Main Page: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Blood gas tension''' refers to the [[partial pressure]] of gases in [[blood]].<ref name="pmid9563770">{{cite journal| author=Severinghaus JW, Astrup P, Murray JF| title=Blood gas analysis and critical care medicine. | journal=Am J Respir Crit Care Med | year= 1998 | volume= 157 | issue= 4 Pt 2 | pages= S114-22 | pmid=9563770 | doi= 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.nhlb1-9| pmc= | url= }}</ref>  There are several significant purposes for measuring gas tension;<ref name="pmid16215371">{{cite journal| author=Bendjelid K, Schütz N, Stotz M, Gerard I, Suter PM, Romand JA| title=Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in critically ill adults: clinical evaluation of a new sensor. | journal=Crit Care Med | year= 2005 | volume= 33 | issue= 10 | pages= 2203–6 | pmid=16215371 | doi= 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181734.26070.26| pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=16215371  }}</ref> the most common gas tensions measured are oxygen tension<ref name="pmid14736638">{{cite journal| author=Yildizdaş D, Yapicioğlu H, Yilmaz HL, Sertdemir Y| title=Correlation of simultaneously obtained capillary, venous, and arterial blood gases of patients in a paediatric intensive care unit. | journal=Arch Dis Child | year= 2004 | volume= 89 | issue= 2 | pages= 176–80 | pmid=14736638 | doi= 10.1136/adc.2002.016261| pmc=1719810 | url= }}</ref> (P<sub>x</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), the carbon dioxide tension<ref name="pmid14736638"/> (P<sub>x</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) and carbon monoxide tension<ref name="pmid14736638"/> (P<sub>x</sub>CO).  The ''x'' factor in the symbol for each would be replaced by the source of the gas being measured; "''a''" meaning [[artery|arterial]],<ref name="pmid14736638"/> "''A''" being alveolar,<ref name="pmid14736638"/> "''v''" being [[vein|venous]],<ref name="pmid14736638"/> "''c''" being [[capillary]].<ref name="pmid14736638"/>
[[Image:reinforced solids cube.jpg|thumb|Figure 1: Small cube of a material with reinforcing bars. The cube is cracked and the material above the crack is removed to show the reinforcement that crosses the crack.]]


==Oxygen tension==
In [[solid mechanics]], a '''reinforced solid''' is a [[brittle]] material that is reinforced by [[ductile]] bars or fibres. A common application is [[reinforced concrete]]. When the concrete cracks the tensile force in a crack is not carried any more by the concrete but by the steel reinforcing bars only. The reinforced concrete will continue to carry the load provided that sufficient reinforcement is present. A typical design problem is to find the smallest amount of reinforcement that can carry the [[Stress (mechanics)|stresses]] on a small cube (Fig. 1). This can be formulated as an [[Mathematical optimization|optimization]] problem.
;Arterial blood oxygen tension (normal)
'''P<sub>a</sub>O<sub>2</sub>''' — Partial pressure of oxygen at sea level (765 mmHg) in arterial blood is between 75 mmHg and 100 mmHg.<ref name="pmid9390851">{{cite journal| author=Shapiro BA| title=Temperature correction of blood gas values. | journal=Respir Care Clin N Am | year= 1995 | volume= 1 | issue= 1 | pages= 69–76 | pmid=9390851 | doi= | pmc= | url= }}</ref><ref name="pmid17652681">{{cite journal| author=Malatesha G, Singh NK, Bharija A, Rehani B, Goel A| title=Comparison of arterial and venous pH, bicarbonate, PCO2 and PO2 in initial emergency department assessment. | journal=Emerg Med J | year= 2007 | volume= 24 | issue= 8 | pages= 569–71 | pmid=17652681 | doi=10.1136/emj.2007.046979 | pmc=2660085  }}</ref><ref name="pmid14569318">{{cite journal| author=Chu YC, Chen CZ, Lee CH, Chen CW, Chang HY, Hsiue TR| title=Prediction of arterial blood gas values from venous blood gas values in patients with acute respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation. | journal=J Formos Med Assoc | year= 2003 | volume= 102 | issue= 8 | pages= 539–43 | pmid=14569318 | doi= | pmc= | url= }}</ref>


