Lucas pseudoprime: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Maxal
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
== Longchamp Bags  when you complete one of those ==
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2013}}
{{John}}


You are a wonderful example to other chapter officers as a leader and volunteer. Your enthusiasm and high level of [http://www.completionpress.com.au/graphics/system/session.asp Longchamp Bags] commitment to the preservation of pioneer records and historical sites is a blessing to the residents and researchers in Jefferson County. <br><br>Sky News, which has been using Twitter as a valuable medium for newsgathering since July 2007, took the decision to make the Twitter Correspondent role official in order to recognise its everincreasing power as an important newsgathering and news sharing medium. Online News Editor for Sky News, Jon Gripton, said: a member of the team committed to Twittering will not only further increase Sky News presence in the Twittersphere, but will also highlight the power of Twitter [http://www.uluruexpress.com.au/flux-system/plugins/formfile.asp Nike Free Run Womens] like a newsgathering tool.. <br><br>Low food intake can reduce the amount of calcium ingested. Osteoporosis has additionally been associated with medications used to combat or prevent:Some bad habits [http://www.romavilla.com/custom/ordersummary.asp Mbt Shoes Perth] can increase your risk of osteoporosis. We would also like to see more articles in Hindi specifically written for the Indian audience than mere translation ofexistingcontent. However, we believe that it will happen once the community grows. <br><br>Its amazing reading this, with Forbes names related to it, we feel as if we've been informed on financial matters. As one said, its pretty much a fact, just like a fact, close to a fact, a facsimile we are able to use for the purpose of fact when attempting to somehow find a way to justify the nhl cutting partner salaries because revenues are spiralling unmanageable. <br><br>It remains to see the number of advertisers want to be associated with a system not every that different from one almost universally hated.I actually thought the recaptchas were kind of neat. I mean, when you complete one of those, you're actually helping to digitise some kind of book or document. <br><br>It is really an almost guaranteed question on your Army interview so there should be no reason why you can't answer it inside a positive manner. Try to display motivation when answering questions of this nature. In Maldives, if the couple is enthusiastic about diving and surfing, then, there are special resorts catering for that clientele. One can chose Anantara Veli, Bandos Island Resort Spa, Huduranfushi Island Resorts and many others if one wishes to experience surfing and diving holiday Maldives.. <br><br>CNET completed the acquisition of GameKult in France. It has no shortage of backlog of acquisitions that it's seeing and is focused on finding those which can either improve the operations associated with a one of its properties or markets or [http://www.gregoryburgessarchitects.com.au/Mobile/Css/style.asp Timberland Shoes] launch CNET into new areas.<ul>
The '''authorship of the Johannine works''' (the [[Gospel of John]], [[Epistles of John]], and the [[Book of Revelation]]) has been debated by [[Biblical criticism|scholars]] since at least the 2nd century AD.<ref>F. L. Cross, ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church'', (New York: [[Oxford University Press]], 1997), 45</ref> The main debate centers on who authored the writings, and which of the writings, if any, can be ascribed to a common author.
 
  <li>[http://www.bv58.cn/news/html/?18147.html http://www.bv58.cn/news/html/?18147.html]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.juzibuy.com/lt/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=773781&extra= http://www.juzibuy.com/lt/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=773781&extra=]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.somd-discgolf.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1408987#p1408987 http://www.somd-discgolf.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1408987#p1408987]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.cqwkc.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=137683 http://www.cqwkc.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=137683]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.heatherbrewer.com/board/read.php?10,130080 http://www.heatherbrewer.com/board/read.php?10,130080]</li>
 
</ul>


== Cheap Nike Shoes  numerous lakes ==
Ancient tradition attributes all the books to [[John the Apostle]].<ref name=Harris>Stephen L Harris, ''Understanding the Bible,'' (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985), 355</ref>


He wished a few weeks in your own home before his last great clash using the French, but leave wasn't forthcoming. October 1804 Britain widened the conflict, once again adding Spain to the list of her enemies. Zoho Show 2.0Similarly to Google Docs, Zoho is another webbased office suite which has word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, databases, notetaking, wikis, CRM, project management software, invoicing and other applications. Users can use the Zoho [http://www.enginegroup.com.au/dynamo/browser.asp Cheap Nike Shoes] Show 2.0 to produce slides for presentation. <br><br>Nizar was the Director of Primary Health Care, Sharjah Medical District Ministry of Health, Sharjah, UAE for thirty years from 1976. From Ain Shams University, Egypt. You will find plenty to keep you busy and unbored. We'll try and update as much as possible. <br><br>You learn how to be wise in how you use your time, your energy as well as your talents. You'll learn that you're only human and that you can only do what you can do. She hopes that other parents will join her in refusing to particpate. According to Fair Test, standardized testing isn't an accurate measurement of a student's progress [http://www.outerrimtradingco.com.au/supersecret/affiliate.asp Hollister Australia] as it measures one day and one area of interest instead of a students broad spectrum of knowledge. <br><br>Snyder is the winningest coach in school history, having compiled an eye on 170851, including 3416 since his return in '09. The Wildcats won the Big 12 title this past [http://www.originpublishing.com.au/graphics/titles/rollovers.asp Ray Ban Aviators] season with a mark of 112, including 81 in [http://www.bellaflora.com.au/common/update.asp Oakley Sunglasses Cheap] conference play. You'll discover beautiful peaks and other treasures from the region. Altai also has endless steppes, impenetrable taiga, numerous lakes, rivers and waterfalls. <br><br>What is occurring in India is what the Elite intend to happen to the rest of us. The Bilderberg Group knows the actual story. Please know the alarm testing you experienced is complete. The testing was essential to prepare for the grand opening from the Margaritaville Cafe scheduled for May 24th. <br><br>Dr. Naissan Wesley is a Diplomat of the American Board of Dermatology and fellowshiptrained Mohs micrographic surgeon. Now, imagine being unsure of the location, expiration date, or status of the digital certificates installed in traffic signals throughout New York City. Suddenly, the digital certificate expires and the traffic signal shuts down denying access with the intersectionsTotal Chaos, and you are responsible.. <br><br>Well here is a fast food alternative that's convenient and healthy. Pita Fusion in Round Rock previously named The Pita Factory. In fact, even today Tibet is closed to foreigners and diplomats stationed in China. This ban continues to be necessitated by the need to have a lid on simmering discontent in Tibet after as many as 45 self immolations have brought Tibet into world focus.<ul>
In the 6th century, the [[Decretum Gelasianum]] argued that Second and Third John have a separate author known as "John, a priest" (see [[John the Presbyter]]).<ref>Since the 18th century, the Decretum Gelasianum has been associated with the [[Council of Rome]] (382), though historians dispute the connection.</ref> [[Higher criticism]], representing most liberal Christian and secular scholars, rejects the view that [[John the Apostle]] authored any of these works.
 
  <li>[http://enseignement-lsf.com/spip.php?article64#forum18426634 http://enseignement-lsf.com/spip.php?article64#forum18426634]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.wxdemir.com/news/html/?762477.html http://www.wxdemir.com/news/html/?762477.html]</li>
 
  <li>[http://mediawiki.softwaredeliverygroup.com/index.php?title=User:Bjqjcyhq#Timberland_Boots_Oo1You_sat_by_his_tombstone http://mediawiki.softwaredeliverygroup.com/index.php?title=User:Bjqjcyhq#Timberland_Boots_Oo1You_sat_by_his_tombstone]</li>
 
  <li>[http://51zzjk.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=272378 http://51zzjk.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=272378]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.mba-zone.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=260864 http://www.mba-zone.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=260864]</li>
 
</ul>


== Ray Ban Sunglasses Australia  services ==
Many modern scholars conclude that the apostle John wrote none of these works,<ref name="Fourth Gospel 1985 p. 355">"Although ancient traditions attributed to the Apostle John the Fourth Gospel, the Book of Revelation, and the three Epistles of John, modern scholars believe that he wrote none of them." [[Stephen L Harris|Harris, Stephen L.]], ''Understanding the Bible'' (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985) p. 355</ref> although others, notably [[John Arthur Thomas Robinson|J.A.T. Robinson]], [[F. F. Bruce]], [[Leon Morris]], and [[Martin Hengel]]<ref>Hengel, Martin. ''Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ'', |page=40 |ISBN 978-1-56338-300-7. Trinity Press International; 1st edition, 2000. p. 40</ref> hold the apostle to be behind at least some, in particular the gospel.<ref name="Morris1995">Morris, Leon (1995) ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=II-33dS9esAC&pg=PA4#v=snippet&q=Continental%20scholars&f=false The Gospel According to John]'' Volume 4 of The new international commentary on the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8028-2504-9, pp. 4–5, 24, 35–7. "Continental scholars have&nbsp;... abandoned the idea that this gospel was written by the apostle John, whereas in Great Britain and America scholarship has been much more open to the idea." Abandonment is due to changing opinion rather "than to any new evidence." "Werner, Colson, and I have been joined, among others, by I. Howard Marshall and J.A.T. Robinson in seeing the evidence as pointing to John the son of Zebedee as the author of this Gospel." The view that John's history is substandard "is becoming increasingly hard to sustain. Many recent writers have shown that there is good reason for regarding this or that story in John as authentic.&nbsp;... It is difficult to&nbsp;... regard John as having little concern for history. The fact is John is concerned with historical information.&nbsp;... John apparently records this kind of information because he believes it to be accurate.&nbsp;... He has some reliable information and has recorded it carefully.&nbsp;... The evidence is that where he can be tested John proves to be remarkably accurate."
*Bruce 1981 pp. 52–4, 58. "The evidence&nbsp;... favor[s] the apostolicity of the gospel.&nbsp;... John knew the other gospels and&nbsp;... supplements them.&nbsp;... The synoptic narrative becomes more intelligible if we follow John." John's style is different so Jesus' "abiding truth might be presented to men and women who were quite unfamiliar with the original setting.&nbsp;... He does not yield to any temptation to restate Christianity.&nbsp;... It is the story of events that happened in history.&nbsp;... John does not divorce the story from its Palestinian context."
*Dodd p. 444. "Revelation is distinctly, and nowhere more clearly than in the Fourth Gospel, a historical revelation. It follows that it is important for the evangelist that what he narrates happened."
*Temple, William. "Readings in St. John's Gospel". MacMillan and Co, 1952. "The synoptists give us something more like the perfect photograph; St. John gives us the more perfect portrait".
*Edwards, R. A. "The Gospel According to St. John" 1954, p 9. One reason he accepts John's authorship is because "the alternative solutions seem far too complicated to be possible in a world where living men met and talked".
*Hunter, A. M. "Interpreting the New Testament" P 86. "After all the conjectures have been heard, the likeliest view is that which identifies the Beloved Disciple with the Apostle John.</ref><ref name="Strobel, Lee 1998">Dr. [[Craig Blomberg]], cited in Lee Strobel ''The Case for Christ'', 1998, Chapter 2.
*Marshall, Howard. "The Illustrated Bible Dictionary", ed J. D. Douglas et al. Leicester 1980. II, p 804
*Robinson, J. A. T. "The Priority of John" P 122
*Cf. Marsh, "John seems to have believed that theology was not something which could be used to read a meaning into events but rather something that was to be discovered in them. His story is what it is because his theology is what it is; but his theology is what it is because the story happened so" (p&nbsp;580–581).</ref>


