# Puiseux series

{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||$N=Technical |date=__DATE__ |$B= {{#invoke:Message box|ambox}} }}

In mathematics, **Puiseux series** are a generalization of power series, first introduced by Isaac Newton in 1676^{[1]} and rediscovered by Victor Puiseux in 1850,^{[2]} that allows for negative and fractional exponents of the indeterminate *T*. A **Puiseux series** in the indeterminate *T* is a Laurent series in *T*^{1/n}, where *n* is a positive integer. A Puiseux series may be written as:

where Template:Mvar is an integer and Template:Mvar is a positive integer.

**Puiseux's theorem**, sometimes also called **Newton–Puiseux theorem** asserts that, given a polynomial equation , its solutions in Template:Mvar, viewed as functions of Template:Mvar, may be expanded as **Puiseux series** that are convergent in some neighbourhood of the origin (0 excluded, in the case of a solution that tends to infinity at the origin). In other words, every branch of an algebraic curve may be locally (in terms of Template:Mvar) described by a Puiseux series.

The set of Puiseux series over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 is itself an algebraically closed field, called the **field of Puiseux series**. It is the algebraic closure of the field of Laurent series. This statement is also referred to as **Puiseux's theorem**, being an expression of the original Puiseux theorem in modern abstract language.

## Field of Puiseux series

If *K* is a field then we can define the field of Puiseux series with coefficients in *K* (or *over* *K*) informally as the set of formal expressions of the form

where *n* and are a nonzero natural number and an integer respectively (which are part of the datum of *f*): in other words, Puiseux series differ from formal Laurent series in that they allow for fractional exponents of the indeterminate as long as these fractional exponents have bounded denominator (here *n*), and just as Laurent series, Puiseux series allow for negative exponents of the indeterminate as long as these negative exponents are bounded (here by ). Addition and multiplication are as expected: one might define them by first “upgrading” the denominator of the exponents to some common denominator and then performing the operation in the corresponding field of formal Laurent series.

In other words, the field of Puiseux series with coefficients in *K* is the union of the fields (where *n* ranges over the nonzero natural numbers), where each element of the union is a field of formal Laurent series over (considered as an indeterminate), and where each such field is considered as a subfield of the ones with larger *n* by rewriting the fractional exponents to use a larger denominator (e.g., is identified with as expected).

This yields a formal definition of the field of Puiseux series: it is the direct limit of the direct system, indexed over the non-zero natural numbers *n* ordered by divisibility, whose objects are all (the field of formal Laurent series, which we rewrite as

with a morphism

being given, whenever *m* divides *n*, by .

### Valuation and order

The Puiseux series over a field *K* form a valued field with value group (the rationals): the *valuation* of a series

as above is defined to be the smallest rational such that the coefficient of the term with exponent is non-zero (with the usual convention that the valuation of 0 is +∞). The coefficient in question is typically called the *valuation coefficient* of *f*.

This valuation in turn defines a (translation-invariant) distance (which is ultrametric), hence a topology on the field of Puiseux series by letting the distance from *f* to 0 be . This justifies *a posteriori* the notation

as the series in question does, indeed, converge to *f* in the Puiseux series field (this is in contrast to Hahn series which *cannot* be viewed as converging series).

If the base field *K* is ordered, then the field of Puiseux series over *K* is also naturally (“lexicographically”) ordered as follows: a non-zero Puiseux series *f* with 0 is declared positive whenever its valuation coefficient is so. Essentially, this means that any positive rational power of the indeterminate *T* is made positive, but smaller than any positive element in the base field *K*.

If the base field *K* is endowed with a valuation *w*, then we can construct a different valuation on the field of Puiseux series over *K* by letting the valuation

where is the previously defined valuation ( is the first non-zero coefficient) and ω is infinitely large (in other words, the value group of is ordered lexicographically, where Γ is the value group of *w*). Essentially, this means that the previously defined valuation *v* is corrected by an infinitesimal amount to take into account the valuation *w* given on the base field.

### Algebraic closedness of Puiseux series

One essential property of Puiseux series is expressed by the following theorem, attributed to Puiseux^{[2]} (for ) but which was implicit in Newton's use of the Newton polygon as early as 1671^{[3]} and therefore known either as Puiseux's theorem or as the Newton–Puiseux theorem:^{[4]}

**Theorem**: if *K* is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, then the field of Puiseux series over *K* is the algebraic closure of the field of formal Laurent series over *K*.^{[5]}

Very roughly, the proof proceeds essentially by inspecting the Newton polygon of the equation and extracting the coefficients one by one using a valuative form of Newton's method. Provided algebraic equations can be solved algorithmically in the base field *K*, then the coefficients of the Puiseux series solutions can be computed to any given order.

For example, the equation has solutions

and

(one readily checks on the first few terms that the sum and product of these two series are 1 and respectively): this is valid whenever the base field *K* has characteristic different from 2.

As the powers of 2 in the denominators of the coefficients of the previous example might lead one to believe, the statement of the theorem is not true in positive characteristic. The example of the Artin–Schreier equation shows this: reasoning with valuations shows that *X* should have valuation , and if we rewrite it as then

and one shows similarly that should have valuation , and proceeding in that way one obtains the series

since this series makes no sense as a Puiseux series—because the exponents have unbounded denominators—the original equation has no solution. However, such Eisenstein equations are essentially the only ones not to have a solution, because, if *K* is algebraically closed of characteristic *p*>0, then the field of Puiseux series over *K* is the perfect closure of the maximal tamely ramified extension of .^{[4]}

Similarly to the case of algebraic closure, there is an analogous theorem for real closure: if *K* is a real closed field, then the field of Puiseux series over *K* is the real closure of the field of formal Laurent series over *K*.^{[6]} (This implies the former theorem since any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero is the unique quadratic extension of some real-closed field.)

