Brauer–Siegel theorem

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Regression bar In statistics, Bayesian multivariate linear regression is a Bayesian approach to multivariate linear regression, i.e. linear regression where the predicted outcome is a vector of correlated random variables rather than a single scalar random variable. A more general treatment of this approach can be found in the article MMSE estimator.

Details

Consider a regression problem where the dependent variable to be predicted is not a single real-valued scalar but an m-length vector of correlated real numbers. As in the standard regression setup, there are n observations, where each observation i consists of k-1 explanatory variables, grouped into a vector 𝐱i of length k (where a dummy variable with a value of 1 has been added to allow for an intercept coefficient). This can be viewed as a set of m related regression problems for each observation i:

yi,1=𝐱iT𝜷1+ϵi,1
yi,m=𝐱iT𝜷m+ϵi,m

where the set of errors {ϵi,1,,ϵi,m} are all correlated. Equivalently, it can be viewed as a single regression problem where the outcome is a row vector 𝐲iT and the regression coefficient vectors are stacked next to each other, as follows:

𝐲iT=𝐱iT𝐁+𝝐iT.

The coefficient matrix B is a k×m matrix where the coefficient vectors 𝜷1,,𝜷m for each regression problem are stacked horizontally:

𝐁=[(𝜷1)(𝜷m)]=[(β1,1β1,k)(βm,1βm,k)].

The noise vector 𝝐i for each observation i is jointly normal, so that the outcomes for a given observation are correlated:

𝝐iN(0,𝜮ϵ2).

We can write the entire regression problem in matrix form as:

𝐘=𝐗𝐁+𝐄,

where Y and E are n×m matrices. The design matrix X is an n×k matrix with the observations stacked vertically, as in the standard linear regression setup:

𝐗=[𝐱1T𝐱2T𝐱nT]=[x1,1x1,kx2,1x2,kxn,1xn,k].

The classical, frequentists linear least squares solution is to simply estimate the matrix of regression coefficients 𝐁̂ using the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse:

𝐁̂=(𝐗T𝐗)1𝐗T𝐘.

To obtain the Bayesian solution, we need to specify the conditional likelihood and then find the appropriate conjugate prior. As with the univariate case of linear Bayesian regression, we will find that we can specify a natural conditional conjugate prior (which is scale dependent).

Let us write our conditional likelihood as

ρ(𝐄|𝜮ϵ)(𝜮ϵ2)n/2exp(12tr(𝐄T𝜮ϵ1𝐄)),

writing the error 𝐄 in terms of 𝐘,𝐗, and 𝐁 yields

ρ(𝐘|𝐗,𝐁,𝜮ϵ)(𝜮ϵ2)n/2exp(12tr((𝐘𝐗𝐁)T𝜮ϵ1(𝐘𝐗𝐁))),

We seek a natural conjugate prior—a joint density ρ(𝐁,σϵ) which is of the same functional form as the likelihood. Since the likelihood is quadratic in 𝐁, we re-write the likelihood so it is normal in (𝐁𝐁̂) (the deviation from classical sample estimate)

Using the same technique as with Bayesian linear regression, we decompose the exponential term using a matrix-form of the sum-of-squares technique. Here, however, we will also need to use the Matrix Differential Calculus (Kronecker product and vectorization transformations).

First, let us apply sum-of-squares to obtain new expression for the likelihood:

ρ(𝐘|𝐗,𝐁,𝜮ϵ)𝜮ϵ(nk)/2exp(tr(12𝐒T𝜮ϵ1𝐒))(𝜮ϵ2)k/2exp(12tr((𝐁𝐁̂)T𝐗T𝜮ϵ1𝐗(𝐁𝐁̂))),
𝐒=𝐘𝐁̂𝐗

We would like to develop a conditional form for the priors:

ρ(𝐁,𝜮ϵ)=ρ(𝜮ϵ)ρ(𝐁|𝜮ϵ),

where ρ(𝜮ϵ) is an inverse-Wishart distribution and ρ(𝐁|𝜮ϵ) is some form of normal distribution in the matrix 𝐁. This is accomplished using the vectorization transformation, which converts the likelihood from a function of the matrices 𝐁,𝐁̂ to a function of the vectors 𝜷=vec(𝐁),𝜷̂=vec(𝐁̂).

Write

tr((𝐁𝐁̂)T𝐗T𝜮ϵ1𝐗(𝐁𝐁̂))=vec(𝐁𝐁̂)Tvec(𝐗T𝜮ϵ1𝐗(𝐁𝐁̂))

Let

vec(𝐗T𝜮ϵ1𝐗(𝐁𝐁̂))=(𝜮ϵ1𝐗T𝐗)vec(𝐁𝐁̂),

where 𝐀𝐁 denotes the Kronecker product of matrices A and B, a generalization of the outer product which multiplies an m×n matrix by a p×q matrix to generate an mp×nq matrix, consisting of every combination of products of elements from the two matrices.

Then

vec(𝐁𝐁̂)T(𝜮ϵ1𝐗T𝐗)vec(𝐁𝐁̂)
=(𝜷𝜷̂)(𝜮ϵ1𝐗T𝐗)(𝜷𝜷̂)

which will lead to a likelihood which is normal in (𝜷𝜷̂).

With the likelihood in a more tractable form, we can now find a natural (conditional) conjugate prior.

See also

References

Template:No footnotes

  • Bradley P. Carlin and Thomas A. Louis, Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Second edition 2000,
  • Peter E. Rossi, Greg M. Allenby, and Robert McCulloch, Bayesian Statistics and Marketing, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2006