Skew-symmetric graph: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>David Eppstein
Examples
 
en>Rjwilmsi
m →‎References: Journal cites, added 1 DOI using AWB (9887)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{expert-subject|Physics|date=July 2013}}


In [[fluid dynamics]], '''aerodynamic potential flow codes''' or '''panel codes''' are used to determine the fluid velocity, and subsequently the pressure distribution, on an object.  This may be a simple two-dimensional object, such as a circle or wing, or it may be a three-dimensional vehicle.


The main advantage of using the blog is that anyone can use the Word - Press blog and customize the elements in the theme regardless to limited knowledge about internet and website development. Thus, it is important to keep pace with this highly advanced age and have a regular interaction with your audience to keep a strong hold in the business market. A pinch of tablet centric strategy can get your Word - Press site miles ahead of your competitors, so here are few strategies that will give your Wordpress websites and blogs an edge over your competitors:. If you're using Wordpress and want to make your blog a "dofollow" blog, meaning that links from your blog pass on the benefits of Google pagerank, you can install one of the many dofollow plugins available. provided by Word - Press Automatic Upgrade, so whenever you need to update the new version does not, it automatically creates no webmaster. <br><br>Word - Press is known as the most popular blogging platform all over the web and is used by millions of blog enthusiasts worldwide. You will have to invest some money into tuning up your own blog but, if done wisely, your investment will pay off in the long run. Some plugins ask users to match pictures or add numbers, and although effective, they appear unprofessional and unnecessary. t need to use the back button or the URL to get to your home page. Akismet is really a sophisticated junk e-mail blocker and it's also very useful thinking about I recieve many junk e-mail comments day-to-day across my various web-sites. <br><br>The least difficult and very best way to do this is by acquiring a Word - Press site. To sum up, ensure that the tactics are aiming to increase the ranking and attracting the maximum intended traffic in the major search engines. We can active Akismet from wp-admin > Plugins > Installed Plugins. The animation can be quite subtle these as snow falling gently or some twinkling start in the track record which are essentially not distracting but as an alternative gives some viewing enjoyment for the visitor of the internet site. If you have any questions on starting a Word - Press food blog or any blog for that matter, please post them below and I will try to answer them. <br><br>Word - Press installation is very easy and hassle free. php file in the Word - Press root folder and look for this line (line 73 in our example):. Normally, the Word - Press developers make a thorough research on your website goals and then ingrain the most suitable graphical design elements to your website. So, we have to add our social media sharing buttons in website. If your site does well you can get paid professional designer to create a unique Word - Press theme. <br><br>Someone with a basic knowledge of setting up a website should be able to complete the process in a couple of minutes however even basic users should find they are able to complete the installation in around 20 minutes by following the step by step guide online. By using Word - Press MLM websites or blogs, an online presence for you and your MLM company can be created swiftly and simply. While deciding couple should consider the expertise of the doctor,clinics success rate,the costs of fertility treatment,including fertility tests and IVF costs and overall ones own financial budget. Here's more information in regards to [http://d2.ae/wordpress_dropbox_backup_826526 backup plugin] check out our own web page. And, it is better that you leave it on for the duration you are writing plugin code. Your topic is going to be the basis of your site's name.
A series of singularities as sources, sinks, vortex points and [[doublet (potential flow)|doublets]] are used to model the panels and wakes.  These codes may be valid at subsonic and supersonic speeds.
 
== History ==
Early panel codes were developed in the late 1960s to early 1970s.  Advanced panel codes, such as Panair (developed by Boeing), were first introduced in the late 1970s, and gained popularity as computing speed increased. Over time, panel codes were replaced with higher order panel methods and subsequently CFD ([[Computational Fluid Dynamics]]).  However, panel codes are still used for preliminary aerodynamic analysis as the time required for an analysis run is significantly less due to a decreased number of elements.
 