There is also an analogous result for p-adic closure: if *K* is a *p*-adically closed field with respect to a valuation *w*, then the field of Puiseux series over *K* is also *p*-adically closed.^{[7]}

## Puiseux expansion of algebraic curves and functions

### Algebraic curves

Let *X* be an algebraic curve^{[8]} given by an affine equation over an algebraically closed field *K* of characteristic zero, and consider a point *p* on *X* which we can assume to be (0,0). We also assume that *X* is not the coordinate axis *x*=0. Then a *Puiseux expansion* of (the *y* coordinate of) *X* at *p* is a Puiseux series *f* having positive valuation such that .

More precisely, let us define the *branches* of *X* at *p* to be the points *q* of the normalization *Y* of *X* which map to *p*. For each such *q*, there is a local coordinate *t* of *Y* at *q* (which is a smooth point) such that the coordinates *x* and *y* can be expressed as formal power series of *t*, say (since *K* is algebraically closed, we can assume the valuation coefficient to be 1) and : then there is a unique Puiseux series of the form (a power series in ), such that (the latter expression is meaningful since is a well defined power series in *t*). This is a Puiseux expansion of *X* at *p* which is said to be associated to the branch given by *q* (or simply, the Puiseux expansion of that branch of *X*), and each Puiseux expansion of *X* at *p* is given in this manner for a unique branch of *X* at *p*.^{[9]}^{[10]}

This existence of a formal parametrization of the branches of an algebraic curve or function is also referred to as *Puiseux's theorem*: it has arguably the same mathematical content as the fact that the field of Puiseux series is algebraically closed and is a historically more accurate description of the original author's statement.^{[11]}

For example, the curve (whose normalization is a line with coordinate *t* and map ) has two branches at the double point (0,0), corresponding to the points *t* = +1 and *t* = −1 on the normalization, whose Puiseux expansions are and respectively (here, both are power series because the *x* coordinate is étale at the corresponding points in the normalization). At the smooth point (-1,0) (which is *t*=0 in the normalization), it has a single branch, given by the Puiseux expansion (the *x* coordinate ramifies at this point, so it is not a power series).

The curve (whose normalization is again a line with coordinate *t* and map ), on the other hand, has a single branch at the cusp point (0,0), whose Puiseux expansion is .

### Analytic convergence

When , i.e. the field of complex numbers, the Puiseux expansions defined above are convergent in the sense that for a given choice of *n*-th root of *x*, they converge for small enough , hence define an analytic parametrization of each branch of *X* in the neighborhood of *p* (more precisely, the parametrization is by the *n*-th root of *x*).

## Generalization

The field of Puiseux series is not complete, but its completion can be easily described: it is the field of formal expressions of the form , where the support of the coefficients (that is, the set of *e* such that ) is the range of an increasing sequence of rational numbers that either is finite or tends to +∞. In other words, such series admit exponents of unbounded denominators, provided there are finitely many terms of exponent less than *A* for any given bound *A*. For example, is not a Puiseux series, but it is the limit of a Cauchy sequence of Puiseux series (Puiseux polynomials). However, even this completion is still not "maximally complete" in the sense that it admits non-trivial extensions which are valued fields having the same value group and residue field,^{[12]}^{[13]} hence the opportunity of completing it even more:

Hahn series are a further (larger) generalization of Puiseux series, introduced by Hans Hahn (in the course of the proof of his embedding theorem in 1907 and then studied by him in his approach to Hilbert's seventeenth problem), where instead of requiring the exponents to have bounded denominator they are required to form a well-ordered subset of the value group (usually or ). These were later further generalized by Anatoly Maltsev and Bernhard Neumann to a non-commutative setting (they are therefore sometimes known as *Hahn-Mal'cev-Neumann series*). Using Hahn series, it is possible to give a description of the algebraic closure of the field of power series in positive characteristic which is somewhat analogous to the field of Puiseux series.^{[14]}

## Notes

- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑
^{2.0}^{2.1}Puiseux (1850, 1851) - ↑ Newton (1736)
- ↑
^{4.0}^{4.1}cf. Kedlaya (2001), introduction - ↑ cf. Eisenbud (1995), corollary 13.15 (p. 295)
- ↑ Basu &al (2006), chapter 2 (“Real Closed Fields”), theorem 2.91 (p. 75)
- ↑ Cherlin (1976), chapter 2 (“The Ax–Kochen–Ershof Transfer Principle”), §7 (“Puiseux series fields”)
- ↑ We assume that
*X*is irreducible or, at least, that it is reduced and that it does not contain the*y*coordinate axis. - ↑ Shafarevich (1994), II.5, p. 133–135
- ↑ Cutkosky (2004), chapter 2, p. 3–11
- ↑ Puiseux (1850), p. 397
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ Kedlaya (2001)

## References

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=journal }}

- {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=journal }} (translated from Latin and published by John Colson in 1736)

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=journal }}

- {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=journal }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

## External links

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}