# S-matrix

{{#invoke:Hatnote|hatnote}}Template:Main other {{#invoke:Hatnote|hatnote}}

In physics, the **S-matrix** or **scattering matrix** relates the initial state and the final state of a physical system undergoing a scattering process. It is used in quantum mechanics, scattering theory and quantum field theory.

More formally, the S-matrix is defined as the unitary matrix connecting asymptotic particle states in the Hilbert space of physical states (scattering channels). While the S-matrix may be defined for any background (spacetime) that is asymptotically solvable and has no event horizons, it has a simple form in the case of the Minkowski space. In this special case, the Hilbert space is a space of irreducible unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group (the Poincaré group); the S-matrix is the evolution operator between time equal to minus infinity (the distant past), and time equal to plus infinity (the distant future). It is defined only in the limit of zero energy density (or infinite particle separation distance).

It can be shown that if a quantum field theory in Minkowski space has a mass gap, the state in the asymptotic past and in the asymptotic future are both described by Fock spaces.

## Contents

## History

The S-matrix was first introduced by John Archibald Wheeler in the 1937 paper "'On the Mathematical Description of Light Nuclei by the Method of Resonating Group Structure'".^{[1]} In this paper Wheeler introduced a *scattering matrix* – a unitary matrix of coefficients connecting "the asymptotic behaviour of an arbitrary particular solution [of the integral equations] with that of solutions of a standard form",^{[2]}
but did not develop it fully.

In the 1940s, Werner Heisenberg developed, independently, and substantiated the idea of the S-matrix. Because of the problematic divergences present in quantum field theory at that time, Heisenberg was motivated to isolate the *essential features of the theory* that would not be affected by future changes as the theory developed. In doing so, he was led to introduce a unitary "characteristic" S-matrix.^{[2]}

After World War II, the clout of Heisenberg and his attachment to the S-matrix approach may well have slowed down development of alternative approaches, such as quantum field theory and the closer study of sub-hadronic physics for a decade or more, at least in Europe: *"Pretty much like medieval Scholastic Magisters were extremely inventive in defending the Church Dogmas and blocking the way to experimental science, some great minds in the sixties developed the S-Matrix dogma with great perfection and skill before it was buried down in the seventies after discovery of quarks and asymptotic freedom"* ^{[3]}

Today, however, **exact S-matrix results** are a crowning achievement of Conformal field theory, Integrable systems, and several further areas of quantum field theory and string theory. S-matrices are not substitutes for a field-theoretic treatment, but rather, complements and the end results of such.

## Motivation

In high-energy particle physics we are interested in computing the probability for different outcomes in scattering experiments. These experiments can be broken down into three stages:

1. Collide together a collection of incoming particles (usually *two* particles with high energies).

2. Allowing the incoming particles to interact. These interactions may change the types of particles present (e.g. if an electron and a positron annihilate they may produce two photons).

3. Measuring the resulting outgoing particles.

The process by which the incoming particles are transformed (through their interaction) into the outgoing particles is called scattering. For particle physics, a physical theory of these processes must be able to compute the probability for different outgoing particles when different incoming particles collide with different energies.

The S-matrix in quantum field theory achieves exactly this. It is assumed that the small-energy-density approximation is valid in these cases.

## Use of S-matrices

The S-matrix is closely related to the transition probability amplitude in quantum mechanics and to cross sections of various interactions; the elements (individual numerical entries) in the S-matrix are known as **scattering amplitudes**. Poles of the S-matrix in the complex-energy plane are identified with bound states, virtual states or resonances. Branch cuts of the S-matrix in the complex-energy plane are associated to the opening of a scattering channel.

In the Hamiltonian approach to quantum field theory, the S-matrix may be calculated as a time-ordered exponential of the integrated Hamiltonian in the interaction picture; it may also be expressed using Feynman's path integrals. In both cases, the perturbative calculation of the S-matrix leads to Feynman diagrams.

In scattering theory, the **S-matrix** is an operator mapping free particle *in-states* to free particle *out-states* (scattering channels) in the Heisenberg picture. This is very useful because often we cannot describe the interaction (at least, not the most interesting ones) exactly.

