Integrated Encryption Scheme: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Nageh
m categories
 
en>Addbot
m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q1332372
Line 1: Line 1:
I would like to introduce  accurate psychic predictions ([http://myoceancounty.net/groups/apply-these-guidelines-when-gardening-and-grow/ myoceancounty.net]) myself to you, I am Jayson Simcox but I don't like when individuals use my full name. For a whilst I've been in Mississippi but now I'm contemplating other choices. The preferred pastime for him and his children is fashion and he'll be starting some thing else along  [http://www.article-galaxy.com/profile.php?a=143251 free tarot readings] with it. He functions as a bookkeeper.<br><br>My web blog ... phone psychic readings, [http://clothingcarearchworth.com/index.php?document_srl=441551&mid=customer_review clothingcarearchworth.com],
In [[algebra]], the '''Binet–Cauchy identity''', named after [[Jacques Philippe Marie Binet]] and [[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]], states that <ref name=Weisstein>
 
{{cite book |title=CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics |author=Eric W. Weisstein |page=228 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=8LmCzWQYh_UC&pg=PA228 |chapter=Binet-Cauchy identity |isbn=1-58488-347-2 |year=2003 |edition=2nd |publisher=CRC Press}}
 
</ref>
 
: <math>
\biggl(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i c_i\biggr)
\biggl(\sum_{j=1}^n b_j d_j\biggr) =
\biggl(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i d_i\biggr)
\biggl(\sum_{j=1}^n b_j c_j\biggr)
+ \sum_{1\le i < j \le n}
(a_i b_j - a_j b_i )
(c_i d_j - c_j d_i )
</math>
 
for every choice of [[real number|real]] or [[complex number]]s (or more generally, elements of a [[commutative ring]]).
Setting ''a<sub>i</sub>''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''c<sub>i</sub>'' and ''b<sub>j</sub>''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''d<sub>j</sub>'', it gives the [[Lagrange's identity]], which is a stronger version of the [[Cauchy–Schwarz inequality]] for the [[Euclidean space]] <math>\scriptstyle\mathbb{R}^n</math>.
 
==The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra==
When ''n'' = 3 the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of [[Dot product|dot]] and [[cross product]]s respectively; in ''n'' dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and [[wedge product]]s. We may write it
 
:<math>(a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) = (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c) + (a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d)\,</math>
 
where '''a''', '''b''', '''c''', and '''d''' are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as
 
:<math>(a \wedge b) \cdot (c \wedge d) = (a \cdot c)(b \cdot d) - (a \cdot d)(b \cdot c).\,</math>
In the special case of unit vectors ''a=c'' and ''b=d'', the formula yields
:<math>|a \wedge b|^2 = |a|^2|b|^2 - |a \cdot b|^2. \,</math>
 
When both vectors are unit vectors, we obtain the usual relation
:<math>1= \cos^2(\phi)+\sin^2(\phi)</math>
where φ is the angle between the vectors.
 
==Proof==
Expanding the last term,
 
:<math>
\sum_{1\le i < j \le n}
(a_i b_j - a_j b_i )
(c_i d_j - c_j d_i )
</math>
:<math>
=
\sum_{1\le i < j \le n}
(a_i c_i b_j d_j + a_j c_j b_i d_i)
+\sum_{i=1}^n a_i c_i b_i d_i
-
\sum_{1\le i < j \le n}
(a_i d_i b_j c_j + a_j d_j b_i c_i)
-
\sum_{i=1}^n a_i d_i b_i c_i
</math>
 
where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows:
 
:<math>
=
\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n
a_i c_i b_j d_j
-
\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n
a_i d_i b_j c_j.
</math>
 
This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by ''i''.
 
==Generalization==
A general form, also known as the [[Cauchy–Binet formula]], states the following:
Suppose ''A'' is an ''m''&times;''n'' [[matrix (mathematics)|matrix]] and ''B'' is an ''n''&times;''m'' matrix. If ''S'' is a [[subset]] of {1, ..., ''n''} with ''m'' elements, we write ''A<sub>S</sub>'' for the ''m''&times;''m'' matrix whose columns are those columns of ''A'' that have indices from ''S''. Similarly, we write ''B<sub>S</sub>'' for the ''m''&times;''m'' matrix whose ''rows'' are those rows of ''B'' that have indices from ''S''.  
Then the [[determinant]] of the [[matrix product]] of ''A'' and ''B'' satisfies the identity
:<math>\det(AB) = \sum_{\scriptstyle S\subset\{1,\ldots,n\}\atop\scriptstyle|S|=m} \det(A_S)\det(B_S),</math>
where the sum extends over all possible subsets ''S'' of  {1, ..., ''n''} with ''m'' elements.
 
We get the original identity as special case by setting
:<math>
A=\begin{pmatrix}a_1&\dots&a_n\\b_1&\dots& b_n\end{pmatrix},\quad
B=\begin{pmatrix}c_1&d_1\\\vdots&\vdots\\c_n&d_n\end{pmatrix}.
</math>
 
==In-line notes and references==
<references/>
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Binet-Cauchy Identity}}
[[Category:Mathematical identities]]
[[Category:Multilinear algebra]]
[[Category:Articles containing proofs]]

Revision as of 02:07, 15 March 2013

In algebra, the Binet–Cauchy identity, named after Jacques Philippe Marie Binet and Augustin-Louis Cauchy, states that [1]

(i=1naici)(j=1nbjdj)=(i=1naidi)(j=1nbjcj)+1i<jn(aibjajbi)(cidjcjdi)

for every choice of real or complex numbers (or more generally, elements of a commutative ring). Setting ai = ci and bj = dj, it gives the Lagrange's identity, which is a stronger version of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the Euclidean space n.

The Binet–Cauchy identity and exterior algebra

When n = 3 the first and second terms on the right hand side become the squared magnitudes of dot and cross products respectively; in n dimensions these become the magnitudes of the dot and wedge products. We may write it

(ac)(bd)=(ad)(bc)+(ab)(cd)

where a, b, c, and d are vectors. It may also be written as a formula giving the dot product of two wedge products, as

(ab)(cd)=(ac)(bd)(ad)(bc).

In the special case of unit vectors a=c and b=d, the formula yields

|ab|2=|a|2|b|2|ab|2.

When both vectors are unit vectors, we obtain the usual relation

1=cos2(ϕ)+sin2(ϕ)

where φ is the angle between the vectors.

Proof

Expanding the last term,

1i<jn(aibjajbi)(cidjcjdi)
=1i<jn(aicibjdj+ajcjbidi)+i=1naicibidi1i<jn(aidibjcj+ajdjbici)i=1naidibici

where the second and fourth terms are the same and artificially added to complete the sums as follows:

=i=1nj=1naicibjdji=1nj=1naidibjcj.

This completes the proof after factoring out the terms indexed by i.

Generalization

A general form, also known as the Cauchy–Binet formula, states the following: Suppose A is an m×n matrix and B is an n×m matrix. If S is a subset of {1, ..., n} with m elements, we write AS for the m×m matrix whose columns are those columns of A that have indices from S. Similarly, we write BS for the m×m matrix whose rows are those rows of B that have indices from S. Then the determinant of the matrix product of A and B satisfies the identity

det(AB)=S{1,,n}|S|=mdet(AS)det(BS),

where the sum extends over all possible subsets S of {1, ..., n} with m elements.

We get the original identity as special case by setting

A=(a1anb1bn),B=(c1d1cndn).

In-line notes and references

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534