Your baby has two soft spots [http://www.nadya.com.au/flux/core/styles/library.asp Ray Ban Sunglasses Australia] on his head: a larger one toward the front from the top of the head and a small one toward the back. They may bulge when he cries, and you may be able to see the pulse of his heartbeat there, too. Because they build with HTML5 rather than Flash, they are also helping Apple since Apple has a complex relationship with Adobe. (There's also that issue with security as Flash cuts down on the security and reliability of Apple products and Flash fails well on mobile devices, especially touch devices.) Android may also be a part of this new platform.. <br><br>But things finally changed when our older sister, plagued with a weight and acne problem, was instructed to go on a sugarfree, dairyfree diet. We loved her, and never wanting her to feel left out, decided to eat the same way she did, as well as in doing so, unintentionally cured our own health problems.. <br><br>(Over time, you will learn your baby's early hunger cues.) When you get to your destination, scout out a place you can breastfeed, if that makes you feel much more comfortable. It isn't possible to stay home constantly and you can feel free to feed your child while out and about. <br><br>A few days ago while I was in Halifax, we were contending with topsy turvy weather veering from rainfall to snow blizzards, freezing temperatures to warmth. It had been very true that if we didn such as the weather, all we had to do was to wait for a few hours! This photograph was adopted the street near Saint Mary University as you can tell, the downpour was heavy, with result that my lens got splattered with a few raindrops. <br><br>I feel it sums up my concept of what great fashion is. The type that almost moves me to tears. Be mindful Caanan, and I'll talk to you soon. Between postage and your photocopying costs, you might pay anywhere from $5 to $25 per issue.). On the west side which was not so badly affected, businesses faced major challenges getting around the city with roading damage and liquefaction forcing these to use different routes, resulting in costly delays. For all businesses it had been a matter of looking at the options, making a prompt decision and acting decisively.. <br><br>Some advertising is in the form of advertisements generated by a third party ad network. Those advertisements will be identified as paid advertisements.Who [http://www.completionpress.com.au/graphics/system/session.asp Longchamp Australia] owns this blog is occasionally compensated to [http://www.enginegroup.com.au/dynamo/browser.asp Cheap Nike Australia] supply opinion on products, services, websites as well as other topics. <br><br>In Corrie care healed well with help provided by the professionals. But one thing didn't have: forgiveness. GriefUnhealthy grief: symptomsGrief is paradoxical. In other words, when you feel most unhealthy you may be fine. Word spread quickly in the community as did the interest in programs and services. As these programs expanded, the need for Native services became more [http://www.hopeislandmarina.com.au/wp-content/plugins/akismet/profile.php Celine Bag Price] apparent.<ul>
There may have been a single author for the gospel and the three epistles.<ref name=Harris/> Some scholars conclude the author of the epistles was different from that of the gospel, although all four works probably originated from the same community.<ref>Ehrman, pp.&nbsp;178–9.</ref> The gospel and epistles traditionally and plausibly came from [[Early centers of Christianity#Asia Minor|Ephesus]], ''c.'' 90-110, although some scholars argue for an origin in [[Early centers of Christianity#Damascus|Syria]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Brown |first=Raymond E. |authorlink=Raymond E. Brown |title=Introduction to the New Testament |year=1997 |publisher=Anchor Bible |page=334 |location=New York |isbn=0-385-24767-2 }}</ref>
 
 
  <li>[http://www.philatelie-france-russie.fr/spip.php?article51/ http://www.philatelie-france-russie.fr/spip.php?article51/]</li>
In the case of Revelation, many modern scholars agree that it was written by a separate author, [[John of Patmos]], ''c.'' 95 with some parts possibly dating to [[Nero]]'s reign in the early 60s.<ref name=Harris/><ref name=Ehrman>{{Cite book|last=Ehrman |first=Bart D.|authorlink=Bart D. Ehrman |title=The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings |year=2004 |publisher=Oxford |location=New York |isbn=0-19-515462-2 |page=468 }}</ref>
 
 
  <li>[http://166.111.7.59/luo/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2414660 http://166.111.7.59/luo/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2414660]</li>
[[File:El Greco 034.jpg|thumb|[[El Greco]]'s rendition of [[John the Apostle]] shows the traditional author of the Johannine works as a young man.]]
 
 
  <li>[http://www.ty2013.com/news/html/?100752.html http://www.ty2013.com/news/html/?100752.html]</li>
==Early use of the Johannine works==
 
[[File:St-john-patmos.jpg|thumb|right|220px|"Saint John on Patmos" by [[Hans Baldung Grien]], 1511 ]]
  <li>[http://cs.dbwhcb.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=872332 http://cs.dbwhcb.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=872332]</li>
The gospel was not widely quoted until late in the 2nd century.<ref>Craig Keener, ''A Gospel of John: A Commentary Volume 1'', (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003), 93.</ref> [[Justin Martyr]] is probably the first ''[[Church Father]]'' to quote John's gospel.<ref>Craig Keener, ''A Gospel of John: A Commentary Volume 1'', (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003), 93 notes that, "Earliest Christian tradition seems to have exercised some ambivalence towards this Gospel, however; it is not recognized in the Roman fathers until the late second century." Keener also notes that "it is possible that he [Justin Martyr] cites instead an agraphon from pre-Johannine tradition or a subsequent tradition based on John."</ref> Some scholars conclude that in antiquity John was probably considered less important than the [[synoptic gospels|synoptics]].<ref>''C.H. Dodd, Historical tradition in the Fourth Gospel'', (Cambridge: University Press, 1963), 13; J.W. Pryor, "Justin Martyr and the Fourth Gospel," ''Second Cent'' 9, no. 3 (1992): 153-169; Keener, ''The Gospel of John,'' 94 notes in one of the footnotes something quite interesting, "Although the analogy carries little weight, my first book cited Matthew over 150 times, Luke 13 times, 1 Peter 9 times, and John twice, though John was my dissertation area."</ref> Walter Bauer suggests:
 
 
  <li>[http://forum.isped.u-bordeaux2.fr/Alzheimer.aspx?g=posts&t=305709 http://forum.isped.u-bordeaux2.fr/Alzheimer.aspx?g=posts&t=305709]</li>
<blockquote>Can it be a coincidence that immediately after Justin, the enemy of heretics who took aim at the [[Valentinians]] (''Dial.'' 35. 6), we note the appearance in Italy-Rome of two representatives of this latter school who especially treasure the Fourth Gospel&nbsp;&ndash; namely Ptolemy and Heracleon (Hillolytus ''Ref.'' 6. 35)? To be sure, Justin's disciple Tatian placed the Gospel of John on the same level as the synoptics, but he also broke with the church on account of profound differences in faith&nbsp;&ndash; poisoned, so Irenaeus thought, by the Valentinians and [[Marcion]] (AH 1. 28. 1 [=1.26.1]).<ref>Walter Bauer, ''Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity'' (Philadelphia: 1971), 206</ref></blockquote>
 
 
</ul>
One reason for this 'orthodox ambivalence' was [[gnostic]] acceptance of the fourth gospel.<ref>Keener, ''The Gospel of John,'' 94; see also John Kysar, "The Gospel of John," in ''Anchor Bible Commentary'' David Noel Freedman eds., (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 912 notes that, "In its defense against Gnosticism the Church embraced the Gospel of John and attempted to demonstrate that the gospel affirmed the 'Orthodox Christian faith.' The affiliation of the gospel with gnostic Christian beliefs led some, however, to reject it along with Revelation, as Irenaeus witnesses (''haer.'' 3.2.12</ref> The early Gnostic use is referred to by [[Irenaeus]] and [[Origen]] in quoted commentary made on John by the Gnostics [[Ptolemy (gnostic)|Ptolemy]] and [[Heracleon]]. In the quote below Irenaeus argues against the gnostic heresy from his book ''Against Heresies'':
 
<blockquote>For, summing up his statements respecting the Word previously mentioned by him, he further declares, "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." But, according to their [gnostic] hypothesis, the Word did not become flesh at all, inasmuch as He never went outside of the Pleroma, but that Saviour [became flesh] who was formed by a special dispensation [out of all the Æons], and was of later date than the Word.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103109.htm ''Against Heresies'' 1.9.2., see]</ref></blockquote>
 
Several church fathers of the 2nd century never quoted John, but the earliest extant written commentary on any book of the New Testament was that written on John by Heracleon, a disciple of the gnostic [[Valentinius|Valentinus]].<ref>[http://www.gnosis.org/library/fragh.htm Fragments of Heracleon's ''Commentary on John'' can be found here]</ref>
 
The following table shows the number of times various church fathers cited John compared to the [[synoptic gospels]].<ref>Taken from Robert. M Grant, "The Fourth Gospel and the Church," ''The Harvard Theological Review'' 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 95-116</ref>
 
{| class="wikitable" border=1 cellpadding=4px
|-
! '''Gospel'''
! Barn.
! Did.
! Ign.
! Poly.
! Herm.
! II Clem.
! Papias
! Basilides
|-
| ''Synoptics''
| 1?
| 1?
| 7(+4?)
| 1
| 0
| 1(+3?)
| 2
| 1
|-
| ''John or Epistles''
| 0
| 0
| 2?
| 1
| 0
| 0
| ?
| 1
|}
 
{| class="wikitable" border=1 cellpadding=4px
|-
! '''Gospel'''
! Marcion
! Justin
! Valentinus
! Hegesip.
! Ptolem.
! Melito
! Apollin.
! Athenag.
|-
| ''Synoptics''
| Luke
| 170
| 1
| 3?
| 4
| 4
| 1
| 13
|-
| ''John or Epistles''
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
| 1
| 4
| 1
| 0
|}
 
John was considered the last to be written. Most scholars today give it a date between 90 and 100,<ref name="Morris1995"/> though a minority suggest an even later date.<ref>Robert M. Grant, ''The Fourth Gospel and the Church'', The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 suggests that, "John's very divergence from the synoptics had already led to is relatively slower reception in the broader church until it could be explained in relation to them."</ref> The Fourth Gospel may have been later also because it was written to a smaller group within the Johannine community, and was not circulated widely until a later date.<ref>Robert M. Grant, ''The Fourth Gospel and the Church'', The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 notes also that "our early second-century papyrus fragment P52, discovered in Egypt, probably limits the value of this second proposal&nbsp;... However much the Fourth Gospel may have been directed toward a specific historical situation, it was only a matter of time before it began to circulate beyond its originally intended readership."</ref> However, claims for authorship much later than 100 have been called into question due to [[Rylands Library Papyrus P52]], a fragment of the gospel found in Egypt that was probably written around 125<ref>Robert M. Grant, ''The Fourth Gospel and the Church'', The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 Nevertheless, most biblical scholars continue to favour the earlier dating, though the possibility of a later date is not entirely discounted; John Rylands Library continues to maintain Roberts's assessment of the date of <math>\mathfrak{P}</math><sup>52</sup>, that it "may with some confidence be dated in the first half of the second century A.D."</ref><ref>[http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/specialcollections/collections/stjohnfragment/ John Rylands Library]</ref><ref>The date is given as c. 125 in standard reference works</ref> as well as by the recent work of Charles Hill.<ref name="Hill2">Hill, Charles E., ''[http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Johannine_Corpus_in_the_Early_Church.html?id=PvqpheF5ljMC The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church]'' Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-929144-1</ref> Hill gives evidence that the Gospel of John was complete and in use between 90 and 130, and of the possible use of uniquely Johannine gospel material in several works which date from this period. These works and authors include [[Ignatius of Antioch]] (''c.'' 107); [[Polycarp]] (''c.'' 107); [[Papias of Hierapolis|Papias]]' elders (''c.'' 110-120); of [[Hierapolis]]' Exegesis of the Lord's Oracles (''c.'' 120-132). Hill assesses that many historical figures did indeed reference the Gospel of John.<ref name="Hill2"/>
 
==History of critical scholarship==
{{Bible related}}
{{Main|Biblical criticism}}
The modern era of critical scholarship on the works opened with [[Karl Gottlieb Bretschneider|K.G. Bretschneider's]] 1820 work on the topic of Johannine authorship.<ref>Adolf Julicher, ''An Introduction to the New Testament,'' (New York: Smith, Elder, and co., 1904), 399 notes that "Ever since, in 1820, Prof. K.G. Bretschneider brought forward strong reasons for declaring it impossible to conceive the Fourth Gospel as the work of the an Apostle, the dispute as to whether the tradition were right or wrong has become ever keener.</ref> Bretschneider called into question the apostolic authorship of the Gospel, and even stated on the basis of the author's unsteady grip on topography that the author could not have come from [[Palestine]].<ref>James Moffatt, "Ninety Years After: A survey of Bretschneider's 'Probabilia' in the Light of Subsequent Johannine Criticism," ''The American Journal of Theology'' 17, no. 3 (July 1913), 371 who notes that "..the opening chapter of Bretschneider is occupied with an incisive discussion of the differences between the synoptic and the Johannine conceptions of Jesus, and it concludes by depreciating the speeches of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel as unworthy of historical credence. Their style, says Bretschneider, is unlike the direct, simple utterances of the synoptic Jesus."</ref> He argued that the meaning and nature of [[Jesus]] presented in the ''Gospel of John'' was very different from that in the [[Synoptic Gospels]], and thus its author could not have been an eyewitness to the events. Bretschneider cited an [[apologetics|apologetic]] character in John, indicating a later date of composition. Scholars such as Wellhausen, Wendt, and Spitta have argued that the fourth gospel is a ''Grundschrift'' or a, "..work which had suffered interpolation before arriving at its canonical form; it was a unity as it stood."<ref>James Moffatt, "Ninety Year After: A survey of Bretschneider's 'Probabilia' in the Light of Subsequent Johannine Criticism," ''The American Journal of Theology'' 17, no. 3 (July 1913), 370</ref>
 
[[Ferdinand Christian Baur|F.C. Baur]] (1792–1860) proposed that John was solely a work of synthesis of thesis-antithesis according to the [[Hegel]]ian model&mdash;synthesis between the thesis of Judeo-Christianity (represented by Peter) and the antithesis of Gentile Christianity (represented by Paul). He also cited in the epistles a synthesis with the opposing dualist forces of [[Gnosticism]]. As such, he assigned a date of 170 to the Gospel.
 