## S-matrix in one-dimensional quantum mechanics

A simple prototype in which the S-matrix is 2-dimensional is considered first, for the purposes of illustration. In it, particles with sharp energy *E* scatter from a localized potential *V* according to the rules of 1-dimensional quantum mechanics. Already this simple model displays some features of more general cases, but is easier to handle.

Each energy *E* yields an S-matrix *S* = *S*(*E*) that depends on *V*. Thus, the total S-matrix could, figuratively speaking, be visualized, in a suitable basis, as a "continuous matrix" with every element zero except for 2 × 2-blocks along the diagonal for a given *V*.

### Definition

Consider a localized one dimensional potential barrier *V*(*x*), subjected to a beam of quantum particles with energy *E*. These particles incident on the potential barrier from left and right.

The solution of Schrödinger's equation outside the potential barrier are plane waves given by

for the region to the left of the potential barrier, and

for the region to the right to the potential barrier, where

is the wave vector. The time dependence is not needed and is hence omitted. The terms with coefficients *A* and *D* represent the incoming waves, whereas terms with coefficients *B* and *C* represent the outgoing waves.

The "scattering amplitude", i.e., the transition overlap of the outgoing waves with the incoming waves is a linear relation defining the S-matrix,

The above relation can be written as

where

The elements of *S* completely characterize the scattering properties of the potential barrier *V*(*x*).

### Unitary property of S-matrix

The unitary property of S-matrix is directly related the to the conservation of the probability current in quantum mechanics.

The probability current Template:Mvar of the wave function *ψ(x)* is defined as

The current density to the left of the barrier is

while the current density to the right of the barrier is

For conservation of the probability current density, *J*_{L} = *J*_{R}. This implies the S-matrix is a unitary matrix.

### Time-reversal symmetry

If the potential *V*(*x*) is real,then the system possesses time-reversal symmetry. Under this condition, if *ψ(x)* is a solution of Schrödinger's equation, then *ψ*(x)* is also a solution.

The time-reversed solution is given by

for the region to the left to the potential barrier, and

for the region to the right to the potential barrier,
where the terms with coefficient *B**, *C** represent incoming wave, and terms with coefficient *A**, *D** represent outgoing wave.

They are again related by the S-matrix,

that is,

Now, the relations

together yield a condition

This condition, in conjunction with the unitarity relation, implies that the S-matrix is symmetric, as a result of time reversal symmetry,

### Transmission coefficient and Reflection coefficient

The transmission coefficient from the left of the potential barrier is, when *D* = 0,

The reflection coefficient from the left of the potential barrier is, when *D* = 0,

Similarly, the transmission coefficient from the right of the potential barrier is, when *A* = 0,

The reflection coefficient from the right of the potential barrier is, when *A* = 0,

The relations between the transmission and reflection coefficients are

and

This is a consequence of the unitarity property of the S-matrix.

### Optical theorem in one dimension

In the case of free particles *V*(*x*) = 0, the S-matrix is^{[4]}

Whenever *V*(*x*) is different from zero, however, there is a departure of the S-matrix from the above form, to

This departure is parameterized by two complex functions of energy, *r* and *t*.
From unitarity there also follows a relationship between these two functions,

The analogue of this identity in three dimensions is known as the optical theorem.

## Definition in quantum field theory

### Interaction picture

A straightforward way to define the S-matrix begins with considering the interaction picture.^{[5]} Let the Hamiltonian *H* be split into a the free part *H*_{0} and the interaction *V*, *H* = *H*_{0} + *V*. In this picture, the operators behave as free field operators and the state vectors have dynamics according to the interaction *V*. Let

denote a state that has evolved from a free initial state

The S-matrix element is then defined as the projection of this state on the final state

Thus

where *S* is the **S-operator**. The great advantage of this definition is that the **time-evolution operator** Template:Mvar evolving a state in the interaction picture is formally known,^{[6]}

where Template:Mvar denotes the time-ordered product. Expressed in this operator,

from which

Using the knowledge about *U*,

or, if Template:Mvar comes as a Hamiltonian density,

Being a special type of time-evolution operator, Template:Mvar is unitary. For any initial state and any final state one finds

This approach is somewhat naîve in that potential problems are swept under the carpet.^{[7]} This is intentional. The approach works in practice and some of the technical issues are addressed in the other sections.

