# Top quark

The top quark, also known as the t quark (symbol: t) or truth quark, is an elementary particle and a fundamental constituent of matter. Like all quarks, the top quark is an elementary fermion with spin-[[spin-½|Template:Frac]], and experiences all four fundamental interactions: gravitation, electromagnetism, weak interactions, and strong interactions. It has an electric charge of +Template:Frac e,[1] and is the most massive of all observed elementary particles. It has a mass of 173.34 ± 0.27 (stat) ± 0.71 (syst)Template:Val,[2] which is about the same mass as an atom of tungsten. The antiparticle of the top quark is the top antiquark (symbol: Template:Overline, sometimes called antitop quark or simply antitop), which differs from it only in that some of its properties have equal magnitude but opposite sign.

The top quark interacts primarily by the strong interaction but can only decay through the weak force. It decays almost exclusively to a W boson and a bottom quark, but it can decay also into a strange quark, and on the rarest of occasions, into a down quark. The Standard Model predicts its mean lifetime to be roughly Template:Val.[3] This is about 20 times shorter than the timescale for strong interactions, and therefore it does not form hadrons, giving physicists a unique opportunity to study a "bare" quark (all other quarks hadronize, meaning they combine with other quarks to form hadrons, and can only be observed as such). Because it is so massive, the properties of the top quark allow predictions to be made of the mass of the Higgs boson under certain extensions of the Standard Model (see Mass and coupling to the Higgs boson below). As such, it is extensively studied as a means to discriminate between competing theories.

Its existence (and that of the bottom quark) was postulated in 1973 by Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa to explain the observed CP violations in kaon decay,[4] and was discovered in 1995 by the CDF[5] and [6] experiments at Fermilab. Kobayashi and Maskawa won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for the prediction of the top and bottom quark, which together form the third generation of quarks.[7]

## History

In 1973, Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa predicted the existence of a third generation of quarks to explain observed CP violations in kaon decay.[4] The names top and bottom were introduced by Haim Harari in 1975,[8][9] to match the names of the first generation of quarks (up and down) reflecting the fact that the two were the 'up' and 'down' component of a weak isospin doublet.[10] The top quark was sometimes called truth quark in the past, but over time top quark became the predominant use.[11]

The proposal of Kobayashi and Maskawa heavily relied on the GIM mechanism put forward by Sheldon Lee Glashow, John Iliopoulos and Luciano Maiani,[12] which predicted existence of the then still unobserved charm quark. When in November 1974 teams at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) simultaneously announced the discovery of the J/ψ meson, it was soon after identified as a bound state of the missing charm quark with its antiquark. This discovery allowed the GIM mechanism to become part of the Standard Model.[13] With the acceptance of the GIM mechanism, Kobayashi and Maskawa's prediction also gained in credibility. Their case was further strengthened by the discovery of the tau by Martin Lewis Perl's team at SLAC between 1974 and 1978.[14] This announced a third generation of leptons, breaking the new symmetry between leptons and quarks introduced by the GIM mechanism. Restoration of the symmetry implied the existence of a fifth and sixth quark.

It was in fact not long until a fifth quark, the bottom, was discovered by the E288 experiment team, led by Leon Lederman at Fermilab in 1977.[15][16][17] This strongly suggested that there must also be a sixth quark, the top, to complete the pair. It was known that this quark would be heavier than the bottom, requiring more energy to create in particle collisions, but the general expectation was that the sixth quark would soon be found. However, it took another 18 years before the existence of the top was confirmed.[18]

Early searches for the top quark at SLAC and DESY (in Hamburg) came up empty-handed. When in the early eighties the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at CERN discovered the W boson and the Z boson, it was again felt that the discovery of the top was imminent. As the SPS gained competition from the Tevatron at Fermilab there was still no sign of the missing particle, and it was announced by the group at CERN that the top mass must be at least Template:Val. After a race between CERN and Fermilab to discover the top, the accelerator at CERN reached its limits without creating a single top pushing the lower bound on its mass up to Template:Val.[18]

