
| The equilibrium equations have slightly different forms depending on the amount of bending expected in the plate. For the situation where the strains and rotations of the plate are smallthe equilibrium equations for a Mindlin–Reissner plate are
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:180px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| & N_{\alpha\beta,\alpha} = 0 \\
| |
| & M_{\alpha\beta,\beta}-Q_\alpha = 0 \\
| |
| & Q_{\alpha,\alpha}+q = 0 \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| The resultant shear forces in the above equations are defined as
| |
| :<math>
| |
| Q_\alpha := \kappa~\int_{-h}^h \sigma_{\alpha 3}~dx_3 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Boundary conditions ===
| |
| The boundary conditions are indicated by the boundary terms in the principle of virtual work.
| |
| | |
| If the only external force is a vertical force on the top surface of the plate, the boundary conditions are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| n_\alpha~N_{\alpha\beta} & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad u^0_\beta \\
| |
| n_\alpha~M_{\alpha\beta} & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad \varphi_\alpha \\
| |
| n_\alpha~Q_\alpha & \quad \mathrm{or} \quad w^0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Constitutive relations ===
| |
| The stress-strain relations for a linear elastic Mindlin–Reissner plate are given by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \sigma_{\alpha\beta} & = C_{\alpha\beta\gamma\theta}~\varepsilon_{\gamma\theta} \\
| |
| \sigma_{\alpha 3} & = C_{\alpha 3\gamma\theta}~\varepsilon_{\gamma\theta} \\
| |
| \sigma_{33} & = C_{33\gamma\theta}~\varepsilon_{\gamma\theta}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Since <math>\sigma_{33}</math> does not appear in the equilibrium equations it is implicitly assumed that it do not have any effect on the momentum balance and is neglected. This assumption is also called the '''plane stress''' assumption. The remaining stress-strain relations for an [[orthotropic material]], in matrix form, can be written as
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{11} \\ \sigma_{22} \\ \sigma_{23} \\ \sigma_{31} \\ \sigma_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{55} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{66}\end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon_{11} \\ \varepsilon_{22} \\ \varepsilon_{23} \\ \varepsilon_{31} \\ \varepsilon_{12}\end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Then,
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}N_{11} \\ N_{22} \\ N_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| \left\{
| |
| \int_{-h}^h \begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & C_{66} \end{bmatrix}~dx_3 \right\}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} u^0_{1,1} \\ u^0_{2,2} \\ \frac{1}{2}~(u^0_{1,2}+u^0_{2,1}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}M_{11} \\ M_{22} \\ M_{12} \end{bmatrix} = -\left\{
| |
| \int_{-h}^h x_3^2~\begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{22} & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & C_{66} \end{bmatrix}~dx_3 \right\}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} \varphi_{1,1} \\ \varphi_{2,2} \\ \frac{1}{2}~(\varphi_{1,2}+\varphi_{2,1}) \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| For the shear terms
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}Q_1 \\ Q_2 \end{bmatrix} = \cfrac{\kappa}{2}\left\{
| |
| \int_{-h}^h \begin{bmatrix} C_{55} & 0 \\ 0 & C_{44} \end{bmatrix}~dx_3 \right\}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} w^0_{,1} - \varphi_1 \\ w^0_{,2} - \varphi_2 \end{bmatrix}
| |
| </math>
| |
| The ''' extensional stiffnesses''' are the quantities
| |
| :<math>
| |
| A_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h C_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3
| |
| </math>
| |
| The ''' bending stiffnesses''' are the quantities
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D_{\alpha\beta} := \int_{-h}^h x_3^2~C_{\alpha\beta}~dx_3
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| == Isotropic and homogeneous Mindlin-Reissner plates ==
| |
| {{main|Mindlin–Reissner plate theory}}
| |
| For uniformly thick, homogeneous, and isotropic plates, the stress-strain relations in the plane of the plate are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_{11} \\ \sigma_{22} \\ \sigma_{12} \end{bmatrix}
| |
| = \cfrac{E}{1-\nu^2}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} 1 & \nu & 0 \\
| |
| \nu & 1 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 1-\nu \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon_{11} \\ \varepsilon_{22} \\ \varepsilon_{12} \end{bmatrix} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| where <math>E</math> is the Young's modulus, <math>\nu</math> is the Poisson's ratio, and <math>\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta}</math> are the in-plane strains. The through-the-thickness shear stresses and strains are related by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \sigma_{31} = 2G\varepsilon_{31} \quad \text{and} \quad
| |
| \sigma_{32} = 2G\varepsilon_{32}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where <math>G = E/(2(1+\nu))</math> is the [[shear modulus]].