### In and out states

Here a slightly more rigorous approach is taken in order to address potential problems that were disregarded in the interaction picture approach of above. The final outcome is, of course, the same as when taking the quicker route. For this, the notions of in and out states are needed. These will be developed in two ways, from vacua, and from free particle states. Needless to say, the two approaches are equivalent, but they illuminate matters from different angles.

#### From vacua

If *a(k)*^{†} is a creation operator, its hermitian adjoint is an annihilation operator and destroys the vacuum,

In Dirac notation, define

as a vacuum quantum state, i.e. a state without real particles. The asterisk signifies that not all vacua are necessarily equal, and certainly not equal to the Hilbert space zero state 0. All vacuum states are assumed Poincaré invariant, invariance under translations, rotations and boosts,^{[7]} formally,

where *P*^{μ} is the **generator of translation** in space and time, and *M*^{μν} is the generator of Lorentz transformations. Thus the description of the vacuum is independent of the frame of reference. Associated to the in and out states to be defined are the in and out **field operators** (aka **fields**) *Φ*_{i} and *Φ*_{o}. Attention is here focused to the simplest case, that of a **scalar theory** in order to exemplify with the least possible cluttering of the notation. The in and out fields satisfy

the free Klein–Gordon equation. These fields are postulated to have the same equal time commutation relations (**ETCR**) as the free fields,

where *π*_{i,j} is the field **canonically conjugate** to *Φ*_{i,j}. Associated to the in and out fields are two sets of creation and annihilation operators, *a _{i}*(

*k*)

^{†}and

*a*(

_{f}*k*)

^{†}, acting in the

*same*Hilbert space,

^{[8]}on two

*distinct*complete sets (Fock spaces; initial space Template:Mvar, final space Template:Mvar ). These operators satisfy the usual commutation rules,

The action of a the creation operators on their respective vacua and states with a finite number of particles in the in and out states is given by

where issues of normalization have been ignored. See the next section for a detailed account on how a general Template:Mvar-particle state is normalized. The initial and final spaces are defined by

The asymptotic states are assumed to have well defined Poincaré transformation properties, i.e. they are assumed to transform as a direct product of one-particle states.^{[9]} This is a characteristic of a non-interacting field. From this follows that the asymptotic states are all eigenstates of the momentum operator *P ^{μ}*,

^{[7]}

In particular, they are eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian,

The vacuum is usually postulated to be stable and unique,^{[7]}^{[nb 1]}

The interaction is assumed adiabatically turned on and off.

#### Heisenberg picture

The Heisenberg picture is employed henceforth. In this picture, the states are time-independent. A Heisenberg state vector thus represents the complete spacetime history of a system of particles.^{[9]} The labeling of the in and out states refers to the asymptotic appearance. An state Ψ_{α, in} is characterized by that as *t*→−∞ the particle content is that represented collectively by Template:Mvar. Likewise, a state Ψ_{β, out} will have the particle content represented by Template:Mvar for *t*→+∞. Using the assumption that the in and out states, as well as the interacting states, inhabit the same Hilbert space and assuming completeness of the normalized in and out states (postulate of asymptotic completeness^{[7]}), the initial states can be expanded in a basis of final states (or vice versa). The explicit expression is given later after more notation and terminology has been introduced. The expansion coefficients are precisely the S-matrix elements to be defined below.

While the state vectors are constant in time in the Heisenberg picture, the physical states they represent are *not*. If a system is found to be in a state Template:Mvar at time *t* = 0, then it will be found in the state *U*(*τ*)Ψ =*e*^{-iHτ}Ψ at time *t* = *τ*. This is not (necessarily) the same Heisenberg state vector, but it is an *equivalent* state vector, meaning that it will, upon measurement, be found to be one of the final states from the expansion with nonzero coefficient. Letting Template:Mvar vary one sees that the observed Template:Mvar (not measured) is indeed the Schrödinger picture state vector. By repeating the measurement sufficiently many times and averaging, one may say that the *same* state vector is indeed found at time *t* = τ as at time *t* = 0. This reflects the expansion above of an in state into out states.