;Venous blood oxygen tension (normal)
==Optimization problem==
'''P<sub>v</sub>O<sub>2</sub>''' — Oxygen tension in venous blood at sea level is between 30 mmHg and 40 mmHg.<ref name="pmid14569318"/><ref name="pmid20018607">{{cite journal| author=Walkey AJ, Farber HW, O'Donnell C, Cabral H, Eagan JS, Philippides GJ| title=The accuracy of the central venous blood gas for acid-base monitoring. | journal=J Intensive Care Med | year= 2010 | volume= 25 | issue= 2 | pages= 104–10 | pmid=20018607 | doi=10.1177/0885066609356164 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20018607  }}</ref>


==Carbon dioxide tension==
The reinforcement is directed in the x, y and z direction. The reinforcement ratio is defined in a cross-section of a reinforcing bar as the reinforcement area <math>A_{r}</math> over the total area <math>A</math>, which is the brittle material area plus the reinforcement area.
Carbon dioxide is a by-product of food metabolism and in high amounts has toxic effects including: [[dyspnea]], [[acidosis]] and [[altered consciousness]].<ref name="pmid2535633">{{cite journal| author=Adrogué HJ, Rashad MN, Gorin AB, Yacoub J, Madias NE| title=Assessing acid-base status in circulatory failure. Differences between arterial and central venous blood. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 1989 | volume= 320 | issue= 20 | pages= 1312–6 | pmid=2535633 | doi=10.1056/NEJM198905183202004 | pmc= | url= }}</ref>


;Arterial blood carbon dioxide tension
:<math>\rho_{x}</math> = <math>A_{rx}</math> / <math>A_{x}</math>
'''P<sub>a</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>''' — Partial pressure of carbon dioxide at sea level (765 mmHg) in arterial blood is between 35 mmHg and 45 mmHg.<ref name="pmid9794863">{{cite journal| author=Williams AJ| title=ABC of oxygen: assessing and interpreting arterial blood gases and acid-base balance. | journal=BMJ | year= 1998 | volume= 317 | issue= 7167 | pages= 1213–6 | pmid=9794863 | doi= 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1213| pmc=1114160 | url= }}</ref>


;Venous blood carbon dioxide tension
:<math>\rho_{y}</math> = <math>A_{ry}</math> / <math>A_{y}</math>
'''P<sub>v</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>''' — Partial pressure of carbon dioxide at sea level in venous blood is between 40 mmHg and 50 mmHg.<ref name="pmid9794863"/>


==Carbon Monoxide tension==
:<math>\rho_{z}</math> = <math>A_{rz}</math> / <math>A_{z}</math>
;Arterial Carbon Monoxide tension (normal)
'''P<sub>a</sub>CO''' — Partial pressure of CO at sea level (765 mmHg) in arterial blood is approximately 0.02. It can be slightly higher in smokers and people living in dense urban areas.


==Significance==
In case of reinforced concrete the reinforcement ratios are usually between 0.1% and 2%. The [[yield stress]] of the reinforcement is denoted by <math>f_{y}</math>. The [[Stress (mechanics)|stress tensor]] of the brittle material is
The partial pressure of gas in blood is significant because it is directly related to ventilation and oxygenation.<ref name="pmid2661120">{{cite journal| author=Hansen JE| title=Arterial blood gases. | journal=Clin Chest Med | year= 1989 | volume= 10 | issue= 2 | pages= 227–37 | pmid=2661120 | doi= | pmc= | url= }}</ref> When used alongside the pH balance of the blood the PaCO2 and HCO3 (and Lactate) lets the health care practitioner know what interventions need to be made, if any.<ref name="pmid2661120"/><ref name="pmid3144222">{{cite journal| author=Tobin MJ| title=Respiratory monitoring in the intensive care unit. | journal=Am Rev Respir Dis | year= 1988 | volume= 138 | issue= 6 | pages= 1625–42 | pmid=3144222 | doi= 10.1164/ajrccm/138.6.1625| pmc= | url= }}</ref>


== Equations ==
:<math>
\left[{\begin{matrix}
\sigma _{xx} - \rho_{x} f_{y} & \sigma _{xy} & \sigma _{xz} \\
\sigma _{xy} & \sigma _{yy} - \rho_{y} f_{y} & \sigma _{yz} \\
\sigma _{xz} & \sigma _{yz} & \sigma _{zz} - \rho_{z} f_{y} \\
\end{matrix}}\right]
</math>.


