Power residue symbol

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, inertial manifolds are concerned with the long term behavior of the solutions of dissipative dynamical systems. Inertial manifolds are finite dimensional, smooth, invariant manifolds that contain the global attractor and attract all solutions exponentially quickly. Since an inertial manifold is finite dimensional even if the original system is infinite dimensional, and because most of the dynamics for the system takes place on the inertial manifold, studying the dynamics on an inertial manifold produces a considerable simplification in the study of the dynamics of the original system.[1]

In many physical applications, inertial manifolds express an interaction law between the small and large wavelength structures. Some say that the small wavelengths are enslaved by the large (e.g. synergetics). Inertial manifolds may also appear as slow manifolds common in meteorology, or as the center manifold in any bifurcation. Computationally, numerical schemes for partial differential equations seek to capture the long term dynamics and so such numerical schemes form an approximate inertial manifold.

Definition

Let u(t) denote a solution of a dynamical system. The solution u(t) may be an evolving vector in H=n or may be an evolving function in an infinite dimensional Banach space H.

In many cases of interest the evolution of u(t) is determined as the solution of a differential equation in H, say du/dt=F(u(t)) with initial value u(0)=u0. In any case, we assume the solution of the dynamical system can be written in terms of a semigroup operator, or state transition matrix, S:HH such that u(t)=S(t)u0 for all times t0 and all initial values u0. In some situations we might consider only discrete values of time as in the dynamics of a map.

An inertial manifold[1] for a dynamical semigroup S(t) is a smooth manifold  such that

  1. is of finite dimension,
  2. S(t) for all times t0,
  3. attracts all solution exponentially quickly, that is, for every initial value u0H there exists constants cj>0 such that dist(S(t)u0,)c1exp(c2t).

The restriction of the differential equation du/dt=F(u) to the inertial manifold  is therefore a well defined finite dimensional system called the inertial system.[1] Subtly, there is a difference between a manifold being attractive, and solutions on the manifold being attractive. Nonetheless, under appropriate conditions the inertial system possesses so-called asymptotic completeness:[2] that is, every solution of the differential equation has a companion solution lying in  and producing the same behavior for large time; in mathematics, for all u0 there exists v0 and possibly a time shift τ0 such that dist(S(t)u0,S(t+τ)v0)0 as t.

Researchers in the 2000s generalized such inertial manifolds to time dependent (nonautonomous) and/or stochastic dynamical systems (e.g.[3][4])

Existence

Existence results that have been proved address inertial manifolds that are expressible as a graph.[1] The governing differential equation is rewritten more specifically in the form du/dt+Au+f(u)=0 for unbounded self-adjoint closed operator A with domain D(A)H, and nonlinear operator f:D(A)H. Typically, elementary spectral theory gives an orthonormal basis of H consisting of eigenvectors vj: Avj=λjvj, j=1,2,, for ordered eigenvalues 0<λ1λ2.

For some given number m of modes, P denotes the projection of H onto the space spanned by v1,,vm, and Q=IP denotes the orthogonal projection onto the space spanned by vm+1,vm+2,. We look for an inertial manifold expressed as the graph Φ:PHQH. For this graph to exist the most restrictive requirement is the spectral gap condition[1] λm+1λmc(λm+1+λm) where the constant c depends upon the system. This spectral gap condition requires that the spectrum of A must contain large gaps to be guaranteed of existence.

Approximate inertial manifolds

Several methods are proposed to construct approximations to inertial manifolds,[1] including the so-called intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds.[5][6]

The most popular way to approximate follows from the existence of a graph. Define the m slow variables p(t)=Pu(t), and the 'infinite' fast variables q(t)=Qu(t). Then project the differential equation du/dt+Au+f(u)=0 onto both PH and QH to obtain the coupled system dp/dt+Ap+Pf(p+q)=0 and dq/dt+Aq+Qf(p+q)=0.

For trajectories on the graph of an inertial manifold M, the fast variable q(t)=Φ(p(t)). Differentiating and using the coupled system form gives the differential equation for the graph:

dΦdp[Ap+Pf(p+Φ(p))]+AΦ(p)+Qf(p+Φ(p))=0.

This differential equation is typically solved approximately in an asymptotic expansion in 'small' p to give an invariant manifold model,[7] or a nonlinear Galerkin method,[8] both of which use a global basis whereas the so-called holistic discretisation uses a local basis.[9] Such approaches to approximation of inertial manifolds are very closely related to approximating center manifolds for which a web service exists to construct approximations for systems input by a user.[5]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 R. Temam. Inertial manifolds. Mathematical Intelligencer, 12:68–74, 1990
  2. J. C. Robinson. The asymptotic completeness of inertial manifolds. Nonlinearity, 9:1325–1340, 1996. [1]
  3. B. Schmalfuss and K. R. Schneider. Invariant manifolds for random dynamical systems with slow and fast variables. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 20(1):133–164, 2008.
  4. C. Potzsche and M. Rasmussen. Computation of nonautonomous invariant and inertial manifolds. Numerische Mathematik, 112(3):449–483, 2009.
  5. U. Maas and S. B. Pope. Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combustion and Flame, 88:239–264, 1992.
  6. V. Bykov, I. Goldfarb, V. Goldshtein, and U. Maas. On a modified version of ILDM approach: asymptotic analysis based on integral manifolds. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 71:359–382, 2006.
  7. A. J. Roberts. The utility of an invariant manifold description of the evolution of a dynamical system. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20:1447–1458, 1989. [2]
  8. C. Foias, M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi. On the computation of inertial manifolds. Phys. Lett. A, 131:433–436, 1988. [3]
  9. A. J. Roberts. A holistic finite difference approach models linear dynamics consistently. Mathematics of Computation, 72:247–262, 2003. [4]