Erdős distinct distances problem

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 23:30, 25 January 2014 by en>Rjwilmsi (References: Journal cites, added 1 DOI using AWB (9887))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, and more precisely in analysis, the Wallis' integrals constitute a family of integrals introduced by John Wallis.

Definition, basic properties

The Wallis' integrals are the terms of the sequence (Wn)n defined by:

Wn=0π2sinn(x)dx,

or equivalently (through a substitution: x=π2t):

Wn=0π2cosn(x)dx

In particular, the first two terms of this sequence are:

W0=π2 and W1=1

The sequence (Wn) is decreasing and has strictly positive terms. In fact, for all n :

(by the linearity of integration and because the last integral is an integral of a non-negative function within the integration interval)

Note: Since the sequence (Wn) is decreasing and bounded below by 0, it converges to a non-negative limit. Indeed, the limit is non-zero (see below).

Recurrence relation, evaluating the Wallis' integrals

By means of integration by parts, an interesting recurrence relation can be obtained:

Noting that for all real x, sin2(x)=1cos2(x), we have, for all natural numbers n2,
0π2sinn(x)dx=0π2sinn2(x)[1cos2(x)]dx
0π2sinn(x)dx=0π2sinn2(x)dx0π2sinn2(x)cos2(x)dx (equation (1))

Integrating the second integral by parts, with:

we have:

0π2sinn2(x)cos2(x)dx=[1n1sinn1(x)cos(x)]0π2+0π21n1sinn1(x)sin(x)dx=0+1n1Wn

Substituting this result into (1) gives:

Wn=Wn21n1Wn

and thus

(1+1n1)Wn=Wn2 (equation (2))

This gives the well-known identity:

nWn=(n1)Wn2, valid for all n2.

This is a recurrence relation giving Wn in terms of Wn2. This, together with the values of W0 and W1, give us two sets of formulae for the terms in the sequence (Wn), depending on whether n is odd or even.

Note that all the even terms are irrational, whereas the odd terms are all rational.

Equivalence

  • From the recurrence formula above (2), we can deduce that
Wn+1Wn (equivalence of two sequences).
Indeed, for all n :
Wn+2Wn+1Wn (since the sequence is decreasing)
Wn+2WnWn+1Wn1 (since Wn>0)
n+1n+2Wn+1Wn1 (by equation (2)).
By the sandwich theorem, we conclude that Wn+1Wn1, and hence Wn+1Wn.
  • By examining WnWn+1, one obtains the following equivalence:
Wnπ2n ( and consequently limnnWn=π/2 ).

Template:Hidden

Deducing Stirling's formula

Suppose that we have the following equivalence (known as Stirling's formula)

n!Cn(ne)n, where C*.

We now want to determine the value of this constant C using the formula for W2p.

  • From above, we know that:
W2pπ4p=π21p (equation (3))
  • Expanding W2p and using the formula above for the factorials, we get:
W2p=(2p)!22p(p!)2π2C(2pe)2p2p22pC2(pe)2p(p)2π2 and hence:
W2pπC21p (equation (4))
From (3) and (4), we obtain, by transitivity,
πC21pπ21p, which gives :
πC2=π2, and hence C=2π.
We have thus proved Stirling's formula:
n!2πn(ne)n.

Evaluating the Gaussian Integral

The Gaussian integral can be evaluated through the use of Wallis' integrals.

We first prove the following inequalities:

In fact, letting u/n=t, the first inequality (in which t[0,1]) is equivalent to 1tet; whereas the second inequality reduces to et(1+t)1, which becomes et1+t. These 2 latter inequalities follow from the convexity of the exponential function (or from an analysis of the function tet1t).

Letting u=x2 and making use of the basic properties of improper integrals (the convergence of the integrals is obvious), we obtain the inequalities:

0n(1x2/n)ndx0nex2dx0+ex2dx0+(1+x2/n)ndx for use with the sandwich theorem (as n).

The first and last integrals can be evaluated easily using Wallis' integrals. For the first one, let x=nsint (t varying from 0 to π/2). Then, the integral becomes nW2n+1. For the last integral, let x=ntant (t varying from 0 to π/2). Then, it becomes nW2n2.

As we have shown before, limn+nWn=π/2. So, it follows that 0+ex2dx=π/2.

Remark: There are other methods of evaluating the Gaussian integral. Some of them are more direct.

Relation with the Beta and Gamma functions

One of the definitions of the Beta function reads:

B(x,y)=20π/2(sinθ)2x1(cosθ)2y1dθ,Re(x)>0,Re(y)>0

Putting x=n+12, y=12 into this equation gives us an expression of the Wallis' integrals in terms of the Beta function:

B(n+12,12)=20π/2(sinθ)n(cosθ)0dθ=20π/2(sinθ)ndθ=2Wn

or equivalently,

Wn=12B(n+12,12).

Exploiting the identity relating the Beta function to Gamma function:

B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)Γ(x+y)

We can rewrite the above in terms of the Gamma function:

Wn=12Γ(n+12)Γ(12)Γ(n+12+12)=Γ(n+12)Γ(12)2Γ(n+22)

So, for odd n, writing n=2p+1, we have:

W2p+1=Γ(p+1)Γ(12)2Γ(p+1+12)=p!Γ(12)(2p+1)Γ(p+12)=2pp!(2p+1)!!=4p(p!)2(2p+1)!

whereas for even n, writing n=2p, we get:

W2p=Γ(p+12)Γ(12)2Γ(p+1)=(2p1)!!π2p+1p!=(2p)!4p(p!)2π2

Note

The same properties lead to Wallis product, which expresses π2 (see π) in the form of an infinite product.

External links

  • Pascal Sebah and Xavier Gourdon. Introduction to the Gamma Function. In PostScript and HTML formats.

Template:Analysis-footer