<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.13.181.233</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.13.181.233"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.13.181.233"/>
	<updated>2026-07-03T12:48:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Superelliptic_curve&amp;diff=27786</id>
		<title>Superelliptic curve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Superelliptic_curve&amp;diff=27786"/>
		<updated>2014-02-03T00:05:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;173.13.181.233: /* Ramification */ Minor fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Matrix Signal-Flow Graph.png|thumb|A multi-input, multi-output system represented as a noncommutative matrix signal-flow graph.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[automata theory]] and [[control theory]], branches of [[mathematics]], [[theoretical computer science]] and [[systems engineering]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;noncommutative signal-flow graph&#039;&#039;&#039; is a tool for modeling{{sfn|Lorens|1964}} interconnected systems and state machines by mapping the edges of a [[directed graph]] to a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] or [[semiring]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A single edge &#039;&#039;&#039;weight&#039;&#039;&#039; might represent an array of [[impulse response]]s of a complex system (see figure to the right),{{sfn|Riegle|Lin|1972}} or a character from an [[Alphabet (computer science)|alphabet]] picked off the [[Finite state transducer|input tape]] of a finite automaton,{{sfn|Brzozowski|McCluskey|1963}} while the graph might represent the flow of information or state transitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As diverse as these applications are, they share much of the same underlying theory.{{sfn|Book|Even|Greibach|Ott|1971}}{{sfn|Pliam|Lee|1995}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Signal-Flow Graph Fragment.png|thumb|Signal-flow graph fragment.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; equations involving &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;+1 variables {&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,...,&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i = \sum_{j=0}^n a_{ij}x_j, \;\;\; 1\leq i \leq n,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ij&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; elements in a ring or semiring &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;.  The free variable &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; corresponds to a source vertex &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, thus having no defining equation.  Each equation corresponds to a fragment of a [[directed graph]] &#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;=(&#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;) as show in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The edge weights define a function &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; from &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;.  Finally fix an output vertex &#039;&#039;v&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;.  A signal-flow graph is the collection of this data &#039;&#039;S&#039;&#039; = (&#039;&#039;G&#039;&#039;=(&#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039;), &#039;&#039;v&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;v&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\in&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; : &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; → &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;).  The equations may not have a solution, but when they do,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_m = T x_0,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039; an element of &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039; called the &#039;&#039;&#039;gain&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Successive Elimination==&lt;br /&gt;
{{expand section|date=May 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Return Loop Method==&lt;br /&gt;
There exist several{{sfn|Riegle|Lin|1972}} noncommutative generalizations of [[Mason&#039;s rule]]. The most common is the  &#039;&#039;&#039;return loop method&#039;&#039;&#039; (sometimes called the &#039;&#039;&#039;forward return loop method (FRL)&#039;&#039;&#039;, having a dual &#039;&#039;&#039;backward return loop method (BRL)&#039;&#039;&#039;).  The first rigorous proof is attributed to Riegle,{{sfn|Riegle|Lin|1972}} so it is sometimes called &#039;&#039;&#039;Riegle&#039;s rule&#039;&#039;&#039;.{{sfn|Andaloussi|Chalh|Sueur|2006|pp=2962}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with Mason&#039;s rule, these gain expressions combine terms in a graph-theoretic manner (loop-gains, path products, etc).  They are known to hold over an arbitrary noncommutative ring and over the semiring of regular expressions.{{sfn|Pliam|Lee|1995}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Formal Description===&lt;br /&gt;
The method starts by enumerating all paths from input to output, indexed by &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\in&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;J&#039;&#039;.  We use the following definitions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;-th &#039;&#039;&#039;path product&#039;&#039;&#039; is (by abuse of notation) a tuple of &#039;&#039;k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;j&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; edge weights along it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_j = (w^{(j)}_{k_j},\ldots, w^{(j)}_2, w^{(j)}_1).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To &#039;&#039;&#039;split&#039;&#039;&#039; a vertex &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039; is to replace it with a source and sink respecting the original incidence and weights (this is the inverse of the graph morphism taking source and sink to &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
