Benjamin Gompertz: Difference between revisions
en>Dl2000 m en-GB; int'l fmt tag |
en>Waacstats →External links: Add persondata short description using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[number theory]], more specifically in [[local class field theory]], the '''ramification groups''' are a filtration of the [[Galois group]] of a [[local field]] extension, which gives detailed information on the [[ramification]] phenomena of the extension. | |||
== Ramification groups in lower numbering == | |||
Ramification groups are a refinement of the Galois group <math>G</math> of a finite <math>L/K</math> [[Galois extension]] of [[local field]]s. We shall write <math>w, \mathcal O_L, \mathfrak p</math> for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for <math>L</math>. As a consequence of [[Hensel's lemma]], one can write <math>\mathcal O_L = \mathcal O_K[\alpha]</math> for some <math>\alpha \in L</math> where <math>O_K</math> is the ring of integers of <math>K</math>.<ref name=N178>Neukirch (1999) p.178</ref> (This is stronger than the [[primitive element theorem]].) Then, for each integer <math>i \ge -1</math>, we define <math>G_i</math> to be the set of all <math>s \in G</math> that satisfies the following equivalent conditions. | |||
*(i) <math>s</math> operates trivially on <math>\mathcal O_L / \mathfrak p^{i+1}.</math> | |||
*(ii) <math>w(s(x) - x) \ge i+1</math> for all <math>x \in \mathcal O_L</math> | |||
*(iii) <math>w(s(\alpha) - \alpha) \ge i+1.</math> | |||
The group <math>G_i</math> is called ''<math>i</math>-th ramification group''. They form a decreasing [[filtration (mathematics)|filtration]], | |||
:<math>G_{-1} = G \supset G_0 \supset G_1 \supset \dots \{*\}.</math> | |||
In fact, the <math>G_i</math> are normal by (i) and [[trivial group|trivial]] for sufficiently large <math>i</math> by (iii). For the lowest indices, it is customary to call <math>G_0</math> the [[inertia subgroup]] of <math>G</math> because of its relation to [[splitting of prime ideals]], while <math>G_1</math> the [[wild inertia subgroup]] of <math>G</math>. The quotient <math>G_1 / G_0</math> is called the tame quotient. | |||
The Galois group <math>G</math> and its subgroups <math>G_i</math> are studied by employing the above filtration or, more specifically, the corresponding quotients. In particular, | |||
*<math>G/G_0 = \operatorname{Gal}(l/k),</math> where <math>l, k</math> are the (finite) residue fields of <math>L, K</math>.<ref>since <math>G/G_0</math> is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.</ref> | |||
*<math>G_0 = 1 \Leftrightarrow L/K </math> is [[unramified extension|unramified]]. | |||
*<math>G_1 = 1 \Leftrightarrow L/K </math> is [[tamely ramified]] (i.e., the ramification index is prime to the residue characteristic.) | |||
The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has <math>G_i = (G_0)_i</math> for <math>i \ge 0</math>. | |||
One also defines the function <math>i_G(s) = w(s(\alpha) - \alpha), s \in G</math>. (ii) in the above shows <math>i_G</math> is independent of choice of <math>\alpha</math> and, moreover, the study of the filtration <math>G_i</math> is essentially equivalent to that of <math>i_G</math>.<ref name=S7962>Serre (1979) p.62</ref> <math>i_G</math> satisfies the following: for <math>s, t \in G</math>, | |||
*<math>i_G(s) \ge i + 1 \Leftrightarrow s \in G_i.</math> | |||
*<math>i_G(t s t^{-1}) = i_G(s).</math> | |||
*<math>i_G(st) \ge \min\{ i_G(s), i_G(t) \}.</math> | |||
Fix a uniformizer <math>\pi</math> of <math>L</math>. <math>s \mapsto s(\pi)/\pi</math> then induces the injection <math>G_i/G_{i+1} \to U_{L, i}/U_{L, i+1}, i \ge 0</math> where <math>U_{L, 0} = \mathcal{O}_L^\times, U_{L, i} = 1 + \mathfrak{p}^i</math>. (The map actually does not depend on the choice of the uniformizer.<ref>Conrad</ref>) It follows from this<ref>Use <math>U_{L, 0}/U_{L, 1} \simeq l^\times</math> and <math>U_{L, i}/U_{L, i+1} \approx l^+</math></ref> | |||