== Assumptions ==
These are the various assumptions that go into developing potential flow panel methods:
* Inviscid <math>\nabla^2 V=0</math>
* Incompressible <math> \nabla \cdot V=0 </math>
* Irrotational <math>\nabla \times V=0</math>
* Steady <math> \frac{d}{dt}=0 </math>
 
However, the incompressible flow assumption may be removed from the potential flow derivation leaving:
* Potential Flow (inviscid, irrotational, steady) <math>\nabla^2 \phi=0</math>
 
== Derivation of Panel Method Solution to Potential Flow Problem ==
* From Small Disturbances
:<math> (1-M_\infty^2) \phi_{xx} + \phi_{yy} + \phi_{zz} = 0 </math> (subsonic)
 
* From Divergence Theorem
:<math>\iiint\limits_V\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\right)dV=\iint\limits_{S}\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\, dS</math>
 
* Let Velocity U be a twice continuously differentiable function in a region of volume V in space. This function is the stream function <math> \phi </math>.
* Let P be a point in the volume V
* Let S be the surface boundary of the volume V.
* Let Q be a point on the surface S, and <math> R = |P-Q|</math>.
 
As Q goes from inside V to the surface of V,
* Therefore:
:<math>U_p= -\frac{1} {4 \pi} \iiint\limits_V\left(\frac{\nabla^2\cdot\mathbf{U}}{R}\right) dV_Q</math>
:<math>  -\frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\frac{\mathbf{n}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{U}  }{R}\right) dS_Q</math>
:<math>  +\frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\mathbf{U}\mathbf{n} \cdot\nabla \frac{1}{R}\right) dS_Q</math>
 
For :<math>\nabla^2 \phi=0</math>, where the surface normal points inwards.
:<math>\phi_p = -\frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\mathbf{n} \frac{  \nabla \phi_{U} - \nabla \phi_{L}}{R} - \mathbf{n} \left( \phi_{U} - \phi_{L}\right) \nabla \frac{1}{R} \right) dS_Q</math>
 
This equation can be broken down into both a source term and a doublet term.
 
The Source Strength at an arbitrary point Q is:
:<math> \sigma = \nabla \mathbf{n} (\nabla \phi_U-\nabla \phi_L )</math>
 
The Doublet Strength at an arbitrary point Q is:
:<math> \mu =\phi_U - \phi_L </math>
 
The simplified potential flow equation is:
:<math>\phi_p = -\frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\frac{\sigma}{R} - \mu \cdot \mathbf{n}  \cdot \nabla \frac{1}{R} \right) dS</math>
 
With this equation, along with applicable boundary conditions, the potential flow problem may be solved.
 
== Required Boundary Conditions ==
The velocity potential on the internal surface and all points inside V (or on the lower surface S) is 0.
:<math> \phi_L = 0 </math>
 
The Doublet Strength is:
:<math> \mu =\phi_U - \phi_L </math>
:<math> \mu = \phi_U  </math>
 
The velocity potential on the outer surface is normal to the surface and is equal to the freestream velocity.
:<math> \phi_U = -V_\infty \cdot \mathbf{n} </math>
 
These basic equations are satisfied when the geometry is a 'watertight' geometry. If it is watertight, it is a well-posed problem.  If it is not, it is an ill-posed problem.
 
== Discretization of Potential Flow Equation ==
The potential flow equation with well-posed boundary conditions applied is:
:<math>\mu_P = \frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\frac{V_\infty \cdot \mathbf{n}}{R}  \right) dS_U + \frac{1} {4 \pi} \iint\limits_S\left(\mu \cdot \mathbf{n}  \cdot \nabla \frac{1}{R} \right) dS</math>
 
*Note that the <math> dS_U </math> integration term is evaluated only on the upper surface, while th <math>dS</math> integral term is evaluated on the upper and lower surfaces.
 
The continuous surface S may now be discretized into discrete panels. These panels will approximate the shape of the actual surface.  This value of the various source and doublet terms may be evaluated at a convenient point (such as the centroid of the panel). Some assumed distribution of the source and doublet strengths (typically constant or linear) are used at points other than the centroid.  A single source term s of unknown strength <math>\lambda</math> and a single doublet term m of unknown strength <math>\lambda</math> are defined at a given point.
 
:<math>\sigma_Q = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i s_i(Q)=0</math>
:<math>\mu_Q = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i m_i(Q)</math>
 
where:
:<math>s_i = ln(r)</math>
:<math>m_i = </math>
 
These terms can be used to create a system of linear equations which can be solved for all the unknown values of <math>\lambda</math>.
 
