Rogers–Ramanujan identities: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>David Eppstein
stub sort — I think this can reasonably be classified as analytic number theory, so put it under number theory stubs
en>Cerabot
m Dating templates: {{section or}} (1). (bot)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Mulliken charges''' arise from the '''Mulliken population analysis'''<ref>{{cite doi | 10.1063/1.1740588 }}</ref><ref>I. G. Csizmadia, Theory and Practice of MO Calculations on Organic Molecules, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976.</ref> and provide a means of estimating [[Partial charge|partial atomic charges]] from calculations carried out by the methods of [[computational chemistry]], particularly those based on the [[linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method]], and are routinely used as variables in linear regression (QSAR<ref name="isbn0-582-38210-6">{{cite book | author = Leach, Andrew R. | title = Molecular modelling: principles and applications | publisher = Prentice Hall | location = Englewood Cliffs, N.J | year = 2001 | isbn = 0-582-38210-6 }}</ref>) procedures.<ref>{{cite journal  | last = Ohlinger | first = William S. | coauthors = Philip E. Klunzinger, Bernard J. Deppmeier, and Warren J. Hehre | title = Efficient Calculation of Heats of Formation | journal = The Journal of Physical Chemistry A | volume = 113  | issue = 10 | pages = 2165–2175 | publisher = ACS Publications | date = January 2009 | doi = 10.1021/jp810144q | pmid=19222177}}</ref> The method was developed by [[Robert S. Mulliken]], after whom the method is named. If the coefficients of the [[basis set (chemistry)|basis functions]] in the molecular orbital are '''C'''<sub>μi</sub> for the μ'th basis function in the i'th molecular orbital, the density matrix terms are:
Wilber Berryhill is the name his mothers and fathers gave him and he totally digs that title. Invoicing is what I do. My wife and I reside in Mississippi and I adore each working day living right here. To play lacross is some thing he would by no means give up.<br><br>Look at my weblog - [http://Isaworld.pe.kr/?document_srl=392088 best psychic readings]
 
:<math> \mathbf {D_{\mu\nu}} = \mathbf{2}\sum_{i}  \mathbf {C_{\mu i}} \mathbf {C_{\nu i}^*} </math>
 
for a closed shell system where each molecular orbital is doubly occupied. The population matrix <math> \mathbf{P} </math> then has terms
 
:<math> \mathbf {P_{\mu\nu}} =  \mathbf {D_{\mu\nu}} \mathbf {S_{\mu\nu}} </math>
 
<math> \mathbf{S} </math> is the overlap matrix of the basis functions. The sum of all terms of <math> \mathbf {P_{\nu\mu}} </math> summed over <math> \mathbf {\mu} </math> is the gross orbital product for orbital <math> \mathbf {\nu} </math> - <math> \mathbf {GOP_{\nu}} </math>. The sum of the gross orbital products is '''N''' - the total number of electrons. The Mulliken population assigns an electronic charge to  a given atom '''A''', known as the gross atom population: <math> \mathbf {GAP_{A}} </math> as the sum of <math> \mathbf {GOP_{\nu}} </math> over all orbitals  <math> \mathbf {\nu} </math> belonging to atom A. The charge, <math> \mathbf {Q_{A}} </math>, is then defined as the difference between the number of electrons on the isolated free atom, which is the atomic number <math> \mathbf {Z_{A}} </math>, and the gross atom population:
 
:<math> \mathbf {Q_{A}} = \mathbf {Z_{A}} - \mathbf {GAP_{A}}</math>
 
One problem with this approach is the equal division of the off-diagonal terms between the two basis functions. This leads to charge separations in molecules that are exaggerated. In a modified Mulliken population analysis,<ref>{{ cite doi | 10.1021/om950966x }}</ref> this problem can be reduced by dividing the overlap populations <math> \mathbf {P_{\mu\nu}} </math> between the corresponding orbital populations <math> \mathbf {P_{\mu\mu}} </math> and <math> \mathbf {P_{\nu\nu}} </math> in the ratio between the latter. This choice, although still arbitrary, relates the partitioning in some way to the electronegativity difference between the corresponding atoms.
 
Another problem is the Mulliken charges are explicitly sensitive to the basis set choice.<ref name = "NPA">{{cite journal | doi = 10.1063/1.449486 | journal = J. Chem. Phys. | title = Natural population analysis | author1 = A. E. Reed | author2 = R. B. Weinstock | author3 = F. Weinhold | year = 1985 | volume = 83 | issue = 2 | pages = 735–746|bibcode = 1985JChPh..83..735R }}</ref> This problem is addressed by Natural Population Analysis <ref name = "NPA" /> and other modern methods for computing net atomic charges.
 
== See also ==
* [[Partial charge]], for other methods used to estimate atomic charges in molecules.
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Quantum chemistry]]

Latest revision as of 05:09, 28 December 2014

Wilber Berryhill is the name his mothers and fathers gave him and he totally digs that title. Invoicing is what I do. My wife and I reside in Mississippi and I adore each working day living right here. To play lacross is some thing he would by no means give up.

Look at my weblog - best psychic readings