Malecot's method of coancestry: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Theoneandonlyduncan
No edit summary
en>Yobot
m Tagging + other fixes, removed underlinked tag using AWB (10392)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Renormalization and regularization}}
Andrew Berryhill is what his spouse loves to call him and he totally digs that title. To play domino is some thing I truly appreciate performing. Office supervising is my profession. I've always loved residing in Kentucky but now I'm contemplating other choices.<br><br>my web page - [http://www.weddingwall.com.au/groups/easy-advice-for-successful-personal-development-today/ free online tarot card readings]
 
In [[mathematics]] and [[theoretical physics]], '''[[Riemann zeta function|zeta function]] regularization''' is a type of [[regularization (physics)|regularization]] or [[summability method]] that assigns finite values to  divergent sums or products, and in particular can be used to define determinants and traces of some [[self-adjoint operator]]s. The technique is now commonly applied to problems in physics, but has its origins in attempts to give precise meanings to ill-conditioned sums appearing in [[number theory]].
 
==Definition==
 
There are several different summation methods called zeta function regularization for defining the sum of a possibly divergent series ''a''<sub>1</sub> + ''a''<sub>2</sub> + ....
 
One method is to define its zeta regularized sum to be ζ<sub>''A''</sub>(&minus;1) if this is defined, where the zeta function is defined for Re(''s'') large by
:<math> \zeta_A(s) = \frac{1}{a_1^s}+\frac{1}{a_2^s} +\cdots</math>
if this sum converges, and by [[analytic continuation]] elsewhere. In the case when ''a''<sub>''n''</sub> = ''n'' the zeta function is the ordinary [[Riemann zeta function]], and this method was used by Euler to "sum" the series [[1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...]] to ζ(&minus;1) = &minus;1/12.
 
{{harvtxt|Hawking|1977}} showed that in flat space, in which the eigenvalues of Laplacians are known, the [[zeta function (operator)|zeta function]] corresponding to the partition function can be computed explicitly. Consider a scalar field ''φ'' contained in a large box of volume ''V'' in flat spacetime at the temperature ''T=β<sup>-1</sup>''. The [[partition function (quantum field theory)|partition function]] is defined by a [[path integral formulation|path integral]] over all fields ''φ'' on the Euclidean space obtained by putting ''τ=it'' which are zero on the walls of the box and which are periodic in ''τ'' with period ''β''. In this situation from the partition function he computes energy, entropy and pressure of the radiation of the field ''φ''. In case of flat spaces the eigenvalues appearing in the physical quantities are generally known, while in case of curved space they are  not known: in this case asymptotic methods are needed.
 
Another method defines the possibly divergent infinite product ''a''<sub>1</sub>''a''<sub>2</sub>.... to be  exp(&minus;ζ&prime;<sub>''A''</sub>(0)). {{harvtxt|Ray|Singer|1971}} used this to define the [[determinant]] of a positive [[self-adjoint operator]] ''A'' (the [[Laplacian operator|Laplacian]] of a [[Riemannian manifold]] in their application) with [[eigenvalue]]s ''a''<sub>1</sub>, ''a''<sub>2</sub>, ...., and in this case the zeta function is formally the trace of ''A''<sup>&minus;''s''</sup>. {{harvtxt|Minakshisundaram|Pleijel|1949}} showed that if ''A'' is the Laplacian of a compact Riemannian manifold then the [[Minakshisundaram–Pleijel zeta function]]  converges and has an analytic continuation as a meromorphic function to all complex numbers, and {{harvtxt|Seeley|1967}} extended this to [[Elliptic_differential_operator|elliptic pseudo-differential operator]]s ''A'' on compact Riemannian manifolds. So for such operators one can define the determinant using zeta function regularization. See "[[analytic torsion]]."
 
{{harvtxt|Hawking|1977}} suggested using this idea to evaluate path integrals in curved spacetimes. He studied zeta function regularization in order to calculate the partition functions for thermal graviton and matter's quanta in curved background such as on the horizon of black holes and on de Sitter background using the relation by the inverse [[Mellin transform|Mellin transformation]] to the trace of the kernel of [[heat equation]]s.
 
==Example==
 
The first example in which zeta function regularization is available appears in the Casimir effect, which is in a flat space with the bulk contributions of the quantum field in three space dimensions. In this case we must calculate the value of Riemann zeta function at ''-3'', which diverges explicitly. However, it can be [[analytic continuation|analytically continued]] to ''s=-3'' where hopefully there is no pole, thus giving a finite value to the expression. A detailed example of this regularization at work is given in the article on the detail example of the [[Casimir effect#Derivation of Casimir effect assuming zeta-regularization|Casimir effect]], where the resulting sum is very explicitly the [[Riemann zeta function|Riemann zeta-function]] (and where the seemingly legerdemain analytic continuation removes an additive infinity, leaving a physically significant finite number).
 