*<math>G_0/G_1</math> is cyclic of order prime to <math>p</math> | |||
*<math>G_i/G_{i+1}</math> is a product of cyclic groups of order <math>p</math>. | |||
In particular, <math>G_1</math> is a [[p-group|''p''-group]] and <math>G</math> is [[solvable group|solvable]]. | |||
The ramification groups can be used to compute the [[Different ideal|different]] <math>\mathfrak{D}_{L/K}</math> of the extension <math>L/K</math> and that of subextensions:<ref name=S64>Serre (1979) 4.1 Prop.4, p.64</ref> | |||
:<math>w(\mathfrak{D}_{L/K}) = \sum_{s \ne 1} i_G(s) = \sum_0^\infty (|G_i| - 1).</math> | |||
If <math>H</math> is a normal subgroup of <math>G</math>, then, for <math>\sigma \in G</math>, <math>i_{G/H}(\sigma) = {1 \over e_{L/K}} \sum_{s \mapsto \sigma} i_G(s)</math>.<ref name=S63>Serre (1979) 4.1. Prop.3, p.63</ref> | |||
Combining this with the above one obtains: for a subextension <math>F/K</math> corresponding to <math>H</math>, | |||
:<math>v_F(\mathfrak{D}_{F/K}) = {1 \over e_{L/F}} \sum_{s \not\in H} i_G(s).</math> | |||
If <math>s \in G_i, t \in G_j, i, j \ge 1</math>, then <math>sts^{-1}t^{-1} \in G_{i+j+1}</math>.<ref>Serre (1979) 4.2. Proposition 10.</ref> In the terminology of [[Michel Lazard|Lazard]], this can be understood to mean the [[Lie algebra]] <math>\operatorname{gr}(G_1) = \sum_{i \ge 1} G_i/G_{i+1}</math> is abelian. | |||
===Example=== | |||
Let K be generated by x<sub>1</sub>=<math>\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}\ }</math>. The conjugates of x<sub>1</sub> are x<sub>2</sub>=<math>\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}\ }</math>, x<sub>3</sub>= - x<sub>1</sub>, x<sub>4</sub>= - x<sub>2</sub>. | |||
A little computation shows that the quotient of any two of these is a [[unit (ring theory)|unit]]. Hence they all generate the same ideal; call it {{pi}}. <math>\sqrt{2}</math> generates {{pi}}<sup>2</sup>; (2)={{pi}}<sup>4</sup>. | |||
Now x<sub>1</sub>-x<sub>3</sub>=2x<sub>1</sub>, which is in {{pi}}<sup>5</sup>. | |||
and x<sub>1</sub>-x<sub>2</sub>=<math>\sqrt{4-2\sqrt{2}\ }</math>, which is in {{pi}}<sup>3</sup>. | |||
Various methods show that the Galois group of K is <math>C_4</math>, cyclic of order 4. Also: | |||
<math>G_0</math>=<math>G_1</math>=<math>G_2</math>=<math>C_4</math>. | |||
and <math>G_3</math>=<math>G_4</math>=(13)(24). | |||
<math>w(\mathfrak{D}_{K/Q})</math> = 3+3+3+1+1 = 11. so that the different <math>\mathfrak{D}_{K/Q}</math>={{pi}}<sup>11</sup>. | |||
x<sub>1</sub> satisfies x<sup>4</sup>-4x<sup>2</sup>+2, which has discriminant 2048=2<sup>11</sup>. | |||
== Ramification groups in upper numbering == | |||
If <math>u</math> is a real number <math>\ge -1</math>, let <math>G_u</math> denote <math>G_i</math> where ''i'' the least integer <math>\ge u</math>. In other words, <math>s \in G_u \Leftrightarrow i_G(s) \ge u+1.</math> Define <math>\phi</math> by<ref name=S67156>Serre (1967) p.156</ref> | |||
:<math>\phi(u) = \int_0^u {dt \over (G_0 : G_t)}</math> | |||
where, by convention, <math>(G_0 : G_t)</math> is equal to <math>(G_{-1} : G_0)^{-1}</math> if <math>t = -1</math> and is equal to <math>1</math> for <math>-1 < t \le 0</math>.<ref name=N179>Neukirch (1999) p.179</ref> Then <math>\phi(u) = u</math> for <math>-1 \le u \le 0</math>. It is immediate that <math>\phi</math> is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function <math>\psi</math> defined on <math>[-1, \infty)</math>. Define | |||
<math>G^v = G_{\psi(v)}</math>. | |||
<math>G^v</math> is then called the '''''v''-th ramification group''' in upper numbering. In other words, <math>G^{\phi(u)} = G_u</math>. Note <math>G^{-1} = G, G^0 = G_0</math>. The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients:<ref name=S67155>Serre (1967) p.155</ref> if <math>H</math> is normal in <math>G</math>, then | |||