* The &#039;&#039;&#039;loop gain&#039;&#039;&#039; of a vertex &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039; w.r.t. a subgraph &#039;&#039;H&#039;&#039; is the gain from source to sink of the signal-flow graph split at &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039; after removing all vertices not in &#039;&#039;H&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each path defines an ordering of vertices along it. The along path &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;, the &#039;&#039;i&#039;&#039;-th &#039;&#039;&#039;FRL (BRL) node factor&#039;&#039;&#039; is (1-&#039;&#039;S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(j)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; where &#039;&#039;S&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(j)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; is the loop gain of the &#039;&#039;i&#039;&#039;-th vertex along the &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;-th w.r.t. the subgraph obtained by removing &#039;&#039;v&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and all vertices ahead of (behind) it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contribution of the &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;-th path to the gain is the product along the path, alternating between the path product weights &lt;br /&gt;
and the node factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_j = \prod_{i=k_j}^1 (1-S^{(j)}_i)^{-1} w^{(j)}_i,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so the total gain is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T = \sum_{j\in J} T_j.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===An Example===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FRL BRL Example.png|thumb|A noncommutative signal-flow graph from &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the signal-flow graph shown.  From &#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;, there are two path products: (&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;) and (&#039;&#039;e,a&#039;&#039;).  Along (&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;), the FRL and BRL contributions coincide as both share same loop gain (whose split reappears in the upper right of the table below):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f+e(1-b)^{-1}c,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiplying its node factor and path weight, its gain contribution is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_d = \left[1 - f - e(1-b)^{-1}c \right]^{-1}d.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along path (&#039;&#039;e,a&#039;&#039;), FRL and BRL differ slightly, each having distinct splits of vertices &#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039; as shown in the following table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[File:Return Loop Split Table.png|540px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding to &#039;&#039;T&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;, the alternating product of node factors and path weights, we obtain two gain expressions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T^{(FRL)} = \left[1 - f - e(1-b)^{-1}c \right]^{-1}d  + \left[1 - f - e(1-b)^{-1}c \right]^{-1}e(1-b)^{-1}a,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T^{(BRL)} = \left[1 - f - e(1-b)^{-1}c \right]^{-1}d + (1-f)^{-1}e\left[1 - b - c(1-f)^e\right]^{-1}a,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These values are easily seen to be the same using identities (&#039;&#039;ab&#039;&#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = &#039;&#039;b&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;(1-&#039;&#039;ba&#039;&#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;=(1-&#039;&#039;ab&#039;&#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix Signal-Flow Graphs===&lt;br /&gt;
Consider equations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y_i=\sum_{j=1}^2 a_{ij} x_j + \sum_{j=1}^2 b_{ij}y_j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z_i=\sum_{j=1}^2 c_{ij} y_j,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system could be modeled as scalar signal-flow graph with multiple inputs and outputs.  But, the variables naturally fall into layers, which can be collected into vectors &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;=(&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;=(&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;=(&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;,&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
This results in much simpler &#039;&#039;&#039;matrix signal-flow graph&#039;&#039;&#039; as shown in the figure at the top of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Applying the forward return loop method is trivial as there&#039;s a single path product (&#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;,&#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;) with a single loop-gain &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; at &#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;.  Thus as a matrix, this system has a very compact representation of its input-output map&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T = C(1-B)^{-1}A.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Finite Automata===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Automaton as Signal-Flow Graph.png|thumb|Representation of a finite automaton as a (noncommutative) signal flow graph over a semiring.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important kind of noncommutative signal-flow graph is a finite state [[automaton]] over an alphabet &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.{{sfn|Brzozowski|McCluskey|1963}}{{sfn|Book|Even|Greibach|Ott|1971}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Serial connections correspond to the concatenation of words, which can be extended to subsets of the [[free monoid]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. For &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\subseteq\Sigma^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A \cdot B = \{ab \mid a\in A, b\in B\}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parallel connections correspond to [[set union]], which in this context is often written &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;+&#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, self-loops naturally correspond to the [[Kleene closure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A^* = \{\lambda\} + A + AA + AAA + \cdots,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the [[empty word]]. The similarity to the infinite geometric series&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1-x)^{-1} = 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 \cdots,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is more than superficial, as expressions of this form serve as &#039;inversion&#039; in this [[semiring]].{{sfn|Kuich|Salomaa|1985}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, the subsets of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; built of from finitely many of these three operations can be identified with the [[semiring]] of [[regular expressions]].  