== Methods for Discretizing Panels ==
* constant strength - simple, large number of panels required
* linear varying strength - reasonable answer, little difficulty in creating well-posed problems
* quadratic varying strength - accurate, more difficult to create a well-posed problem
 
Some techniques are commonly used to model surfaces.<ref>Section 7.6</ref>
* Body Thickness by line sources
* Body Lift by line doublets
* Wing Thickness by constant source panels
* Wing Lift by constant pressure panels
* Wing-Body Interface by constant pressure panels
 
== Methods of determining pressure ==
Once the Velocity at every point is determined, the pressure can be determined by using one of the following formulas.  All various [[Pressure coefficient]] methods produce results that are similar and are commonly used to identify regions where the results are invalid.
 
Pressure Coefficient is defined as:
:<math>C_p = \frac{p-p_\infty}{q_\infty}=\frac{p-p_\infty}{\frac{1}{2} \rho_\infty V_\infty^2} = \frac{p-p_\infty}{\frac{\gamma}{2}  p_\infty M_\infty^2 }</math>
 
The Isentropic Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = \frac{2} {\gamma M_\infty^2} \left( \left(1+\frac{\gamma-1} {2} M_\infty^2 \left[\frac{1-|\vec{V}|^2}{|\vec{V_\infty}|^2}\right]\right)^{ \frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1} } -1  \right) </math>
 
The Incompressible Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = 1 - \frac{|\vec{V}|^2}{|\vec{V_\infty}|^2} </math>
 
The Second Order Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = 1-|\vec{V}|^2 + M_\infty^2 u^2 </math>
 
The Slender Body Theory Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = -(2u +v^2 +w^2) </math>
 
The Linear Theory Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = -2u </math>
 
The Reduced Second Order Pressure Coefficient is:
:<math>C_p = 1-|\vec{V}|^2 </math>
 
== What Panel Methods Can't Do ==
 
* Panel methods are inviscid solutions. You will not capture viscous effects except via user “modeling” by changing the geometry.
*Solutions are invalid as soon as the flow develops local supersonic zones (Critical Mach Number)
 
== Potential flow codes ==
* PanAir a502 (created by [[Boeing]])
* HESS (created by [[Douglas Aircraft Company|Douglas]])
* MACAERO (created by McDonnell Aircraft)
* PMARC (created by NASA)
* Quadpan (created by [[Lockheed Corporation|Lockheed]])
* LinAir (created by Desktop Aeronautics)
* VSAero
* CMARC (created by AeroLogic, Personal Simulation Works, based in PMARC)
* DesignFOIL (created by DreeseCode Software LLC)
* [[XFOIL]] (open source)
* XFLR5 (open source)
* [[Vortexje]] (open source, created by Baayen & Heinz GmbH)
* PANUKL (freeware, Warsaw University of Technology)
 
== See also ==
*[[Stream function]]
*[[Conformal mapping]]
*[[Velocity potential]]
*[[Divergence theorem]]
*[[Joukowsky transform]]
*[[Potential flow]]
*[[Circulation (fluid dynamics)|Circulation]]
*[[Biot-Savart law#Aerodynamics applications|Biot-Savart law]]
 
==Notes==
{{Reflist}}
 
==References==
* [http://www.pdas.com/ Public Domain Aerodynamic Software], A Panair Distribution Source, Ralph Carmichael
* [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19920013405 Panair Volume I, Theory Manual, Version 3.0], Michael Epton, Alfred Magnus, 1990 [[Boeing]]
* [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19920013622 Panair Volume II, Theory Manual, Version 3.0], Michael Epton, Alfred Magnus, 1990 [[Boeing]]
* [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19850002614 Panair Volume III, Case Manual, Version 1.0], Michael Epton, Kenneth Sidewell, Alfred Magnus, 1981 [[Boeing]]
* [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19920013399 Panair Volume IV, Maintenance Document, Version 3.0], Michael Epton, Kenneth Sidewell, Alfred Magnus, 1991 [[Boeing]]
* [http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19710009882 Recent Experience in Using Finite Element Methods For The Solution Of Problems In Aerodynamic Intereference], Ralph Carmichael, 1971 [[NASA Ames Research Center]]
* [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910009745_1991009745.pdf]
 
[[Category:Fluid dynamics]]

Revision as of 21:18, 25 January 2014

Template:Expert-subject

In fluid dynamics, aerodynamic potential flow codes or panel codes are used to determine the fluid velocity, and subsequently the pressure distribution, on an object. This may be a simple two-dimensional object, such as a circle or wing, or it may be a three-dimensional vehicle.

