Duane–Hunt law: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Zorrobot
m r2.7.3) (Robot: Adding nn:Duane–Hunt-lova
 
en>Yobot
m →‎References: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes / special characters in sortkey fixed using AWB (9427)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''' Magnetic hyperthermia''' is the name given to an [[experimental cancer treatment]], although it has also been investigated for the treatment of other ailments, such as bacterial infections. It is based on the fact that [[magnetic nanoparticles]], when subjected to an alternating magnetic field, produce heat. As a consequence, if magnetic nanoparticles are put inside a tumor and the whole patient is placed in an alternating magnetic field of well-chosen amplitude and frequency, the tumor temperature would rise. This treatment method has entered phase II trials (in humans) only in Europe, but research is done in several laboratories around the world to test and develop this technique further.


==Generalities and definition==
Many magnetic materials display a [[magnetic hysteresis]] when subjected to a magnetic field that alternates direction. The area of this hysteresis loop is dissipated in the environment as thermal energy, and this is the energy used in magnetic hyperthermia. The power dissipated by a magnetic material subjected to an alternating magnetic field is often called the "Specific Absorption Rate" (''SAR'') in the community of magnetic hyperthermia; it is expressed in W/g of nanoparticles. The ''SAR'' of a given material is then simply given by ''SAR'' = ''Af'', where ''A'' is the area of the hysteresis loop and ''f'' the alternation frequency of the magnetic field. ''A'' is expressed in J/g and is also called the "specific losses" of the material. Note that this expression for ''SAR'' is a definition; the difficulty lies in finding ''A''. Indeed, as is explained in more detail below, ''A'' depends on all the properties of the magnetic material in a very complex manner. In the case of magnetic nanoparticles, ''A'' depends on their [[magnetocrystalline anisotropy]] ''K'', their volume ''V'', the temperature ''T'', the frequency of the magnetic field ''f'', its amplitude ''H''<sub>max</sub>, and on the volumic concentration of the nanoparticles.<ref name="JAP-Carrey">J. Carrey, B. Mehdaoui, M. Respaud, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 083921 (2011).</ref>


If you are looking for a specific plugin, then you can just search for the name of the plugin. Affilo - Theme is the guaranteed mixing of wordpress theme that Mark Ling use for his internet marketing career. Change the site's theme and you have essentially changed the site's personality. If you need a special plugin for your website , there are thousands of plugins that can be used to meet those needs. In the most current edition you can customize your retailer layout and display hues and fonts similar to your site or blog. <br><br>Word - Press is known as the most popular blogging platform all over the web and is used by millions of blog enthusiasts worldwide. Wordpress have every reason with it which promote wordpress development. Our Daily Deal Software plugin brings the simplicity of setting up a Word - Press blog to the daily deal space. Being able to help with your customers can make a change in how a great deal work, repeat online business, and referrals you'll be given. Akismet is really a sophisticated junk e-mail blocker and it's also very useful thinking about I recieve many junk e-mail comments day-to-day across my various web-sites. <br><br>Usually, Wordpress owners selling the ad space on monthly basis and this means a residual income source. Browse through the popular Wordpress theme clubs like the Elegant Themes, Studio Press, Woo - Themes, Rocket Theme, Simple Themes and many more. For those who have almost any questions relating to in which and the way to work with [http://yoorl.info/?WordpressDropboxBackup159805 backup plugin], you can call us in our own website. Use this section to change many formatting elements. In crux the developer must have a detailed knowledge not only about the marketing tool but also about the ways in which it can be applied profitably. Premium vs Customised Word - Press Themes - Premium themes are a lot like customised themes but without the customised price and without the wait. <br><br>The primary differences are in the plugins that I install, as all sites don't need all the normal plugins. Russell HR Consulting provides expert knowledge in the practical application of employment law as well as providing employment law training and HR support services. One of the great features of Wordpress is its ability to integrate SEO into your site. It supports backup scheduling and allows you to either download the backup file or email it to you. The Pakistani culture is in demand of a main surgical treatment. <br><br>As a open source platform Wordpress offers distinctive ready to use themes for free along with custom theme support and easy customization. Visit our website to learn more about how you can benefit. In simple words, this step can be interpreted as the planning phase of entire PSD to wordpress conversion process. Extra investment in Drupal must be bypassed as value for money is what Drupal provides. Likewise, professional publishers with a multi author and editor setup often find that Word - Press lack basic user and role management capabilities.
==Influence of nanoparticle size on their domain structure==
The size of nanoparticles influence their [[magnetic domains]]. Small nanoparticles are composed of a single domain. Larger ones are composed of multiple domains minimizing the magnetostatic energy. At intermediate sizes, they display a magnetic structure called [[vortex]]. A rough approximation to determine the size above which a magnetic nanoparticles is not single-domain any more is when its size is above the typical [[Domain wall (magnetism)|domain wall]] dimension in the magnetic material, which ranges from a few to a few tens of nanometers. The nature of the domain structure have a profound influence of the hysteresis of the magnetic nanoparticles and, as a consequence of their hyperthermia properties.
 
==Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization reversal of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles==
 
===Reversal by Brownian motion===
In hyperthermia application, the nanoparticles are in a fluid, the blood. During ''in vitro'' hyperthermia measurements they are generally dispersed in a liquid and form a [[ferrofluid]]. They move and rotate randomly in the fluid, a phenomenon called [[Brownian motion]]. When a magnetic field is applied to them, magnetic nanoparticles rotate and progressively align with the magnetic field due to the torque generated by the interaction of the magnetic field with the magnetization. This is similar to a [[compass]]. The delay between the magnetic field reversal and the one of the magnetization leads to an hysteresis.
 
===Reversal by thermal activation===
The magnetization of the nanoparticle can spontaneously change of orientation under the influence of thermal energy, a phenomenon called [[superparamagnetism]]. The magnetization oscillate between its two equilibrium positions. The typical time between two orientation changes is given by the Néel relaxation time <math> \tau_N = \tau_0 e^{\frac{K V}{k_B T}}</math>, where <math>\tau_0</math> is an attempt time with a value around 10<sup>−9</sup>–10<sup>−10</sup> seconds.
 
===Reversal by the suppression of the anisotropy barrier by a magnetic field===
The magnetization of the nanoparticle is also reversed when an applied magnetic field is large enough to suppress the energy barrier between the two equilibrium positions, a phenomenon which is known as the [[Stoner–Wohlfarth model]] of magnetization reversal.
 
===Combination of the three mechanisms===
In the most general case, the reversal of the magnetization is due to a combination of the three mechanisms described above. For instance, for a [[single domain (magnetic)|single domain]] nanoparticle is inside a fluid at room temperature and that a sweeping magnetic field is suddenly applied with a direction opposite to the one of the nanoparticle magnetization. The nanoparticle will at the same time i) rotate in the fluid ii) the barrier between the two equilibrium positions of the magnetization will decrease iii) when the energy barrier becomes of the order of the thermal energy, the magnetization will switch (if the nanoparticle is not already align with the magnetic field due to its physical rotation). There is no simple analytical expression describing this reversal and the properties of the hysteresis loop in this very general case but numerical simulations and analytical expressions can be used in some cases.<ref name="JAP-Carrey"/>
 
==Models to be used for single-domain nanoparticles==
 
===The linear response theory===
The linear response theory is only valid when the response of the magnetic material is linear with the applied magnetic field and can be thus written under the form <math>M=\chi H</math>, where <math>\chi</math> is the complex susceptibility of the material. It is thus valid when the applied magnetic field is much smaller than the magnetic field needed to saturate the magnetization of the nanoparticle. It is able to take into account both the reversal by thermal activation and the reversal by Brownian motion.<br/>
The linear response theory uses an average relaxation time <math>\tau</math>, given by <math>\frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{1}{\tau_B} + \frac{1}{\tau_N} </math>. The out of phase component of complex susceptibility is then given by <math>\chi '' = \frac{\mu_0 M_S^2 V}{3 k_B T} \frac{2 \pi f \tau}{1+(2 \pi f \tau)^2}</math>. The hysteresis loop is then an ellipse with an area given by <math>A = \pi \mu_0 H^2 \chi ''</math>.
 
===The Stoner–Wohlfarth model and the maximum area===
The [[Stoner–Wohlfarth model]] allows one to calculate the hysteresis loop of magnetic nanoparticles at ''T''=0 with the assumption that the nanoparticles are fixed in the magnetic field (the Brownian motion is neglected) and magnetically independent. Its main interest is to predict the '''maximum hysteresis area''' for independent nanoparticles with given properties. Indeed, the addition of thermal energy or Brownian motion only leads to a decrease of the hysteresis loop area (see below). <br />
The Stoner–Wohlfarth model predicts that the coercive field at ''T''=0 of an assembly of nanoparticles with randomly oriented axes is given by <math>H_C(0) = \frac{K}{M_S}</math>. The area of the hysteresis is approximatively <math>A = 2\mu_0 M_S H_C(0)</math>.
 