=== Oxygen content ===
This can be interpreted as the stress tensor of the composite material minus the stresses carried by the reinforcement at yielding. This formulation is accurate for reinforcement ratio's smaller than 5%. It is assumed that the brittle material has no tensile strength. (In case of reinforced concrete this assumption is necessary because the concrete has small shrinkage cracks.) Therefore, the [[principal stresses]] of the brittle material need to be compression. The principal stresses of a stress tensor are its [[eigenvalues]].
:<math>C_a O_2 = 1.36 * Hgb * \frac{S_a O_2}{100} + 0.0031 * P_a O_2</math>
The constant, 1.36, is the amount of oxygen (ml at 1 atmosphere) bound per gram of hemoglobin. The exact value of this constant varies from 1.34 to 1.39, depending on the reference and the way it is derived. The constant 0.0031 represents the amount of oxygen dissolved in plasma. The dissolved oxygen term is generally small relative to the hemoglobin-bound oxygen, but becomes significant at very high PaO2 (as in a hyperbaric chamber) or in severe anemia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-users.med.cornell.edu/~spon/picu/calc/oxycont.htm|accessdate=7 October 2014}}</ref>


=== Oxygen saturation ===
The optimization problem is formulated as follows. Minimize <math>\rho_{x}</math> + <math>\rho_{y}</math> + <math>\rho_{z}</math> subject to all eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor are less than or equal to zero ([[Positive-definite matrix|negative-semidefinite]]). Additional constraints are <math>\rho_{x}</math> ≥ 0, <math>\rho_{y}</math> ≥ 0, <math>\rho_{z}</math> ≥ 0.
:<math> SO_2 = (\frac{23,400}{pO_2^3 + 150 pO_2} +1)^{-1}</math>
 
This is an estimation and does not account for differences in temperature, pH and concentrations of 2,3 DPG.<ref>Severinghaus, J. W. Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations. J Appl Physiol. 46(3): 599-602. 1979.</ref>
==Solution==
 
The solution to this problem can be presented in a form most suitable for hand calculations.<ref name="A"/><ref name="N"/> It can be presented in graphical form.<ref name="F"/> It can also be presented in a form most suitable for computer implementation.<ref name="H1"/><ref name="H2"/> In this article the latter method is shown.
 