A series of singularities as sources, sinks, vortex points and doublets are used to model the panels and wakes. These codes may be valid at subsonic and supersonic speeds.

History

Early panel codes were developed in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Advanced panel codes, such as Panair (developed by Boeing), were first introduced in the late 1970s, and gained popularity as computing speed increased. Over time, panel codes were replaced with higher order panel methods and subsequently CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics). However, panel codes are still used for preliminary aerodynamic analysis as the time required for an analysis run is significantly less due to a decreased number of elements.

Assumptions

These are the various assumptions that go into developing potential flow panel methods:

However, the incompressible flow assumption may be removed from the potential flow derivation leaving:

Derivation of Panel Method Solution to Potential Flow Problem

  • From Small Disturbances
(subsonic)
  • From Divergence Theorem

As Q goes from inside V to the surface of V,

  • Therefore:

For :, where the surface normal points inwards.

This equation can be broken down into both a source term and a doublet term.

The Source Strength at an arbitrary point Q is:

The Doublet Strength at an arbitrary point Q is:

The simplified potential flow equation is:

With this equation, along with applicable boundary conditions, the potential flow problem may be solved.

Required Boundary Conditions

The velocity potential on the internal surface and all points inside V (or on the lower surface S) is 0.

The Doublet Strength is:

The velocity potential on the outer surface is normal to the surface and is equal to the freestream velocity.

These basic equations are satisfied when the geometry is a 'watertight' geometry. If it is watertight, it is a well-posed problem. If it is not, it is an ill-posed problem.

Discretization of Potential Flow Equation

The potential flow equation with well-posed boundary conditions applied is:

The continuous surface S may now be discretized into discrete panels. These panels will approximate the shape of the actual surface. This value of the various source and doublet terms may be evaluated at a convenient point (such as the centroid of the panel). Some assumed distribution of the source and doublet strengths (typically constant or linear) are used at points other than the centroid. A single source term s of unknown strength and a single doublet term m of unknown strength are defined at a given point.

where:

These terms can be used to create a system of linear equations which can be solved for all the unknown values of .

Methods for Discretizing Panels

  • constant strength - simple, large number of panels required
  • linear varying strength - reasonable answer, little difficulty in creating well-posed problems
  • quadratic varying strength - accurate, more difficult to create a well-posed problem

Some techniques are commonly used to model surfaces.[1]

  • Body Thickness by line sources
  • Body Lift by line doublets
  • Wing Thickness by constant source panels
  • Wing Lift by constant pressure panels
  • Wing-Body Interface by constant pressure panels

Methods of determining pressure

Once the Velocity at every point is determined, the pressure can be determined by using one of the following formulas. All various Pressure coefficient methods produce results that are similar and are commonly used to identify regions where the results are invalid.

Pressure Coefficient is defined as:

The Isentropic Pressure Coefficient is:

The Incompressible Pressure Coefficient is:

The Second Order Pressure Coefficient is:

The Slender Body Theory Pressure Coefficient is:

The Linear Theory Pressure Coefficient is:

The Reduced Second Order Pressure Coefficient is:

What Panel Methods Can't Do

  • Panel methods are inviscid solutions. You will not capture viscous effects except via user “modeling” by changing the geometry.
  • Solutions are invalid as soon as the flow develops local supersonic zones (Critical Mach Number)

Potential flow codes

  • PanAir a502 (created by Boeing)
  • HESS (created by Douglas)
  • MACAERO (created by McDonnell Aircraft)
  • PMARC (created by NASA)
  • Quadpan (created by Lockheed)
  • LinAir (created by Desktop Aeronautics)
  • VSAero
  • CMARC (created by AeroLogic, Personal Simulation Works, based in PMARC)
  • DesignFOIL (created by DreeseCode Software LLC)
  • XFOIL (open source)
  • XFLR5 (open source)
  • Vortexje (open source, created by Baayen & Heinz GmbH)
  • PANUKL (freeware, Warsaw University of Technology)

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  1. Section 7.6