:<math>(G/H)^v = G^v H / H</math> for all <math>v</math> | |||
(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.) | |||
'''Herbrand's theorem''' states that the ramification groups in the lower numbering satisfy <math>G_u H/H = (G/H)_v</math> (for <math>v = \phi_{L/F}(u)</math> where <math>L/F</math> is the subextension corresponding to <math>H</math>), and that the ramification groups in the upper numbering satisfy <math>G^u H/H = (G/H)^u</math>.<ref name=N180>Neukirch (1999) p.180</ref><ref name=S75>Serre (1979) p.75</ref> This allows one to define ramification groups in the upper numbering for infinite Galois extensions (such as the [[absolute Galois group]] of a local field) from the inverse system of ramification groups for finite subextensions. | |||
The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the [[Hasse–Arf theorem]]. It states that if <math>G</math> is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration <math>G^v</math> are integers; i.e., <math>G_i = G_{i+1}</math> whenever <math>\phi(i)</math> is not an integer.<ref name=N355>Neukirch (1999) p.355</ref> | |||
The upper numbering is compatible with the filtration of the norm residue group by the unit groups under the [[Artin isomorphism]]. The image of <math>G^n(L/K)</math> under the isomorphism | |||
:<math> G(L/K)^{\mathrm{ab}} \leftrightarrow K^*/N_{L/K}(L^*) </math> | |||
is just<ref name=Sn3031>Snaith (1994) pp.30-31</ref> | |||
:<math> U^n_K / (U^n_K \cap N_{L/K}(L^*)) \ . </math> | |||
== Notes == | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
==See also== | |||
*[[Ramification theory of valuations]] | |||
==References== | |||
*B. Conrad, [http://math.stanford.edu/~conrad/248APage/handouts/ramgroup.pdf Math 248A. Higher ramification groups] | |||
* {{cite book | last1=Fröhlich | first1=A. | author1-link=Albrecht Fröhlich | last2=Taylor | first2= M.J. | author2-link=Martin J. Taylor | title=Algebraic number theory | series=Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics | volume=27 | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=1991 | isbn=0-521-36664-X | zbl=0744.11001 }} | |||
*{{Neukirch ANT}} | |||
* {{cite book | last=Serre | first=Jean-Pierre | authorlink=Jean-Pierre Serre | chapter=VI. Local class field theory | pages=128–161 | editor1-last=Cassels | editor1-first=J.W.S. | editor1-link=J. W. S. Cassels | editor2-last=Fröhlich | editor2-first=A. | editor2-link=Albrecht Fröhlich | title=Algebraic number theory. Proceedings of an instructional conference organized by the London Mathematical Society (a NATO Advanced Study Institute) with the support of the International Mathematical Union | location=London | publisher=Academic Press | year=1967 | zbl=0153.07403 }} | |||
* {{cite book | last1=Serre | first1=Jean-Pierre | author1-link=Jean-Pierre Serre | title=[[Local Fields (book)|Local Fields]] | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | mr=0554237 | year=1979 | others=Translated from the French by Marvin Jay Greenberg | series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics | volume=67 | isbn=0-387-90424-7 | zbl=0423.12016 }} | |||
* {{cite book | last=Snaith | first=Victor P. | title=Galois module structure | series=Fields Institute monographs | location=Providence, RI | publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]] | year=1994 | isbn=0-8218-0264-X | zbl=0830.11042 }} | |||
[[Category:Algebraic number theory]] |
Revision as of 15:47, 29 November 2013
In number theory, more specifically in local class field theory, the ramification groups are a filtration of the Galois group of a local field extension, which gives detailed information on the ramification phenomena of the extension.