There are 12 possible reinforcement solutions to this problem, which are shown in the table below. Every row contains a possible solution. The first column contains the number of a solution. The second column gives conditions for which a solution is valid. Columns 3, 4 and 5 give the formulas for calculating the reinforcement ratios.
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|  || Condition || <math>\rho_{x}</math> <math>f_{y} </math> || <math>\rho_{y}</math> <math>f_{y}</math>  || <math>\rho_{z}</math> <math>f_{y}</math>
|-
| 1 || <math>I_{1}</math> ≤ 0, <math>I_{2}</math> ≥ 0, <math>I_{3}</math> ≤ 0 || 0 || 0 || 0
|-
| 2 || <math>\sigma_{yy}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{yz}</math> > 0<br/><math>I_{1}(\sigma_{yy}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{yz}) - I_{3}</math> ≤ 0<br/><math>I_{2}(\sigma_{yy}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{yz}) - I_{3}(\sigma_{yy}+\sigma_{zz})</math> ≥ 0 || <math>\frac{I_{3}}{\sigma_{yy} \sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{yz}}</math> || 0 || 0
|-
| 3 || <math>\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{xz}</math> > 0<br/><math>I_{1}(\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{xz}) - I_{3}</math> ≤ 0<br/><math>I_{2}(\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{xz}) - I_{3}(\sigma_{xx}+\sigma_{zz})</math> ≥ 0 || 0 || <math>\frac{I_{3}}{\sigma_{xx} \sigma_{zz} - \sigma^2_{xz}}</math> || 0
|-
| 4 || <math>\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{yy} - \sigma^2_{xy}</math> > 0<br/><math>I_{1}(\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{yy} - \sigma^2_{xy}) - I_{3}</math> ≤ 0<br/><math>I_{2}(\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{yy} - \sigma^2_{xy}) - I_{3}(\sigma_{xx}+\sigma_{yy})</math> ≥ 0 || 0 || 0 || <math>\frac{I_{3}}{\sigma_{xx} \sigma_{yy} - \sigma^2_{xy}}</math>
|-
| 5 || <math>\sigma_{xx}<0</math> || 0 || <math>\sigma_{yy}- \frac{\sigma^2_{xy}}{\sigma_{xx}} +|\sigma_{yz}-\frac{\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{xx}}|</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz}-\frac{\sigma^2_{xz}}{\sigma_{xx}}+|\sigma_{yz}-\frac{\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{xx}}|</math>
|-
| 6 || <math>\sigma_{yy}<0</math> || <math>\sigma_{xx}-\frac{\sigma^2_{xy}}{\sigma_{yy}} +|\sigma_{xz}-\frac{\sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{yy}}|</math> || 0 || <math>\sigma_{zz}-\frac{\sigma^2_{yz}}{\sigma_{yy}} +|\sigma_{xz}-\frac{\sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{yy}}|</math>
|-
| 7 || <math>\sigma_{zz}<0</math> || <math>\sigma_{xx}-\frac{\sigma^2_{xz}}{\sigma_{zz}} +|\sigma_{xy}-\frac{\sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}}{\sigma_{zz}}|</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} -\frac{\sigma^2_{yz}}{\sigma_{zz}} +|\sigma_{xy} -\frac{\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{yz}}{\sigma_{zz}}|</math> || 0
|-
| 8 || <math>\sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> ≥ 0<br/><math>\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy} + \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy} + \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}</math> ≥ 0<br/> || <math>\sigma_{xx} + \sigma_{xz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} + \sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz} + \sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xz}</math>
|-
| 9 || <math>- \sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> ≥ 0<br/><math>- \sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy} - \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy} + \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}</math> ≥ 0<br/> || <math>\sigma_{xx} - \sigma_{xz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} - \sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz} - \sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xz}</math>
|-
| 10 || <math>\sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> ≥ 0<br/><math>\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy} - \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy} - \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}</math> ≥ 0<br/> || <math>\sigma_{xx} - \sigma_{xz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} + \sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz} + \sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xz}</math>
|-
| 11 || <math>- \sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> ≥ 0<br/><math>- \sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy} + \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy} - \sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}</math> ≥ 0<br/> || <math>\sigma_{xx} + \sigma_{xz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} - \sigma_{yz} - \sigma_{xy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz} - \sigma_{yz} + \sigma_{xz}</math>
|-
| 12 || <math>\sigma_{xy}\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{yz}<0</math> || <math>\sigma_{xx} - \frac{\sigma_{xz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{yz}}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy} - \frac{\sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xy}}{\sigma_{xz}}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz} - \frac{\sigma_{yz}\sigma_{xz}}{\sigma_{xy}}</math>
|-
|}
 
<math>I_{1}</math>, <math>I_{2}</math> and <math>I_{3}</math> are the [[Stress (mechanics)|stress invariants]] of the composite material stress tensor.
 
The algorithm for obtaining the right solution is simple. Compute the reinforcement ratios of each possible solution that fulfills the conditions. Further ignore solutions with a reinforcement ratio less than zero. Compute the values of <math>\rho_{x}</math> + <math>\rho_{y}</math> + <math>\rho_{z}</math> and select the solution for which this value is smallest. The principal stresses in the brittle material can be computed as the eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor, for example by [[Jacobi method|Jacobi's method]].
 
The formulas can be simply checked by substituting the reinforcement ratios in the brittle material stress tensor and calculating the invariants. The first invariant needs to be less than or equal to zero. The second invariant needs to be greater than or equal to zero. These provide the conditions in column 2. For solution 2 to 12, the third invariant needs to be zero.<ref name="F"/>
 
==Examples==
 
The table below shows computed reinforcement ratios for 10 stress tensors. The applied reinforcement yield stress is <math>f_{y}</math> = 500 N/mm². The [[Density|mass density]] of the reinforcing bars is 7800&nbsp;kg/m<sup>3</sup>. In the table <math>\sigma_{m}</math> is the computed brittle material stress. <math>m_{r}</math> is the optimised amount of reinforcement.
 
