|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{refimprove|date=June 2008}}
| | The name of the writer is Jayson. To play lacross is some thing he would by no means give up. Since I was eighteen I've been operating as a bookkeeper but soon my wife and I will begin our own business. I've always loved residing in Alaska.<br><br>Also visit my page ... [http://cspl.postech.ac.kr/zboard/Membersonly/144571 authentic psychic readings] |
| {{for|the British aerospace company|Reaction Engines Limited}}
| |
| A '''reaction engine''' is an [[engine|engine or motor]] which provides propulsion ([[thrust]]) by expelling [[reaction mass]], in accordance with [[Newton's third law of motion]]. This law of motion is most commonly paraphrased as: "For every action force there is an equal, but opposite, reaction force".
| |
| | |
| Examples include both [[jet engine]]s and [[rocket engine]]s, and more uncommon variations such as [[Hall effect thruster]]s, [[ion drive]]s, [[mass drivers]] and [[nuclear pulse propulsion]].
| |
| | |
| ==Energy use==
| |
| ===Propulsive efficiency===
| |
| {{main|propulsive efficiency}}
| |
| For all reaction engines which carry their propellant onboard prior to use (such as [[rocket engine]]s and [[electric propulsion]] drives) some energy must go into accelerating the reaction mass.
| |
| Every engine will waste some energy, but even assuming 100% efficiency, the engine will need energy amounting to
| |
| | |
| :<math>\begin{matrix} \frac{1}{2} \end{matrix} MV_e^2</math>
| |
| | |
| (where M is the mass of propellent expended and <math>V_e</math> is the exhaust velocity), which is simply the energy to accelerate the exhaust.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Propulsive efficiency.png|thumb|right|Due to energy carried away in the exhaust the energy efficiency of a reaction engine varies with the speed of the exhaust relative to the speed of the vehicle, this is called [[propulsive efficiency]], blue is the curve for rocket-like reaction engines, red is for air-breathing (duct) reaction engines]]
| |
| Comparing the rocket equation (which shows how much energy ends up in the final vehicle) and the above equation (which shows the total energy required) shows that even with 100% engine efficiency, certainly not all energy supplied ends up in the vehicle - some of it, indeed usually most of it, ends up as kinetic energy of the exhaust.
| |
| | |
| Interestingly, if the <math>I_{sp}</math> is fixed, for a mission delta-v, there is a particular <math>I_{sp}</math> that minimises the overall energy used by the rocket. This comes to an exhaust velocity of about ⅔ of the mission delta-v (see [[Tsiolkovsky rocket equation#Energy|the energy computed from the rocket equation]]). Drives with a specific impulse that is both high and fixed such as Ion thrusters have exhaust velocities that can be enormously higher than this ideal, and thus end up powersource limited and give very low thrust. Where the vehicle performance is power limited, e.g. if [[solar energy|solar power]] or nuclear power is used, then in the case of a large <math>v_{e}</math> the maximum acceleration is inversely proportional to it. Hence the time to reach a required delta-v is proportional to <math>v_{e}</math>. Thus the latter should not be too large.
| |
| | |
| On the other hand if the exhaust velocity can be made to vary so that at each instant it is equal and opposite to the vehicle velocity then the absolute minimum energy usage is achieved. When this is achieved, the exhaust stops in space {{note|frames||}} and has no kinetic energy; and the propulsive efficiency is 100% all the energy ends up in the vehicle (in principle such a drive would be 100% efficient, in practice there would be thermal losses from within the drive system and residual heat in the exhaust). However in most cases this uses an impractical quantity of propellant, but is a useful theoretical consideration.
| |
| | |
| Some drives (such as [[Variable specific impulse magnetoplasma rocket|VASIMR]] or [[electrodeless plasma thruster]]) actually can significantly vary their exhaust velocity. This can help reduce propellant usage and improve acceleration at different stages of the flight. However the best energetic performance and acceleration is still obtained when the exhaust velocity is close to the vehicle speed. Proposed ion and plasma drives usually have exhaust velocities enormously higher than that ideal (in the case of VASIMR the lowest quoted speed is around 15 km/s compared to a mission delta-v from high Earth orbit to Mars of about [[Delta-v#Delta-vs around the Solar System|4 km/s]]).
| |
| | |
| For a mission, for example, when launching from or landing on a planet, the effects of gravitational attraction and any atmospheric drag must be overcome by using fuel. It is typical to combine the effects of these and other effects into an effective mission [[delta-v]]. For example a launch mission to low Earth orbit requires about 9.3–10 km/s delta-v. These mission delta-vs are typically numerically integrated on a computer.
| |
| | |
| ===Cycle efficiency===
| |
| All reaction engines lose some energy, mostly as heat.
| |
| | |
| Different reaction engines have different efficiencies and losses. For example rocket engines can be up to 60-70% energy efficient in terms of accelerating the propellant. The rest is lost as heat and thermal radiation, primarily in the exhaust.
| |
| | |
| ===Oberth effect===
| |
| {{main|Oberth effect}}
| |
| Reaction engines are more energy efficient when they emit their reaction mass when the vehicle is travelling at high speed.
| |
| | |
| This is because the useful mechanical energy generated is simply force times distance, and when a thrust force is generated while the vehicle moves, then:
| |
| | |
| :<math>E = F \times d \;</math>
| |
| | |
| where F is the force and d is the distance moved.
| |
| | |
| Dividing by length of time of motion we get:
| |
| | |
| :<math> \frac E t = P = \frac {F \times d} t = F \times v</math>
| |
| | |
| Hence:
| |
| | |
| :<math> P = F \times v \;</math>
| |
| | |
| where P is the useful power and v is the speed.
| |
| | |
| Hence you want v to be as high as possible; and a stationary engine does no useful work.<ref>Note, that might seem to suggest that a stationary engine would not start to move. However, at low speeds the amount of energy needed to start to move tends to zero faster than the power does. So in practice it does move, as you would expect.</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Types of reaction engines==
| |
| *Rocket-like
| |
| **[[Rocket engine]]
| |
| **[[Electric propulsion]], including [[VASIMR]]
| |
| | |
| *Airbreathing
| |
| **[[Turbojet]]
| |
| **[[Turbofan]]
| |
| **[[Pulsejet]]
| |
| **[[Ramjet]]
| |
| **[[Scramjet]]
| |
| | |
| *Liquid
| |
| **[[Pump-jet]]
| |
| | |
| *Rotary
| |
| **[[Aeolipile]]
| |
| | |
| *Solid exhaust
| |
| **[[Mass driver]]
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Ion thruster]]
| |
| * [[Internal combustion engine]]
| |
| * [[Jet force]]
| |
| * [[List of plasma (physics) articles]]
| |
| | |
| ==Notes and references==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| {{Commons|Category:Reaction engines|Reaction engines}}
| |
| *[http://books.google.com/books?id=ACEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA70&dq=%22reaction+engine%22&ei=WjjuSsexC6quyATW56S6Cw#v=onepage&q=%22reaction%20engine%22&f=true Popular Science May 1945]
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Engine technology]]
| |
| [[Category:Aerospace engineering]]
| |
The name of the writer is Jayson. To play lacross is some thing he would by no means give up. Since I was eighteen I've been operating as a bookkeeper but soon my wife and I will begin our own business. I've always loved residing in Alaska.
Also visit my page ... authentic psychic readings