An example of zeta-function regularization is the calculation of the [[vacuum expectation value]] of the [[energy]] of a particle field in [[quantum field theory]]. More generally, the zeta-function approach can be used to regularize the whole [[energy-momentum tensor]] in curved spacetime. {{ref|Mo97}} {{ref|BCEMZ}}
 
The unregulated value of the energy is given by a summation over the [[zero-point energy]] of all of the excitation modes of the vacuum:
 
:<math>\langle 0|T_{00} |0\rangle = \sum_n \frac{\hbar |\omega_n|}{2}</math>
 
Here, <math>T_{00}</math> is the zeroth component of the energy-momentum tensor and the sum (which may be an integral) is understood to extend over all (positive and negative) energy modes <math>\omega_n</math>; the absolute value reminding us that the energy is taken to be positive. This sum, as written, is usually infinite (<math>\omega_n</math> is typically linear in n). The sum may be [[regularization (physics)|regularized]] by writing it as
 
:<math>\langle 0|T_{00}(s) |0\rangle =
\sum_n \frac{\hbar |\omega_n|}{2} |\omega_n|^{-s}</math>
 
where ''s'' is some parameter, taken to be a [[complex number]]. For large, [[real number|real]] ''s'' greater than 4 (for three-dimensional space), the sum is manifestly finite, and thus may often be evaluated theoretically.
 
The zeta-regularization is useful as it can often be used in a way such that the various symmetries of the physical system are preserved. Zeta-function regularization is used in [[conformal field theory]], [[renormalization]] and in fixing the critical [[spacetime]] dimension of [[string theory]].
 
==Relation to other regularizations==
 
We can ask if are there any relation to the [[dimensional regularization]] originated by the Feynman diagram. But now we may say they are equivalent each other. ( see {{ref|BCEMZ}}.) However the main advantage of the zeta regularization is that it can be used whenever the dimensional regularization fails, for example if there are matrices or tensors inside the calculations <math> \epsilon _{i,j,k} </math>
 
==Relation to Dirichlet series==
 
Zeta-function regularization gives a nice analytic structure to any sums over an [[arithmetic function]] ''f''(''n''). Such sums are known as [[Dirichlet series]]. The regularized form
 
:<math>\tilde{f}(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty f(n)n^{-s}</math>
 
converts divergences of the sum into [[simple pole]]s on the complex ''s''-plane.  In numerical calculations, the zeta-function regularization is inappropriate, as it is extremely slow to converge. For numerical purposes, a more rapidly converging sum is the exponential regularization, given by
 
:<math>F(t)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty f(n) e^{-tn}.</math>
 
This is sometimes called the [[Z-transform]] of ''f'', where ''z''&nbsp;=&nbsp;exp(&minus;''t''). The analytic structure of the exponential and zeta-regularizations are related.  By expanding the exponential sum as a [[Laurent series]]
 
:<math>F(t)=\frac{a_N}{t^N} + \frac{a_{N-1}}{t^{N-1}} + \cdots</math>
 
one finds that the zeta-series has the structure
 
:<math>\tilde{f}(s) = \frac{a_N}{s-N} + \cdots. \, </math>
 
The structure of the exponential and zeta-regulators are related by means of the [[Mellin transform]]. The one may be converted to the other by making use of the integral representation of the [[Gamma function]]:
 
:<math>\Gamma(s+1)=\int_0^\infty x^s e^{-x} \, dx</math>
 
which lead to the identity
 
:<math>\Gamma(s+1) \tilde{f}(s+1) = \int_0^\infty t^s F(t) \, dt</math>
 
relating the exponential and zeta-regulators, and converting poles in the s-plane to divergent terms in the Laurent series.
 
==Heat kernel regularization==
The sum
:<math>f(s)=\sum_n a_n e^{-s|\omega_n|}</math>
 
is sometimes called a '''heat kernel''' or a '''heat-kernel regularized sum'''; this name stems from the idea that the <math>\omega_n</math> can sometimes be understood as eigenvalues of the [[heat kernel]]. In mathematics, such a sum is known as a generalized [[Dirichlet series]]; its use for averaging is known as an [[Abelian mean]]. It is closely related to the [[Laplace–Stieltjes transform]], in that
 
:<math>f(s)=\int_0^\infty e^{-st} \, d\alpha(t)</math>
 
where <math>\alpha(t)</math> is a [[step function]], with steps of <math>a_n</math> at <math>t=|\omega_n|</math>.  A number of theorems for the convergence of such a series exist. For example, by the Hardy-Littlewood Tauberian theorem, if {{ref|Apostol}}
 
:<math>L=\limsup_{n\to\infty} \frac{\log\vert\sum_{k=1}^n a_k\vert}{|\omega_n|}</math>
 
then the series for <math>f(s)</math> converges in the half-plane <math>\Re(s)>L</math> and is [[uniformly convergent]] on every [[compact subset]] of the half-plane <math>\Re(s)>L</math>. In almost all applications to physics, one has <math>L=0</math>
 
==History==
Much of the early work establishing the convergence and equivalence of series regularized with the heat kernel and zeta function regularization methods was done by [[G.H. Hardy]] and [[J. E. Littlewood]] in 1916{{ref|Hard16}} and is based on the application of the [[Cahen–Mellin integral]]. The effort was made in order to obtain values for various ill-defined, [[conditionally convergent]] sums appearing in [[number theory]].
 
