Fitness proportionate selection: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Saund
grammar correction: selection -> selections
 
en>Eumolpo
m orthographic
Line 1: Line 1:
Roberto is the name I just love to be titled with though I won't really like being called like that. My very good say it's not superb for me but something I love doing is also to bake but My organization is thinking on starting something new. South Carolina is where my new home is. Software [http://Www.wikipedia.org/wiki/developing developing] is how My personal support my family. You can find my website here: http://prometeu.net<br><br>My web blog :: [http://prometeu.net clash of clans hack free]
In [[abstract algebra]], the theory of [[field (mathematics)|fields]] lacks a [[direct product]]: the direct product of two fields, considered as a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] is ''never'' itself a field. On the other hand it is often required to 'join' two fields ''K'' and ''L'', either in cases where ''K'' and ''L'' are given as [[subfield (mathematics)|subfields]] of a larger field ''M'', or when ''K'' and ''L'' are both [[field extension]]s of a smaller field ''N'' (for example a [[prime field]]).
 
The '''tensor product of fields''' is the best available construction on fields with which to discuss all the phenomena arising. As a ring, it is sometimes a field, and often a direct product of fields; it can, though, contain non-zero nilpotents (see [[radical of a ring]]).
 
If ''K'' and ''L'' do not have isomorphic prime fields, or in other words they have different [[characteristic (field)|characteristic]]s, they have no possibility of being common subfields of a field ''M''. Correspondingly their tensor product will in that case be the [[trivial ring]] (collapse of the construction to nothing of interest).
 
==Compositum of fields==
 
Firstly, one defines the notion of the compositum of fields. This construction occurs frequently in [[field theory (mathematics)|field theory]]. The idea behind the compositum is to make the smallest field containing two other fields. In order to formally define the compositum, one must first specify a [[tower of fields]]. Let ''k'' be a field and ''L'' and ''K'' be two extensions of ''k''. The compositum, denoted ''KL'' is defined to be <math> KL = k(K \cup L) </math> where the right-hand side denotes the extension generated by ''K'' and ''L''. Note that this assumes ''some'' field containing both ''K'' and ''L''. Either one starts in a situation where such a common over-field is easy to identify (for example if ''K'' and ''L'' are both subfields of the complex numbers); or one proves a result that allows one to place both ''K'' and ''L'' (as isomorphic copies) in some large enough field.
 
In many cases one can identify ''K''.''L'' as a [[vector space]] [[tensor product]], taken over the field ''N'' that is the intersection of ''K'' and ''L''. For example if one adjoins √2 to the rational field ℚ to get ''K'', and √3 to get ''L'', it is true that the field ''M'' obtained as ''K''.''L'' inside the complex numbers ℂ is ([[up to]] isomorphism)
 
:<math>K\otimes_{\mathbb Q}L</math>
 
as a vector space over ℚ. (This type of result can be verified, in general, by using the [[ramification]] theory of [[algebraic number theory]].)
 
Subfields ''K'' and ''L'' of ''M'' are [[linearly disjoint]] (over a subfield ''N'') when in this way the natural ''N''-linear map of
 
:<math>K\otimes_NL</math>
 
to ''K''.''L'' is [[injective]].<ref>{{springer|id=L/l059560|title=Linearly-disjoint extensions}}</ref> Naturally enough this isn't always the case, for example when ''K'' = ''L''. When the degrees are finite, injective is equivalent here to [[bijective]].
 
A significant case in the theory of [[cyclotomic field]]s is that for the ''n''th [[roots of unity]], for ''n'' a composite number, the subfields generated by the ''p''<sup>''k''</sup>th roots of unity for [[prime power]]s dividing ''n'' are linearly disjoint for distinct ''p''.<ref>{{springer|id=c/c027570|title=Cyclotomic field}}</ref>
 
==The tensor product as ring==
 
To get a general theory, one needs to consider a ring structure on <math>K \otimes_N L</math>. One can define the product <math>(a\otimes b)(c\otimes d)</math> to be <math> ac \otimes bd</math>. This formula is multilinear over ''N'' in each variable; and so defines a ring structure on the tensor product, making <math>K \otimes_N L</math> into a commutative [[algebra over a field|''N''-algebra]], called the '''tensor product of fields'''.
 
