Kakutani fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>David Eppstein
m ce: equilibrium => equilibria
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello and welcome. My title is Numbers Wunder. California is exactly where her house is but she needs to move simply because of her family members. In her professional life she is a payroll clerk but she's always needed her personal company. What I adore doing is taking part in baseball but I haven't produced a dime with it.<br><br>Check out my web site; [http://nxnn.info/user/G8498 over the counter std test]
In [[mathematics]], the Fourier '''sine and cosine transforms''' are forms of the [[Fourier transform|Fourier integral transform]] that do not use [[complex number]]s. They are the forms originally used by [[Joseph Fourier]] and are still preferred in some applications, such as [[signal processing]] or [[statistics]].
 
==Definition==
 
The '''Fourier sine transform''' of <math> f (t) </math>, sometimes denoted by either <math> {\hat f}^s </math> or <math> {\mathcal F}_s (f) </math>, is
 
:<math> 2 \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)\sin\,{2\pi \nu t} \,dt.</math>
 
If <math> t </math> means time, then <math> \nu</math> is frequency in cycles per unit time, but in the abstract, they can be any pair of variables which are dual to each other.
 
This transform is necessarily an [[odd function]] of frequency, i.e.,
:<math>  {\hat f}^s(\nu) = - {\hat f}^s(-\nu) </math> for all <math>\nu</math>.
 
The numerical factors in the [[Fourier transform]]s are defined uniquely only by their product.  Here, in order that the Fourier inversion formula not have any numerical factor, the factor of 2 appears because the sine function has <math> L^2 </math> norm of <math> \frac 1 {\sqrt2} </math>.
 
The '''Fourier cosine transform''' of <math> f (t) </math>, sometimes denoted by either <math> {\hat f}^c </math> or <math> {\mathcal F}_c (f) </math>, is
 
:<math> 2 \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)\cos\,{2\pi \nu t} \,dt.</math>
 
It is necessarily an [[even function]] of <math>\nu</math>, i.e.,
<math>  {\hat f}^c(\nu) =  {\hat f}^c(-\nu) </math> for all <math>\nu</math>.
 
Some authors<ref>[[Mary L. Boas]], ''[[Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences]]'', 2nd Ed, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1983. ISBN 0-471-04409-1</ref> only define the cosine transform for [[even function]]s of <math>t </math>, in which case its sine transform is zero.  Since cosine is also even,  a simpler formula can be used, <math> 4 \int\limits_0^\infty f(t)\cos\,{2\pi \nu t} \,dt.</math>  Similarly, if <math>f</math> is an [[odd function]], then the cosine transform is zero and the sine transform can be simplified to <math> 4 \int\limits_0^\infty f(t)\sin\,{2\pi \nu t} \,dt.</math>
 
==Fourier inversion==
The original function <math> f(t) </math> can be recovered from its transforms under the usual hypotheses, that <math> f </math> and both of its transforms should be absolutely integrable.  For more details on the different hypotheses, see [[Fourier inversion theorem]].
 
The inversion formula is<ref>{{cite book|last=[[Poincaré]]|first=Henri|title=Theorie analytique de la propagation de chaleur|year=1895|publisher=G. Carré|location=Paris|pages=pp. 108ff.|url=http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5500702f/f115.image}}</ref>
 
:<math> f(t) = \int _0^\infty {\hat f}^c \cos (2\pi \nu t) d\nu + \int _0^\infty {\hat f}^s \sin (2\pi \nu t) d\nu,</math>
 
which has the advantage that all frequencies are positive and all quantities are real.  If the numerical factor 2 is left out of the definitions of the transforms, then the inversion formula is usually written as an integral over both negative and positive frequencies.
 
Using the addition formula for [[cosine]], this is sometimes rewritten as
 
:<math> \frac\pi2 (f(x+0)+f(x-0)) = \int _0^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos \omega (t-x) f(t) dt d\omega, </math>
 
where <math> f(x+0) </math> denotes the one-sided [[limit]] of <math>f</math> as <math> x </math> approaches zero from above, and
<math> f(x-0) </math> denotes the one-sided limit of <math>f</math> as <math> x </math> approaches zero from below.
 
If the original function <math> f</math> is an [[even function]], then the sine transform is zero; if <math> f</math> is an [[odd function]], then the cosine transform is zero.  In either case, the inversion formula simplifies.
 
==Relation with complex exponentials==
 
The form of the [[Fourier transform]] used more often today is
 
:<math>
\hat f(\nu)
= \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) e^{-2\pi i\nu t}\,dt.
</math>
 
Expanding the [[integrand]] by means of [[Euler's formula]] results in
 
:<math> = \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)(\cos\,{2\pi\nu t} - i\,\sin{2\pi\nu t})\,dt,</math>
 
which may be written as the [[sum]] of two [[integral]]s
 
:<math> = \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)\cos\,{2\pi \nu t} \,dt - i \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)\sin\,{2\pi \nu t}\,dt,</math>
 
:<math> = \frac 12 {\hat f}^c (\nu) - \frac i2 {\hat f}^s (\nu). </math>
 
==See also==
*[[Discrete cosine transform]]
*[[Discrete sine transform]]
 
==References==
 
* Whittaker, Edmund, and James Watson, ''A Course in Modern Analysis'', Fourth Edition, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927, pp. 189, 211
 
<references />
 
[[Category:Integral transforms]]
[[Category:Fourier analysis]]

Revision as of 19:35, 23 January 2014

In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers. They are the forms originally used by Joseph Fourier and are still preferred in some applications, such as signal processing or statistics.

Definition

The Fourier sine transform of , sometimes denoted by either or , is

If means time, then is frequency in cycles per unit time, but in the abstract, they can be any pair of variables which are dual to each other.

This transform is necessarily an odd function of frequency, i.e.,

for all .

The numerical factors in the Fourier transforms are defined uniquely only by their product. Here, in order that the Fourier inversion formula not have any numerical factor, the factor of 2 appears because the sine function has norm of .

The Fourier cosine transform of , sometimes denoted by either or , is

It is necessarily an even function of , i.e., for all .

Some authors[1] only define the cosine transform for even functions of , in which case its sine transform is zero. Since cosine is also even, a simpler formula can be used, Similarly, if is an odd function, then the cosine transform is zero and the sine transform can be simplified to

Fourier inversion

The original function can be recovered from its transforms under the usual hypotheses, that and both of its transforms should be absolutely integrable. For more details on the different hypotheses, see Fourier inversion theorem.

The inversion formula is[2]

which has the advantage that all frequencies are positive and all quantities are real. If the numerical factor 2 is left out of the definitions of the transforms, then the inversion formula is usually written as an integral over both negative and positive frequencies.

Using the addition formula for cosine, this is sometimes rewritten as

where denotes the one-sided limit of as approaches zero from above, and denotes the one-sided limit of as approaches zero from below.

If the original function is an even function, then the sine transform is zero; if is an odd function, then the cosine transform is zero. In either case, the inversion formula simplifies.

Relation with complex exponentials

The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is

Expanding the integrand by means of Euler's formula results in

which may be written as the sum of two integrals

See also

References

  • Whittaker, Edmund, and James Watson, A Course in Modern Analysis, Fourth Edition, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927, pp. 189, 211
  1. Mary L. Boas, Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 2nd Ed, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1983. ISBN 0-471-04409-1
  2. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534