| |
| | |
| === Constitutive relations ===
| |
| The relations between the stress resultants and the generalized displacements for an isotropic Mindlin–Reissner plate are:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}N_{11} \\ N_{22} \\ N_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| \cfrac{2Eh}{1-\nu^2} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & \nu & 0 \\ \nu & 1 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 1-\nu \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} u^0_{1,1} \\ u^0_{2,2} \\ \frac{1}{2}~(u^0_{1,2}+u^0_{2,1}) \end{bmatrix} \,,
| |
| </math>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}M_{11} \\ M_{22} \\ M_{12} \end{bmatrix} =
| |
| -\cfrac{2Eh^3}{3(1-\nu^2)} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & \nu & 0 \\ \nu & 1 & 0 \\
| |
| 0 & 0 & 1-\nu \end{bmatrix}
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} \varphi_{1,1} \\ \varphi_{2,2} \\ \frac{1}{2}(\varphi_{1,2}+\varphi_{2,1}) \end{bmatrix} \,,
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{bmatrix}Q_1 \\ Q_2 \end{bmatrix} = \kappa G h
| |
| \begin{bmatrix} w^0_{,1} - \varphi_1 \\ w^0_{,2} - \varphi_2 \end{bmatrix} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The [[bending rigidity]] is defined as the quantity
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D = \cfrac{2Eh^3}{3(1-\nu^2)} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| For a plate of thickness <math>h</math>, the bending rigidity has the form
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D = \cfrac{Eh^3}{12(1-\nu^2)} \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| === Governing equations ===
| |
| If we ignore the in-plane extension of the plate, the governing equations are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| M_{\alpha\beta,\beta}-Q_\alpha & = 0 \\
| |
| Q_{\alpha,\alpha}+q & = 0 \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| In terms of the generalized deformations <math>w^0, \varphi_1, \varphi_2</math>, the three governing equations are
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:450px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| &\nabla^2 \left(\frac{\partial \varphi_1}{\partial x_1} + \frac{\partial \varphi_2}{\partial x_2}\right) = -\frac{q}{D} \\
| |
| &\nabla^2 w^0 - \frac{\partial \varphi_1}{\partial x_1} - \frac{\partial \varphi_2}{\partial x_2} = -\frac{q}{\kappa G h} \\
| |
| &\nabla^2 \left(\frac{\partial \varphi_1}{\partial x_2} - \frac{\partial \varphi_2}{\partial x_1}\right) = -\frac{2\kappa G h}{D(1-\nu)}\left(\frac{\partial \varphi_1}{\partial x_2} - \frac{\partial \varphi_2}{\partial x_1}\right) \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| The boundary conditions along the edges of a rectangular plate are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| \text{simply supported} \quad & \quad w^0 = 0, M_{11} = 0 ~(\text{or}~M_{22} = 0),
| |
| \varphi_1 = 0 ~(\text{or}~\varphi_2 = 0) \\
| |
| \text{clamped} \quad & \quad w^0 = 0, \varphi_1 = 0, \varphi_{2} = 0 \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| == Reissner–Stein theory for isotropic cantilever plates ==
| |
| In general, exact solutions for cantilever plates using plate theory are quite involved and few exact solutions can be found in the literature. Reissner and Stein<ref name=Reissner51>E. Reissner and M. Stein. Torsion and transverse bending of cantilever plates. Technical Note 2369, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics,Washington, 1951.</ref> provide a simplified theory for cantilever plates that is an improvement over older theories such as Saint-Venant plate theory.