==Analysis of the ring structure==
 
The structure of the ring can be analysed by considering all ways of embedding both ''K'' and ''L'' in some field extension of ''N''. Note that the construction here assumes the common subfield ''N''; but does not assume ''[[A priori and a posteriori|a priori]]'' that ''K'' and ''L'' are subfields of some field ''M'' (thus getting round the caveats about constructing a compositum field). Whenever one embeds ''K'' and ''L'' in such a field ''M'', say using embeddings α of ''K'' and β of ''L'', there results a ring homomorphism γ from <math>K \otimes_N L</math> into ''M'' defined by:
 
:<math>\gamma(a\otimes b) = (\alpha(a)\otimes1)\star(1\otimes\beta(b)) = \alpha(a).\beta(b).</math>
 
The kernel of γ will be a [[prime ideal]] of the tensor product; and conversely any prime ideal of the tensor product will give a homomorphism of ''N''-algebras to an [[integral domain]] (inside a [[field of fractions]]) and so provides embeddings of ''K'' and ''L'' in some field as extensions of (a copy of) ''N''.
 
In this way one can analyse the structure of <math>K \otimes_N L</math>: there may in principle be a non-zero [[Jacobson radical]] (intersection of all prime ideals) - and after taking the quotient by that one can speak of the product of all embeddings of ''K'' and ''L'' in various ''M'', ''over'' ''N''.
 
In case ''K'' and ''L'' are finite extensions of N, the situation is particularly simple since the tensor product is of finite dimension as an ''N''-algebra (and thus an [[Artinian ring]]). One can then say that if ''R'' is the radical, one has <math>(K \otimes_N L) / R</math> as a direct product of finitely many fields. Each such field is a representative of an equivalence class of (essentially distinct) field embeddings for ''K'' and ''L'' in some extension ''M''.
 
==Examples==
 
For example, if ''K'' is generated over ℚ by the cube root of 2, then <math>K\otimes_{\mathbb Q}K</math> is the product of (a copy of) ''K'', and a [[splitting field]] of
 
:''X''<sup>3</sup> − 2,
 
of degree 6 over ℚ. One can prove this by calculating the dimension of the tensor product over ℚ as 9, and observing that the splitting field does contain two (indeed three) copies of ''K'', and is the compositum of two of them. That incidentally shows that ''R'' = {0} in this case.
 
An example leading to a non-zero nilpotent: let
 
:''P''(''X'') = ''X''<sup>''p''</sup> − ''T''
 
with K the field of [[rational function]]s in the indeterminate ''T'' over the finite field with ''p'' elements. (See [[separable polynomial]]: the point here is that ''P'' is ''not'' separable). If L is the field extension ''K''(''T''<sup>1/''p''</sup>) (the [[splitting field]] of ''P'') then ''L''/''K'' is an example of a [[purely inseparable field extension]]. In <math>L\otimes_KL</math> the element
 
:<math>T^{1/p}\otimes1-1\otimes T^{1/p}</math>
 
is nilpotent: by taking its ''p''th power one gets 0 by using ''K''-linearity.
 
==Classical theory of real and complex embeddings==
 
In [[algebraic number theory]], tensor products of fields are (implicitly, often) a basic tool. If ''K'' is an extension of ℚ of finite degree ''n'', <math>K\otimes_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb R</math> is always a product of fields isomorphic to ℝ or ℂ. The [[totally real number field]]s are those for which only real fields occur: in general there are ''r''<sub>1</sub> real and ''r''<sub>2</sub> complex fields, with ''r''<sub>1</sub> + 2''r''<sub>2</sub> = ''n'' as one sees by counting dimensions. The field factors are in 1–1 correspondence with the ''real embeddings'', and ''pairs of complex conjugate embeddings'', described in the classical literature.
 