#### From free particle states

For this viewpoint, one should consider how the archetypical scattering experiment is performed. The initial particles are prepared in well defined states where they are so far apart that they don't interact. They are somehow made to interact, and the final particles are registered when they are so far apart that they have ceased to interact. The idea is to look for states in the Heisenberg picture that in the distant past had the appearance of free particle states. This will be the in states. Likewise, an out state will be a state that in the distant future has the appearance of a free particle state.^{[9]}

The notation from the general reference for this section, Template:Harvtxt will be used. A general non-interacting multi-particle state is given by

where

- Template:Mvar is momentum,
- Template:Mvar is spin z-component or, in the massless case, helicity,
- Template:Mvar is particle species.

These states are normalized as

Permutations work as such; if *s* ∈ *S*_{k} is a permutation of *k* objects (for a Template:Mvar-particle state) such that

then a nonzero term results. The sign is plus unless Template:Mvar involves an odd number of fermion transpositions, in which case it is minus. The notation is usually abbreviated letting one Greek letter stand for the whole collection describing the state. In abbreviated form the normalization becomes

When integrating over free-particle states one writes in this notation

where the sum includes only terms such that no two terms are equal modulo a permutation of the particle type indices. The sets of states sought for are supposed to be *complete*. This is expressed as

which could be paraphrased as

where for each fixed Template:Mvar, the right hand side is a projection operator onto the state Template:Mvar. Under an inhomogeneous Lorentz transformation (Λ, *a*), the field transforms according to the rule
Template:NumBlk
where *W*(Λ, *p*) is the Wigner rotation and *D*^{(j)} is the (2*j* + 1)-dimensional representation of SO(3). By putting Λ = 1, *a* = (*τ*, 0, 0, 0), for which Template:Mvar is exp(*iHτ*), in Template:EquationNote, it immediately follows that

so the in and out states sough after are eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian that are necessarily non-interacting due to the absence of mixed particle energy terms. The discussion in the section above suggests that the in states Ψ^{+} and the out states Ψ^{−} should be such that

for large positive and negative Template:Mvar has the appearance of the corresponding package, represented by *g*, of free-particle states, *g* assumed smooth and suitably localized in momentum. Wave packages are necessary, else the time evolution will yield only a phase factor indicating free particles, which cannot be the case. The right hand side follows from that the in and out states are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian per above. To formalize this requirement, assume that the full Hamiltonian Template:Mvar can be divided into two terms, a free-particle Hamiltonian *H*_{0} and an interaction Template:Mvar, *H* = *H*_{0} + *V* such that the eigenstates Φ_{γ} of *H*_{0} have the same appearance as the in- and out-states with respect to normalization and Lorentz transformation properties,

The in and out states are defined as eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian,

satisfying

for *τ* → −∞ or *τ* → +∞ respectively. Define

then

This last expression will work only using wave packages.From these definitions follow that the in and out states are normalized in the same way as the free-particle states,

and the three sets are unitarily equivalent. Now rewrite the eigenvalue equation,

where the *±iε* terms has been added to make the operator on the LHS invertible. Since the in and out states reduce to the free-particle states for *V* → 0, put

on the RHS to obtain

Then use the completeness of the free-particle states,

to finally obtain

Here *H*_{0} has been replaced by its eigenvalue on the free-particle states. This is the Lippmann–Schwinger equation.

#### In states expressed as out states

The initial states can be expanded in a basis of final states (or vice versa). Using the completeness relation,

where |*C*_{m}|^{2} is the probability that the interaction transforms

into

By the ordinary rules of quantum mechanics,

and one may write

The expansion coefficients are precisely the S-matrix elements to be defined below.

### The S-matrix

The S-matrix is now defined by^{[9]}

Here Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are shorthands that represent the particle content but suppresses the individual labels. Associated to the S-matrix there is the **S-operator** Template:Mvar defined by^{[9]}

where the Φ_{γ} are free particle states.^{[9]}^{[nb 2]} This definition conforms with the direct approach used in the interaction picture. Also, due to unitary equivalence,

As a physical requirement, Template:Mvar must be a unitary operator. This is a statement of conservation of probability in quantum field theory. But

By completeness then,

so S is the unitary transformation from in-states to out states.
Lorentz invariance is another crucial requirement on the S-matrix.^{[9]}^{[nb 3]} The S-operator represents the quantum canonical transformation of the initial *in* states to the final *out* states. Moreover, Template:Mvar leaves the vacuum state invariant and transforms *in*-space fields to *out*-space fields,^{[nb 4]}

In terms of creation and annihilation operators, this becomes

hence

A similar expression holds when Template:Mvar operates to the left on an out state. This means that the S-matrix can be expressed as

If Template:Mvar describes an interaction correctly, these properties must be also true:

- If the system is made up with
*a single particle*in momentum eigenstate |*k*⟩, then*S*|*k*⟩= |*k*⟩. This follows from the calculation above as a special case. - The S-matrix element may be nonzero only where the output state has the same total momentum as the input state.This follows from the required Lorentz invariance of the S-matrix.