===Early criticism===
The first certain witness to Johannine theology among the Fathers of the Church is in [[Ignatius of Antioch]], whose ''Letter to the Philippians'' is founded on {{bibleref|John|3:8|NIV}} and alludes to {{bibleref|John|10:7-9|NIV}} and {{bibleverse-nb||John|14:6|NIV}}. This would indicate that the Gospel was known in Antioch before Ignatius' death (probably 107). [[Polycarp of Smyrna]] (''c.'' 80 to 167) quotes from the letters of John, as does [[Justin Martyr]](''c.'' 100 to 165).<ref>[http://www.ntcanon.org/Polycarp.shtml Polycarp] at NTCanon.org</ref><ref name=JustinNTC>[http://www.ntcanon.org/Justin_Martyr.shtml Justin Martyr] at NTCanon.org</ref>
 
The earliest testimony to the author was that of [[Papias of Hierapolis|Papias]], preserved in fragmentary quotes in [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]]'s history of the Church. This text is consequently rather obscure. Eusebius says that two different Johns must be distinguished, John the Apostle, and [[John the Presbyter]], with the Gospel assigned to the Apostle and the [[Book of Revelation]] to the presbyter.<ref>Eusebius, ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Ecclesiastical History]]'' 3.39.4-6</ref>
 
Irenaeus's witness based on Papias represents the tradition in [[Ephesus]], where John the Apostle is reputed to have lived.<ref>Irenaeus ''[[On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis|Adversus haereses]]'' 3.11 = Eusebius ''Historia ecclesiastica'' 5.8.4</ref> Irenaeus was a disciple of [[Polycarp]], thus in the second generation after the apostle. According to many scholars, he states unequivocally that the apostle is the author of the Gospel. (Other scholars note, however, that Irenaeus consistently refers to the author of the gospel, as well as of Revelation, as "the disciple of the Lord," whereas he refers to the others as "apostles." And so Irenaeus appears to distinguish John, the author of the fourth gospel, from John the apostle.) Koester rejects the reference of Ignatius of Antioch as referring to the Gospel and cites Irenaeus as the first to use it.<ref>[[Helmut Koester]]. ''Ancient Christian Gospels''. Harrisburg, PA.: Trinity Press. 1990. p. 246</ref>
 
The [[Rylands Library Papyrus P52]], typically dated to around 125, suggests that the text of the ''Gospel of John'' spread rapidly through Egypt. The front of the fragment contains lines from the Gospel of {{bibleref|John|18:31-33|NIV}}, in Greek, and the back contains lines from verses 37-38. [[Clement of Alexandria]] (''c.'' 150 - 211) mentions John the Apostle's missionary activity in Asia Minor, and continues, "As for John, the last, upon seeing that in the Gospels they had told the corporal matters, supported by his disciples and inspired by the [[Holy Spirit]], he wrote a spiritual Gospel."<ref>Eusebius Pamphilius, Church History 14.2 http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.xi.xiv.html</ref> [[Origen]] (185–''c.'' 254) responded, when asked how John had placed the cleansing of the Temple first rather than last, "John does not always tell the truth literally, he always tells the truth spiritually."<ref>Origen, ''Commentary on John'' 10.4.6.</ref> In [[Alexandria]], the authorship of the Gospel and the first epistle was never questioned. [[Bruce Metzger]] stated "One finds in Clement's work citations of all the books of the New Testament with the exception of Philemon, James, 2 Peter, and 2 and 3 John."<ref>Metzger, Bruce M. ''The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance''. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1987: p. 131.</ref>
 
Rome was the home to the only early rejection of the fourth Gospel. The adversaries of [[Montanism]] were responsible. Irenaeus says that these persons tried to suppress the teaching about the Holy Spirit in order to put down Montanism, and as a result denied the authorship of the Gospel and its authority. Later [[Epiphanius of Salamis|Epiphanius]] called this group, who were followers of the priest Caius, the [[Alogi]] in a wordplay between "without the Word" and "without reason".
 
===Modern criticism===
Modern Criticism can be broken down into three main sections: (1) Foundations with Bauer to Braun (1934–1935), (2) Heyday with Schnackenburg to Koester (1959–60), (3) Uneasy supremacy from Hengel to Hangel (1989–2000).<ref>Charles E. Hill, ''The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 13</ref>
 
[[Walter Bauer]] opened the modern discussion on John with his book ''Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum.''<ref>The English version of this text can be found at Walter Bauer, ''Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity'' (Philadelphia: 1971)</ref> Bauer's thesis is that "the heretics probably outnumbered the orthodox" in the early Christian world and that heresy and orthodoxy were not as narrowly defined as we now define them.<ref>Walter Bauer, ''Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity'' (Philadelphia: 1971), 194; Charles E. Hill, ''The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 13 notes, however, that "Bauer's thesis has certainly been challenged by later scholars, and even his heirs today would not accept his theories without significant modifications. Nevertheless, as a grand, organizing principle for understanding the spread of Christianity in the second century, his approach has retained much of its force among scholars, particularly since the appearance of the English translation of the book decades later in 1971.</ref> He was "convinced that none of the Apostolic Fathers had relied on the authority of the Fourth Gospel. It was the gnostics, the Marcionites, and the Montanists who first used it and introduced it to the Christian community."<ref>Charles E. Hill, ''The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 15</ref>
 
[[J.N. Sanders]], who wrote ''[[The Fourth Gospel in the Early Church]]'', examined "the alleged parallels with John in [[Ignatius of Antioch|Ignatius]], [[Polycarp]], [[Barnabas]], and the ''[[Epistle to Diognetus]]'', and concluded that there was no certain traces of the Fourth Gospel's influence among any of the [[Apostolic Fathers]]."<ref>Charles E. Hill, ''The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 15; to see the Sanders original book, one can find it at J.N. Sanders, ''The Fourth Gospel in the Early Church: Its Origin and Influence on Christian Theology up to Irenaeus'' (Cambridge, 1943)</ref> Sanders argued the book originated in Alexandria.<ref name="Sanders86">Sanders, ''The Fourth Gospel'', 86.</ref>
 
The ''[[Gospel of John]]'' states explicitly in its text that it was written by the "[[disciple whom Jesus loved]]", so a great deal of effort has been put into determining who this person might be. Traditionally he is identified as John the Apostle, since otherwise, one of the most important apostles in the other Gospels would be entirely missing in the fourth gospel. However, critical scholars have suggested some other possibilities.
 
Filson, Sanders, [[Vernard Eller]], [[Rudolf Steiner]], and Ben Witherington suggest [[Lazarus of Bethany|Lazarus]], since {{bibleref|John|11:3|NIV}} and {{bibleverse-nb||John|11:36|NIV}} specifically indicates that Jesus "loved" him, and it is perhaps also implied in the ''[[Secret Gospel of Mark]]''.<ref>Vernard Eller, The Beloved Disciple:
His Name, His Story, His Throught [sic], ''House Church Central,'' accessed at http://www.hccentral.com/eller8/index.html on 13 October 2007; Rudolf Steiner, "The Gospel of St. John" (Lecture, Berlin, 19 February 1906) accessed at
http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GospJohn1906/19060219p01.html; Craig Keener, The Gospel of John: Volume 1, 86 suggests that, "..one of the more commonly proposed and most defensible candidates is Lazarus, "whom Jesus loved" (John 11:3). This makes sense of the phrase, though it makes less sense of the frequency with which, and locations in which, the disciples appears in the narrative, if an earlier anonymous disciples (1:37-40) includes him (which is uncertain).</ref> Keener notes that "Lazarus of Bethany would have readier access to the high priest's house (if the disciple of 18:15-16 is the beloved disciple, which is uncertain); the Synoptics might also have omitted Lazarus to protect him because of his location."<ref name="Sanders86" /> This would fit well with the author's interest in the Judean activity of Jesus.
 
Parker suggested that this disciple might be [[Mark the Evangelist|John Mark]]; nonetheless, the [[Acts of the Apostles]] indicate that John Mark was very young and a late-comer as a disciple. J. Colson suggested that "John" was a priest in Jerusalem, explaining the alleged priestly mentality in the fourth gospel. R.&nbsp;Schnackenburg suggested that "John" was an otherwise unknown resident of Jerusalem who was in Jesus' circle of friends.  The ''[[Gospel of Philip]]'' and the ''[[Gospel of Mary]]'' identify [[Mary Magdalene]] as the disciple whom Jesus loved, a connection that has been analyzed by Esther de Boer<ref>de Boer, Esther, 2004. Essay in Marvin Meyer, ''The Gospels of Mary''. HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-072791-8</ref> and made notorious in the fictional ''[[The Da Vinci Code]]''. Finally, a few authors, such as Loisy and Bultmann and [[Hans-Martin Schenke]], see "the Beloved Disciple" as a purely symbolic creation, an idealized pseudonym for the group of authors.
 
Gnosticism scholar [[Elaine Pagels]] goes further and claims that the author himself was a Gnostic, citing similarities with the ''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'' and the ''[[Gospel of Philip]]''.<ref name=Pagels2003>[[Elaine Pagels|Pagels, Elaine]], 2003. ''Beyond Belief'', ISBN 0-375-70316-0, pp&nbsp;115–117.
* See also the response at [http://www.answeringinfidels.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=56 answeringinfidels.com]</ref>
 
Various objections to John the Apostle's authorship have been raised.  First of all, the ''Gospel of John'' is a highly intellectual account of Jesus' life, and is familiar with Rabbinic traditions of biblical interpretation. The Synoptic Gospels, however, are united in identifying John as a fisherman. {{bibleref|Acts|4:13|NIV}} refers to John as "without learning" or "unlettered".
 
Objections are also raised because the "disciple whom Jesus loved" is not mentioned before the [[Last Supper]].<ref>Craig Keener, ''The Gospel of John: Volume One''. p. 84 notes, "One could argue that the beloved disciple is not one of the Twelve because he is not mentioned by the 'beloved disciple' until the last discourse and passion narrative (one could also use this to separate sections of the gospels into sources)." See also Robert Kysar, ''John, the maverick Gospel,'' (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1976), 919</ref>
 
The title ("beloved disciple") is also strange to Beasley-Murray because "if the beloved disciple were one of the Twelve, he would have been sufficiently known outside the Johannine circle of churches for the author to have named him".<ref>Keener, ''The Gospel of John: Volume 1, 84; See also George R. Beasley-Murray, ''John,'' (Waco: Word Books, 1987), lxxiii</ref>
 
[[Raymond E. Brown]], among others, posit a community of writers rather than a single individual that gave final form to the work.<ref>Raymond Brown, ''The Gospel According to John,'' (Garden City: Doubleday, 1966), chapter 11.</ref> In particular, [[John 21|Chapter 21]] is very stylistically different from the main body of the Gospel, and is thought to be a later addition (known as the ''appendix''). Among many Christian scholars the view has evolved that there were multiple stages of development involving the disciples as well as the apostle;  R.E. Brown (1970) distinguishes four stages of development: traditions connected directly with the apostle, partial editing by his disciples, synthesis by the apostle, and additions by a final editor. At the very least, it seems clear that in chapter 21 someone else speaks in the third person plural ("we"), ostensibly as the voice of a community that believes the testimony of this other person called the "beloved disciple" to be true.
 