| |
| | |
| The Reissner-Stein theory assumes a transverse displacement field of the form
| |
| :<math>
| |
| w(x,y) = w_x(x) + y\,\theta_x(x) \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The governing equations for the plate then reduce to two coupled ordinary differential equations:
| |
| <blockquote style="border: 1px solid black; padding:10px; width:800px">
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| & bD \frac{\mathrm{d}^4w_x}{\mathrm{d}x^4}
| |
| = q_1(x) - n_1(x)\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} - \cfrac{d n_1}{d x}\,\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}
| |
| - \frac{1}{2}\cfrac{d n_2}{d x}\,\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} - \frac{n_2(x)}{2}\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2} \\
| |
| &\frac{b^3D}{12}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}^4\theta_x}{\mathrm{d}x^4} - 2bD(1-\nu)\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2}
| |
| = q_2(x) - n_3(x)\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2} - \cfrac{d n_3}{d x}\,\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}
| |
| - \frac{n_2(x)}{2}\,\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} - \frac{1}{2}\cfrac{d n_2}{d x}\,\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| q_1(x) & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q(x,y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ q_2(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,q(x,y)\,\text{d}y~,~~
| |
| n_1(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y \\
| |
| n_2(x) & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ n_3(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y^2\,n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| At <math>x = 0</math>, since the beam is clamped, the boundary conditions are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| w(0,y) = \cfrac{d w}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = 0 \qquad \implies \qquad
| |
| w_x(0) = \cfrac{d w_x}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = \theta_x(0) = \cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = 0 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The boundary conditions at <math>x = a</math> are
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| & bD\cfrac{d^3 w_x}{d x^3} + n_1(x)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x} + n_2(x)\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} + q_{x1} = 0 \\
| |
| & \frac{b^3D}{12}\cfrac{d^3 \theta_x}{d x^3} + \left[n_3(x) -2bD(1-\nu)\right]\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}
| |
| + n_2(x)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x} + t = 0 \\
| |
| & bD\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} + m_1 = 0 \quad,\quad \frac{b^3D}{12}\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2} + m_2 = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| m_1 & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}m_x(y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ m_2 = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,m_x(y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~
| |
| q_{x1} = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q_x(y)\,\text{d}y \\
| |
| t & = q_{x2} + m_3 = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,q_x(y)\,\text{d}y + \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}m_{xy}(y)\,\text{d}y \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| :{| class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width="60%" style="text-align:left"
| |
| !Derivation of Reissner–Stein cantilever plate equations
| |
| |-
| |
| |The strain energy of bending of a thin rectangular plate of uniform thickness <math>h</math> is given by
| |
| :<math>
| |
| U = \frac{1}{2} \int_0^a \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}D\left\{\left(\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}\right)^2 +
| |
| 2(1-\nu)\left[\left(\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial x \partial y}\right)^2 - \frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}\right]
| |
| \right\}\text{d}x\text{d}y
| |
| </math>
| |
| where <math>w</math> is the transverse displacement, <math>a</math> is the length, <math>b</math> is the width, <math>\nu</math> is the Poisson's
| |
| ratio, <math>E</math> is the Young's modulus, and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| D = \frac{Eh^3}{12(1-\nu)}.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The potential energy of transverse loads <math>q(x,y)</math> (per unit length) is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| P_q = \int_0^a \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q(x,y)\, w(x,y)\,\text{d}x\text{d}y \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The potential energy of in-plane loads <math>n_x(x,y)</math> (per unit width) is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| P_n = \frac{1}{2} \int_0^a \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}n_x(x,y)\,\left(\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right)^2\,\text{d}x\text{d}y \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The potential energy of tip forces <math>q_x(y)</math> (per unit width), and bending moments <math>m_x(y)</math> and <math>m_{xy}(y)</math>
| |
| (per unit width) is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| P_t = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}\left(q_x(y)\,w(x,y) - m_x(y)\,\frac{\partial w}{\partial x} + m_{xy}(y)\,\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right)\text{d}x\text{d}y \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| A balance of energy requires that the total energy is
| |
| :<math>
| |