Similarly, finite graphs whose edges are weighted by subsets of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Sigma^*&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be identified with finite automata, though generally that theory starts with [[Singleton (mathematics)|singleton]] sets as in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This automaton is deterministic so we can unambiguously enumerate paths via words. Using the return loop method, path contributions are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* path &#039;&#039;ab&#039;&#039;, has node factors (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), yielding gain contribution&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ac^*b,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* path &#039;&#039;ada&#039;&#039;, has node factors (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), yielding gain contribution&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ac^*dc^*a,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* path &#039;&#039;ba&#039;&#039;, has node factors (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), yielding gain contribution&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;bc^*a.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus the [[Formal language|language]] accepted by this automaton (the gain of its signal-flow graph) is the sum of these terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L = ac^*b+ac^*dc^*a+bc^*a.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{expand section|date=May 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Signal-flow graph]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mason&#039;s rule]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Finite automata]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Regular expressions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite conference&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Infinite zero of linear time varying bond-graph models: Graphical rules&lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Andaloussi&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=C. &lt;br /&gt;
  | last2=Chalh&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2=Z.&lt;br /&gt;
  | last3=Sueur&lt;br /&gt;
  | first3=C.&lt;br /&gt;
  | booktitle=Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=2962–2967&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=2006&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4777109&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Book&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
  | last2= Even&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2=Shimon&lt;br /&gt;
  | last3= Greibach&lt;br /&gt;
  | first3=Sheila&lt;br /&gt;
  | last4= Ott&lt;br /&gt;
  | first4=Gene&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Ambiguity in graphs and expressions&lt;br /&gt;
  | journal=IEEE Transactions on Computers&lt;br /&gt;
  | volume=100&lt;br /&gt;
  | number=2&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=149–153&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1971&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=IEEE&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://www.diku.dk/hjemmesider/ansatte/henglein/papers/book1971.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Brzozowski&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=J.A. &lt;br /&gt;
  | last2=McCluskey Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2= E.J.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Signal flow graph techniques for sequential circuit state diagrams&lt;br /&gt;
  | journal=IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=IEEE&lt;br /&gt;
  | number=2&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=67–76&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1963&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4037802&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | title=A new normal-form theorem for context-free phrase structure grammars&lt;br /&gt;
  | last=Greibach&lt;br /&gt;
  | first=Sheila&lt;br /&gt;
  | journal=Journal of the ACM&lt;br /&gt;
  | volume=12&lt;br /&gt;
  | number=1&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=42–52&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1965&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=ACM&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=321254&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Kuich&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=Werner&lt;br /&gt;
  | last2=Salomaa&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2=Arto&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Semirings, automata and languages&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1985&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=Springer-Verlag &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last=Lorens&lt;br /&gt;
  | first=Charles S.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Flowgraphs: For the Modeling and Analysis of Linear Systems&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1964&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=McGraw-Hill&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Pliam&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=John&lt;br /&gt;
  | last2=Lee&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2=E. Bruce&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=On the global properties of interconnected systems&lt;br /&gt;
  | journal=IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fund. Theory and Apps &lt;br /&gt;
  | volume=42&lt;br /&gt;
  | number=12&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=1013–1017&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=IEEE&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://www.atbash.com/node/8&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
  | ref=harv &lt;br /&gt;
  | last1=Riegle&lt;br /&gt;
  | first1=Daryle&lt;br /&gt;
  | last2=Lin&lt;br /&gt;
  | first2=P.M.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title=Matrix signal flow graphs and an optimum topological method for evaluating their gains&lt;br /&gt;
  | journal=IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory&lt;br /&gt;
  | volume=19&lt;br /&gt;
  | number=5&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages=427–435&lt;br /&gt;
  | year=1972&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher=IEEE&lt;br /&gt;
  | url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1083542&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Control theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Automata theory]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>173.13.181.233</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>