The Tevatron was (until the start of LHC operation at CERN in 2009) the only hadron collider powerful enough to produce top quarks. In order to be able to confirm a future discovery, a second detector, the DØ detector, was added to the complex (in addition to the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF) already present). In October 1992, the two groups found their first hint of the top, with a single creation event that appeared to contain the top. In the following years more evidence was collected and on April 22, 1994, the CDF group submitted their paper presenting tentative evidence for the existence of a top quark with a mass of about Template:Val. In the meantime DØ had found no more evidence than the suggestive event in 1992. A year later on March 2, 1995, after having gathered more evidence and a reanalysis of the DØ data (who had been searching for a much lighter top), the two groups jointly reported the discovery of the top with a certainty of 99.9998% at a mass of Template:Val.[5][6][18]

In the years leading up to the top quark discovery, it was realized that certain precision measurements of the electroweak vector boson masses and couplings are very sensitive to the value of the top quark mass. These effects become much larger for higher values of the top mass and therefore could indirectly see the top quark even if it could not be directly produced in any experiment at the time. The largest effect from the top quark mass was on the T parameter and by 1994 the precision of these indirect measurements had led to a prediction of the top quark mass to be between Template:Val and Template:Val.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |\$B= {{#invoke:Category handler|main}}{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}[citation needed] }} It is the development of techniques that ultimately allowed such precision calculations that led to Gerardus 't Hooft and Martinus Veltman winning the Nobel Prize in physics in 1999.[19][20]

## Properties

• At the final Tevatron energy of 1.96 TeV, top–antitop pairs were produced with a cross section of about 7 picobarns (pb).[21] The Standard Model prediction (at next-to-leading order with mt = Template:Val) is 6.7–7.5 pb.
• The W bosons from top quark decays carry polarization from the parent particle, hence pose themselves as a unique probe to top polarization.
• In the Standard Model, the top quark is predicted to have a spin quantum number of Template:Frac and electric charge +Template:Frac. A first measurement of the top quark charge has been published, resulting in approximately 90% confidence limit that the top quark charge is indeed +Template:Frac.[22]

## Production

Because top quarks are very massive, large amounts of energy are needed to create one. The only way to achieve such high energies is through high energy collisions. These occur naturally in the Earth's upper atmosphere as cosmic rays collide with particles in the air, or can be created in a particle accelerator. As of 2011, the only operational accelerator that generates a beam of sufficient energy to produce top quarks is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, with a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV.

There are multiple processes that can lead to the production of a top quark. The most common is production of a top–antitop pair via strong interactions. In a collision a highly energetic gluon is created which subsequently decays into a top and antitop. This process was responsible for the majority of the top events at Tevatron and was the process observed when the top was first discovered in 1995.[23] It is also possible to produce pairs of top–antitop through the decay of an intermediate photon or Z-boson. However, these processes are predicted to be much rarer and have a virtually identical experimental signature in a hadron collider like Tevatron.

A distinctly different process is the production of single tops via weak interaction. This can happen in two ways (called channels): either an intermediate W-boson decays into a top and antibottom quark ("s-channel") or a bottom quark (probably created in a pair through the decay of a gluon) transforms to top quark by exchanging a W-boson with an up or down quark ("t-channel"). The first evidence for these processes was published by the DØ collaboration in December 2006,[24] and in March 2009 the CDF[25] and DØ[23] collaborations released twin papers with the definitive observation of these processes. The main significance of measuring these production processes is that their frequency is directly proportional to the | Vtb |2 component of the CKM matrix.

## Decay

The only known way that a top quark can decay is through the weak interaction producing a W-boson and a down-type quark (down, strange, or bottom). Because of its enormous mass, the top quark is extremely short-lived with a predicted lifetime of only Template:Val.[3] As a result top quarks do not have time to form hadrons before they decay, as other quarks do. This provides physicists with the unique opportunity to study the behavior of a "bare" quark.

In particular, it is possible to directly determine the branching ratio Γ(W+b) / Γ(W+q (q = b,s,d)). The best current determination of this ratio is Template:Val.[26] Since this ratio is equal to | Vtb |2 according to the Standard Model, this gives another way of determining the CKM element | Vtb |, or in combination with the determination of | Vtb | from single top production provides tests for the assumption that the CKM matrix is unitary.[27]

The Standard Model also allows more exotic decays, but only at one loop level, meaning that they are extremely suppressed. In particular, it is possible for a top quark to decay into another up-type quark (an up or a charm) by emitting a photon or a Z-boson.[28] Searches for these exotic decay modes have provided no evidence for their existence in accordance with expectations from the Standard Model. The branching ratios for these decays have been determined to be less than 5.9 in 1,000 for photonic decay and less than 2.1 in 1,000 for Z-boson decay at 95% confidence.[26]

## Mass and coupling to the Higgs boson

Template:Refimprove section The Standard Model describes fermion masses through the Higgs mechanism. The Higgs boson has a Yukawa coupling to the left- and right-handed top quarks. After electroweak symmetry breaking (when the Higgs acquires a vacuum expectation value), the left- and right-handed components mix, becoming a mass term.

