Output elasticity

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 22:17, 7 May 2013 by en>EmausBot (Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:Q655370)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Depletion region of an nMOSFET biased below the threshold
Depletion region of an nMOSFET biased above the threshold with channel formed
Simulation result for formation of inversion channel (electron density) and attainment of threshold voltage (IV) in a nanowire MOSFET. Note that the threshold voltage for this device lies around 0.45V.

The threshold voltage, commonly abbreviated as Vth, of a field-effect transistor (FET) is the value of the gate–source voltage when the conducting channel just begins to connect the source and drain contacts of the transistor, allowing significant current. In wide planar transistors the threshold voltage is essentially independent of the drain–source voltage and is therefore a well defined characteristic, however it is less clear in modern nanometer-sized MOSFETs due to drain-induced barrier lowering.

The threshold voltage of a junction field-effect transistor is often called pinch-off voltage instead, which is somewhat confusing since "pinch off" for an insulated-gate field-effect transistor is used to refer to the channel pinching that leads to current saturation behaviour under high source–drain bias, even though the current is never off. The term "threshold voltage" is unambiguous and refers to the same concept in any field-effect transistor.

In an n-MOSFET the substrate of the transistor is composed of p-type silicon (see doping (semiconductor)), which has positively charged mobile holes as carriers. When a positive voltage is applied on the gate, an electric field causes the holes to be repelled from the interface, creating a depletion region containing immobile negatively charged acceptor ions. A further increase in the gate voltage eventually causes electrons to appear at the interface, in what is called an inversion layer, or channel. Historically the gate voltage at which the electron density at the interface is the same as the hole density in the neutral bulk material is called the threshold voltage. Practically speaking the threshold voltage is the voltage at which there are sufficient electrons in the inversion layer to make a low resistance conducting path between the MOSFET source and drain. When the voltage between transistor gate and source (VGS) exceeds the threshold voltage (Vth), it is known as overdrive voltage.

In the figures, the source (left side) and drain (right side) are labeled n+ to indicate heavily doped (blue) n-regions. The depletion layer dopant is labeled NA to indicate that the ions in the (pink) depletion layer are negatively charged and there are very few holes. In the (red) bulk the number of holes p = NA making the bulk charge neutral.

If the gate voltage is below the threshold voltage (top figure), the transistor is turned off and ideally there is no current from the drain to the source of the transistor. In fact, there is a current even for gate biases below the threshold (subthreshold leakage) current, although it is small and varies exponentially with gate bias.

If the gate voltage is above the threshold voltage (lower figure), the transistor is turned on, due to there being many electrons in the channel at the oxide-silicon interface, creating a low-resistance channel where charge can flow from drain to source. For voltages significantly above the threshold, this situation is called strong inversion. The channel is tapered when VD > 0 because the voltage drop due to the current in the resistive channel reduces the oxide field supporting the channel as the drain is approached.

Body effect

The body effect refers to the changes in the threshold voltage by the change in VSB, the source-bulk voltage. Because the body influences the threshold voltage (when it is not tied to the source), it can be thought of as a second gate, and is sometimes referred to as the "back gate"; the body effect is sometimes called the "back-gate effect".[1]

For an enhancement mode, n-mos MOSFET body effect upon threshold voltage is computed according to the Shichman-Hodges model[2] (accurate for very old technology) using the following equation.

VTN=VTO+γ(|VSB+2ϕF||2ϕF|)

where VTN is the threshold voltage when substrate bias is present, VSB is the source-to-body substrate bias, 2ϕF is the surface potential, and VTO is threshold voltage for zero substrate bias, γ=(tox/ϵox)2qϵsiNA is the body effect parameter, tox is oxide thickness, ϵox is oxide permittivity, ϵsi is the permittivity of silicon, NA is a doping concentration, q is the charge of an electron.

Dependence on oxide thickness

In a given technology node, such as the 90-nanometer CMOS process, the threshold voltage depends on the choice of oxide and on oxide thickness. Using the body formulas above, VTN is directly proportional to γ, and tOX, which is the parameter for oxide thickness.

Thus, the thinner the oxide thickness, the lower the threshold voltage. Although this may seem to be an improvement, it is not without cost; because the thinner the oxide thickness, the higher the subthreshold leakage current through the device will be. Consequently, the design specification for 90-nanometer gate-oxide thickness was set at 1 nanometer to control the leakage current.[3] This kind of tunneling, called Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling.[4]

Ifn=C1WL(Eox)2eE0/Eox

where C1 and E0 are constants and Eox is the electric field across the gate oxide.

Before scaling the design features down to 90 nanometers, a dual-oxide approach for creating the oxide thickness was a common solution to this issue. With a 90-nanometer process technology, a triple-oxide approach has been adopted in some cases.[5] One standard thin oxide is used for most transistors, another for I/O driver cells, and a third for memory-and-pass transistor cells. These differences are based purely on the characteristics of oxide thickness on threshold voltage of CMOS technologies.

Dependence on temperature

As with the case of oxide thickness affecting threshold voltage, temperature has an effect on the threshold voltage of a CMOS device. Expanding on part of the equation in the body effect section

ϕF=(kT/q)ln(NA/Ni)

where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is Temperature, q is the charge of an electron, NA is a doping parameter and Ni is the intrinsic doping parameter for the substrate.

We see that the surface potential has a direct relationship with the temperature. Looking above, that while the threshold voltage does not have a direct relationship but is not independent of the effects. On average this variation is between −4 mV/°C and −2 mV/°C depending on doping level.[6] For a change of 30 °C this results in significant variation from the 500mV design parameter commonly used for the 90 nanometer technology node.

Dependence on random dopant fluctuation

Random dopant fluctuation(RDF) is a form of process variation resulting from variation in the implanted impurity concentration. In MOSFET transistors, RDF in the channel region can alter the transistor's properties, especially threshold voltage. In newer process technologies RDF has a larger effect because the total number of dopants is fewer.[7]

Research works are being carried out in order to suppress the dopant fluctuation which leads to the variation of threshold voltage between devices undergoing same manufacturing process.[8]

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

fr:Transistor à effet de champ à grille métal-oxyde#Tension de seuil

  1. Marco Delaurenti, PhD dissertation, Design and optimization techniques of high-speed VLSI circuits (1999))
  2. NanoDotTek Report NDT14-08-2007, 12 August 2007
  3. Sugii, Watanabe and Sugatani. Transistor Design for 90-nm Generation and Beyond. (2002)
  4. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Second Edition, New York: Wiley and Sons, 1981, pp. 496–504.
  5. Anil Telikepalli, Xilinx Inc, Power considerations in designing with 90 nm FPGAs (2005))[1]
  6. Weste and Eshraghian, Principles of CMOS VLSI Design : a systems perspective, Second Edition, (1993) pp.48 ISBN 0-201-53376-6
  7. Asenov, A. Huang,Random dopant induced threshold voltage lowering and fluctuations in sub-0.1 μm MOSFET's: A 3-D “atomistic” simulation study, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions, 45 , Issue: 12
  8. Asenov, A. Huang,Suppression of random dopant-induced threshold voltage fluctuations in sub-0.1-μm MOSFET's with epitaxial and δ-doped channels, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions, 46 , Issue: 8