| W = U - (P_q + P_n + P_t) \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| With the Reissener–Stein assumption for the displacement, we have
| |
| :<math>
| |
| U = \int_0^a\frac{bD}{24}\left[12\left(\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2}\right)^2 +
| |
| b^2\left(\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2}\right)^2 + 24(1-\nu)\left(\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}\right)^2\right]\,\text{d}x\,,
| |
| </math>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| P_q = \int_0^a\left[\left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q(x,y)\,\text{d}y\right)w_x + \left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}yq(x,y)\,\text{d}y\right)\theta_x\right]\,dx \,,
| |
| </math>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| P_n & = \frac{1}{2}\int_0^a\left[\left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y\right)\left(\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}\right)^2 +
| |
| \left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y\right)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}\,\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} \right.\\
| |
| & \left. \qquad\qquad +\left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y^2 n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y\right)\left(\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}\right)^2\right]\text{d}x\,,
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| P_t & = \left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q_x(y)\,\text{d}y\right)w_x -
| |
| \left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}m_x(y)\,\text{d}y\right)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x} +
| |
| \left[\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}\left(y q_x(y) + m_{xy}(y)\right)\,\text{d}y\right]\theta_x \\
| |
| & \qquad \qquad -\left(\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y m_x(y)\,\text{d}y\right)\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} \,.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Taking the first variation of <math>W</math> with respect to <math>(w_x, \theta_x, x)</math> and
| |
| setting it to zero gives us the Euler equations
| |
| :<math> \text{(1)} \qquad
| |
| bD \frac{\mathrm{d}^4w_x}{\mathrm{d}x^4}
| |
| = q_1(x) - n_1(x)\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} - \cfrac{d n_1}{d x}\,\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}
| |
| - \frac{1}{2}\cfrac{d n_2}{d x}\,\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} - \frac{n_2(x)}{2}\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2}
| |
| </math>
| |
| and
| |
| :<math> \text{(2)} \qquad
| |
| \frac{b^3D}{12}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}^4\theta_x}{\mathrm{d}x^4} - 2bD(1-\nu)\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2}
| |
| = q_2(x) - n_3(x)\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2} - \cfrac{d n_3}{d x}\,\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}
| |
| - \frac{n_2(x)}{2}\,\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} - \frac{1}{2}\cfrac{d n_2}{d x}\,\cfrac{d w_x}{d x}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| q_1(x) & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q(x,y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ q_2(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,q(x,y)\,\text{d}y~,~~
| |
| n_1(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y \\
| |
| n_2(x) & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ n_3(x) = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y^2\,n_x(x,y)\,\text{d}y.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| Since the beam is clamped at <math>x = 0</math>, we have
| |
| :<math>
| |
| w(0,y) = \cfrac{d w}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = 0 \qquad \implies \qquad
| |
| w_x(0) = \cfrac{d w_x}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = \theta_x(0) = \cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}\Bigr|_{x=0} = 0 \,.
| |
| </math>
| |
| The boundary conditions at <math>x = a</math> can be found by integration by parts:
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| & bD\cfrac{d^3 w_x}{d x^3} + n_1(x)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x} + n_2(x)\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x} + q_{x1} = 0 \\
| |
| & \frac{b^3D}{12}\cfrac{d^3 \theta_x}{d x^3} + \left[n_3(x) -2bD(1-\nu)\right]\cfrac{d \theta_x}{d x}
| |
| + n_2(x)\cfrac{d w_x}{d x} + t = 0 \\
| |
| & bD\cfrac{d^2 w_x}{d x^2} + m_1 = 0 \quad,\quad \frac{b^3D}{12}\cfrac{d^2 \theta_x}{d x^2} + m_2 = 0
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \begin{align}
| |
| m_1 & = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}m_x(y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~ m_2 = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,m_x(y)\,\text{d}y ~,~~
| |
| q_{x1} = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}q_x(y)\,\text{d}y \\
| |
| t & = q_{x2} + m_3 = \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}y\,q_x(y)\,\text{d}y + \int_{-b/2}^{b/2}m_{xy}(y)\,\text{d}y.
| |
| \end{align}
| |
| </math>
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Bending of plates]]
| |
| * [[Vibration of plates]]
| |
| * [[Infinitesimal strain theory]]
| |
| *[[Finite strain theory]]
| |
| *[[Stress (mechanics)]]
| |
| *[[Stress resultants]]
| |
| *[[Linear elasticity]]
| |
| *[[Bending]]
| |
| *[[Euler–Bernoulli beam equation]]
| |
| *[[Timoshenko beam theory]]
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Plate Theory}}
| |
| [[Category:Continuum mechanics]]
| |
| | |
| [[ca:Teoria de plaques i làmines]]
| |
| [[de:Plattentheorie]]
| |
| [[gl:Laxe (construción)]]
| |