Sverdrup wave: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
en>Tassedethe m WPCleaner v1.27 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Harald Sverdrup |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{For|the argument about certain monoids having to be commutative|Eckmann–Hilton argument}} | |||
In the mathematical disciplines of [[algebraic topology]] and [[homotopy theory]], '''Eckmann–Hilton duality''' in its most basic form, consists of taking a given [[diagram (category theory)|diagram]] for a particular concept and reversing the direction of all arrows, much as in [[category theory]] with the idea of the [[opposite category]]. | |||
It | It is named after [[Beno Eckmann]] and [[Peter Hilton]]. | ||
For example, the fact that the dual notion of a [[limit (category theory)|limit]] is a [[colimit]] allows us to change the [[Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms]] for [[homology (mathematics)|homology]] to give axioms for [[cohomology]]. <!-- explain more--> | |||
Another example is given by [[currying]], which tells us that for any object <math>X</math>, a map <math> X \times I \to Y</math> is the same as a map <math> X \to Y^I</math>, where <math> Y^I</math> is the [[exponential object]], given by all maps from <math> I </math> to <math> Y </math>. In the case of [[topological spaces]], if we take <math> I </math> to be the unit interval, this leads to a duality between <math> X \times I</math> and <math> Y^I</math> which then gives a duality between | |||
the [[suspension (topology)|reduced suspension]] <math> \Sigma X</math> which is a quotient of <math>X \times I</math> and | |||
the [[loop space]] <math> \Omega Y</math> which is a subspace of <math> Y ^ I</math>. | |||
This then leads to the [[adjoint relation]] <math> \langle \Sigma X, Y \rangle = \langle X, \Omega Y \rangle</math> which allows the study of [[spectrum (homotopy theory)|spectra]] which give rise to [[cohomology|cohomology theories]]. | |||
We can also directly relate [[fibration]]s and [[cofibration]]s: a fibration <math> p \colon E \to B </math> is defined by having the [[homotopy lifting property]], represented by the following diagram | |||
[[Image:Homotopy lifting property.svg|175px|center]] | |||
and a cofibration <math> i \colon A \to X</math> is defined by having the dual [[homotopy extension property]], represented by dualising the previous diagram: | |||
[[Image:Homotopy extension property.svg|175px|center]] | |||
The above considerations also apply when looking at the sequences associated to a fibration or a cofibration, as given a fibration <math> F \to E \to B</math> we get the sequence | |||
: <math>\cdots \to \Omega^2 B \to \Omega F \to \Omega E \to \Omega B \to F \to E \to B \, </math> | |||
and given a cofibration <math> A \to X \to X/A</math> we get the sequence | |||
: <math> A \to X \to X/A \to \Sigma A \to \Sigma X \to \Sigma \left (X/A \right ) \to \Sigma^2 A \to \cdots. \, </math> | |||
This also allows us to relate [[homotopy]] and cohomology: we know that [[homotopy group]]s are [[homotopy class]]es of maps from the [[n-sphere|''n''-sphere]] to our space, written <math> \pi_n(X,p) \cong \langle S^n,X \rangle</math>, and we know that the sphere has a single nonzero (reduced) [[cohomology group]]. On the other hand, cohomology groups are homotopy classes of maps to spaces with a single nonzero homotopy group. This is given by the [[Eilenberg–MacLane space]]s <math> K(G,n)</math> and the relation <math> H^n(X;G) \cong \langle X,K(G,n) \rangle </math>. | |||
== References == | |||
*{{Hatcher AT}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Eckmann-Hilton Duality}} | |||
[[Category:Duality theories]] | |||
Revision as of 19:04, 4 May 2013
28 year-old Painting Investments Worker Truman from Regina, usually spends time with pastimes for instance interior design, property developers in new launch ec Singapore and writing. Last month just traveled to City of the Renaissance.
In the mathematical disciplines of algebraic topology and homotopy theory, Eckmann–Hilton duality in its most basic form, consists of taking a given diagram for a particular concept and reversing the direction of all arrows, much as in category theory with the idea of the opposite category.
It is named after Beno Eckmann and Peter Hilton.
For example, the fact that the dual notion of a limit is a colimit allows us to change the Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms for homology to give axioms for cohomology.
Another example is given by currying, which tells us that for any object , a map is the same as a map , where is the exponential object, given by all maps from to . In the case of topological spaces, if we take to be the unit interval, this leads to a duality between and which then gives a duality between the reduced suspension which is a quotient of and the loop space which is a subspace of . This then leads to the adjoint relation which allows the study of spectra which give rise to cohomology theories.
We can also directly relate fibrations and cofibrations: a fibration is defined by having the homotopy lifting property, represented by the following diagram
and a cofibration is defined by having the dual homotopy extension property, represented by dualising the previous diagram:
The above considerations also apply when looking at the sequences associated to a fibration or a cofibration, as given a fibration we get the sequence
and given a cofibration we get the sequence
This also allows us to relate homotopy and cohomology: we know that homotopy groups are homotopy classes of maps from the n-sphere to our space, written , and we know that the sphere has a single nonzero (reduced) cohomology group. On the other hand, cohomology groups are homotopy classes of maps to spaces with a single nonzero homotopy group. This is given by the Eilenberg–MacLane spaces and the relation .