# Ratio test

{{#invoke: Sidebar | collapsible }}

In mathematics, the **ratio test** is a test (or "criterion") for the convergence of a series , where each term is a real or complex number and is nonzero when *n* is large. The test was first published by Jean le Rond d'Alembert and is sometimes known as **d'Alembert's ratio test **or as the **Cauchy ratio test**.^{[1]}

## Contents

## Motivation

Given the following geometric series:

The quotient of any two adjacent terms is 1/2. The sum of the first *m* terms is given by:

As *m* increases, this converges to 1, so the sum of the series is 1. On the other hand given this geometric series:

The quotient of any two adjacent terms is 2. The sum of the first *m* terms is given by

which increases without bound as *m* increases, so this series diverges. More generally, the sum of the first *m* terms of the geometric series is given by:

Whether this converges or diverges as *m* increases depends on whether *r*, the quotient of any two adjacent terms, is less than or greater than 1. Now consider the series:

This is similar to the first convergent sequence above, except that now the ratio of two terms is not fixed at exactly 1/2:

However, as *n* increases, the ratio still tends in the limit towards the same constant 1/2. The ratio test generalizes the simple test for geometric series to more complex series like this one where the quotient of two terms is not fixed, but in the limit tends towards a fixed value. The rules are similar: if the quotient approaches a value less than one, the series converges, whereas if it approaches a value greater than one, the series diverges.

## The test

The usual form of the test makes use of the limit Template:NumBlk The ratio test states that:

- if
*L*< 1 then the series converges absolutely; - if
*L*> 1 then the series does not converge; - if
*L*= 1 or the limit fails to exist, then the test is inconclusive, because there exist both convergent and divergent series that satisfy this case.

It is possible to make the ratio test applicable to certain cases where the limit *L* fails to exist, if limit superior and limit inferior are used. The test criteria can also be refined so that the test is sometimes conclusive even when *L* = 1. More specifically, let

Then the ratio test states that:^{[2]}^{[3]}

- if
*R*< 1, the series converges absolutely; - if
*r*> 1, the series diverges; - if for all large
*n*(regardless of the value of*r*), the series also diverges; this is because is nonzero and increasing and hence does not approach zero; - the test is otherwise inconclusive.

If the limit *L* in (Template:EquationNote) exists, we must have *L=R=r*. So the original ratio test is a weaker version of the refined one.

## Examples

### Convergent because *L*<1

Consider the series

Putting this into the ratio test:

Thus the series converges.

### Divergent because *L>1*

Consider the series

Putting this into the ratio test:

Thus the series diverges.

### Inconclusive because *L*=1

Consider the three series

The first series diverges, the second one converges absolutely and the third one converges conditionally. However, the term-by-term magnitude ratios of the three series are respectively 1, and . So, in all three cases, we have. This illustrates that when *L*=1, the series may converge or diverge and hence the original ratio test is inconclusive. For the first series , however, as the term-by-term magnitude ratio for all *n*, we can apply the third criterion in the refined version of the ratio test to conclude that the series diverges.

## Proof

Below is a proof of the validity of the original ratio test.

Suppose that . We can then show that the series converges absolutely by showing that its terms will eventually become less than those of a certain convergent geometric series. To do this, let . Then *r* is strictly between *L* and 1, and for sufficiently large n (say, n greater than N). Hence for each *n > N* and *i > 0*, and so

That is, the series converges absolutely.

On the other hand, if *L* > 1, then for sufficiently large n, so that the limit of the summands is non-zero. Hence the series diverges.

## Extensions for *L*=1

As seen in the previous example, the ratio test may be inconclusive when the limit of the ratio is 1. Extensions to ratio test, however, sometimes allows one to deal with this case. For instance, the aforementioned refined version of the test handles the case . Below are some other extensions.

### Raabe's test

This extension is due to Joseph Ludwig Raabe. It states that if

then the series will be absolutely convergent.^{[4]} d'Alembert's ratio test and Raabe's test are the first and second theorem in a hierarchy of such theorems due to Augustus De Morgan.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B=
{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}^{[citation needed]}
}}

### Proof of Raabe's test

let

and k>p>1,

the series

therefore : converges for k>1
Similarly for k<1^{[5]}

### Higher order tests

The next cases in de Morgan's hierarchy are Bertrand's and Gauss's test. Each test involves slightly different higher order asymptotics. If

then the series converges if lim inf ρ_{n} > 1, and diverges if lim sup ρ_{n} < 1. This is **Bertrand's test**.^{[6]}

If

where *r* > 1 and *C*_{n} is bounded, then the series converges if *h* > 1 and diverges if *h* ≤ 1. This is **Gauss's test**.^{[7]}

These are both special cases of **Kummer's test** for the convergence of the series Σ*a*_{n}. Let ζ_{n} be an auxiliary sequence of positive constants. Let

Then if *ρ* > 0, the series converges. If *ρ* < 0 and Σ1/*ζ*_{n} diverges, then the series diverges. Otherwise the test is inconclusive.^{[8]}

## See also

## Footnotes

- ↑ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RatioTest.html
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RaabesTest.html
- ↑ http://mathumatiks.com/subpage-401-Raabe%E2%80%99s-Test-and-Logarithmic-Test.htm
- ↑ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BertrandsTest.html
- ↑ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssTest.html
- ↑ http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KummersTest.html

## References

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}.

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}: §8.14.

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}: §3.3, 5.4.

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}: §3.34.

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}: §2.36, 2.37.

it:Criteri di convergenza#Criterio del rapporto (o di d'Alembert)