{| class="wikitable"
|- style="height: 30px;"
| width="50pt" | || <math>\sigma_{xx}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yy}</math> || <math>\sigma_{zz}</math> || <math>\sigma_{yz}</math> || <math>\sigma_{xz}</math> || <math>\sigma_{xy}</math> || || <math>\rho_{x}</math> || <math>\rho_{y}</math> || <math>\rho_{z}</math> || <math>\sigma_{m}</math> || <math>m_{r}</math>
|-
| 1 || 1 N/mm²|| 2 N/mm²|| 3 N/mm²|| -4 N/mm²|| 3 N/mm²|| -1 N/mm²|| || 1.00%|| 1.40%|| 2.00%|| -10.65 N/mm² || 343&nbsp;kg/m<sup>3</sup>
|-
| 2 || -5 || 2 || 3 || 4 || 3 || 1 || || 0.00 || 1.36 || 1.88 || -10.31 || 253
|-
| 3 || -5 || -6 || 3 || 4 || 3 || 1 || || 0.00 || 0.00 || 1.69 || -10.15 || 132
|-
| 4 || -5 || -6 || -6 || 4 || 3 || 1 || || 0.00 || 0.00 || 0.00 || -10.44 || 0
|-
| 5 || 1 || 2 || 3 || -4 || -3 || -1 || || 0.60 || 1.00 || 2.00 || -10.58 || 281
|-
| 6 || 1 || -2 || 3 || -4 || 3 || 2 || || 0.50 || 0.13 || 1.80 || -10.17 || 190
|-
| 7 || 1 || 2 || 3 || 4 || 2 || -1 || || 0.40 || 1.00 || 1.80 || -9.36 || 250
|-
| 8 || 2 || -2 || 5 || 2 || -4 || 6 || || 2.40 || 0.40 || 1.40 || -15.21 || 328
|-
| 9 || -3 || -7 || 0 || 2 || -4 || 6 || || 0.89 || 0.00 || 0.57 || -14.76 || 114
|-
| 10 || 3 || 0 || 10 || 0 || 5 || 0 || || 1.60 || 0.00 || 3.00 || -10.00 || 359
|-
|}
 
==Extension==
 
The above solution can be very useful to design reinforcement, however, it has some practical limitations. The following aspects can be included too if the problem is solved using [[convex optimization]].
*Multiple stress tensors in one point due to multiple loads on the structure instead of only one stress tensor,
*A constraint imposed to crack widths at the surface of the structure,
*Shear stress in the crack (aggregate interlock),
*Reinforcement in other directions than x, y and z,
*Reinforcing bars that already have been placed in the reinforcement design process,
*The whole structure instead of one small material cube in turn.
*Large reinforcement ratio's
*Compression reinforcement
 
Minimise |<math>\rho_{1}</math>| + |<math>\rho_{2}</math>| + |<math>\rho_{3}</math>|.
 
Variables <math>\rho_{xx}</math>, <math>\rho_{yy}</math>, <math>\rho_{zz}</math>, <math>\rho_{yz}</math>, <math>\rho_{xz}</math>, <math>\rho_{xy}</math>.
 
Constraint Eigenvalues of <math>T_{ij}</math> ≤ 0.
 
<math>\rho_{1}</math>, <math>\rho_{2}</math> and <math>\rho_{3}</math> are the eigenvalues of the reinforcement tensor. <math>T_{ij}</math> is the brittle material stress tensor.
 