## S-matrix and evolution operator *U*

Define a time-dependent creation and annihilation operator as follows,

so, for the fields,

where

We allow for a phase difference, given by

because for Template:Mvar,

Substituting the explicit expression for Template:Mvar, one has

where is the interaction part of the hamiltonian and is the time ordering.

By inspection, it can be seen that this formula is not explicitly covariant.

## Dyson series

{{#invoke:main|main}}

The most widely used expression for the S-matrix is the Dyson series. This expresses the S-matrix operator as the series:

where:

- denotes time-ordering,
- denotes the interaction Hamiltonian density which describes the interactions in the theory.

## See also

{{#invoke:Portal|portal}}

- Feynman diagram
- LSZ reduction formula
- Wick's theorem
- Haag's theorem
- Interaction picture
- Dyson series

## Remarks

- ↑ This is not true if an open system is studied. Under an influence of an external field the in and out vacua can differ since the external field can produce particles.
- ↑ Here it is assumed that the full Hamiltonian Template:Mvar can be divided into two terms, a free-particle Hamiltonian
*H*_{0}and an interaction Template:Mvar,*H*=*H*_{0}+*V*such that the eigenstates Φ_{γ}of*H*_{0}have the same appearance as the in- and out-states with respect to normalization and Lorentz transformation properties. See Template:Harvtxt, page 110. - ↑ If Λ is a (inhomogeneous) proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation, then Wigner's theorem guarantees the existence of a unitary operator
*U*(Λ) acting either on*H*_{i}*or**H*_{f}. A theory is said to be Lorentz invariant if the same*U*(Λ) acts on*H*_{i}*and**H*_{f}. Using the unitarity of*U*(Λ),*S*_{βα}= ⟨*i*,*β*|*f*,*α*⟩ = ⟨*i*,*β*|*U*(Λ)^{†}*U*(Λ)|*f*,*α*⟩. The right-hand side can be expanded using knowledge about how the non-interacting states transform to obtain an expression, and that expression is to be taken as a*definition*of what it means for the S-matrix to be Lorentz invariant. See Template:Harvtxt, equation 3.3.1 gives an explicit form. - ↑ Here the
**postulate of asymptotic completeness**is employed. The in and out states span the same Hilbert space, which is assumed to agree with the Hilbert space of the interacting theory. This is not a trivial postulate. If particles can be permanently combined into bound states, the structure of the Hilbert space changes. See Template:Harvtxt, section 9.2.

## Notes

- ↑ John Archibald Wheeler, 'On the Mathematical Description of Light Nuclei by the Method. of Resonating Group Structure' Phys. Rev. 52, 1107–1122 (1937)
- ↑
^{2.0}^{2.1}Jagdish Mehra, Helmut Rechenberg,*The Historical Development of Quantum Theory*(Pages 990 and 1031) Springer, 2001 ISBN 0-387-95086-9, ISBN 978-0-387-95086-0 - ↑ Alexander Migdal, Paradise Lost, Part 1
- ↑ Template:Harvnb Ch 6. A more common convention, utilized below, is to have the S-matrix go to the identity in the free particle case.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb Section 8.2.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb Equation 8.44.
- ↑
^{7.0}^{7.1}^{7.2}^{7.3}^{7.4}Template:Harvnb Chapter 9. - ↑ Template:Harvnb Chapter 3. See especially remark at the beginning of section 3.2.
- ↑
^{9.0}^{9.1}^{9.2}^{9.3}^{9.4}^{9.5}^{9.6}Template:Harvnb Chapter 3.

## References

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }} §125

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }} Ch 13, §3; Ch 19, §6

- Sakurai, J.J., and Napolitano, J. (1964,2011).
*Modern quantum mechanics*(2nd ed.), Addison Wesley ISBN 978-0-8053-8291-4 . Chapter 6 - {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- Template:Cite web
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}