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}=y_{\text{t}}hqu^{c}\rightarrow {\frac {y_{\text{t}}v}{\sqrt {2}}}(1+h^{0}/v)uu^{c}}$

The top quark Yukawa coupling has a value of

${\displaystyle y_{\text{t}}={\sqrt {2}}m_{\text{t}}/v\simeq 1}$

where v = 246 GeV is the value of the Higgs vacuum expectation value.

### Yukawa couplings

{{#invoke:see also|seealso}} In the Standard Model, all of the quark and lepton Yukawa couplings are small compared to the top quark Yukawa coupling. Understanding this hierarchy in the fermion masses is an open problem in theoretical physics. Yukawa couplings are not constants and their values change depending on the energy scale (distance scale) at which they are measured. The dynamics of Yukawa couplings are determined by the renormalization group equation.

One of the prevailing views in particle physics is that the size of the top quark Yukawa coupling is determined by the renormalization group, leading to the "quasi-infrared fixed point."

The Yukawa couplings of the up, down, charm, strange and bottom quarks, are hypothesized to have small values at the extremely high energy scale of grand unification, 1015 GeV. They increase in value at lower energy scales, at which the quark masses are generated by the Higgs. The slight growth is due to corrections from the QCD coupling. The corrections from the Yukawa couplings are negligible for the lower mass quarks.

If, however, a quark Yukawa coupling has a large value at very high energies, its Yukawa corrections will evolve and cancel against the QCD corrections. This is known as a (quasi-) infrared fixed point. No matter what the initial starting value of the coupling is, if it is sufficiently large it will reach this fixed point value. The corresponding quark mass is then predicted.

The top quark Yukawa coupling lies very near the infrared fixed point of the Standard Model. The renormalization group equation is:

${\displaystyle \mu {\frac {\partial }{\partial \mu }}y_{\text{t}}\approx {\frac {y_{\text{t}}}{16\pi ^{2}}}\left({\frac {9}{2}}y_{\text{t}}^{2}-8g_{3}^{2}-{\frac {9}{4}}g_{2}^{2}-{\frac {17}{20}}g_{1}^{2}\right),}$

where g3 is the color gauge coupling, g2 is the weak isospin gauge coupling, and g1 is the weak hypercharge gauge coupling. This equation describes how the Yukawa coupling changes with energy scale Template:Mvar. Solutions to this equation for large initial values yt cause the right-hand side of the equation to quickly approach zero, locking yt to the QCD coupling g3. The value of the fixed point is fairly precisely determined in the Standard Model, leading to a top quark mass of 230 GeV. However, if there is more than one Higgs doublet, the mass value will be reduced by Higgs mixing angle effects in an unpredicted way.

In the minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), there are two Higgs doublets and the renormalization group equation for the top quark Yukawa coupling is slightly modified:

${\displaystyle \mu {\frac {\partial }{\partial \mu }}y_{\text{t}}\approx {\frac {y_{\text{t}}}{16\pi ^{2}}}\left(6y_{\text{t}}^{2}+y_{\text{b}}^{2}-{\frac {16}{3}}g_{3}^{2}-3g_{2}^{2}-{\frac {13}{15}}g_{1}^{2}\right),}$

where yb is the bottom quark Yukawa coupling. This leads to a fixed point where the top mass is smaller, 170–200 GeV. The uncertainty in this prediction arises because the bottom quark Yukawa coupling can be amplified in the MSSM. Some theorists believe this is supporting evidence for the MSSM.

The quasi-infrared fixed point has subsequently formed the basis of top quark condensation theories of electroweak symmetry breaking in which the Higgs boson is composite at extremely short distance scales, composed of a pair of top and antitop quarks.

## References

1. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named LHCTevatron2014
3. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
4. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
5. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
6. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
7. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
8. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
9. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
10. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
11. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
12. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=book }}
13. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
14. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
15. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
16. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
17. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=conference }}
18. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
19. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
20. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
21. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
22. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
23. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}