Epsilon Lupi: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Monkbot
en>Jonesey95
m Fixing "Pages with citations using unsupported parameters" error
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{multiple issues|
Hi! <br>My name is Lashawn and I'm a 24 years old girl from Canada.<br><br>Also visit my web site: [http://adcollege.cafe24.com/xe/?document_srl=1400109 sed tv wiki]
{{more footnotes|date=February 2012}}
{{one source|date=February 2012}}
{{too few opinions|date=February 2012}}
}}
 
The '''Dale–Chall readability formula is a''' [[readability test]] that provides a numeric gauge of the comprehension difficulty that readers will have when reading a text. It uses a list of words that groups of fourth-grade American students could reliably understand, considering any word not on that list to be difficult.
 
==History==
The formula was inspired by [[Rudolf Flesch]]'s [[Flesch–Kincaid readability test]] which used word length to determine how difficult a word was for readers to understand. [[Edgar Dale]] and [[Jeanne Chall]] instead used a list of 763 words that 80% of fourth-grade students were familiar with to determine which words were difficult. The Dale-Chall Readability Formula was originally published in their 1948 article ''A Formula for Predicting Readability''<ref>{{Cite journal |author=[[Edgar Dale|Dale E]], [[Jeanne Chall|Chall J]] |year=1948 |title=A Formula for Predicting Readability |journal=Educational Research Bulletin |volume=27 |pages=11–20+28}}</ref> and updated in 1995 in ''Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula'', which expanded the word list to 3,000 familiar words.<ref>{{cite isbn|1571290087}}</ref>
 
==Formula==
The formula for calculating the raw score of the Dale–Chall readability score is given below:
 
:<math>
0.1579 \left (\frac{\mbox{difficult words}}{\mbox{words}}\times 100 \right) + 0.0496 \left (\frac{\mbox{words}}{\mbox{sentences}} \right)
</math>
 
If the percentage of difficult words is above 5%, then add 3.6365 to the raw score to get the adjusted score, otherwise the adjusted score is equal to the raw score.
 
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
! Score
! Notes
|-
| 4.9 or lower
| easily understood by an average 4th-grade student or lower
|-
| 5.0–5.9
| easily understood by an average 5th or 6th-grade student
|-
| 6.0–6.9
| easily understood by an average 7th or 8th-grade student
|-
| 7.0–7.9
| easily understood by an average 9th or 10th-grade student
|-
| 8.0–8.9
| easily understood by an average 11th or 12th-grade student
|-
| 9.0–9.9
| easily understood by an average 13th to 15th-grade (college) student
|-
| 10.0 or higher
| easily understood by an average college graduate
|-
|}
 
== See also ==
*[[Flesch–Kincaid readability test]]
*[[Gunning fog index]]
*[[Coleman-Liau Index]]
*[[Automated Readability Index]]
*[[SMOG (Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook)]]
*[[Accessible publishing]]
*[[Readability]]
 
== References ==
{{Reflist|1}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dale-Chall readability formula}}
[[Category:Readability tests]]

Latest revision as of 05:59, 2 December 2014

Hi!
My name is Lashawn and I'm a 24 years old girl from Canada.

Also visit my web site: sed tv wiki