This idea applies also to <math>K\otimes_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb Q_p,</math> where ℚ<sub>''p''</sub> is the field of [[p-adic number|''p''-adic numbers]]. This is a product of finite extensions of ℚ<sub>''p''</sub>, in 1–1 correspondence with the completions of K for extensions of the ''p''-adic metric on ℚ.
 
==Consequences for Galois theory==
 
This gives a general picture, and indeed a way of developing [[Galois theory]]
(along lines exploited in [[Grothendieck's Galois theory]]). It can be shown that for [[separable extension]]s the radical is always {0}; therefore the Galois theory case is the ''semisimple'' one, of products of fields alone.
 
==See also==
*[[Extension of scalars]]—tensor product of a field extension and a vector space over that field
 
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}
 
==References==
*{{springer|id=C/c024310|title=Compositum of field extensions}}
*George Kempf (1995) ''Algebraic Structures'', pp.&nbsp;85–87.
*[http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ANT.pdf ''Algebraic Number Theory'', J. S. Milne Notes (PDF)] at p.&nbsp;17.
*[http://boxen.math.washington.edu/papers/ant/ant.pdf ''A Brief Introduction to Classical and Adelic Algebraic Number Theory'', William Stein (PDF)] pp.&nbsp;140–142.
*{{Citation | last1=Zariski | first1=Oscar | author1-link=Oscar Zariski | last2=Samuel | first2=Pierre | author2-link=Pierre Samuel | title=Commutative algebra I | origyear=1958 | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics | isbn=978-0-387-90089-6  | mr=0090581 | year=1975 | volume=28}}
 
==External links==
*[http://mathoverflow.net/questions/8324/what-does-linearly-disjoint-mean-for-abstract-field-extensions MathOverflow thread on the definition of linear disjointness]
 
[[Category:Field theory]]

Revision as of 09:26, 5 January 2014

In abstract algebra, the theory of fields lacks a direct product: the direct product of two fields, considered as a ring is never itself a field. On the other hand it is often required to 'join' two fields K and L, either in cases where K and L are given as subfields of a larger field M, or when K and L are both field extensions of a smaller field N (for example a prime field).

The tensor product of fields is the best available construction on fields with which to discuss all the phenomena arising. As a ring, it is sometimes a field, and often a direct product of fields; it can, though, contain non-zero nilpotents (see radical of a ring).

If K and L do not have isomorphic prime fields, or in other words they have different characteristics, they have no possibility of being common subfields of a field M. Correspondingly their tensor product will in that case be the trivial ring (collapse of the construction to nothing of interest).

Compositum of fields

Firstly, one defines the notion of the compositum of fields. This construction occurs frequently in field theory. The idea behind the compositum is to make the smallest field containing two other fields. In order to formally define the compositum, one must first specify a tower of fields. Let k be a field and L and K be two extensions of k. The compositum, denoted KL is defined to be where the right-hand side denotes the extension generated by K and L. Note that this assumes some field containing both K and L. Either one starts in a situation where such a common over-field is easy to identify (for example if K and L are both subfields of the complex numbers); or one proves a result that allows one to place both K and L (as isomorphic copies) in some large enough field.

In many cases one can identify K.L as a vector space tensor product, taken over the field N that is the intersection of K and L. For example if one adjoins √2 to the rational field ℚ to get K, and √3 to get L, it is true that the field M obtained as K.L inside the complex numbers ℂ is (up to isomorphism)

as a vector space over ℚ. (This type of result can be verified, in general, by using the ramification theory of algebraic number theory.)

Subfields K and L of M are linearly disjoint (over a subfield N) when in this way the natural N-linear map of

to K.L is injective.[1] Naturally enough this isn't always the case, for example when K = L. When the degrees are finite, injective is equivalent here to bijective.