===Extension of the Stoner–Wohlfarth model to include temperature and frequency===
Extensions of the [[Stoner–Wohlfarth model]] have been done to include the influence of the temperature and frequency on the hysteresis loop. They allow to calculate hysteresis area in a rather large range of parameters.<ref name=JAP-Carrey />
 
==Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization of magnetic multi-domain nanoparticles==
{{Expand section|date=May 2009}}
In multi-domain nanoparticles the basic ingredients to describe the magnetization reversal are the nucleation of new domains and the propagation of [[Domain wall (magnetism)|domain wall]]s. Both mechanisms are strongly influenced by the structural defects at the surface or inside the nanoparticles and make difficult any quantitative prediction of the hysteresis loops shape and area from intrinsic parameters of the magnetic nanoparticles.
 
==Models to be used for multi-domain nanoparticles==
At low magnetic field, the hysteresis loop is expected to be a [[Rayleigh loop]]. In this case, the hysteresis area is <math>A = \frac{4}{3} \eta H^3</math>, where <math>\eta</math> is the Rayleigh constant.
 
==Measuring hyperthermia: in vitro experiments==
 
===Producing a high frequency magnetic field===
Two basic means to produce the high frequency field necessary to study hyperthermia can be used: the coil and the electromagnet. For the "coil" way, a very simple method to get the high frequency magnetic field is to use an [[induction furnace]], which precisely used a high-frequency magnetic field to heat materials. It is however conceived to work at a single frequency and requires a water cooling system. It is also possible to build electromagnets or coils able to work at various frequencies at the condition to use variable capacitors.<ref name="RSI-Lacroix">L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey and M. Respaud, Rev. Sci. Instr. 79, 093909 (2008). http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3005</ref> It is also possible to get rid of the cooling system in coils at the condition to build them with [[Litz wire]].<ref name="RSI-Lacroix"/>
 
===Measuring the temperature and artefacts===
A platinum or semi-conductor [[resistance thermometer]] in a high-frequency magnetic field is self-heated and leads to erroneous temperature measurements. Temperature measurements in hyperthermia can be made using alcohol thermometer, [[optic fiber thermometers]], infrared cameras, or differential heating measurements using traditional semiconductor-based sensing elements.<br />
A colloidal solution heated by an external magnetic field will be subject to [[convection]] phenomena so the temperature inside the calorimeter is not homogeneous. Shaking of the colloidal solutions at the end of a measurement or average on several temperature probes can ensure a more accurate temperature measurement.
 
==Materials for magnetic hyperthermia==
 
===Thermoseeds===
{{Empty section|date=May 2009}}
 
===Iron oxide nanoparticles===
The most widely used magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia consists in iron oxide nanoparticles. Similar nanoparticles are used as [[MRI contrast agent]]. They are in the context of MRI called "Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles", or SPION. The main interest of these nanoparticles are their biocompatibility and their stability with respect to oxidation. The nanoparticles displaying the largest hysteresis area so far are the SPIONs synthesized by [[magnetotactic bacteria]],<ref name="JMMM-Hergt2">R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, M. Zeisberger, D. Schüler, U. Heyen, I. Hilger and W. A. Kaiser, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 293, 80 (2005).</ref> with ''A'' = 2.3 mJ/g although chemically synthesized nanoparticles reach values up to ''A'' = 1.5 mJ/g.<ref name="JMMM-Hergt">R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, I. Hilger, W. A. Kaiser, Y. Lapatnikov, S. Margel and U. Richter, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 270, 345 (2004).</ref>
A typical hyperthermia study uses an inductive heater to measure specific losses (heating power) of the colloidal SPIONS also called a ferrofluid. Hyperthermia depends on material, particle morphology, size, and surface effects.<ref name="Armijo, L.M. 2012">Armijo, L.M.; Brandt, Y.I.; Mathew, D.; Yadav, S.; Maestas, S.; Rivera, A.C.; Cook, N.C.; Withers, N.J.; Smolyakov, G.A.; Adolphi, N.L.; Monson, T.C.; Huber, D.L.; Smyth, H.D.C.; Osiński, M. Iron Oxide Nanocrystals for Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications. Nanomaterials 2012, 2, 134-146</ref>
 