Ramification groups in lower numbering
Ramification groups are a refinement of the Galois group of a finite Galois extension of local fields. We shall write for the valuation, the ring of integers and its maximal ideal for . As a consequence of Hensel's lemma, one can write for some where is the ring of integers of .[1] (This is stronger than the primitive element theorem.) Then, for each integer , we define to be the set of all that satisfies the following equivalent conditions.
The group is called -th ramification group. They form a decreasing filtration,
In fact, the are normal by (i) and trivial for sufficiently large by (iii). For the lowest indices, it is customary to call the inertia subgroup of because of its relation to splitting of prime ideals, while the wild inertia subgroup of . The quotient is called the tame quotient.
The Galois group and its subgroups are studied by employing the above filtration or, more specifically, the corresponding quotients. In particular,
- where are the (finite) residue fields of .[2]
- is unramified.
- is tamely ramified (i.e., the ramification index is prime to the residue characteristic.)
The study of ramification groups reduces to the totally ramified case since one has for .
One also defines the function . (ii) in the above shows is independent of choice of and, moreover, the study of the filtration is essentially equivalent to that of .[3] satisfies the following: for ,
Fix a uniformizer of . then induces the injection where . (The map actually does not depend on the choice of the uniformizer.[4]) It follows from this[5]
In particular, is a p-group and is solvable.
The ramification groups can be used to compute the different of the extension and that of subextensions:[6]
If is a normal subgroup of , then, for , .[7]
Combining this with the above one obtains: for a subextension corresponding to ,
If , then .[8] In the terminology of Lazard, this can be understood to mean the Lie algebra is abelian.
Example
Let K be generated by x1=. The conjugates of x1 are x2=, x3= - x1, x4= - x2.
A little computation shows that the quotient of any two of these is a unit. Hence they all generate the same ideal; call it Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.. generates Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.2; (2)=Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.4.
Now x1-x3=2x1, which is in Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.5.
and x1-x2=, which is in Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.3.
Various methods show that the Galois group of K is , cyclic of order 4. Also:
= 3+3+3+1+1 = 11. so that the different =Potter or Ceramic Artist Harry Rave from Cobden, spends time with hobbies for instance magic, property developers house in singapore singapore and fitness. Finds inspiration through travel and just spent 7 months at Keoladeo National Park.11.
x1 satisfies x4-4x2+2, which has discriminant 2048=211.
Ramification groups in upper numbering
If is a real number , let denote where i the least integer . In other words, Define by[9]
where, by convention, is equal to if and is equal to for .[10] Then for . It is immediate that is continuous and strictly increasing, and thus has the continuous inverse function defined on . Define . is then called the v-th ramification group in upper numbering. In other words, . Note . The upper numbering is defined so as to be compatible with passage to quotients:[11] if is normal in , then
(whereas lower numbering is compatible with passage to subgroups.)
Herbrand's theorem states that the ramification groups in the lower numbering satisfy (for where is the subextension corresponding to ), and that the ramification groups in the upper numbering satisfy .[12][13] This allows one to define ramification groups in the upper numbering for infinite Galois extensions (such as the absolute Galois group of a local field) from the inverse system of ramification groups for finite subextensions.
The upper numbering for an abelian extension is important because of the Hasse–Arf theorem. It states that if is abelian, then the jumps in the filtration are integers; i.e., whenever is not an integer.[14]
The upper numbering is compatible with the filtration of the norm residue group by the unit groups under the Artin isomorphism. The image of under the isomorphism
is just[15]
Notes
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
See also
References
- B. Conrad, Math 248A. Higher ramification groups
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - Template:Neukirch ANT
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
- ↑ Neukirch (1999) p.178
- ↑ since is canonically isomorphic to the decomposition group.
- ↑ Serre (1979) p.62
- ↑ Conrad
- ↑ Use and
- ↑ Serre (1979) 4.1 Prop.4, p.64
- ↑ Serre (1979) 4.1. Prop.3, p.63
- ↑ Serre (1979) 4.2. Proposition 10.
- ↑ Serre (1967) p.156
- ↑ Neukirch (1999) p.179
- ↑ Serre (1967) p.155
- ↑ Neukirch (1999) p.180
- ↑ Serre (1979) p.75
- ↑ Neukirch (1999) p.355
- ↑ Snaith (1994) pp.30-31