:<math>
T_{ij} =
\left[{\begin{matrix}
\sigma_{xx} & \sigma_{xy} & \sigma_{xz} \\
\sigma_{xy} & \sigma_{yy} & \sigma_{yz} \\
\sigma_{xz} & \sigma_{yz} & \sigma_{zz} \\
\end{matrix}}\right]_{ij}
- f_{y} \sum_{k}
 
\left[{\begin{matrix}
\rho_{xx k} & \rho_{xy k} & \rho_{xz k} \\
\rho_{xy k} & \rho_{yy k} & \rho_{yz k} \\
\rho_{xz k} & \rho_{yz k} & \rho_{zz k} \\
\end{matrix}}\right]
- f_{y}
\left[{\begin{matrix}
\rho_{xx} & \rho_{xy} & \rho_{xz} \\
\rho_{xy} & \rho_{yy} & \rho_{yz} \\
\rho_{xz} & \rho_{yz} & \rho_{zz} \\
\end{matrix}}\right]
</math>.
<math>i</math> is the number of the load combination on the structure related to the ultimate limit state.
<math>j</math> is the number of the material point.
<math>k</math> is the number of the rebar that is already placed.


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Fick's laws of diffusion]]
*[[Reinforced concrete]]
* [[Alveolar air equation]]
*[[Solid mechanics]]
*[[Structural engineering]]


==References==
==References==
<references/>


[[Category:Hematology]]
<references>
[[Category:Respiratory therapy]]
<ref name="A">Andreasen B.S., Nielsen M.P., Armiering af beton I det tredimesionale tilfælde, Bygningsstatiske meddelelser, Vol. 5 (1985), No. 2-3, pp. 25-79 (in Danish).</ref>
[[Category:Pulmonology]]
<ref name="F">Foster S.J., Marti P., Mojsilovic N., Design of Reinforced Concrete Solids Using Stress Analysis, ACI Structural Journal, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 758-764.</ref>
<ref name="H1">Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of reinforcement for solid concrete", Heron, Vol. 53 (2008), No. 4. pp. 247-271.</ref>
<ref name="H2">Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of optimal concrete reinforcement in three dimensions", Proceedings of EURO-C 2010, Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures, pp. 639-646, Editors Bicanic et al. Publisher CRC Press, London.</ref>
<ref name="N">Nielsen M.P., Hoang L.C., Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity, third edition, CRC Press, 2011.</ref>
</references>
 
[[Category:Composite materials]]
[[Category:Plasticity (physics)]]
[[Category:Structural analysis]]
[[Category:Concrete]]

Revision as of 17:16, 18 August 2014

Figure 1: Small cube of a material with reinforcing bars. The cube is cracked and the material above the crack is removed to show the reinforcement that crosses the crack.

In solid mechanics, a reinforced solid is a brittle material that is reinforced by ductile bars or fibres. A common application is reinforced concrete. When the concrete cracks the tensile force in a crack is not carried any more by the concrete but by the steel reinforcing bars only. The reinforced concrete will continue to carry the load provided that sufficient reinforcement is present. A typical design problem is to find the smallest amount of reinforcement that can carry the stresses on a small cube (Fig. 1). This can be formulated as an optimization problem.

Optimization problem

The reinforcement is directed in the x, y and z direction. The reinforcement ratio is defined in a cross-section of a reinforcing bar as the reinforcement area over the total area , which is the brittle material area plus the reinforcement area.

= /
= /
= /

In case of reinforced concrete the reinforcement ratios are usually between 0.1% and 2%. The yield stress of the reinforcement is denoted by . The stress tensor of the brittle material is

.

This can be interpreted as the stress tensor of the composite material minus the stresses carried by the reinforcement at yielding. This formulation is accurate for reinforcement ratio's smaller than 5%. It is assumed that the brittle material has no tensile strength. (In case of reinforced concrete this assumption is necessary because the concrete has small shrinkage cracks.) Therefore, the principal stresses of the brittle material need to be compression. The principal stresses of a stress tensor are its eigenvalues.

The optimization problem is formulated as follows. Minimize + + subject to all eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor are less than or equal to zero (negative-semidefinite). Additional constraints are ≥ 0, ≥ 0, ≥ 0.

Solution

The solution to this problem can be presented in a form most suitable for hand calculations.[1][2] It can be presented in graphical form.[3] It can also be presented in a form most suitable for computer implementation.[4][5] In this article the latter method is shown.

There are 12 possible reinforcement solutions to this problem, which are shown in the table below. Every row contains a possible solution. The first column contains the number of a solution. The second column gives conditions for which a solution is valid. Columns 3, 4 and 5 give the formulas for calculating the reinforcement ratios.