The writing of the Gospel has been dated to ''c.'' 90-100.<ref>{{Cite book| last = Bruce| first = F.F.| authorlink = F.F. Bruce| title = The New Testament Documents: Are they Reliable?| page = 7}}</ref> John the Apostle, if the principal author, would have been in his 70s or 80s which was higher than normal but not uncommon.<ref name="Roman Life Expectancy">{{cite web|url=http://www.utexas.edu/depts/classics/documents/Life.html |title=Roman Life Expectancy |publisher=University of Texas |date= |accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref> On the other hand, if the apostle had actually lived to such an age, it would explain the tradition reported in John 21, that many believed that Jesus had said the apostle would not die (which may have led to the legend of [[Prester John]]).{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}} A date later than the early 2nd century is excluded because [[Rylands Library Papyrus P52|P52]], our earliest manuscript evidence of the Gospel, dates from before the middle of the 2nd century. Even in the early church there was a doubt over its authenticity, and both [[Marcion]] (heretical founder of [[Marcionism]]) and [[Celsus]] (a pagan critical of Christianity in general) heavily criticized it as a clear forgery. The debate focused around not only its differences from the other Gospels, but also its teaching about the [[Paraclete]], which was important in the early "charismatic" movement known as [[Montanism]].
 
===Literary criticism in the 19th and early 20th centuries===
{{unreferenced section|date=August 2013}}Theories such as the [[two-source hypothesis]] have been circulated for the [[Synoptic Gospels]], but there has been little agreement about the literary sources for the Johannine works.
 
Criticism in the early 20th century centered on the idea of the ''[[Logos]]'' (''word''), which was perceived as a Hellenistic concept. Thus [[H. J. Holtzmann]] hypothesized a dependence of the work on [[Philo Judaeus]]; [[Albert Schweitzer]] considered the work to be a Hellenized version of [[Paul the Apostle|Pauline]] mysticism, while [[R. Reitzenstein]] sought the work's origin in [[Egypt]]ian and [[Iran|Persian]] [[mystery religions]].
 
[[Rudolf Bultmann]] took a different approach to the work. He hypothesized a Gnostic origin (specifically [[Mandaeanism]] which maintains that Jesus was a mšiha kdaba or "[[false prophet]]," ) for the work. He noted similarities with the Pauline corpus, but attributed this to a common Hellenistic background. He claimed that the many contrasts in the Gospel, between light and darkness, truth and lies, above and below, and so on, show a tendency toward dualism, explained by the Gnostic roots of the work. Despite the Gnostic origin, Bultmann commended the author for several improvements over Gnosticism, such as the Judeo-Christian view of creation and the [[demythologizing]] of the role of the Redeemer. He saw the Gospel as an investigation into a [[God]] who was wholly Other and transcendent, seeing no place in the vision of the author for a Church or [[sacrament]]s.
 
Bultmann's analysis is still widely applied in [[German-speaking countries]], although with many corrections and discussions. Wide-ranging replies have been made to this analysis. Today, most Christian exegetes reject much of Bultmann's theory, but accept certain of his intuitions. For instance, J. Blank uses Bultmann in his discussion of the [[Last Judgment]] and W. Thüsing uses him to discuss the elevation and glorification of Jesus.
 
In the [[English-speaking world]], Bultmann has had less impact. Instead, these scholars tended to continue in the investigation of the Hellenistic and [[Plato]]nistic theories, generally returning to theories closer to the traditional interpretation. By way of example, G.H.C. McGregor (1928) and W.F. Howard (1943) belong to this group.
 
===More recent criticism===
The discovery of the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]] in [[Qumran]] marked a change in Johannine scholarship. Several of the hymns, presumed to come from a community of [[Essenes]], contained the same sort of plays between opposites &ndash; light and dark, truth and lies &ndash; which are themes within the Gospel. Thus the hypothesis that the Gospel relied on Gnosticism fell out of favor. Many suggested further that [[John the Baptist]] himself belonged to an Essene community, and if John the Apostle had previously been a disciple of the Baptist, he would have been affected by that teaching.{{Citation needed|date=August 2013}}
 
The resulting revolution in Johannine scholarship was termed the ''new look'' by [[John A. T. Robinson]], who coined the phrase in 1957 at [[Oxford]]. According to Robinson, this new information rendered the question of authorship a relative one. He considered a group of disciples around the aging John the Apostle who wrote down his memories, mixing them with theological speculation, a model that had been proposed as far back as [[Ernest Renan|Renan]]'s ''Vie de Jésus'' ("Life of Jesus," 1863). The work of such scholars brought the consensus back to a Palestinian origin for the text, rather than the Hellenistic origin favored by the critics of the previous decades.{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}}
 
According to Gnosticism scholar Pagels, "Qumran fever" that was raised by the discovery of the Scrolls is gradually dying down, with theories of Gnostic influences in the Johannine works beginning to be proposed again, especially in Germany. Some recent views have seen the theology of Johannine works as directly opposing "Thomas Christians".<ref name=Pagels2003/><ref>Riley, Gregory J., 1995. ''Resurrection Reconsidered: Thomas and John in Controversy''. Minneapolis.</ref> Most scholars, however, consider the Gnostism question closed.<ref name="Morris1995"/><ref name="Strobel, Lee 1998"/>
 
[[Hugh J. Schonfield]], in the controversial [[The Passover Plot]] and other works, saw evidence that the source of this Gospel was the [[Disciple whom Jesus loved|Beloved Disciple]] of the Last Supper and further that this person, perhaps named John, was a senior Temple priest and so probably a member of the Sanhedrin. This would account for the knowledge of and access to the Temple which would not have been available to rough fishermen and followers of a disruptive rural preacher from the Galilee, one who was being accused of heresy besides. And probably for the evanescent presence of the Beloved Disciple in the events of Jesus' Ministry. On this reading, the Gospel was written, perhaps by a student and follower of this Disciple in his last advanced years, perhaps at Patmos.<ref>{{cite book |last=Schonfield |first=Hugh Joseph |authorlink=Hugh J. Schonfield |title=The Passover Plot: a New Interpretation of the Life and Death of Jesus |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=rrhk5B3AQocC |accessdate= |year=1965 |edition=1996 reprint |publisher=Element |location= |isbn=978-1-85230-836-0 |page=}}</ref>
 
==Johannine literature==
This section looks at each of the five New Testament books traditionally attributed to the Apostle John.
 
===Gospel according to John===
{{main|Gospel of John}}
While evidence regarding the author is slight, some scholars believe this gospel developed from a school or Johannine circle working at the end of the 1st century, possibly in Ephesus.<ref name = "biblical literature"/>
 
Most 19th-century scholars{{who|date=October 2010}} denied historical value of the work, largely basing their conclusions on seven particular theses:{{citation needed|date=August 2013}} first, that the tradition of authorship by John the Apostle was created ''ex post facto'' to support the book's authority; second, that the book does not proceed even indirectly from an eyewitness account; third, that the book was intended as an apologetic work, not a history; fourth, that the Synoptic tradition was used and adapted very freely by the author; fifth, that these deviations are not due to the application of other sources unknown to the authors of the Synoptic gospels; sixth, that the discourses in the Gospel express not Jesus' words, but those of the evangelist; and therefore, that the fourth Gospel has no value in supplementing the Synoptics. Some 19th-century scholars, however, agreed with the traditional authorship view.<ref>Renan's ''Vie de Jésus'' (Life of Jesus) which praised the historical and geographical details present in the Gospel.
*[[Ernest Renan|Renan, Ernest]] (1863) "[[S:Life of Jesus/Introduction|Life of Jesus]]" at WikiSource</ref>
 
In favor of the historical and eyewitness character of the Gospel, a few passages are cited. John's chronology for the death of Jesus seems more realistic, because the [[Synoptic Gospels]] would have the trial before the [[Sanhedrin]] occurring on the first day of the [[Passover]], which was a day of rest. Schonfield agrees that the Gospel was the product of the Apostle's great age, but further identifies him as the Beloved Disciple of the Last Supper, and so believes that the Gospel is based on first hand witness, though decades later and perhaps through the assistance of a younger follower and writer, which may account for the mixture of Hebraicisms (from the Disciple) and Greek idiom (from the assistant).
 
Fredriksen sees the Fourth Gospel's unique explanation for Jesus' arrest and crucifixion as the most historically plausible: "The priests' motivation is clear and commonsensical: 'If we let [Jesus] go on.. the Romans will come and destroy both our holy place and our nation.' Caiaphas continues, 'It is expedient that one man should die for the people, that the whole nation not perish' (John 11:48,50).<ref>Paula Fredriksen, "What you see is what you Get: Context and Content in Current Research on the Historical Jesus," ''Theology Today'' 52, no. 1 (1995): 75-97</ref>
 
===Three epistles===
{{main|Epistles of John}}
These three epistles are similar in terminology, style, and general situation.<ref name = "biblical literature"/> They are loosely associated with the Gospel of John and may result from that gospel's theology.<ref name = "biblical literature"/> These epistles are commonly accepted as deriving from the Johannine community in Asia Minor.<ref name = "biblical literature"/> Early references to the epistles, the organization of the church apparent in the text, and the lack of reference to persecution suggests that they were written early in the 2nd century.<ref name = "biblical literature">"biblical literature." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 8 Jul. 2010 <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/64496/biblical-literature></ref>
 
====First epistle====
The phraseology of the first letter of John is very similar to that of the fourth gospel,<ref name=Burton>{{cite journal |last=Burton|first= Ernest DeWitt|authorlink=Ernest DeWitt Burton|year=1896|title=The Epistles of John|journal=The Biblical World|volume=7|issue=5|page=366|publisher=University of Chicago Press|jstor=3140373}}</ref> so the question of its authorship is often connected to the question of authorship of the gospel. The two works use many of the same characteristic words and phrases, such as ''light'', ''darkness'', ''life'', ''truth'', ''a new commandment'', ''to be of the truth'', ''to do the truth'' and ''only begotten son''.<ref name="Wilder214"/> In both works, the same basic concepts are explored: the Word, the incarnation, the passing from death to life, the truth and lies, etc.<ref name="Wilder214">{{cite book|last=Wilder|first=Amos|authorlink=Amos Wilder|editor-last=Harmon|editor-first=Nolan|title=The Interpreter's Bible|volume=12|page=214|chapter=Introduction to the First, Second, and Third Epistles of John|publisher=[[Abingdon Press]]|year=1957}}</ref> The two works also bear many stylistic affinities to one another. In the words of [[Amos Wilder]], the works share "a combination of simplicity and elevation which differs from the flexible discourse of Paul and from the more concrete vocabulary and formal features of the Synoptic Gospels."<ref>Wilder 1957, pp.&nbsp;214–215.</ref>
 
Given the similarity with the Gospel, the "great majority" of critical scholars assign the same authorship to the epistle that they assign to the Gospel.<ref name="Wilder214"/>  At the end of the 19th century, scholar [[Ernest DeWitt Burton]] was able to write that, "the similarity in style, vocabulary and doctrine to the fourth gospel is, however, so clearly marked that there can be no reasonable doubt that the letter and the gospel are from the same pen."<ref name="Burton"/>  Starting with [[Heinrich Julius Holtzmann]], however, and continuing with [[C. H. Dodd]], some scholars have maintained that the epistle and the gospel were written by different authors.<ref name="Wilder214"/>  There are at least two principal arguments for this view. The first is that the epistle often uses a demonstrative pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction, followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end of the sentence, a stylistic technique which is not used the gospel.<ref>Wilder 1957, p. 211</ref> The second is that the author of the epistle, "uses the conditional sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the gospel."<ref>C. H. Dodd, "The First Epistle of John and the Fourth Gospel," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, XXI (1937)</ref>
 
The book was not among those whose [[Biblical canon|canonicity]] was in doubt, according to Eusebius; however, it is not included in an ancient Syrian canon. [[Theodore of Mopsuestia]] also presented a negative opinion toward its canonicity. Outside of the Syrian world, however, the book has many early witnesses, and appears to have been widely accepted.
 
