Beta function (physics)

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a Cauchy–Euler equation (also known as the Euler–Cauchy equation, or simply Euler's equation) is a linear homogeneous ordinary differential equation with variable coefficients. It is sometimes referred to as an equidimensional equation. Because of its simple structure the equation can be replaced with an equivalent equation with constant coefficients which can then be solved explicitly.

The equation

Let y(n)(x) be the nth derivative of the unknown function y(x). Then a Cauchy–Euler equation of order n has the form

anxny(n)(x)+an1xn1y(n1)(x)++a0y(x)=0.

The substitution x=eu reduces this equation to a linear differential equation with constant coefficients. Alternatively a trial solution y=xm may be used to solve for the basis solutions.[1]

Second order – solving through trial solution

Typical solution curves for a second-order Euler–Cauchy equation for the case of two real roots
Typical solution curves for a second-order Euler–Cauchy equation for the case of a double root
Typical solution curves for a second-order Euler–Cauchy equation for the case of complex roots

The most common Cauchy–Euler equation is the second-order equation, appearing in a number of physics and engineering applications, such as when solving Laplace's equation in polar coordinates. It is given by the equation:[1]

x2d2ydx2+axdydx+by=0.

We assume a trial solution given by[1]

y=xm.

Differentiating, we have:

dydx=mxm1

and

d2ydx2=m(m1)xm2.

Substituting into the original equation, we have:

x2(m(m1)xm2)+ax(mxm1)+b(xm)=0

Or rearranging gives:

m2+(a1)m+b=0.

We then can solve for m. There are three particular cases of interest:

  • Case #1: Two distinct roots, m1 and m2
  • Case #2: One real repeated root, m
  • Case #3: Complex roots, α ± βi

In case #1, the solution is given by:

y=c1xm1+c2xm2

In case #2, the solution is given by

y=c1xmln(x)+c2xm

To get to this solution, the method of reduction of order must be applied after having found one solution y = xm.

In case #3, the solution is given by:

y=c1xαcos(βln(x))+c2xαsin(βln(x))
α=Re(m)
β=Im(m)

For c1 and c2 in the real plane

This form of the solution is derived by setting x = et and using Euler's formula

Second order – solution through change of variables

x2d2ydx2+axdydx+by=0

We operate the variable substitution defined by

t=ln(x).
y(x)=ϕ(ln(x))=ϕ(t).

Differentiating:

dydx=1xdϕdt
d2ydx2=1x2(d2ϕdt2dϕdt).

Substituting ϕ(t), we have

d2ϕdt2+(a1)dϕdt+bϕ=0.

This equation in ϕ(t) can be easily solved using its characteristic polynomial

λ2+(a1)λ+b=0.

Now, if λ1 and λ2 are the roots of this polynomial, we analyze the two main cases: distinct roots and double roots:

If the roots are distinct, the general solution is given by

ϕ(t)=c1eλ1t+c2eλ2t, where the exponentials may be complex.

If the roots are equal, the general solution is given by

ϕ(t)=c1eλ1t+c2teλ1t.

In both cases, the solution y(x) may be found by setting t=ln(x), hence ϕ(ln(x))=y(x).

Hence, in the first case,

y(x)=c1xλ1+c2xλ2,

and in the second case,

y(x)=c1xλ1+c2ln(x)xλ1.

Example

Given

x2u3xu+3u=0,

we substitute the simple solution xα:

x2(α(α1)xα2)3x(αxα1)+3xα=α(α1)xα3αxα+3xα=(α24α+3)xα=0.

For xα to be a solution, either x = 0, which gives the trivial solution, or the coefficient of xα is zero. Solving the quadratic equation, we get α = 1, 3. The general solution is therefore

u=c1x+c2x3.

Difference equation analogue

There is a difference equation analogue to the Cauchy–Euler equation. For a fixed m > 0, define the sequence ƒm(n) as

fm(n):=n(n+1)(n+m1).

Applying the difference operator to fm, we find that

Dfm(n)=fm(n+1)fm(n)=m(n+1)(n+2)(n+m1)=mnfm(n).

If we do this k times, we will find that

fm(k)(n)=m(m1)(mk+1)n(n+1)(n+k1)fm(n)=m(m1)(mk+1)fm(n)fk(n),

where the superscript (k) denotes applying the difference operator k times. Comparing this to the fact that the k-th derivative of xm equals

m(m1)(mk+1)xmxk

suggests that we can solve the N-th order difference equation

fN(n)y(N)(n)+aN1fN1(n)y(N1)(n)++a0y(n)=0,

in a similar manner to the differential equation case. Indeed, substituting the trial solution

y(n)=fm(n)

brings us to the same situation as the differential equation case,

m(m1)(mN+1)+aN1m(m1)(mN+2)++a1m+a0=0.

One may now proceed as in the differential equation case, since the general solution of an N-th order linear difference equation is also the linear combination of N linearly independent solutions. Applying reduction of order in case of a multiple root m1 will yield expressions involving a discrete version of ln,

φ(n)=k=1n1km1.

(Compare with: ln(xm1)=1+m1x1tm1dt.)

In cases where fractions become involved, one may use

fm(n):=Γ(n+m)Γ(n)

instead (or simply use it in all cases), which coincides with the definition before for integer m.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534

Bibliography

  • 22 year-old Systems Analyst Rave from Merrickville-Wolford, has lots of hobbies and interests including quick cars, property developers in singapore and baking. Always loves visiting spots like Historic Monuments Zone of Querétaro.

    Here is my web site - cottagehillchurch.com