Condition
1 ≤ 0, ≥ 0, ≤ 0 0 0 0
2 > 0
≤ 0
≥ 0
0 0
3 > 0
≤ 0
≥ 0
0 0
4 > 0
≤ 0
≥ 0
0 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 ≥ 0
≥ 0
9 ≥ 0
≥ 0
10 ≥ 0
≥ 0
11 ≥ 0
≥ 0
12

, and are the stress invariants of the composite material stress tensor.

The algorithm for obtaining the right solution is simple. Compute the reinforcement ratios of each possible solution that fulfills the conditions. Further ignore solutions with a reinforcement ratio less than zero. Compute the values of + + and select the solution for which this value is smallest. The principal stresses in the brittle material can be computed as the eigenvalues of the brittle material stress tensor, for example by Jacobi's method.

The formulas can be simply checked by substituting the reinforcement ratios in the brittle material stress tensor and calculating the invariants. The first invariant needs to be less than or equal to zero. The second invariant needs to be greater than or equal to zero. These provide the conditions in column 2. For solution 2 to 12, the third invariant needs to be zero.[3]

Examples

The table below shows computed reinforcement ratios for 10 stress tensors. The applied reinforcement yield stress is = 500 N/mm². The mass density of the reinforcing bars is 7800 kg/m3. In the table is the computed brittle material stress. is the optimised amount of reinforcement.

1 1 N/mm² 2 N/mm² 3 N/mm² -4 N/mm² 3 N/mm² -1 N/mm² 1.00% 1.40% 2.00% -10.65 N/mm² 343 kg/m3
2 -5 2 3 4 3 1 0.00 1.36 1.88 -10.31 253
3 -5 -6 3 4 3 1 0.00 0.00 1.69 -10.15 132
4 -5 -6 -6 4 3 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10.44 0
5 1 2 3 -4 -3 -1 0.60 1.00 2.00 -10.58 281
6 1 -2 3 -4 3 2 0.50 0.13 1.80 -10.17 190
7 1 2 3 4 2 -1 0.40 1.00 1.80 -9.36 250
8 2 -2 5 2 -4 6 2.40 0.40 1.40 -15.21 328
9 -3 -7 0 2 -4 6 0.89 0.00 0.57 -14.76 114
10 3 0 10 0 5 0 1.60 0.00 3.00 -10.00 359

Extension

The above solution can be very useful to design reinforcement, however, it has some practical limitations. The following aspects can be included too if the problem is solved using convex optimization.

  • Multiple stress tensors in one point due to multiple loads on the structure instead of only one stress tensor,
  • A constraint imposed to crack widths at the surface of the structure,
  • Shear stress in the crack (aggregate interlock),
  • Reinforcement in other directions than x, y and z,
  • Reinforcing bars that already have been placed in the reinforcement design process,
  • The whole structure instead of one small material cube in turn.
  • Large reinforcement ratio's
  • Compression reinforcement

Minimise || + || + ||.

Variables , , , , , .

Constraint Eigenvalues of ≤ 0.

, and are the eigenvalues of the reinforcement tensor. is the brittle material stress tensor.

.

is the number of the load combination on the structure related to the ultimate limit state. is the number of the material point. is the number of the rebar that is already placed.

See also

References

  1. Andreasen B.S., Nielsen M.P., Armiering af beton I det tredimesionale tilfælde, Bygningsstatiske meddelelser, Vol. 5 (1985), No. 2-3, pp. 25-79 (in Danish).
  2. Nielsen M.P., Hoang L.C., Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity, third edition, CRC Press, 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Foster S.J., Marti P., Mojsilovic N., Design of Reinforced Concrete Solids Using Stress Analysis, ACI Structural Journal, Nov.-Dec. 2003, pp. 758-764.
  4. Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of reinforcement for solid concrete", Heron, Vol. 53 (2008), No. 4. pp. 247-271.
  5. Hoogenboom P.C.J., De Boer A., "Computation of optimal concrete reinforcement in three dimensions", Proceedings of EURO-C 2010, Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures, pp. 639-646, Editors Bicanic et al. Publisher CRC Press, London.