The First Epistle of John assumes knowledge of the Gospel of John, and some scholars think that the epistle's author might have been the one who redacted the gospel.<ref name = "biblical literature"/>
 
====Second and third epistles====
[[Eusebius]] claimed that the author of 2nd and 3rd John were not [[John the Apostle]] but actually [[John the Elder]],<ref>Eusebius: The Church History</ref> due to the introductions of the epistles. [[Eusebius]] was a high ranking official in the Roman Empire under Constantine in the 4th century, and [[John's Revelation]] makes strong claims that the Roman Empire is [[Babylon]], so it's unlikely that [[John the Elder]] and [[John the Apostle]] are different people based by [[Eusebius]] a priori claim.<ref>The Gospel According to John: An Introduction and Commentary (Pillar New Testament Commentary) (Hardcover). [[Don Carson|D.A Carson]], Wm. B. [[Eerdmans Publishing Company]] (January 1991) pg. 44</ref> The vocabulary, structure, grammar of the Gospel of John is remarkably similar to 1st John, 2nd John and 3rd John. So it is highly improbable that "John the Presbyter" ever existed distinct from John the Apostle.<ref>The Gospel According to John: An Introduction and Commentary (Pillar New Testament Commentary) (Hardcover). [[Don Carson|D.A Carson]], Wm. B. [[Eerdmans Publishing Company]] (January 1991) pg. 25</ref> This author of the epistles may well have been the author of the Gospel of John, but modern scholars believe that he was not John the Apostle.<ref name="Fourth Gospel 1985 p. 355"/>
 
The second and third epistles may have been written by the same author, but this is not necessarily the person who wrote the first epistle.<ref name = "biblical literature"/>
 
===Revelation===
[[File:Saint Jean à Pathmos.jpg|thumb|right|Saint John of Patmos, by [[Jean Fouquet]]]]
{{main|Book of Revelation}}
 
The author of the [[Book of Revelation]] identifies himself as "John", so that the book has been traditionally credited to John the Apostle.<ref name="ODCC Revelation, Book of"/> Reference to the apostle's authorship is found as early as [[Justin Martyr]], in his ''Dialogue with Trypho''.<ref name="Justin">Justin Martyr, ''Dialogue with Trypho'', 81.4</ref> Other early witnesses to this tradition are [[Irenaeus]],<ref>''Against Heresies iv. 20. 11''</ref> [[Clement of Alexandria]],<ref>''Who Is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved? xlii''</ref> [[Tertullian]],<ref>''On Prescription Against Heretics 36''</ref> [[Cyprian]], and [[Hippolytus of Rome|Hippolytus]].<ref>''Treatise on Christ and Antichrist xxxvi''</ref> This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including [[Dionysius of Alexandria]], [[Eusebius of Caesarea]], [[Cyril of Jerusalem]], [[Gregory Nazianzen]], and [[John Chrysostom]].<ref>[http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/revelation/intro.htm New American Bible: Revelation]</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Confraternity of Christian Doctrine|first1=Board of Trustees|last2=Catholic Church|first2=National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Administrative Committee|author3=United States Catholic Conference|title=The New American Bible: translated from the original languages with critical use of all the ancient, including the revised Psalms and the revised New Testament|accessdate=2011-12-29|year=2005|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford, New York|isbn=978-0-19-528903-9|oclc=436316983|pages=1363–1364|chapter=The Book of Revelation|chapterurl=http://books.google.nl/books?id=upCApSwuJP0C&pg=PA1364&lpg=PA1364&dq=new+american+bible+john+revelation+eusebius+of+caesarea#v=onepage&q&f=false|postscript=.}}</ref> The [[Apocryphon of John]] claims John as both the author of itself and Revelation.<ref>S. Giversen. Apocryphon Johannis Copenhagen: 1963 p. 49</ref> [[Donald Guthrie (theologian)|Donald Guthrie]] wrote that the evidence of the Church Fathers supports the identification of the author as John the Apostle.<ref>"So strong is this evidence that it is difficult to believe that they all made a mistake confusing the John of the Apocalypse with John the apostle&nbsp;... It must be conceded that taken as a whole (the evidence) points very strongly to the probability that John of the Apocalypse was, in fact, John the apostle." New Testament Introduction. IVP: 1990 p935</ref>
 
According to [[Epiphanius of Salamis|Epiphanius]], one Caius of Rome believed that [[Cerinthus]], a [[Gnostic]], was the author of the [[Book of Revelation]].<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.cerinthus.html?highlight=epiphanius,hær,xxviii#highlight Cerinthus] at [[CCEL]].org</ref>
 
In the 3rd century, Bishop Dionysius of Alexandria rejected apostolic authorship, but accepted the book's canonicity. Dionysius believed that author was another man also named John, [[John the Presbyter]], teacher of [[Papias of Hierapolis|Papias, bishop of Hieropolis]]. [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] later agreed with this.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250107.htm Eusebius: Church History (Book VII), Chapter 25]</ref><ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250103.htm Euserbius: Church History (Book III, Chapter 39)]</ref> Because authorship was one of several considerations for [[canonization]], several [[Church Fathers]] and the [[Council of Laodicea]] rejected Revelation.<ref>''The Book of Revelation'' by [[Robert H. Mounce]]. pp.&nbsp;23–24</ref>
 
Mainstream scholars conclude that the author did not also write the Gospel of John because of wide differences in eschatology, language, and tone.<ref name="ODCC Revelation, Book of">"Revelation, Book of." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005</ref> The Book of Revelation contains grammatical errors and stylistic abnormalities whereas the Gospel and [[Epistles]] are all stylistically consistent which indicate its author may not have been as familiar with the Greek language as the Gospel/Epistles's author.<ref>Ehrman 2004, p. 467ff</ref> Contemporary scholars note that when Revelation and the Gospel refer to Jesus as "lamb" they use different Greek words, and they spell "Jerusalem" differently. There are differing [[Motif (narrative)|motif]]s between the book and the Gospel: use of allegory, symbolism, and similar metaphors, such as "living water", "shepherd", "lamb", and "manna". The ''Book of Revelation'' does not go into several typically Johannine themes, such as light, darkness, truth, love, and "the world" in a negative sense. The [[eschatology]] of the two works are also very different.{{dubious|date=June 2012}}<ref>John, the Son of Zebedee By R. Alan Culpepper, pp.&nbsp;98–102</ref> Still, the author uses the terms "Word of God" and "Lamb of God" for Jesus Christ, possibly indicating that the author had a common theological background with the author of John.<ref name="ODCC Revelation, Book of"/>
 
Revelation is written in a specific genre of [[apocalyptic literature]] which differs from the style of the gospels and the epistles.
 
According to the testimony of Irenaeus, Eusebius and Jerome, the writing of this book took place near the very end of Domitian's reign, around 95 or 96. [[Kenneth Gentry]] contends for an earlier date, 68 or 69, in the reign of [[Nero]] or shortly thereafter.<ref>Gentry, Kenneth. ''Before Jerusalem Fell'', ISBN 0-930464-20-6. Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 1989.</ref>
 
==See also==
* [[John the Apostle]]
* [[John the Evangelist]]
* [[John the Presbyter]]
* [[Gospel of John]]
* [[Disciple whom Jesus loved]]
* [[John 21]]
* [[Textual criticism]]
* [[Higher criticism]]
* [[Authorship of the Pauline epistles]]
* [[Rylands Library Papyrus P52]]
 
==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}
 
==External links==
* [http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?passage=JOHN%2B21%3A20-24&showfn=on&showxref=on&language=greek&version=WHNU&x=19&y=11 John 21:20-24] at [http://www.biblegateway.com/ Bible Gateway], or [http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?passage=JOHN%2B21%3A20-24&showfn=on&showxref=on&language=english&version=NIV&x=12&y=5 the same passage in English (NIV)].  (Other texts, the other passages mentioned, and other translations are also available at the same site.)
* [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html Discussion of the view that John the Apostle did not write the book] (and links to related material) at [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com Early Christian Writings].
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08492a.htm New Catholic Encyclopedia article]
* [http://www.oca.org/pages/orth_chri/Feasts-and-Saints/May/May-08.html Orthodox Church of America's take]
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Authorship of the Johannine Works}}
[[Category:Biblical authorship debates|Johannine]]
[[Category:Johannine literature| ]]

Revision as of 15:31, 25 January 2014

30 year-old Entertainer or Range Artist Wesley from Drumheller, really loves vehicle, property developers properties for sale in singapore singapore and horse racing. Finds inspiration by traveling to Works of Antoni Gaudí. Template:John

The authorship of the Johannine works (the Gospel of John, Epistles of John, and the Book of Revelation) has been debated by scholars since at least the 2nd century AD.[1] The main debate centers on who authored the writings, and which of the writings, if any, can be ascribed to a common author.

Ancient tradition attributes all the books to John the Apostle.[2]

In the 6th century, the Decretum Gelasianum argued that Second and Third John have a separate author known as "John, a priest" (see John the Presbyter).[3] Higher criticism, representing most liberal Christian and secular scholars, rejects the view that John the Apostle authored any of these works.

Many modern scholars conclude that the apostle John wrote none of these works,[4] although others, notably J.A.T. Robinson, F. F. Bruce, Leon Morris, and Martin Hengel[5] hold the apostle to be behind at least some, in particular the gospel.[6][7]

There may have been a single author for the gospel and the three epistles.[2] Some scholars conclude the author of the epistles was different from that of the gospel, although all four works probably originated from the same community.[8] The gospel and epistles traditionally and plausibly came from Ephesus, c. 90-110, although some scholars argue for an origin in Syria.[9]

In the case of Revelation, many modern scholars agree that it was written by a separate author, John of Patmos, c. 95 with some parts possibly dating to Nero's reign in the early 60s.[2][10]

El Greco's rendition of John the Apostle shows the traditional author of the Johannine works as a young man.

Early use of the Johannine works

File:St-john-patmos.jpg
"Saint John on Patmos" by Hans Baldung Grien, 1511

The gospel was not widely quoted until late in the 2nd century.[11] Justin Martyr is probably the first Church Father to quote John's gospel.[12] Some scholars conclude that in antiquity John was probably considered less important than the synoptics.[13] Walter Bauer suggests:

Can it be a coincidence that immediately after Justin, the enemy of heretics who took aim at the Valentinians (Dial. 35. 6), we note the appearance in Italy-Rome of two representatives of this latter school who especially treasure the Fourth Gospel – namely Ptolemy and Heracleon (Hillolytus Ref. 6. 35)? To be sure, Justin's disciple Tatian placed the Gospel of John on the same level as the synoptics, but he also broke with the church on account of profound differences in faith – poisoned, so Irenaeus thought, by the Valentinians and Marcion (AH 1. 28. 1 [=1.26.1]).[14]

One reason for this 'orthodox ambivalence' was gnostic acceptance of the fourth gospel.[15] The early Gnostic use is referred to by Irenaeus and Origen in quoted commentary made on John by the Gnostics Ptolemy and Heracleon. In the quote below Irenaeus argues against the gnostic heresy from his book Against Heresies:

For, summing up his statements respecting the Word previously mentioned by him, he further declares, "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." But, according to their [gnostic] hypothesis, the Word did not become flesh at all, inasmuch as He never went outside of the Pleroma, but that Saviour [became flesh] who was formed by a special dispensation [out of all the Æons], and was of later date than the Word.[16]

Several church fathers of the 2nd century never quoted John, but the earliest extant written commentary on any book of the New Testament was that written on John by Heracleon, a disciple of the gnostic Valentinus.[17]

The following table shows the number of times various church fathers cited John compared to the synoptic gospels.[18]

Gospel Barn. Did. Ign. Poly. Herm. II Clem. Papias Basilides
Synoptics 1? 1? 7(+4?) 1 0 1(+3?) 2 1
John or Epistles 0 0 2? 1 0 0 ? 1
Gospel Marcion Justin Valentinus Hegesip. Ptolem. Melito Apollin. Athenag.
Synoptics Luke 170 1 3? 4 4 1 13
John or Epistles 0 1 0 0 1 4 1 0

John was considered the last to be written. Most scholars today give it a date between 90 and 100,[6] though a minority suggest an even later date.[19] The Fourth Gospel may have been later also because it was written to a smaller group within the Johannine community, and was not circulated widely until a later date.[20] However, claims for authorship much later than 100 have been called into question due to Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a fragment of the gospel found in Egypt that was probably written around 125[21][22][23] as well as by the recent work of Charles Hill.[24] Hill gives evidence that the Gospel of John was complete and in use between 90 and 130, and of the possible use of uniquely Johannine gospel material in several works which date from this period. These works and authors include Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107); Polycarp (c. 107); Papias' elders (c. 110-120); of Hierapolis' Exegesis of the Lord's Oracles (c. 120-132). Hill assesses that many historical figures did indeed reference the Gospel of John.[24]

History of critical scholarship

Template:Bible related Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. The modern era of critical scholarship on the works opened with K.G. Bretschneider's 1820 work on the topic of Johannine authorship.[25] Bretschneider called into question the apostolic authorship of the Gospel, and even stated on the basis of the author's unsteady grip on topography that the author could not have come from Palestine.[26] He argued that the meaning and nature of Jesus presented in the Gospel of John was very different from that in the Synoptic Gospels, and thus its author could not have been an eyewitness to the events. Bretschneider cited an apologetic character in John, indicating a later date of composition. Scholars such as Wellhausen, Wendt, and Spitta have argued that the fourth gospel is a Grundschrift or a, "..work which had suffered interpolation before arriving at its canonical form; it was a unity as it stood."[27]

F.C. Baur (1792–1860) proposed that John was solely a work of synthesis of thesis-antithesis according to the Hegelian model—synthesis between the thesis of Judeo-Christianity (represented by Peter) and the antithesis of Gentile Christianity (represented by Paul). He also cited in the epistles a synthesis with the opposing dualist forces of Gnosticism. As such, he assigned a date of 170 to the Gospel.

