Infinite loop space machine

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 22:40, 25 January 2014 by en>Alvin Seville (removing and categorizing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, solid partitions are natural generalizations of partitions and plane partitions defined by Percy Alexander MacMahon.[1] A solid partition of n is a three-dimensional array, ni,j,k, of non-negative integers (the indices i,j,k1) such that

i,j,kni,j,k=n

and

ni+1,j,kni,j,k,ni,j+1,kni,j,kandni,j,k+1ni,j,k,i,j and k.

Let p3(n) denote the number of solid partitions of n. As the definition of solid partitions involves three-dimensional arrays of numbers, they are also called three-dimensional partitions in notation where plane partitions are two-dimensional partitions and partitions are one-dimensional partitions. Solid partitions and their higher-dimensional generalizations are discussed in the book by Andrews.[2]

Ferrers diagrams for solid partitions

Another representation for solid partitions is in the form of Ferrers diagrams. The Ferrers diagram of a solid partition of n is a collection of n points or nodes, λ=(y1,y2,,yn), with yi04 satisfying the condition:[3]

Condition FD: If the node a=(a1,a2,a3,a4)λ, then so do all the nodes y=(y1,y2,y4,y4) with 0yiai for all i=1,2,3,4.

For instance, the Ferrers diagram

(00000010010010001100),

where each column is a node, represents a solid partition of 5. There is a natural action of the permutation group S4 on a Ferrers diagram – this corresponds to permuting the four coordinates of all nodes. This generalizes the conjugation operation for partitions.

Equivalence of the two representations

Given a Ferrers diagram, one constructs the solid partition (as in the main definition) as follows.

Let ni,j,k be the number of nodes in the Ferrers diagram with coordinates of the form (i1,j1,k1,*) where * denotes an arbitrary value. The collection ni,j,k form a solid partition. One can verify that condition FD implies that the conditions for a solid partition are satisfied.

Given a set of ni,j,k that form a solid partition, one obtains the corresponding Ferrers diagram as follows.

Start with the Ferrers diagram with no nodes. For every non-zero ni,j,k, add ni,j,k nodes (i1,j1,k1,y4) for 0y4<ni,j,k to the Ferrers diagram. By construction, it is easy to see that condition FD is satisfied.

For example, the Ferrers diagram with 5 nodes given above corresponds to the solid partition with

n1,1,1=n2,1,1=n1,2,1=n1,1,2=n2,2,1=1

with all other ni,j,k vanishing.

Generating function

Let p3(0)1. Define the generating function of solid partitions, P3(q), by

P3(q):=n=0p3(n)qn=1+q+4q2+10q3+26q4+59q5+140q6+

The generating functions of partitions and plane partitions have simple formulae due to Euler and MacMahon respectively. However, a guess of MacMahon fails to correctly reproduce the solid partitions of 6 as shown by Atkin et. al.[3] It appears that there is no simple formula for the generating function of solid partitions. Somewhat confusingly, Atkin et. al. refer to solid partitions as four-dimensional partitions as that is the dimension of the Ferrers diagram.[3]

Exact enumeration using computers

Given the lack of an explicitly known generating function, the enumerations of the numbers of solid partitions for larger integers have been carried out numerically. There are two algorithms that are used to enumerate solid partitions and their higher-dimensional generalizations. The work of Atkin. et. al. used an algorithm due to Bratley and McKay.[4] In 1970, Knuth proposed a different algorithm to enumerate topological sequences that he used to evaluate numbers of solid partitions of all integers n28.[5] Mustonen and Rajesh extended the enumeration for all integers n50.[6] In 2010, S. Balakrishnan proposed a parallel version of Knuth's algorithm that has been used to extend the enumeration to all integers n72.[7] One finds

p3(72)=3464274974065172792,

which is a 19 digit number illustrating the difficulty in carrying out such exact enumerations.

Asymptotic behavior

It is known that from the work of Bhatia et. al. that[8]

limnn3/4lnp3(n)a constant.

The value of this constant was estimated using Monte-Carlo simulations by Mustonen and Rajesh to be 1.79±0.01.[6]

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

  1. P. A. MacMahon, Combinatory Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York, Vol. 1, 1915 and Vol. 2, 1916; see vol. 2, p 332.
  2. G. E. Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 A. O. L. Atkin, P. Bratley, I. G. McDonald and J. K. S. McKay, Some computations for m-dimensional partitions, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 63 (1967), 1097–1100.
  4. P. Bratley and J. K. S. McKay, "Algorithm 313: Multi-dimensional partition generator", Comm. ACM, 10 (Issue 10, 1967), p. 666.
  5. D. E. Knuth, "A note on solid partitions", Math. Comp., 24 (1970), 955–961.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Ville Mustonen and R. Rajesh, "Numerical Estimation of the Asymptotic Behaviour of Solid Partitions of an Integer", J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 (2003), no. 24, 6651.cond-mat/0303607
  7. Srivatsan Balakrishnan, Suresh Govindarajan and Naveen S. Prabhakar, "On the asymptotics of higher-dimensional partitions", J.Phys. A: Math. Gen. 45 (2012) 055001 arXiv:1105.6231.
  8. D P Bhatia, M A Prasad and D Arora, "Asymptotic results for the number of multidimensional partitions of an integer and directed compact lattice animals", J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 (1997) 2281