In terms of application as the regulator in physical problems, before {{harvtxt|Hawking|1977}}, J. Stuart Dowker and Raymond Critchley in 1976 proposed a zeta-function regularization method for quantum physical problems. {{ref|Do76}}. Emilio Elizalde and others have also proposed a method based on the zeta regularization for the integrals <math> \int_{a}^{\infty}x^{m-s}dx </math> , here <math> x^{-s} </math> is a regulator and the divergent integral depends on the numbers <math> \zeta (s-m) </math> in the limit <math> s \to 0 </math> see [[renormalization]]. Also unlike other regularizations such as [[dimensional regularization]] and analytic regularization, zeta regularization has no counterterms and gives only finite results.
 
==See also==
* [[Generating function]]
* [[Perron's formula]]
* [[Renormalization]]
* [[1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·]]
* [[analytic torsion]]
* [[Ramanujan summation]]
* [[Minakshisundaram–Pleijel zeta function]]
* [[zeta function (operator)]]
 
==References==
 
* {{note|Apostol}} Tom M. Apostol, "Modular Functions and Dirichlet Series in Number Theory", "Springer-Verlag New York. (See Chapter 8.)"
* {{note|BCEMZ}}A. Bytsenko, G. Cognola,  E. Elizalde,  V. Moretti and S. Zerbini, "Analytic Aspects of Quantum Fields", World Scientific Publishing, 2003,  ISBN 981-238-364-6
* {{note|Hard16}}G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood, "Contributions to the Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function and the Theory of the Distribution of Primes", ''Acta Mathematica'', '''41'''(1916) pp.&nbsp;119–196. ''(See, for example, theorem 2.12)''
* {{Citation | last1=Hawking | first1=S. W. | author1-link=Stephen Hawking | title=Zeta function regularization of path integrals in curved spacetime | doi=10.1007/BF01626516 | mr=0524257 | year=1977 | journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics | issn=0010-3616 | volume=55 | issue=2 | pages=133–148|bibcode = 1977CMaPh..55..133H }}
* {{note|Mo97}} V. Moretti, "Direct z-function approach and renormalization of one-loop stress tensor in curved spacetimes'', ''Phys. Rev.D 56, 7797 ''(1997).
* {{Citation | last1=Minakshisundaram | first1=S. | last2=Pleijel | first2=Å. | title=Some properties of the eigenfunctions of the Laplace-operator on Riemannian manifolds | url=http://math.ca/10.4153/CJM-1949-021-5 | doi=10.4153/CJM-1949-021-5 | mr=0031145 | year=1949 | journal=[[Canadian Journal of Mathematics]] | issn=0008-414X | volume=1 | pages=242–256}}
* {{Citation | last1=Ray | first1=D. B. | last2=Singer | first2=I. M. | title=''R''-torsion and the Laplacian on Riemannian manifolds. | doi=10.1016/0001-8708(71)90045-4 | mr=0295381 | year=1971 | journal=Advances in Math. | volume=7 | pages=145–210}}
* García Moreta, José Javier http://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/498 The Application of Zeta Regularization Method to the Calculation of Certain Divergent Series and Integrals Refined Higgs, CMB from Planck, Departures in Logic, and GR Issues & Solutions vol 4 Nº 3 prespacetime journal http://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/issue/view/41/showToc
* {{springer|title=Zeta-function method for regularization|id=p/z130090}}
* {{Citation | last1=Seeley | first1=R. T. | editor1-last=Calderón | editor1-first=Alberto P. | title=Singular Integrals (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Chicago, Ill., 1966) | publisher=Amer. Math. Soc. | location=Providence, R.I. | series=Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics | isbn=978-0-8218-1410-9 | mr=0237943 | year=1967 | volume=10 | chapter=Complex powers of an elliptic operator | pages=288–307}}
* {{note|Do76}} J.S. Dowker and R. Critchley, Effective Lagrangian and energy-momentum tensor in de Sitter space'', ''Phys. Rev.D 13, 3224 ''(1976).
<references/>
 
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]
[[Category:String theory]]
[[Category:Mathematical analysis]]
[[Category:Zeta and L-functions]]
[[Category:Summability methods]]

Latest revision as of 23:47, 21 August 2014

Andrew Berryhill is what his spouse loves to call him and he totally digs that title. To play domino is some thing I truly appreciate performing. Office supervising is my profession. I've always loved residing in Kentucky but now I'm contemplating other choices.

my web page - free online tarot card readings