Early criticism

The first certain witness to Johannine theology among the Fathers of the Church is in Ignatius of Antioch, whose Letter to the Philippians is founded on Template:Bibleref and alludes to Template:Bibleref and Template:Bibleverse-nb. This would indicate that the Gospel was known in Antioch before Ignatius' death (probably 107). Polycarp of Smyrna (c. 80 to 167) quotes from the letters of John, as does Justin Martyr(c. 100 to 165).[28][29]

The earliest testimony to the author was that of Papias, preserved in fragmentary quotes in Eusebius's history of the Church. This text is consequently rather obscure. Eusebius says that two different Johns must be distinguished, John the Apostle, and John the Presbyter, with the Gospel assigned to the Apostle and the Book of Revelation to the presbyter.[30]

Irenaeus's witness based on Papias represents the tradition in Ephesus, where John the Apostle is reputed to have lived.[31] Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp, thus in the second generation after the apostle. According to many scholars, he states unequivocally that the apostle is the author of the Gospel. (Other scholars note, however, that Irenaeus consistently refers to the author of the gospel, as well as of Revelation, as "the disciple of the Lord," whereas he refers to the others as "apostles." And so Irenaeus appears to distinguish John, the author of the fourth gospel, from John the apostle.) Koester rejects the reference of Ignatius of Antioch as referring to the Gospel and cites Irenaeus as the first to use it.[32]

The Rylands Library Papyrus P52, typically dated to around 125, suggests that the text of the Gospel of John spread rapidly through Egypt. The front of the fragment contains lines from the Gospel of Template:Bibleref, in Greek, and the back contains lines from verses 37-38. Clement of Alexandria (c. 150 - 211) mentions John the Apostle's missionary activity in Asia Minor, and continues, "As for John, the last, upon seeing that in the Gospels they had told the corporal matters, supported by his disciples and inspired by the Holy Spirit, he wrote a spiritual Gospel."[33] Origen (185–c. 254) responded, when asked how John had placed the cleansing of the Temple first rather than last, "John does not always tell the truth literally, he always tells the truth spiritually."[34] In Alexandria, the authorship of the Gospel and the first epistle was never questioned. Bruce Metzger stated "One finds in Clement's work citations of all the books of the New Testament with the exception of Philemon, James, 2 Peter, and 2 and 3 John."[35]

Rome was the home to the only early rejection of the fourth Gospel. The adversaries of Montanism were responsible. Irenaeus says that these persons tried to suppress the teaching about the Holy Spirit in order to put down Montanism, and as a result denied the authorship of the Gospel and its authority. Later Epiphanius called this group, who were followers of the priest Caius, the Alogi in a wordplay between "without the Word" and "without reason".

Modern criticism

Modern Criticism can be broken down into three main sections: (1) Foundations with Bauer to Braun (1934–1935), (2) Heyday with Schnackenburg to Koester (1959–60), (3) Uneasy supremacy from Hengel to Hangel (1989–2000).[36]

Walter Bauer opened the modern discussion on John with his book Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum.[37] Bauer's thesis is that "the heretics probably outnumbered the orthodox" in the early Christian world and that heresy and orthodoxy were not as narrowly defined as we now define them.[38] He was "convinced that none of the Apostolic Fathers had relied on the authority of the Fourth Gospel. It was the gnostics, the Marcionites, and the Montanists who first used it and introduced it to the Christian community."[39]

J.N. Sanders, who wrote The Fourth Gospel in the Early Church, examined "the alleged parallels with John in Ignatius, Polycarp, Barnabas, and the Epistle to Diognetus, and concluded that there was no certain traces of the Fourth Gospel's influence among any of the Apostolic Fathers."[40] Sanders argued the book originated in Alexandria.[41]

The Gospel of John states explicitly in its text that it was written by the "disciple whom Jesus loved", so a great deal of effort has been put into determining who this person might be. Traditionally he is identified as John the Apostle, since otherwise, one of the most important apostles in the other Gospels would be entirely missing in the fourth gospel. However, critical scholars have suggested some other possibilities.

Filson, Sanders, Vernard Eller, Rudolf Steiner, and Ben Witherington suggest Lazarus, since Template:Bibleref and Template:Bibleverse-nb specifically indicates that Jesus "loved" him, and it is perhaps also implied in the Secret Gospel of Mark.[42] Keener notes that "Lazarus of Bethany would have readier access to the high priest's house (if the disciple of 18:15-16 is the beloved disciple, which is uncertain); the Synoptics might also have omitted Lazarus to protect him because of his location."[41] This would fit well with the author's interest in the Judean activity of Jesus.

Parker suggested that this disciple might be John Mark; nonetheless, the Acts of the Apostles indicate that John Mark was very young and a late-comer as a disciple. J. Colson suggested that "John" was a priest in Jerusalem, explaining the alleged priestly mentality in the fourth gospel. R. Schnackenburg suggested that "John" was an otherwise unknown resident of Jerusalem who was in Jesus' circle of friends. The Gospel of Philip and the Gospel of Mary identify Mary Magdalene as the disciple whom Jesus loved, a connection that has been analyzed by Esther de Boer[43] and made notorious in the fictional The Da Vinci Code. Finally, a few authors, such as Loisy and Bultmann and Hans-Martin Schenke, see "the Beloved Disciple" as a purely symbolic creation, an idealized pseudonym for the group of authors.

Gnosticism scholar Elaine Pagels goes further and claims that the author himself was a Gnostic, citing similarities with the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Philip.[44]

Various objections to John the Apostle's authorship have been raised. First of all, the Gospel of John is a highly intellectual account of Jesus' life, and is familiar with Rabbinic traditions of biblical interpretation. The Synoptic Gospels, however, are united in identifying John as a fisherman. Template:Bibleref refers to John as "without learning" or "unlettered".

Objections are also raised because the "disciple whom Jesus loved" is not mentioned before the Last Supper.[45]

The title ("beloved disciple") is also strange to Beasley-Murray because "if the beloved disciple were one of the Twelve, he would have been sufficiently known outside the Johannine circle of churches for the author to have named him".[46]

Raymond E. Brown, among others, posit a community of writers rather than a single individual that gave final form to the work.[47] In particular, Chapter 21 is very stylistically different from the main body of the Gospel, and is thought to be a later addition (known as the appendix). Among many Christian scholars the view has evolved that there were multiple stages of development involving the disciples as well as the apostle; R.E. Brown (1970) distinguishes four stages of development: traditions connected directly with the apostle, partial editing by his disciples, synthesis by the apostle, and additions by a final editor. At the very least, it seems clear that in chapter 21 someone else speaks in the third person plural ("we"), ostensibly as the voice of a community that believes the testimony of this other person called the "beloved disciple" to be true.

The writing of the Gospel has been dated to c. 90-100.[48] John the Apostle, if the principal author, would have been in his 70s or 80s which was higher than normal but not uncommon.[49] On the other hand, if the apostle had actually lived to such an age, it would explain the tradition reported in John 21, that many believed that Jesus had said the apostle would not die (which may have led to the legend of Prester John).Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park. A date later than the early 2nd century is excluded because P52, our earliest manuscript evidence of the Gospel, dates from before the middle of the 2nd century. Even in the early church there was a doubt over its authenticity, and both Marcion (heretical founder of Marcionism) and Celsus (a pagan critical of Christianity in general) heavily criticized it as a clear forgery. The debate focused around not only its differences from the other Gospels, but also its teaching about the Paraclete, which was important in the early "charismatic" movement known as Montanism.

Literary criticism in the 19th and early 20th centuries

Before you choose any particular company it is vital to understand in full how the different plans can vary. There is no other better method than to create a message board so that people can relax and "chill" on your website and check out your articles more. You should read the HostGator review, even before registering with a web hosting company. but Hostgator in addition considers the surroundings. You can even use a Hostgator reseller coupon for unlimited web hosting at HostGator! Most of individuals by no means go for yearly subscription and choose month to month subscription. Several users commented that this was the deciding factor in picking HostGator but in any case there is a 45 day Money Back Guarantee and there is no contract so you can cancel at any time. GatorBill is able to send you an email notice about the new invoice. In certain cases a dedicated server can offer less overhead and a bigger revenue in investments. With the plan come a Free Billing Executive, Free sellers account and Free Hosting Templates.



This is one of the only things that require you to spend a little money to make money. Just go make an account, get a paypal account, and start selling. To go one step beyond just affiliating products and services is to create your own and sell it through your blog. Not great if you really enjoy trying out all the themes. Talking in real time having a real person causes it to be personal helping me personally to sort out how to proceed. The first step I took was search for a discount code, as I did with HostGator. Using a HostGator coupon is a beneficial method to get started. As long as the necessities are able to preserve the horizontal functionality of your site, you would pretty much be fine.Theories such as the two-source hypothesis have been circulated for the Synoptic Gospels, but there has been little agreement about the literary sources for the Johannine works.

Criticism in the early 20th century centered on the idea of the Logos (word), which was perceived as a Hellenistic concept. Thus H. J. Holtzmann hypothesized a dependence of the work on Philo Judaeus; Albert Schweitzer considered the work to be a Hellenized version of Pauline mysticism, while R. Reitzenstein sought the work's origin in Egyptian and Persian mystery religions.

Rudolf Bultmann took a different approach to the work. He hypothesized a Gnostic origin (specifically Mandaeanism which maintains that Jesus was a mšiha kdaba or "false prophet," ) for the work. He noted similarities with the Pauline corpus, but attributed this to a common Hellenistic background. He claimed that the many contrasts in the Gospel, between light and darkness, truth and lies, above and below, and so on, show a tendency toward dualism, explained by the Gnostic roots of the work. Despite the Gnostic origin, Bultmann commended the author for several improvements over Gnosticism, such as the Judeo-Christian view of creation and the demythologizing of the role of the Redeemer. He saw the Gospel as an investigation into a God who was wholly Other and transcendent, seeing no place in the vision of the author for a Church or sacraments.

Bultmann's analysis is still widely applied in German-speaking countries, although with many corrections and discussions. Wide-ranging replies have been made to this analysis. Today, most Christian exegetes reject much of Bultmann's theory, but accept certain of his intuitions. For instance, J. Blank uses Bultmann in his discussion of the Last Judgment and W. Thüsing uses him to discuss the elevation and glorification of Jesus.

In the English-speaking world, Bultmann has had less impact. Instead, these scholars tended to continue in the investigation of the Hellenistic and Platonistic theories, generally returning to theories closer to the traditional interpretation. By way of example, G.H.C. McGregor (1928) and W.F. Howard (1943) belong to this group.

