Consistency (suspension)

In algebra, Zariski's lemma, introduced by Oscar Zariski, states that if K is a finitely generated algebra over a field k and if K is a field, then K is a finite field extension of k.

An important application of the lemma is a proof of the weak form of Hilbert's nullstellensatz: if I is a proper ideal of $k[t_{1},...,t_{n}]$ (k algebraically closed field), then I has a zero; i.e., there is a point x in $k^{n}$ such that $f(x)=0$ for all f in I.

The lemma may also be understood from the following perspective. In general, a ring R is a Jacobson ring if and only if every finitely generated R-algebra that is a field is finite over R. Thus, the lemma follows from the fact that a field is a Jacobson ring.

Proof

Two direct proofs, one of which is due to Zariski, are given in Atiyah–MacDonald. The lemma is also a consequence of the Noether normalization lemma. Indeed, by the normalization lemma, K is a finite module over the polynomial ring $k[x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d}]$ where $x_{1},\ldots ,x_{d}$ are algebraically independent over k. But since K has Krull dimension zero, the polynomial ring must have dimension zero; i.e., $d=0$.

In fact, the lemma is a special case of the general formula $\dim A=\operatorname {tr.deg} _{k}A$ for a finitely generated k-algebra A that is an integral domain, which is also a consequence of the normalization lemma.

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

• M. Atiyah, I.G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison–Wesley, 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5
• James Milne, Algebraic Geometry