Goodman and Kruskal's lambda

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2014 by en>Kku (l)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, Neumann–Neumann methods are domain decomposition preconditioners named so because they solve a Neumann problem on each subdomain on both sides of the interface between the subdomains.[1] Just like all domain decomposition methods, so that the number of iterations does not grow with the number of subdomains, Neumann–Neumann methods require the solution of a coarse problem to provide global communication. The balancing domain decomposition is a Neumann–Neumann method with a special kind of coarse problem.

More specifically, consider a domain Ω, on which we wish to solve the Poisson equation

Δu=f,u|Ω=0

for some function f. Split the domain into two non-overlapping subdomains Ω1 and Ω2 with common boundary Γ and let u1 and u2 be the values of u in each subdomain. At the interface between the two subdomains, the two solutions must satisfy the matching conditions

u1=u2,nu1=nu2

where n is the unit normal vector to Γ.

An iterative method for approximating each ui satisfying the matching conditions is to first solve the decoupled problems (i=1,2)

Δui(k)=fi,ui(k)|Ω=0,ui(k)|Γ=λ(k)

for some function λ(k) on Γ. We then solve the two Neumann problems

Δψi(k)=0,ψi(k)|Ω=0,nψi(k)=nu1(k)nu2(k).

We then obtain the next iterate by setting

λ(k+1)=λ(k)ω(θ1ψ1(k)|Γθ2ψ2(k)|Γ)

for some parameters ω, θ1 and θ2.

This procedure can be viewed as a Richardson extrapolation for the iterative solution of the equations arising from the Schur complement method.[2]

This continuous iteration can be discretized by the finite element method and then solved—in parallel—on a computer. The extension to more subdomains is straightforward, but using this method as stated as a preconditioner for the Schur complement system is not scalable with the number of subdomains; hence the need for a global coarse solve.

See also

References

  1. A. Klawonn and O. B. Widlund, FETI and Neumann–Neumann iterative substructuring methods: connections and new results, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54 (2001), pp. 57–90.
  2. A. Quarteroni and A. Valli, Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Oxford Science Publications 1999.

Template:Numerical PDE