More recent criticism

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in Qumran marked a change in Johannine scholarship. Several of the hymns, presumed to come from a community of Essenes, contained the same sort of plays between opposites – light and dark, truth and lies – which are themes within the Gospel. Thus the hypothesis that the Gospel relied on Gnosticism fell out of favor. Many suggested further that John the Baptist himself belonged to an Essene community, and if John the Apostle had previously been a disciple of the Baptist, he would have been affected by that teaching.Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

The resulting revolution in Johannine scholarship was termed the new look by John A. T. Robinson, who coined the phrase in 1957 at Oxford. According to Robinson, this new information rendered the question of authorship a relative one. He considered a group of disciples around the aging John the Apostle who wrote down his memories, mixing them with theological speculation, a model that had been proposed as far back as Renan's Vie de Jésus ("Life of Jesus," 1863). The work of such scholars brought the consensus back to a Palestinian origin for the text, rather than the Hellenistic origin favored by the critics of the previous decades.Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

According to Gnosticism scholar Pagels, "Qumran fever" that was raised by the discovery of the Scrolls is gradually dying down, with theories of Gnostic influences in the Johannine works beginning to be proposed again, especially in Germany. Some recent views have seen the theology of Johannine works as directly opposing "Thomas Christians".[44][50] Most scholars, however, consider the Gnostism question closed.[6][7]

Hugh J. Schonfield, in the controversial The Passover Plot and other works, saw evidence that the source of this Gospel was the Beloved Disciple of the Last Supper and further that this person, perhaps named John, was a senior Temple priest and so probably a member of the Sanhedrin. This would account for the knowledge of and access to the Temple which would not have been available to rough fishermen and followers of a disruptive rural preacher from the Galilee, one who was being accused of heresy besides. And probably for the evanescent presence of the Beloved Disciple in the events of Jesus' Ministry. On this reading, the Gospel was written, perhaps by a student and follower of this Disciple in his last advanced years, perhaps at Patmos.[51]

Johannine literature

This section looks at each of the five New Testament books traditionally attributed to the Apostle John.

Gospel according to John

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. While evidence regarding the author is slight, some scholars believe this gospel developed from a school or Johannine circle working at the end of the 1st century, possibly in Ephesus.[52]

Most 19th-century scholarsTemplate:Who denied historical value of the work, largely basing their conclusions on seven particular theses:Potter or Ceramic Artist Truman Bedell from Rexton, has interests which include ceramics, best property developers in singapore developers in singapore and scrabble. Was especially enthused after visiting Alejandro de Humboldt National Park. first, that the tradition of authorship by John the Apostle was created ex post facto to support the book's authority; second, that the book does not proceed even indirectly from an eyewitness account; third, that the book was intended as an apologetic work, not a history; fourth, that the Synoptic tradition was used and adapted very freely by the author; fifth, that these deviations are not due to the application of other sources unknown to the authors of the Synoptic gospels; sixth, that the discourses in the Gospel express not Jesus' words, but those of the evangelist; and therefore, that the fourth Gospel has no value in supplementing the Synoptics. Some 19th-century scholars, however, agreed with the traditional authorship view.[53]

In favor of the historical and eyewitness character of the Gospel, a few passages are cited. John's chronology for the death of Jesus seems more realistic, because the Synoptic Gospels would have the trial before the Sanhedrin occurring on the first day of the Passover, which was a day of rest. Schonfield agrees that the Gospel was the product of the Apostle's great age, but further identifies him as the Beloved Disciple of the Last Supper, and so believes that the Gospel is based on first hand witness, though decades later and perhaps through the assistance of a younger follower and writer, which may account for the mixture of Hebraicisms (from the Disciple) and Greek idiom (from the assistant).

Fredriksen sees the Fourth Gospel's unique explanation for Jesus' arrest and crucifixion as the most historically plausible: "The priests' motivation is clear and commonsensical: 'If we let [Jesus] go on.. the Romans will come and destroy both our holy place and our nation.' Caiaphas continues, 'It is expedient that one man should die for the people, that the whole nation not perish' (John 11:48,50).[54]

Three epistles

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. These three epistles are similar in terminology, style, and general situation.[52] They are loosely associated with the Gospel of John and may result from that gospel's theology.[52] These epistles are commonly accepted as deriving from the Johannine community in Asia Minor.[52] Early references to the epistles, the organization of the church apparent in the text, and the lack of reference to persecution suggests that they were written early in the 2nd century.[52]

First epistle

The phraseology of the first letter of John is very similar to that of the fourth gospel,[55] so the question of its authorship is often connected to the question of authorship of the gospel. The two works use many of the same characteristic words and phrases, such as light, darkness, life, truth, a new commandment, to be of the truth, to do the truth and only begotten son.[56] In both works, the same basic concepts are explored: the Word, the incarnation, the passing from death to life, the truth and lies, etc.[56] The two works also bear many stylistic affinities to one another. In the words of Amos Wilder, the works share "a combination of simplicity and elevation which differs from the flexible discourse of Paul and from the more concrete vocabulary and formal features of the Synoptic Gospels."[57]

Given the similarity with the Gospel, the "great majority" of critical scholars assign the same authorship to the epistle that they assign to the Gospel.[56] At the end of the 19th century, scholar Ernest DeWitt Burton was able to write that, "the similarity in style, vocabulary and doctrine to the fourth gospel is, however, so clearly marked that there can be no reasonable doubt that the letter and the gospel are from the same pen."[55] Starting with Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, however, and continuing with C. H. Dodd, some scholars have maintained that the epistle and the gospel were written by different authors.[56] There are at least two principal arguments for this view. The first is that the epistle often uses a demonstrative pronoun at the beginning of a sentence, then a particle or conjunction, followed by an explanation or definition of the demonstrative at the end of the sentence, a stylistic technique which is not used the gospel.[58] The second is that the author of the epistle, "uses the conditional sentence in a variety of rhetorical figures which are unknown to the gospel."[59]

The book was not among those whose canonicity was in doubt, according to Eusebius; however, it is not included in an ancient Syrian canon. Theodore of Mopsuestia also presented a negative opinion toward its canonicity. Outside of the Syrian world, however, the book has many early witnesses, and appears to have been widely accepted.

The First Epistle of John assumes knowledge of the Gospel of John, and some scholars think that the epistle's author might have been the one who redacted the gospel.[52]

Second and third epistles

Eusebius claimed that the author of 2nd and 3rd John were not John the Apostle but actually John the Elder,[60] due to the introductions of the epistles. Eusebius was a high ranking official in the Roman Empire under Constantine in the 4th century, and John's Revelation makes strong claims that the Roman Empire is Babylon, so it's unlikely that John the Elder and John the Apostle are different people based by Eusebius a priori claim.[61] The vocabulary, structure, grammar of the Gospel of John is remarkably similar to 1st John, 2nd John and 3rd John. So it is highly improbable that "John the Presbyter" ever existed distinct from John the Apostle.[62] This author of the epistles may well have been the author of the Gospel of John, but modern scholars believe that he was not John the Apostle.[4]

The second and third epistles may have been written by the same author, but this is not necessarily the person who wrote the first epistle.[52]

Revelation

Saint John of Patmos, by Jean Fouquet

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

The author of the Book of Revelation identifies himself as "John", so that the book has been traditionally credited to John the Apostle.[63] Reference to the apostle's authorship is found as early as Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho.[64] Other early witnesses to this tradition are Irenaeus,[65] Clement of Alexandria,[66] Tertullian,[67] Cyprian, and Hippolytus.[68] This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Dionysius of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom.[69][70] The Apocryphon of John claims John as both the author of itself and Revelation.[71] Donald Guthrie wrote that the evidence of the Church Fathers supports the identification of the author as John the Apostle.[72]

According to Epiphanius, one Caius of Rome believed that Cerinthus, a Gnostic, was the author of the Book of Revelation.[73]

In the 3rd century, Bishop Dionysius of Alexandria rejected apostolic authorship, but accepted the book's canonicity. Dionysius believed that author was another man also named John, John the Presbyter, teacher of Papias, bishop of Hieropolis. Eusebius of Caesarea later agreed with this.[74][75] Because authorship was one of several considerations for canonization, several Church Fathers and the Council of Laodicea rejected Revelation.[76]

Mainstream scholars conclude that the author did not also write the Gospel of John because of wide differences in eschatology, language, and tone.[63] The Book of Revelation contains grammatical errors and stylistic abnormalities whereas the Gospel and Epistles are all stylistically consistent which indicate its author may not have been as familiar with the Greek language as the Gospel/Epistles's author.[77] Contemporary scholars note that when Revelation and the Gospel refer to Jesus as "lamb" they use different Greek words, and they spell "Jerusalem" differently. There are differing motifs between the book and the Gospel: use of allegory, symbolism, and similar metaphors, such as "living water", "shepherd", "lamb", and "manna". The Book of Revelation does not go into several typically Johannine themes, such as light, darkness, truth, love, and "the world" in a negative sense. The eschatology of the two works are also very different.To succeed in selling a home, it is advisable be competent in real estate advertising and marketing, authorized, monetary, operational aspects, and other information and skills. This is essential as a result of you want to negotiate with more and more sophisticated buyers. You could outperform rivals, use latest technologies, and stay ahead of the fast altering market.

Home is where the center is, and choosing the right house is a part of guaranteeing a contented expertise in Singapore. Most expats sign up for a two-year lease with the option to resume, so it is value taking the time to choose a neighbourhood that has the services you want. The experts at Expat Realtor have compiled the next data that will help you negotiate your means by way of the property minefield. Some government state properties for rent. Over 2000 units available for lease however occupancy is often excessive. Some properties come under a bidding system. Their property brokers embody DTZ and United Premas. Up to date serviced residences located just off Orchard Highway. one hundred sixty Orchard Highway, #06-01 Orchard Level, Singapore 238842. Institute Of Property Agents

There is no such thing as a deal too small. Property agents who're willing to find time for any deal even when the commission is small are those you want in your side. They also show humbleness and might relate with the average Singaporean higher. Relentlessly pursuing any deal, calling prospects even without being prompted. Even when they get rejected a hundred times, they still come back for more. These are the property brokers who will find consumers what they want finally, and who would be the most profitable in what they do. four. Honesty and Integrity

As a realtor, you're our own business. Due to this fact, it is imperative that you handle yours prices and spend money correctly in order to market your property successfully. Also, beware of mentors who always ask you to pay for pointless costs. Such mentors typically are recruiting to develop a staff and see you as a option to defray advertising and marketing prices. For foreigners who want to register with CEA as salespersons, they might want to have a valid Employment Cross (EP) issued by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM). They should consult an property agent that is ready to assist their future registration software, who would then examine with CEA. Thereafter, after they register for the RES Course, they might want to produce a letter of assist from the property agent."

Main Real Property Brokers with in depth local knowledge, Carole Ann, Elizabeth and their group of extremely skilled property consultants provide a personalised service, for those looking to buy, lease or promote in Singapore. Relocation companies out there. Properties for the aesthete. Boutique real property agency for architecturally distinguished, unique properties for rent and on the market. Caters to the niche market of design-savvy people. Sale, letting and property management and taxation services. three Shenton Means, #10-08 Shenton Home, Singapore 068805. Buy property, promote or leasing estate company. 430 Lorong 6 Toa Payoh, #08-01 OrangeTee Constructing, Singapore 319402. HIGH Date / Age of property Estate Agents and Home Search Services Property Information Highlights Prime Achievers

From the above info, you may see that saving on agent's commission will not cover the expenses wanted to market your home efficiently. As well as, it's essential make investments a whole lot of time, vitality and effort. By taking yourself away from your work and other endeavors, additionally, you will incur unnecessary opportunity prices. There may be additionally no assurance you could beat the market and get the outcomes you need. That is why you want an agent - not simply an ordinary agent - you want knowledgeable and competent specialist, geared up with the best instruments and knowledge to serve you and lead you to success! Within the midst of this ‘uniquely Singapore' Property GSS, our most needed foreign customers are nowhere to be seen. Different types of Public Residential properties

Based on Kelvin, other agents may also make use of your agent's listings. "If your pricing is on the excessive aspect, these brokers may use your house to persuade their patrons why Http://Trafficstooges.Com/Singapore-Property-Condominium they should purchase another residence." To counter this, Kelvin says it is crucial for your agent to supply a current market analysis before putting up your private home for sale. "This helps you worth your property appropriately and realistically." When property is made accessible (HIGH is issued) to the client. Becoming a successful property agent is a distinct story altogether! Hi, I would like to ask how I might be a property agent and whether there are courses I might take. And if I need to be at a certain age. www. Property BUYER com.sg (your impartial Mortgage Advisor) In private properties in[78] Still, the author uses the terms "Word of God" and "Lamb of God" for Jesus Christ, possibly indicating that the author had a common theological background with the author of John.[63]

Revelation is written in a specific genre of apocalyptic literature which differs from the style of the gospels and the epistles.