A significant case in the theory of cyclotomic fields is that for the nth roots of unity, for n a composite number, the subfields generated by the pkth roots of unity for prime powers dividing n are linearly disjoint for distinct p.[2]

The tensor product as ring

To get a general theory, one needs to consider a ring structure on . One can define the product to be . This formula is multilinear over N in each variable; and so defines a ring structure on the tensor product, making into a commutative N-algebra, called the tensor product of fields.

Analysis of the ring structure

The structure of the ring can be analysed by considering all ways of embedding both K and L in some field extension of N. Note that the construction here assumes the common subfield N; but does not assume a priori that K and L are subfields of some field M (thus getting round the caveats about constructing a compositum field). Whenever one embeds K and L in such a field M, say using embeddings α of K and β of L, there results a ring homomorphism γ from into M defined by:

The kernel of γ will be a prime ideal of the tensor product; and conversely any prime ideal of the tensor product will give a homomorphism of N-algebras to an integral domain (inside a field of fractions) and so provides embeddings of K and L in some field as extensions of (a copy of) N.

In this way one can analyse the structure of : there may in principle be a non-zero Jacobson radical (intersection of all prime ideals) - and after taking the quotient by that one can speak of the product of all embeddings of K and L in various M, over N.

In case K and L are finite extensions of N, the situation is particularly simple since the tensor product is of finite dimension as an N-algebra (and thus an Artinian ring). One can then say that if R is the radical, one has as a direct product of finitely many fields. Each such field is a representative of an equivalence class of (essentially distinct) field embeddings for K and L in some extension M.

Examples

For example, if K is generated over ℚ by the cube root of 2, then is the product of (a copy of) K, and a splitting field of

X3 − 2,

of degree 6 over ℚ. One can prove this by calculating the dimension of the tensor product over ℚ as 9, and observing that the splitting field does contain two (indeed three) copies of K, and is the compositum of two of them. That incidentally shows that R = {0} in this case.

An example leading to a non-zero nilpotent: let

P(X) = XpT

with K the field of rational functions in the indeterminate T over the finite field with p elements. (See separable polynomial: the point here is that P is not separable). If L is the field extension K(T1/p) (the splitting field of P) then L/K is an example of a purely inseparable field extension. In the element

is nilpotent: by taking its pth power one gets 0 by using K-linearity.

Classical theory of real and complex embeddings

In algebraic number theory, tensor products of fields are (implicitly, often) a basic tool. If K is an extension of ℚ of finite degree n, is always a product of fields isomorphic to ℝ or ℂ. The totally real number fields are those for which only real fields occur: in general there are r1 real and r2 complex fields, with r1 + 2r2 = n as one sees by counting dimensions. The field factors are in 1–1 correspondence with the real embeddings, and pairs of complex conjugate embeddings, described in the classical literature.

This idea applies also to where ℚp is the field of p-adic numbers. This is a product of finite extensions of ℚp, in 1–1 correspondence with the completions of K for extensions of the p-adic metric on ℚ.

Consequences for Galois theory

This gives a general picture, and indeed a way of developing Galois theory (along lines exploited in Grothendieck's Galois theory). It can be shown that for separable extensions the radical is always {0}; therefore the Galois theory case is the semisimple one, of products of fields alone.

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • Other Sports Official Kull from Drumheller, has hobbies such as telescopes, property developers in singapore and crocheting. Identified some interesting places having spent 4 months at Saloum Delta.

    my web-site http://himerka.com/
  • George Kempf (1995) Algebraic Structures, pp. 85–87.
  • Algebraic Number Theory, J. S. Milne Notes (PDF) at p. 17.
  • A Brief Introduction to Classical and Adelic Algebraic Number Theory, William Stein (PDF) pp. 140–142.
  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010

External links

  1. Other Sports Official Kull from Drumheller, has hobbies such as telescopes, property developers in singapore and crocheting. Identified some interesting places having spent 4 months at Saloum Delta.

    my web-site http://himerka.com/
  2. Other Sports Official Kull from Drumheller, has hobbies such as telescopes, property developers in singapore and crocheting. Identified some interesting places having spent 4 months at Saloum Delta.

    my web-site http://himerka.com/