===Metallic nanoparticles===
The higher magnetization of metallic nanoparticles of Co, Fe or FeCo compared to iron oxide increases the maximum SAR values which can be reached using them in hyperthermia applications. ''A'' = 1.5 mJ/g has been reported for FeCo nanoparticles,<ref name="JAP-Lacroix">L.-M. Lacroix, R. Bel Malaki,J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, G. F. Goya and B. Chaudret, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 023911 (2009), http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4109</ref> ''A'' = 3.25 mJ/g for Co nanoparticles<ref name="JMMM-Zeiberger">M. Zeisberger, S. Dutz, R. Müller, R. Hergt, N. Matoussevitch, and H.Bönneman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 224 (2005)</ref> and ''A''=5.6 mJ/g for Fe nanoparticles.<ref name="condmat-Medahoui">B. Mehdaoui, A. Meffre, L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, M. Gougeon, B. Chaudret, http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4063</ref> The main issue with respect to metallic nanoparticles concerns their protection against oxidation and their eventual toxicity.
 
==''Ex vivo'' experiments==
{{Expand section|date=August 2009}}
''[[Ex vivo]]'' experiments in hyperthermia require to make tumor cells absorb magnetic nanoparticles, to place them into an alternative magnetic field and to test their survival rate compared to tumor cells which would follow the same protocol but would not absorb magnetic nanoparticles.
 
==''In vivo'' experiments==
 
===Animal testing===
{{Empty section|date=August 2009}}
 
===Clinical trials===
{{Expand section|date=August 2009}}
 
The only hyperthermia setup suitable to treat humans has been developed at the Charité Medical School, Clinic of Radiation Therapy in Berlin.<ref name="JMMM-Jordan">A. Jordan et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 225, 118 (2001). http://vpd.ms.northwestern.edu/Publications_files/Lei/JMMM_225_118_2001.pdf</ref> Andreas Jordan's team in this hospital has performed clinical trials on patients with prostate cancers.<ref name="IJH-Jordan">M. Johannsen ''et al.'', Int. J. of Hyperthermia 21, 637 (2005). http://www.anamacap.fr/telechargement/hyperthermie-vo.pdf</ref>
 
==See also==
*[[Experimental cancer treatment]]
*[[Magnetic nanoparticles]]
*[[Ferrofluid]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
==External links==
* [http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=44 Hyperthermia - Cancer therapy hots up] article on physics.org
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Magnetic Hyperthermia}}
[[Category:Oncothermia]]
[[Category:Medical physics]]
[[Category:Experimental cancer treatments]]

Latest revision as of 08:15, 20 August 2013

Magnetic hyperthermia is the name given to an experimental cancer treatment, although it has also been investigated for the treatment of other ailments, such as bacterial infections. It is based on the fact that magnetic nanoparticles, when subjected to an alternating magnetic field, produce heat. As a consequence, if magnetic nanoparticles are put inside a tumor and the whole patient is placed in an alternating magnetic field of well-chosen amplitude and frequency, the tumor temperature would rise. This treatment method has entered phase II trials (in humans) only in Europe, but research is done in several laboratories around the world to test and develop this technique further.

Generalities and definition

Many magnetic materials display a magnetic hysteresis when subjected to a magnetic field that alternates direction. The area of this hysteresis loop is dissipated in the environment as thermal energy, and this is the energy used in magnetic hyperthermia. The power dissipated by a magnetic material subjected to an alternating magnetic field is often called the "Specific Absorption Rate" (SAR) in the community of magnetic hyperthermia; it is expressed in W/g of nanoparticles. The SAR of a given material is then simply given by SAR = Af, where A is the area of the hysteresis loop and f the alternation frequency of the magnetic field. A is expressed in J/g and is also called the "specific losses" of the material. Note that this expression for SAR is a definition; the difficulty lies in finding A. Indeed, as is explained in more detail below, A depends on all the properties of the magnetic material in a very complex manner. In the case of magnetic nanoparticles, A depends on their magnetocrystalline anisotropy K, their volume V, the temperature T, the frequency of the magnetic field f, its amplitude Hmax, and on the volumic concentration of the nanoparticles.[1]

Influence of nanoparticle size on their domain structure

The size of nanoparticles influence their magnetic domains. Small nanoparticles are composed of a single domain. Larger ones are composed of multiple domains minimizing the magnetostatic energy. At intermediate sizes, they display a magnetic structure called vortex. A rough approximation to determine the size above which a magnetic nanoparticles is not single-domain any more is when its size is above the typical domain wall dimension in the magnetic material, which ranges from a few to a few tens of nanometers. The nature of the domain structure have a profound influence of the hysteresis of the magnetic nanoparticles and, as a consequence of their hyperthermia properties.

Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization reversal of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles

Reversal by Brownian motion

In hyperthermia application, the nanoparticles are in a fluid, the blood. During in vitro hyperthermia measurements they are generally dispersed in a liquid and form a ferrofluid. They move and rotate randomly in the fluid, a phenomenon called Brownian motion. When a magnetic field is applied to them, magnetic nanoparticles rotate and progressively align with the magnetic field due to the torque generated by the interaction of the magnetic field with the magnetization. This is similar to a compass. The delay between the magnetic field reversal and the one of the magnetization leads to an hysteresis.

Reversal by thermal activation

The magnetization of the nanoparticle can spontaneously change of orientation under the influence of thermal energy, a phenomenon called superparamagnetism. The magnetization oscillate between its two equilibrium positions. The typical time between two orientation changes is given by the Néel relaxation time , where is an attempt time with a value around 10−9–10−10 seconds.

Reversal by the suppression of the anisotropy barrier by a magnetic field

The magnetization of the nanoparticle is also reversed when an applied magnetic field is large enough to suppress the energy barrier between the two equilibrium positions, a phenomenon which is known as the Stoner–Wohlfarth model of magnetization reversal.

Combination of the three mechanisms

In the most general case, the reversal of the magnetization is due to a combination of the three mechanisms described above. For instance, for a single domain nanoparticle is inside a fluid at room temperature and that a sweeping magnetic field is suddenly applied with a direction opposite to the one of the nanoparticle magnetization. The nanoparticle will at the same time i) rotate in the fluid ii) the barrier between the two equilibrium positions of the magnetization will decrease iii) when the energy barrier becomes of the order of the thermal energy, the magnetization will switch (if the nanoparticle is not already align with the magnetic field due to its physical rotation). There is no simple analytical expression describing this reversal and the properties of the hysteresis loop in this very general case but numerical simulations and analytical expressions can be used in some cases.[1]

Models to be used for single-domain nanoparticles

The linear response theory

The linear response theory is only valid when the response of the magnetic material is linear with the applied magnetic field and can be thus written under the form , where is the complex susceptibility of the material. It is thus valid when the applied magnetic field is much smaller than the magnetic field needed to saturate the magnetization of the nanoparticle. It is able to take into account both the reversal by thermal activation and the reversal by Brownian motion.
The linear response theory uses an average relaxation time , given by . The out of phase component of complex susceptibility is then given by . The hysteresis loop is then an ellipse with an area given by .

The Stoner–Wohlfarth model and the maximum area

The Stoner–Wohlfarth model allows one to calculate the hysteresis loop of magnetic nanoparticles at T=0 with the assumption that the nanoparticles are fixed in the magnetic field (the Brownian motion is neglected) and magnetically independent. Its main interest is to predict the maximum hysteresis area for independent nanoparticles with given properties. Indeed, the addition of thermal energy or Brownian motion only leads to a decrease of the hysteresis loop area (see below).
The Stoner–Wohlfarth model predicts that the coercive field at T=0 of an assembly of nanoparticles with randomly oriented axes is given by . The area of the hysteresis is approximatively .

Extension of the Stoner–Wohlfarth model to include temperature and frequency

Extensions of the Stoner–Wohlfarth model have been done to include the influence of the temperature and frequency on the hysteresis loop. They allow to calculate hysteresis area in a rather large range of parameters.[1]

Basic mechanisms involved in the magnetization of magnetic multi-domain nanoparticles

Template:Expand section In multi-domain nanoparticles the basic ingredients to describe the magnetization reversal are the nucleation of new domains and the propagation of domain walls. Both mechanisms are strongly influenced by the structural defects at the surface or inside the nanoparticles and make difficult any quantitative prediction of the hysteresis loops shape and area from intrinsic parameters of the magnetic nanoparticles.

Models to be used for multi-domain nanoparticles

At low magnetic field, the hysteresis loop is expected to be a Rayleigh loop. In this case, the hysteresis area is , where is the Rayleigh constant.