According to the testimony of Irenaeus, Eusebius and Jerome, the writing of this book took place near the very end of Domitian's reign, around 95 or 96. Kenneth Gentry contends for an earlier date, 68 or 69, in the reign of Nero or shortly thereafter.[79]

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

  1. F. L. Cross, The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 45
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Stephen L Harris, Understanding the Bible, (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985), 355
  3. Since the 18th century, the Decretum Gelasianum has been associated with the Council of Rome (382), though historians dispute the connection.
  4. 4.0 4.1 "Although ancient traditions attributed to the Apostle John the Fourth Gospel, the Book of Revelation, and the three Epistles of John, modern scholars believe that he wrote none of them." Harris, Stephen L., Understanding the Bible (Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1985) p. 355
  5. Hengel, Martin. Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ, |page=40 |ISBN 978-1-56338-300-7. Trinity Press International; 1st edition, 2000. p. 40
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Morris, Leon (1995) The Gospel According to John Volume 4 of The new international commentary on the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, ISBN 978-0-8028-2504-9, pp. 4–5, 24, 35–7. "Continental scholars have ... abandoned the idea that this gospel was written by the apostle John, whereas in Great Britain and America scholarship has been much more open to the idea." Abandonment is due to changing opinion rather "than to any new evidence." "Werner, Colson, and I have been joined, among others, by I. Howard Marshall and J.A.T. Robinson in seeing the evidence as pointing to John the son of Zebedee as the author of this Gospel." The view that John's history is substandard "is becoming increasingly hard to sustain. Many recent writers have shown that there is good reason for regarding this or that story in John as authentic. ... It is difficult to ... regard John as having little concern for history. The fact is John is concerned with historical information. ... John apparently records this kind of information because he believes it to be accurate. ... He has some reliable information and has recorded it carefully. ... The evidence is that where he can be tested John proves to be remarkably accurate."
    • Bruce 1981 pp. 52–4, 58. "The evidence ... favor[s] the apostolicity of the gospel. ... John knew the other gospels and ... supplements them. ... The synoptic narrative becomes more intelligible if we follow John." John's style is different so Jesus' "abiding truth might be presented to men and women who were quite unfamiliar with the original setting. ... He does not yield to any temptation to restate Christianity. ... It is the story of events that happened in history. ... John does not divorce the story from its Palestinian context."
    • Dodd p. 444. "Revelation is distinctly, and nowhere more clearly than in the Fourth Gospel, a historical revelation. It follows that it is important for the evangelist that what he narrates happened."
    • Temple, William. "Readings in St. John's Gospel". MacMillan and Co, 1952. "The synoptists give us something more like the perfect photograph; St. John gives us the more perfect portrait".
    • Edwards, R. A. "The Gospel According to St. John" 1954, p 9. One reason he accepts John's authorship is because "the alternative solutions seem far too complicated to be possible in a world where living men met and talked".
    • Hunter, A. M. "Interpreting the New Testament" P 86. "After all the conjectures have been heard, the likeliest view is that which identifies the Beloved Disciple with the Apostle John.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Dr. Craig Blomberg, cited in Lee Strobel The Case for Christ, 1998, Chapter 2.
    • Marshall, Howard. "The Illustrated Bible Dictionary", ed J. D. Douglas et al. Leicester 1980. II, p 804
    • Robinson, J. A. T. "The Priority of John" P 122
    • Cf. Marsh, "John seems to have believed that theology was not something which could be used to read a meaning into events but rather something that was to be discovered in them. His story is what it is because his theology is what it is; but his theology is what it is because the story happened so" (p 580–581).
  8. Ehrman, pp. 178–9.
  9. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  10. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  11. Craig Keener, A Gospel of John: A Commentary Volume 1, (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003), 93.
  12. Craig Keener, A Gospel of John: A Commentary Volume 1, (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003), 93 notes that, "Earliest Christian tradition seems to have exercised some ambivalence towards this Gospel, however; it is not recognized in the Roman fathers until the late second century." Keener also notes that "it is possible that he [Justin Martyr] cites instead an agraphon from pre-Johannine tradition or a subsequent tradition based on John."
  13. C.H. Dodd, Historical tradition in the Fourth Gospel, (Cambridge: University Press, 1963), 13; J.W. Pryor, "Justin Martyr and the Fourth Gospel," Second Cent 9, no. 3 (1992): 153-169; Keener, The Gospel of John, 94 notes in one of the footnotes something quite interesting, "Although the analogy carries little weight, my first book cited Matthew over 150 times, Luke 13 times, 1 Peter 9 times, and John twice, though John was my dissertation area."
  14. Walter Bauer, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia: 1971), 206
  15. Keener, The Gospel of John, 94; see also John Kysar, "The Gospel of John," in Anchor Bible Commentary David Noel Freedman eds., (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 912 notes that, "In its defense against Gnosticism the Church embraced the Gospel of John and attempted to demonstrate that the gospel affirmed the 'Orthodox Christian faith.' The affiliation of the gospel with gnostic Christian beliefs led some, however, to reject it along with Revelation, as Irenaeus witnesses (haer. 3.2.12
  16. Against Heresies 1.9.2., see
  17. Fragments of Heracleon's Commentary on John can be found here
  18. Taken from Robert. M Grant, "The Fourth Gospel and the Church," The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 95-116
  19. Robert M. Grant, The Fourth Gospel and the Church, The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 suggests that, "John's very divergence from the synoptics had already led to is relatively slower reception in the broader church until it could be explained in relation to them."
  20. Robert M. Grant, The Fourth Gospel and the Church, The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 notes also that "our early second-century papyrus fragment P52, discovered in Egypt, probably limits the value of this second proposal ... However much the Fourth Gospel may have been directed toward a specific historical situation, it was only a matter of time before it began to circulate beyond its originally intended readership."
  21. Robert M. Grant, The Fourth Gospel and the Church, The Harvard Theological Review 35, no. 2 (April 1942): 94 Nevertheless, most biblical scholars continue to favour the earlier dating, though the possibility of a later date is not entirely discounted; John Rylands Library continues to maintain Roberts's assessment of the date of 52, that it "may with some confidence be dated in the first half of the second century A.D."
  22. John Rylands Library
  23. The date is given as c. 125 in standard reference works
  24. 24.0 24.1 Hill, Charles E., The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-929144-1
  25. Adolf Julicher, An Introduction to the New Testament, (New York: Smith, Elder, and co., 1904), 399 notes that "Ever since, in 1820, Prof. K.G. Bretschneider brought forward strong reasons for declaring it impossible to conceive the Fourth Gospel as the work of the an Apostle, the dispute as to whether the tradition were right or wrong has become ever keener.
  26. James Moffatt, "Ninety Years After: A survey of Bretschneider's 'Probabilia' in the Light of Subsequent Johannine Criticism," The American Journal of Theology 17, no. 3 (July 1913), 371 who notes that "..the opening chapter of Bretschneider is occupied with an incisive discussion of the differences between the synoptic and the Johannine conceptions of Jesus, and it concludes by depreciating the speeches of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel as unworthy of historical credence. Their style, says Bretschneider, is unlike the direct, simple utterances of the synoptic Jesus."
  27. James Moffatt, "Ninety Year After: A survey of Bretschneider's 'Probabilia' in the Light of Subsequent Johannine Criticism," The American Journal of Theology 17, no. 3 (July 1913), 370
  28. Polycarp at NTCanon.org
  29. Justin Martyr at NTCanon.org
  30. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.39.4-6
  31. Irenaeus Adversus haereses 3.11 = Eusebius Historia ecclesiastica 5.8.4
  32. Helmut Koester. Ancient Christian Gospels. Harrisburg, PA.: Trinity Press. 1990. p. 246
  33. Eusebius Pamphilius, Church History 14.2 http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.xi.xiv.html
  34. Origen, Commentary on John 10.4.6.
  35. Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1987: p. 131.
  36. Charles E. Hill, The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 13
  37. The English version of this text can be found at Walter Bauer, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia: 1971)
  38. Walter Bauer, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia: 1971), 194; Charles E. Hill, The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 13 notes, however, that "Bauer's thesis has certainly been challenged by later scholars, and even his heirs today would not accept his theories without significant modifications. Nevertheless, as a grand, organizing principle for understanding the spread of Christianity in the second century, his approach has retained much of its force among scholars, particularly since the appearance of the English translation of the book decades later in 1971.
  39. Charles E. Hill, The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 15
  40. Charles E. Hill, The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 15; to see the Sanders original book, one can find it at J.N. Sanders, The Fourth Gospel in the Early Church: Its Origin and Influence on Christian Theology up to Irenaeus (Cambridge, 1943)
  41. 41.0 41.1 Sanders, The Fourth Gospel, 86.
  42. Vernard Eller, The Beloved Disciple: His Name, His Story, His Throught [sic], House Church Central, accessed at http://www.hccentral.com/eller8/index.html on 13 October 2007; Rudolf Steiner, "The Gospel of St. John" (Lecture, Berlin, 19 February 1906) accessed at http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GospJohn1906/19060219p01.html; Craig Keener, The Gospel of John: Volume 1, 86 suggests that, "..one of the more commonly proposed and most defensible candidates is Lazarus, "whom Jesus loved" (John 11:3). This makes sense of the phrase, though it makes less sense of the frequency with which, and locations in which, the disciples appears in the narrative, if an earlier anonymous disciples (1:37-40) includes him (which is uncertain).
  43. de Boer, Esther, 2004. Essay in Marvin Meyer, The Gospels of Mary. HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-072791-8
  44. 44.0 44.1 Pagels, Elaine, 2003. Beyond Belief, ISBN 0-375-70316-0, pp 115–117.
  45. Craig Keener, The Gospel of John: Volume One. p. 84 notes, "One could argue that the beloved disciple is not one of the Twelve because he is not mentioned by the 'beloved disciple' until the last discourse and passion narrative (one could also use this to separate sections of the gospels into sources)." See also Robert Kysar, John, the maverick Gospel, (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1976), 919
  46. Keener, The Gospel of John: Volume 1, 84; See also George R. Beasley-Murray, John, (Waco: Word Books, 1987), lxxiii
  47. Raymond Brown, The Gospel According to John, (Garden City: Doubleday, 1966), chapter 11.
  48. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  49. Template:Cite web
  50. Riley, Gregory J., 1995. Resurrection Reconsidered: Thomas and John in Controversy. Minneapolis.
  51. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  52. 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 52.5 52.6 "biblical literature." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 8 Jul. 2010 <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/64496/biblical-literature>
  53. Renan's Vie de Jésus (Life of Jesus) which praised the historical and geographical details present in the Gospel.
  54. Paula Fredriksen, "What you see is what you Get: Context and Content in Current Research on the Historical Jesus," Theology Today 52, no. 1 (1995): 75-97
  55. 55.0 55.1 One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting

    In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang

    Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules

    Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.

    A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running

    The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more

    There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang
  56. 56.0 56.1 56.2 56.3 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  57. Wilder 1957, pp. 214–215.
  58. Wilder 1957, p. 211
  59. C. H. Dodd, "The First Epistle of John and the Fourth Gospel," Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, XXI (1937)
  60. Eusebius: The Church History
  61. The Gospel According to John: An Introduction and Commentary (Pillar New Testament Commentary) (Hardcover). D.A Carson, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company (January 1991) pg. 44
  62. The Gospel According to John: An Introduction and Commentary (Pillar New Testament Commentary) (Hardcover). D.A Carson, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company (January 1991) pg. 25
  63. 63.0 63.1 63.2 "Revelation, Book of." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005
  64. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, 81.4
  65. Against Heresies iv. 20. 11
  66. Who Is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved? xlii
  67. On Prescription Against Heretics 36
  68. Treatise on Christ and Antichrist xxxvi
  69. New American Bible: Revelation
  70. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  71. S. Giversen. Apocryphon Johannis Copenhagen: 1963 p. 49
  72. "So strong is this evidence that it is difficult to believe that they all made a mistake confusing the John of the Apocalypse with John the apostle ... It must be conceded that taken as a whole (the evidence) points very strongly to the probability that John of the Apocalypse was, in fact, John the apostle." New Testament Introduction. IVP: 1990 p935
  73. Cerinthus at CCEL.org
  74. Eusebius: Church History (Book VII), Chapter 25
  75. Euserbius: Church History (Book III, Chapter 39)
  76. The Book of Revelation by Robert H. Mounce. pp. 23–24
  77. Ehrman 2004, p. 467ff
  78. John, the Son of Zebedee By R. Alan Culpepper, pp. 98–102
  79. Gentry, Kenneth. Before Jerusalem Fell, ISBN 0-930464-20-6. Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 1989.