Measuring hyperthermia: in vitro experiments

Producing a high frequency magnetic field

Two basic means to produce the high frequency field necessary to study hyperthermia can be used: the coil and the electromagnet. For the "coil" way, a very simple method to get the high frequency magnetic field is to use an induction furnace, which precisely used a high-frequency magnetic field to heat materials. It is however conceived to work at a single frequency and requires a water cooling system. It is also possible to build electromagnets or coils able to work at various frequencies at the condition to use variable capacitors.[2] It is also possible to get rid of the cooling system in coils at the condition to build them with Litz wire.[2]

Measuring the temperature and artefacts

A platinum or semi-conductor resistance thermometer in a high-frequency magnetic field is self-heated and leads to erroneous temperature measurements. Temperature measurements in hyperthermia can be made using alcohol thermometer, optic fiber thermometers, infrared cameras, or differential heating measurements using traditional semiconductor-based sensing elements.
A colloidal solution heated by an external magnetic field will be subject to convection phenomena so the temperature inside the calorimeter is not homogeneous. Shaking of the colloidal solutions at the end of a measurement or average on several temperature probes can ensure a more accurate temperature measurement.

Materials for magnetic hyperthermia

Thermoseeds

Template:Empty section

Iron oxide nanoparticles

The most widely used magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia consists in iron oxide nanoparticles. Similar nanoparticles are used as MRI contrast agent. They are in the context of MRI called "Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles", or SPION. The main interest of these nanoparticles are their biocompatibility and their stability with respect to oxidation. The nanoparticles displaying the largest hysteresis area so far are the SPIONs synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria,[3] with A = 2.3 mJ/g although chemically synthesized nanoparticles reach values up to A = 1.5 mJ/g.[4] A typical hyperthermia study uses an inductive heater to measure specific losses (heating power) of the colloidal SPIONS also called a ferrofluid. Hyperthermia depends on material, particle morphology, size, and surface effects.[5]

Metallic nanoparticles

The higher magnetization of metallic nanoparticles of Co, Fe or FeCo compared to iron oxide increases the maximum SAR values which can be reached using them in hyperthermia applications. A = 1.5 mJ/g has been reported for FeCo nanoparticles,[6] A = 3.25 mJ/g for Co nanoparticles[7] and A=5.6 mJ/g for Fe nanoparticles.[8] The main issue with respect to metallic nanoparticles concerns their protection against oxidation and their eventual toxicity.

Ex vivo experiments

Template:Expand section Ex vivo experiments in hyperthermia require to make tumor cells absorb magnetic nanoparticles, to place them into an alternative magnetic field and to test their survival rate compared to tumor cells which would follow the same protocol but would not absorb magnetic nanoparticles.

In vivo experiments

Animal testing

Template:Empty section

Clinical trials

Template:Expand section

The only hyperthermia setup suitable to treat humans has been developed at the Charité Medical School, Clinic of Radiation Therapy in Berlin.[9] Andreas Jordan's team in this hospital has performed clinical trials on patients with prostate cancers.[10]

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 J. Carrey, B. Mehdaoui, M. Respaud, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 083921 (2011).
  2. 2.0 2.1 L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey and M. Respaud, Rev. Sci. Instr. 79, 093909 (2008). http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3005
  3. R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, M. Zeisberger, D. Schüler, U. Heyen, I. Hilger and W. A. Kaiser, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 293, 80 (2005).
  4. R. Hergt, R. Hiergeist, I. Hilger, W. A. Kaiser, Y. Lapatnikov, S. Margel and U. Richter, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 270, 345 (2004).
  5. Armijo, L.M.; Brandt, Y.I.; Mathew, D.; Yadav, S.; Maestas, S.; Rivera, A.C.; Cook, N.C.; Withers, N.J.; Smolyakov, G.A.; Adolphi, N.L.; Monson, T.C.; Huber, D.L.; Smyth, H.D.C.; Osiński, M. Iron Oxide Nanocrystals for Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications. Nanomaterials 2012, 2, 134-146
  6. L.-M. Lacroix, R. Bel Malaki,J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, G. F. Goya and B. Chaudret, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 023911 (2009), http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4109
  7. M. Zeisberger, S. Dutz, R. Müller, R. Hergt, N. Matoussevitch, and H.Bönneman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 311, 224 (2005)
  8. B. Mehdaoui, A. Meffre, L.-M. Lacroix, J. Carrey, S. Lachaize, M. Respaud, M. Gougeon, B. Chaudret, http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4063
  9. A. Jordan et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 225, 118 (2001). http://vpd.ms.northwestern.edu/Publications_files/Lei/JMMM_225_118_2001.pdf
  10. M. Johannsen et al., Int. J. of Hyperthermia 21, 637 (2005). http://www.anamacap.fr/telechargement/hyperthermie-vo.pdf